Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
85,935 result(s) for "Ear"
Sort by:
How your ears work
Explains how the parts of the ear work to translate sound from the outside world into signals that the brain can understand.
Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma
External auditory canal carcinoma (EACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with substantial variability in prognosis depending on tumor stage and adjacent structure involvement. We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal treated at a tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2022. Clinical data including demographics, tumor stage, treatment modalities, surgical approach, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Of the 56 patients (mean age 61.6 years; 46.4% female), 30 had early-stage (T1–T2) and 26 had advanced-stage (T3–T4) tumors. The 5-year OS rates were 100.0% for early-stage, 60.0% for T3, and 42.0% for T4 disease. Advanced T-stage, nodal metastasis, and abutment to vascular structures such as the carotid artery or jugular bulb were significantly associated with worse outcomes. In multivariate analysis, younger age, vascular abutment, and nodal metastasis were independent negative prognostic factors. En bloc resection with clear margins was associated with improved survival. These findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and meticulous surgical planning to achieve complete resection and optimize outcomes in patients with EACC.
Whose ears?
\"Round ears, pointy ears, big ears, little ears, ears that hear well, and ears that don't! How many can you guess?\"--Book jacket.
Emerging Paradigms in Cholesteatoma: From a Traditional Approach to Personalized Therapy
Cholesteatoma is a prevalent disease affecting both children and adults. In this review, we present the recent findings related to the molecular mechanisms involved in cholesteatoma and discuss how researchers can target new molecules to treat this disease. These new approaches illustrate the paradigm shift from a primarily surgical solution to a biological “control and prevent” strategy.
Updates and Knowledge Gaps in Cholesteatoma Research
The existence of acquired cholesteatoma has been recognized for more than three centuries; however, the nature of the disorder has yet to be determined. Without timely detection and intervention, cholesteatomas can become dangerously large and invade intratemporal structures, resulting in numerous intra- and extracranial complications. Due to its aggressive growth, invasive nature, and the potentially fatal consequences of intracranial complications, acquired cholesteatoma remains a cause of morbidity and death for those who lack access to advanced medical care. Currently, no viable nonsurgical therapies are available. Developing an effective management strategy for this disorder will require a comprehensive understanding of past progress and recent advances. This paper presents a brief review of background issues related to acquired middle ear cholesteatoma and deals with practical considerations regarding the history and etymology of the disorder. We also consider issues related to the classification, epidemiology, histopathology, clinical presentation, and complications of acquired cholesteatoma and examine current diagnosis and management strategies in detail.
Open- and closed-type congenital cholesteatomas of the middle ear: computed tomography differentiation and correlation with surgical staging
PURPOSETo investigate the differences in computed tomography (CT) features between closed-type congenital cholesteatoma (CCC) and open-type congenital cholesteatoma (OCC) of the middle ear and to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative CT examination for staging workup of congenital cholesteatoma (CC) in correlation with the surgical findings.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the preoperative CT scans of the temporal bone obtained from 80 patients with surgically confirmed CC of the middle ear. All patients had a solitary lesion, except for one patient with two lesions, resulting in 81 CCs, which formed the basis of this study. We compared the CT features between CCCs and OCCs, focusing on their morphological characteristics, such as size, shape, location, and bone change. Based on the Potsic classification, the stage of CCs was determined at CT and surgery, and the results were compared between CCCs and OCCs.RESULTSOf the 81 CCs, surgery revealed 43 CCCs and 38 OCCs. On CT scans, CCC was frequently seen as a small (median: 3.15 mm), round to oval (65.1%) mass, most commonly located in the anterosuperior quadrant (74.4%) of the middle ear with less frequent ossicular erosion (14.0%). In contrast, OCC was frequently seen as a large (median: 6.70 mm), irregular (94.7%) mass, most commonly located in the posterosuperior quadrant (68.4%) of the middle ear with frequent ossicular erosion (55.3%). The size, shape, location, and presence of ossicular erosion were significantly different between the two types. Overall, the CT and surgical stages of CCs demonstrated good agreement (kappa value: 0.77) and the CT and surgical stages of OCCs were statistically significantly higher than those of CCCs (P < 0.001 in both).CONCLUSIONCT is useful for preoperative determination of the types and staging of CC of the middle ear.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEPreoperative differentiation between CCC and OCC is important to avoid reoperation and prevent an extensive surgery. By providing valuable information on the morphology and extent of the lesions, CT is useful for not only the accurate preoperative determination of the type of CCs but also the accurate prediction of staging of the lesion, which should be important to preparing optimal treatment plans.
New proposal to revise the classification for squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal and middle ear
The prognosis of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal and middle ear has been improved by advances in skull base surgery and multidrug chemoradiotherapy during the last two decades. Ninety-five patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal and middle ear who were treated between 1998 and 2017 were enrolled. The number of patients with tumour stages T1, T2, T3 and T4 was 15, 22, 24 and 34, respectively. Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors were retrospectively investigated. Among patients with T4 disease, invasion of the brain (p = 0.024), carotid artery (p = 0.049) and/or jugular vein (p = 0.040) were significant predictors of poor prognosis. The five-year overall survival rate of patients with at least one of these factors (T4b) was significantly lower than that of patients without these factors (T4a) (25.5 vs 65.5 per cent, p = 0.049). It is proposed that stage T4 be subclassified into T4a and T4b according to the prognostic factors.