Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
34,150
result(s) for
"Docking"
Sort by:
Linking the space shuttle and space stations : early docking technologies from concept to implementation
How could the newly authorized space shuttle help in the U.S. quest to build a large research station in Earth orbit? As a means of transporting goods, the shuttle could help supply the parts to the station. But how would the two entitles be physically linked? Docking technologies had to constantly evolve as the designs of the early space stations changed. It was hoped the shuttle would make missions to the Russian Salyut and American Skylab stations, but these were postponed until the Mir station became available, while plans for getting a new U.S. space station underway were stalled. In Linking the Space Shuttle and Space Stations, the author delves into the rich history of the Space Shuttle and its connection to these early space stations, culminating in the nine missions to dock the shuttle to Mir. By 1998, after nearly three decades of planning and operations, shuttle missions to Mir had resulted in: \" A proven system to link up the space shuttle to a space station \" Equipment and hands-on experience in handling tons of materials \" An infrastructure to support space station assembly and resupply Each of these played a pivotal role in developing the skills and procedures crucial to the creation of the later, much larger and far more complex International Space Station, as described in the companion volume Assembling and Supplying the ISS: The Space Shuttle Fulfills Its Mission.
Book
Cobdock: an accurate and practical machine learning-based consensus blind docking method
Probing the surface of proteins to predict the binding site and binding affinity for a given small molecule is a critical but challenging task in drug discovery. Blind docking addresses this issue by performing docking on binding regions randomly sampled from the entire protein surface. However, compared with local docking, blind docking is less accurate and reliable because the docking space is too largetly sampled. Cavity detection-guided blind docking methods improved the accuracy by using cavity detection (also known as binding site detection) tools to guide the docking procedure. However, it is worth noting that the performance of these methods heavily relies on the quality of the cavity detection tool. This constraint, namely the dependence on a single cavity detection tool, significantly impacts the overall performance of cavity detection-guided methods. To overcome this limitation, we proposed
Co
nsensus
B
lind
Dock
(CoBDock), a novel blind, parallel docking method that uses machine learning algorithms to integrate docking and cavity detection results to improve not only binding site identification but also pose prediction accuracy. Our experiments on several datasets, including PDBBind 2020, ADS, MTi, DUD-E, and CASF-2016, showed that CoBDock has better binding site and binding mode performance than other state-of-the-art cavity detector tools and blind docking methods.
Journal Article
Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
Molecular docking is a computational chemistry method which has become essential for the rational drug design process. In this context, it has had great impact as a successful tool for the study of ligand–receptor interaction modes, and for the exploration of large chemical datasets through virtual screening experiments. Despite their unquestionable merits, docking methods are not reliable for predicting binding energies due to the simple scoring functions they use. However, comparisons between two or three complexes using the predicted binding energies as a criterion are commonly found in the literature. In the present work we tested how wise is it to trust the docking energies when two complexes between a target protein and enantiomer pairs are compared. For this purpose, a ligand library composed by 141 enantiomeric pairs was used, including compounds with biological activities reported against seven protein targets. Docking results using the software Glide (considering extra precision (XP), standard precision (SP), and high-throughput virtual screening (HTVS) modes) and AutoDock Vina were compared with the reported biological activities using a classification scheme. Our test failed for all modes and targets, demonstrating that an accurate prediction when binding energies of enantiomers are compared using docking may be due to chance. We also compared pairs of compounds with different molecular weights and found the same results.
Journal Article
Comprehensive Survey of Consensus Docking for High-Throughput Virtual Screening
The rapid advances of 3D techniques for the structural determination of proteins and the development of numerous computational methods and strategies have led to identifying highly active compounds in computer drug design. Molecular docking is a method widely used in high-throughput virtual screening campaigns to filter potential ligands targeted to proteins. A great variety of docking programs are currently available, which differ in the algorithms and approaches used to predict the binding mode and the affinity of the ligand. All programs heavily rely on scoring functions to accurately predict ligand binding affinity, and despite differences in performance, none of these docking programs is preferable to the others. To overcome this problem, consensus scoring methods improve the outcome of virtual screening by averaging the rank or score of individual molecules obtained from different docking programs. The successful application of consensus docking in high-throughput virtual screening highlights the need to optimize the predictive power of molecular docking methods.
Journal Article
Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks
The Rosetta software for macromolecular modeling, docking and design is extensively used in laboratories worldwide. During two decades of development by a community of laboratories at more than 60 institutions, Rosetta has been continuously refactored and extended. Its advantages are its performance and interoperability between broad modeling capabilities. Here we review tools developed in the last 5 years, including over 80 methods. We discuss improvements to the score function, user interfaces and usability. Rosetta is available at
http://www.rosettacommons.org
.
This Perspective reviews tools developed over the past five years in the macromolecular modeling, docking and design software Rosetta.
Journal Article
Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data?
Molecular docking is the most frequently used computational method for studying the interactions between organic molecules and biological macromolecules. In this context, docking allows predicting the preferred pose of a ligand inside a receptor binding site. However, the selection of the “best” solution is not a trivial task, despite the widely accepted selection criterion that the best pose corresponds to the best energy score. Here, several rigid-target docking methods were evaluated on the same dataset with respect to their ability to reproduce crystallographic binding orientations, to test if the best energy score is a reliable criterion for selecting the best solution. For this, two experiments were performed: (A) to reconstruct the ligand-receptor complex by performing docking of the ligand in its own crystal structure receptor (defined as self-docking), and (B) to reconstruct the ligand-receptor complex by performing docking of the ligand in a crystal structure receptor that contains other ligand (defined as cross-docking). Root-mean square deviation (RMSD) was used to evaluate how different the obtained docking orientation is from the corresponding co-crystallized pose of the same ligand molecule. We found that docking score function is capable of predicting crystallographic binding orientations, but the best ranked solution according to the docking energy is not always the pose that reproduces the experimental binding orientation. This happened when self-docking was achieved, but it was critical in cross-docking. Taking into account that docking is typically used with predictive purposes, during cross-docking experiments, our results indicate that the best energy score is not a reliable criterion to select the best solution in common docking applications. It is strongly recommended to choose the best docking solution according to the scoring function along with additional structural criteria described for analogue ligands to assure the selection of a correct docking solution.
Journal Article
Docking in the Dark: Insights into Protein–Protein and Protein–Ligand Blind Docking
Blind docking predicts binding interactions between two molecular entities without prior knowledge of the binding site. This approach is essential because it explores the entire surface of the receptor to identify potential interaction sites. Blind docking widely works for both protein–protein and ligand–protein interaction studies. In protein–protein blind docking, the method aims to predict the correct orientation and interface of two proteins forming a complex. Protein blind docking is particularly valuable in studying transient interactions, protein–protein recognition, signaling pathways, tentative and significant biomolecular assemblies where structural data is limited. Ligand–protein blind docking discovers potential binding pockets across the entire protein surface. It is frequently applied in early-stage drug discovery, especially for novel or poorly characterized targets. The method helps identify allosteric sites or novel binding regions that are not evident from known structures. Overall, blind docking provides a versatile and powerful tool for studying molecular interactions, enabling discovery even in the absence of detailed structural information. In this scenario, we reported a timeline of attempts to improve this kind of computational approach with ML and hybrid approaches to obtain more reliable predictions. We dedicate two main sections to protein–protein and protein-ligand blind docking, presenting the reliability and caveats for each approach and outlining potential future directions.
Journal Article
HIPPO: HIstogram-based Pseudo-POtential for scoring protein-ssRNA fragment-based docking poses
Background
The RNA-Recognition motif (RRM) is a protein domain that binds single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) and is present in as much as 2% of the human genome. Despite this important role in biology, RRM-ssRNA interactions are very challenging to study on the structural level because of the remarkable flexibility of ssRNA. In the absence of atomic-level experimental data, the only method able to predict the 3D structure of protein-ssRNA complexes with any degree of accuracy is ssRNA’TTRACT, an ssRNA fragment-based docking approach using ATTRACT. However, since ATTRACT parameters are not ssRNA-specific and were determined in 2010, there is substantial opportunity for enhancement.
Results
Here we present HIPPO, a composite RRM-ssRNA scoring potential derived analytically from contact frequencies in near-native versus non-native docking models. HIPPO consists of a consensus of four distinct potentials, each extracted from a distinct reference pool of protein-trinucleotide docking decoys. To score a docking pose with one potential, for each pair of RNA–protein coarse-grained bead types, each contact is awarded or penalised according to the relative frequencies of this contact distance range among the correct and incorrect poses of the reference pool. Validated on a fragment-based docking benchmark of 57 experimentally solved RRM-ssRNA complexes, HIPPO achieved a threefold or higher enrichment for half of the fragments, versus only a quarter with the ATTRACT scoring function. In particular, HIPPO drastically improved the chance of very high enrichment (12-fold or higher), a scenario where the incremental modelling of entire ssRNA chains from fragments becomes viable. However, for the latter result, more research is needed to make it directly practically applicable. Regardless, our approach already improves upon the state of the art in RRM-ssRNA modelling and is in principle extendable to other types of protein-nucleic acid interactions.
Journal Article
Putative Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease from A Library of Marine Natural Products: A Virtual Screening and Molecular Modeling Study
The current emergency due to the worldwide spread of the COVID-19 caused by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a great concern for global public health. Already in the past, the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012 demonstrates the potential of coronaviruses to cross-species borders and further underlines the importance of identifying new-targeted drugs. An ideal antiviral agent should target essential proteins involved in the lifecycle of SARS-CoV. Currently, some HIV protease inhibitors (i.e., Lopinavir) are proposed for the treatment of COVID-19, although their effectiveness has not yet been assessed. The main protease (Mpro) provides a highly validated pharmacological target for the discovery and design of inhibitors. We identified potent Mpro inhibitors employing computational techniques that entail the screening of a Marine Natural Product (MNP) library. MNP library was screened by a hyphenated pharmacophore model, and molecular docking approaches. Molecular dynamics and re-docking further confirmed the results obtained by structure-based techniques and allowed this study to highlight some crucial aspects. Seventeen potential SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors have been identified among the natural substances of marine origin. As these compounds were extensively validated by a consensus approach and by molecular dynamics, the likelihood that at least one of these compounds could be bioactive is excellent.
Journal Article
Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery
Molecular docking is an established in silico structure-based method widely used in drug discovery. Docking enables the identification of novel compounds of therapeutic interest, predicting ligand-target interactions at a molecular level, or delineating structure-activity relationships (SAR), without knowing a priori the chemical structure of other target modulators. Although it was originally developed to help understanding the mechanisms of molecular recognition between small and large molecules, uses and applications of docking in drug discovery have heavily changed over the last years. In this review, we describe how molecular docking was firstly applied to assist in drug discovery tasks. Then, we illustrate newer and emergent uses and applications of docking, including prediction of adverse effects, polypharmacology, drug repurposing, and target fishing and profiling, discussing also future applications and further potential of this technique when combined with emergent techniques, such as artificial intelligence.
Journal Article