Explore the vast range of titles available.

One of the problems with new medications is their poor water solubility that is possible to be addressed by using supercritical method. This study aims to predict the solubility of raloxifene and the density of supercritical CO 2 using temperature and pressure as inputs to analyze the supercritical processing for production of drug nanoparticles. Three regression models, Extra Trees (ET), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting (GB) were proposed and optimized using Gradient-based optimization to predict density and solubility of drug. In predicting the density of supercritical CO₂, GB attained an R² value of 0.986, reflecting an excellent agreement between its estimates and the true measurements. The model exhibited an RMSE of 23.20, indicating high accuracy, with a maximum error of 33.06. Regarding the solubility of raloxifene, the ET model yielded the highest R-squared score of 0.949, indicating a good fit to the data. The model exhibited an RMSE of 0.41, with a maximum error of 0.90. Comparatively, the RF and GB models obtained slightly lower precision, for the solubility of raloxifene. The RF model exhibited an RMSE of 0.55, while the GB model had an RMSE of 0.72. The optimized models were found to be reliable in predicting solubility and density within the supercritical processing field.

Drug interactions, including drug–drug interactions (DDIs) and drug–food constituent interactions (DFIs), can trigger unexpected pharmacological effects, including adverse drug events (ADEs), with causal mechanisms often unknown. Several computational methods have been developed to better understand drug interactions, especially for DDIs. However, these methods do not provide sufficient details beyond the chance of DDI occurrence, or require detailed drug information often unavailable for DDI prediction. Here, we report development of a computational framework DeepDDI that uses names of drug–drug or drug–food constituent pairs and their structural information as inputs to accurately generate 86 important DDI types as outputs of human-readable sentences. DeepDDI uses deep neural network with its optimized prediction performance and predicts 86 DDI types with a mean accuracy of 92.4% using the DrugBank gold standard DDI dataset covering 192,284 DDIs contributed by 191,878 drug pairs. DeepDDI is used to suggest potential causal mechanisms for the reported ADEs of 9,284 drug pairs, and also predict alternative drug candidates for 62,707 drug pairs having negative health effects. Furthermore, DeepDDI is applied to 3,288,157 drug–food constituent pairs (2,159 approved drugs and 1,523 well-characterized food constituents) to predict DFIs. The effects of 256 food constituents on pharmacological effects of interacting drugs and bioactivities of 149 food constituents are predicted. These results suggest that DeepDDI can provide important information on drug prescription and even dietary suggestions while taking certain drugs and also guidelines during drug development.

The effectiveness of most cancer targeted therapies is short-lived. Tumors often develop resistance that might be overcome with drug combinations. However, the number of possible combinations is vast, necessitating data-driven approaches to find optimal patient-specific treatments. Here we report AstraZeneca’s large drug combination dataset, consisting of 11,576 experiments from 910 combinations across 85 molecularly characterized cancer cell lines, and results of a DREAM Challenge to evaluate computational strategies for predicting synergistic drug pairs and biomarkers. 160 teams participated to provide a comprehensive methodological development and benchmarking. Winning methods incorporate prior knowledge of drug-target interactions. Synergy is predicted with an accuracy matching biological replicates for >60% of combinations. However, 20% of drug combinations are poorly predicted by all methods. Genomic rationale for synergy predictions are identified, including ADAM17 inhibitor antagonism when combined with PIK3CB/D inhibition contrasting to synergy when combined with other PI3K-pathway inhibitors in PIK3CA mutant cells. Resistance to first line treatment is a major hurdle in cancer treatment, that can be overcome with drug combinations. Here, the authors provide a large drug combination screen across cancer cell lines to benchmark crowdsourced methods and to computationally predict drug synergies.

Thalidomide and its analogs improve the survival of patients with multiple myeloma and other blood cancers. Previous work showed that the drugs bind to the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cereblon, which then targets for degradation two specific zinc finger (ZF) transcription factors with a role in cancer development. Sievers et al. found that more ZF proteins than anticipated are destabilized by thalidomide analogs. A proof-of-concept experiment revealed that chemical modifications of thalidomide can lead to selective degradation of specific ZF proteins. The detailed information provided by structural, biochemical, and computational analyses could guide the development of drugs that target ZF transcription factors implicated in human disease. Science , this issue p. eaat0572 A detailed analysis of zinc finger protein degradation by thalidomide may help efforts to “drug” transcription factors. The small molecules thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide induce the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the transcription factors Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3) by recruiting a Cys 2 -His 2 (C2H2) zinc finger domain to Cereblon (CRBN), the substrate receptor of the CRL4 CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase. We screened the human C2H2 zinc finger proteome for degradation in the presence of thalidomide analogs, identifying 11 zinc finger degrons. Structural and functional characterization of the C2H2 zinc finger degrons demonstrates how diverse zinc finger domains bind the permissive drug-CRBN interface. Computational zinc finger docking and biochemical analysis predict that more than 150 zinc fingers bind the drug-CRBN complex in vitro, and we show that selective zinc finger degradation can be achieved through compound modifications. Our results provide a rationale for therapeutically targeting transcription factors that were previously considered undruggable.

High throughput screening (HTS) is routinely used to identify bioactive small molecules. This requires physical compounds, which limits coverage of accessible chemical space. Computational approaches combined with vast on-demand chemical libraries can access far greater chemical space, provided that the predictive accuracy is sufficient to identify useful molecules. Through the largest and most diverse virtual HTS campaign reported to date, comprising 318 individual projects, we demonstrate that our AtomNet® convolutional neural network successfully finds novel hits across every major therapeutic area and protein class. We address historical limitations of computational screening by demonstrating success for target proteins without known binders, high-quality X-ray crystal structures, or manual cherry-picking of compounds. We show that the molecules selected by the AtomNet® model are novel drug-like scaffolds rather than minor modifications to known bioactive compounds. Our empirical results suggest that computational methods can substantially replace HTS as the first step of small-molecule drug discovery.

Background Drug-disease associations provide important information for the drug discovery. Wet experiments that identify drug-disease associations are time-consuming and expensive. However, many drug-disease associations are still unobserved or unknown. The development of computational methods for predicting unobserved drug-disease associations is an important and urgent task. Results In this paper, we proposed a s imilarity c onstrained m atrix f actorization method for the d rug- d isease association prediction (SCMFDD), which makes use of known drug-disease associations, drug features and disease semantic information. SCMFDD projects the drug-disease association relationship into two low-rank spaces, which uncover latent features for drugs and diseases, and then introduces drug feature-based similarities and disease semantic similarity as constraints for drugs and diseases in low-rank spaces. Different from the classic matrix factorization technique, SCMFDD takes the biological context of the problem into account. In computational experiments, the proposed method can produce high-accuracy performances on benchmark datasets, and outperform existing state-of-the-art prediction methods when evaluated by five-fold cross validation and independent testing. Conclusion We developed a user-friendly web server by using known associations collected from the CTD database, available at http://www.bioinfotech.cn/SCMFDD/ . The case studies show that the server can find out novel associations, which are not included in the CTD database.

The emergence of large-scale genomic, chemical and pharmacological data provides new opportunities for drug discovery and repositioning. In this work, we develop a computational pipeline, called DTINet, to predict novel drug–target interactions from a constructed heterogeneous network, which integrates diverse drug-related information. DTINet focuses on learning a low-dimensional vector representation of features, which accurately explains the topological properties of individual nodes in the heterogeneous network, and then makes prediction based on these representations via a vector space projection scheme. DTINet achieves substantial performance improvement over other state-of-the-art methods for drug–target interaction prediction. Moreover, we experimentally validate the novel interactions between three drugs and the cyclooxygenase proteins predicted by DTINet, and demonstrate the new potential applications of these identified cyclooxygenase inhibitors in preventing inflammatory diseases. These results indicate that DTINet can provide a practically useful tool for integrating heterogeneous information to predict new drug–target interactions and repurpose existing drugs. Network-based data integration for drug–target prediction is a promising avenue for drug repositioning, but performance is wanting. Here, the authors introduce DTINet, whose performance is enhanced in the face of noisy, incomplete and high-dimensional biological data by learning low-dimensional vector representations.

Nowak-Sliwinska et al . describe a protocol for optimizing drug combinations using Feedback System Control (FSC). Drug combinations are tested in a cell-based assay in which results are entered into the FSC pipeline to predict new combinations to be tested in vitro . We describe a protocol for the discovery of synergistic drug combinations for the treatment of disease. Synergistic drug combinations lead to the use of drugs at lower doses, which reduces side effects and can potentially lead to reduced drug resistance, while being clinically more effective than the individual drugs. To cope with the extremely large search space for these combinations, we developed an efficient combinatorial drug screening method called the Feedback System Control (FSC) technique. Starting with a broad selection of drugs, the method follows an iterative approach of experimental testing in a relevant bioassay and analysis of the results by FSC. First, the protocol uses a cell viability assay to generate broad dose-response curves to assess the efficacy of individual compounds. These curves are then used to guide the dosage input of each drug to be tested in combination. Data from applied drug combinations are input into the differential evolution (DE) algorithm, which predicts new combinations to be tested in vitro . This process identifies optimal drug-dose combinations, while saving orders of magnitude in experimental effort. The complete optimization process is estimated to take ∼4 weeks. FSC does not require insight into the disease mechanism, and it has therefore been applied to find combination therapies for many different pathologies, including cancer and infectious diseases, and it has also been used in organ transplantation.

Predicting the response of a specific cancer to a therapy is a major goal in modern oncology that should ultimately lead to a personalised treatment. High-throughput screenings of potentially active compounds against a panel of genomically heterogeneous cancer cell lines have unveiled multiple relationships between genomic alterations and drug responses. Various computational approaches have been proposed to predict sensitivity based on genomic features, while others have used the chemical properties of the drugs to ascertain their effect. In an effort to integrate these complementary approaches, we developed machine learning models to predict the response of cancer cell lines to drug treatment, quantified through IC₅₀ values, based on both the genomic features of the cell lines and the chemical properties of the considered drugs. Models predicted IC₅₀ values in a 8-fold cross-validation and an independent blind test with coefficient of determination R² of 0.72 and 0.64 respectively. Furthermore, models were able to predict with comparable accuracy (R² of 0.61) IC50s of cell lines from a tissue not used in the training stage. Our in silico models can be used to optimise the experimental design of drug-cell screenings by estimating a large proportion of missing IC₅₀ values rather than experimentally measuring them. The implications of our results go beyond virtual drug screening design: potentially thousands of drugs could be probed in silico to systematically test their potential efficacy as anti-tumour agents based on their structure, thus providing a computational framework to identify new drug repositioning opportunities as well as ultimately be useful for personalized medicine by linking the genomic traits of patients to drug sensitivity.

Inferring potential drug indications, for either novel or approved drugs, is a key step in drug development. Previous computational methods in this domain have focused on either drug repositioning or matching drug and disease gene expression profiles. Here, we present a novel method for the large‐scale prediction of drug indications (PREDICT) that can handle both approved drugs and novel molecules. Our method is based on the observation that similar drugs are indicated for similar diseases, and utilizes multiple drug–drug and disease–disease similarity measures for the prediction task. On cross‐validation, it obtains high specificity and sensitivity (AUC=0.9) in predicting drug indications, surpassing existing methods. We validate our predictions by their overlap with drug indications that are currently under clinical trials, and by their agreement with tissue‐specific expression information on the drug targets. We further show that disease‐specific genetic signatures can be used to accurately predict drug indications for new diseases (AUC=0.92). This lays the computational foundation for future personalized drug treatments, where gene expression signatures from individual patients would replace the disease‐specific signatures. Synopsis Predicting indications for new molecules or finding alternative indications for approved drugs is a laborious and costly process (DiMasi et al , 2003 ), calling for computational solutions that would minimize production time and development costs (Terstappen and Reggiani, 2001 ). Here, we present a novel method for predicting drug indications, PREDICT, capable of handling both approved drugs and novel molecules. Our method is based on the assumption that similar drugs are indicated for similar diseases. To score a possible drug–disease association, we compute its similarity to known associations by combining drug–drug and disease–disease similarity computations. This strategy achieves high specificity and sensitivity rates in a cross‐validation setting, where part of the known associations are hidden and the method is assessed based on how well it can retrieve them based on the rest of the associations. Assessing its predictions of novel indications for existing drugs, we find that it covers a significant portion (27%, P <2 × 10 −220 ) of drug indications currently tested on clinical trials. Examples of such predictions include: (i) Cabergoline, indicated for Hyperprolactinemia, which is predicted to treat Migrane, a prediction supported by two separate studies (Verhelst et al , 1999 ; Cavestro et al , 2006 ) and (ii) Progesterone, which is predicted to treat renal cell cancer, non‐papillary (npRCC), supported by the study of Izumi et al (2007) . In addition, we provide indication predictions for novel molecules. For example, Cycloleucine is predicted for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD); indeed, Cycloleucine was found to be a potent and selective antagonist of NMDA receptor‐mediated responses (Hershkowitz and Rogawski, 1989 ), a new promising class of chemicals for the treatment of AD (Farlow, 2004 ). As another example, Hyperforin, St John's wort extract, is predicted to treat hyperthermia. Interestingly, St John's wort extract was found to have anxiolytic effects on stress‐induced hyperthermia in mice (Grundmann et al , 2006 ). We further introduce a disease–disease similarity measure based on disease‐specific gene signatures and show that such a measure can be used by our method to accurately predict drug indications. Importantly, this suggests the potential utility of our approach also in a personalized medicine setting, whereby future gene expression signatures from individual patients would replace these disease‐specific signatures. We present a novel method for the large‐scale prediction of drug indications that can handle both approved drugs and novel molecules. Our method utilizes multiple drug–drug and disease–disease similarity measures for the prediction task, obtaining high specificity and sensitivity rates (AUC=0.9). Our drug repositioning predictions cover 27% of the indications currently tested on clinical trials ( P <2 × 10 −220 ). We show comparable performance using a gene expression signature‐based disease–disease similarity, laying the computational foundation for predicting patient‐specific indications.