Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
153,511
result(s) for
"EXTRADITION"
Sort by:
Deport deprive extradite : 21st century state extremism
by
Kapoor, Nisha, 1980- author
in
Terrorists Legal status, laws, etc.
,
Extradition Cases
,
Detention of persons Cases
2018
\"The extradition of terror subjects reveals who is considered to be human--and who is not. When Minh Pham was extradited from Britain to the US to face terrorism related charges, his appeal against the deprivation of his British citizenship was still pending. Soon after he arrived, his appeal was lost and he was effectively made stateless. Pham's story is one of the many in Deport, Deprive, Extradite that illustrates the perpetual enhancement of state power and its capabilities to expel. In looking at these stories of Muslim men accused of terrorism-related offenses, Nisha Kapoor exposes how these racialised subjects are dehumanized, made non-human, both in terms of how they are represented and via the disciplinary techniques used to expel them. She explores how the establishment of these non-humans enables the expansion of inhumanity more broadly, targeting Muslims, people of colour, immigrants and refugees. In asking what such cases illuminate and legitimate about precariousness and dispossession, she offers a radical analysis of the contemporary security state\"-- Provided by publisher.
A Comparison of the Protest Waves of the Umbrella and Anti-Extradition Bill Movements in Hong Kong
by
Liang, J
in
Extradition
2022
This comparative case study aims to identify common factors that contribute to the differences in the protest waves of social movements in general by using a mechanistic approach to assess the political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes of the Umbrella Movement and the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement. These two protest waves are different in the emergences, longevities, and declines. An analytical framework is developed on the relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variables through mechanisms. The mechanisms are used as the intermediate variables between the IVs and the DVs, and the quantitative analysis on the IVs makes the mechanisms operational. This thesis adopts mixed methods. A quantitative approach of network analysis and protest event analysis fully examines the relationships between the IVs - actors (leaders, SMOs/groups, influential allies) & frames and DV - waves of protest which studied by protest event analysis. The qualitative approach of mechanisms is used to describe the impacts of the mechanisms - attribution of opportunity and threat, repression, radicalization, competition and diffusion. Specifically, the mechanistic approach is the overall methodological approach, and network analysis (social network analysis and discourse network analysis) and protest event analysis are specific methods. The original contribution to knowledge of this research was adopting a mechanistic approach based on a broader political process theory to the protest waves in hybrid regimes. Merely having the classic social movement theories - political opportunities, mobilizing structures and framing processes accessible is not enough for the explanation of the differences in protest waves. This thesis adds new knowledge to the theories field of Hong Kong's democratic movements. It also has policy implication for the future of Hong Kong and the relationship between China and Hong Kong.
Dissertation
European Arrest Warrant
by
Barbosa, Renata
,
Glerum, Vincent
,
Kijlstra, Hans
in
Extradition-European Union countries
,
Extradition-Greece
,
Extradition-Netherlands
2022
What practical problems are at stake in current EAW surrender proceedings?The research project Improving Mutual Recognition of European Arrest Warrants through Common Practical Guidelines of which the three country reports for Greece, the Netherlands and Poland are now published, is a follow-up of an earlier project that led to the publication of.
Breaking Boundaries
2023
This thought-provoking paper explores the intriguing issue of Indonesia’s limited geographical jurisdiction concerning extradition treaty implementation. Extradition, the process of returning fugitives to face justice, is frequently impeded by complex legal obstacles stemming from a country’s membership in the United Nations and commitment to human rights principles and values. Due to their legal jurisdiction or concerns regarding human rights violations, many nations are not obligated to deliver over suspects, posing a unique difficulty for Indonesia. Nevertheless, there is optimism. International cooperation and the development of extradition agreements can serve as a road map for nations seeking to enhance their extradition practices. Countries can negotiate multilateral or regional agreements that satisfy the concerns and interests of all parties by comprehending the complexities of the extradition process, such as the list of extraditable offences and customary international law. Our paper suggests that nations investigate legal models and extradition treaties that offer viable solutions for overcoming these obstacles. By collaborating and sharing information, we can surmount obstacles to justice and ensure that fugitives face the consequences of their actions, regardless of where they hide.
Journal Article
Breaking Boundaries
by
Joko Setiyono
,
Eddy Pratomo
in
extradition
,
extradition treaty
,
Indonesia’s limited territorial jurisdiction
2023
This thought-provoking paper explores the intriguing issue of Indonesia’s limited geographical jurisdiction concerning extradition treaty implementation. Extradition, the process of returning fugitives to face justice, is frequently impeded by complex legal obstacles stemming from a country’s membership in the United Nations and commitment to human rights principles and values. Due to their legal jurisdiction or concerns regarding human rights violations, many nations are not obligated to deliver over suspects, posing a unique difficulty for Indonesia. Nevertheless, there is optimism. International cooperation and the development of extradition agreements can serve as a road map for nations seeking to enhance their extradition practices. Countries can negotiate multilateral or regional agreements that satisfy the concerns and interests of all parties by comprehending the complexities of the extradition process, such as the list of extraditable offences and customary international law. Our paper suggests that nations investigate legal models and extradition treaties that offer viable solutions for overcoming these obstacles. By collaborating and sharing information, we can surmount obstacles to justice and ensure that fugitives face the consequences of their actions, regardless of where they hide.
Journal Article