Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Disclosure: A.H. Shoemaker: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. J.A. Yanovski: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. K.S. Obrynba: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. M. Lah: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. P. Salehi: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. S. Ballal: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. J. Perry: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. M. Huang: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. J.L. Miller: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.. Objectives: To characterize peripheral edema in clinical trial participants with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) during administration of diazoxide choline extended-release (DCCR) over 4.5 years. Methods: PWS is a rare genetic neurobehavioral metabolic disorder characterized by hyperphagia. DCCR is an oral, once-daily medication under development for the treatment of patients with PWS who have hyperphagia. We analyzed data for participants who received DCCR across 2 Phase 3 studies (C601 - a randomized placebo-controlled trial, and C602 OLE - an open label extension trial to C601). The analyses included 125 participants who received DCCR in either study. At each study visit, examination of the lower extremities was performed with digital pressure and edema was graded on a scale of 1+ to 4+ based on degree and duration of pitting. Time to first onset of peripheral edema adverse event (AE) was estimated from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method. Results: Mean duration of DCCR exposure was 131.5 weeks, and maximum duration was 237.3 weeks. 52% of participants exceeded 3 years of exposure. Before start of DCCR, 16.8% of participants had a medical history of (peripheral) edema. Peripheral edema occurred intermittently as assessed by both physical examination and AEs. With the exception of the Week 13 visit, when 2 participants (1.6%) exhibited grade 3+ pitting edema on physical examination, at all other visits through Week 156, severity of peripheral edema was mild (1+ to 2+ pitting edema) and >90% of participants at each visit did not have peripheral edema on physical examination. Forty-six participants (36.8%) reported AEs related to peripheral edema at any time during the study. Most participants (44 participants; 35.2%) reported mild (Grade 1 or 2) peripheral edema. Two participants (1.6%) reported Grade 3 peripheral edema and no participants reported any Grade 4 or 5 events. In response to AEs related to peripheral edema, Investigators implemented DCCR dose reductions in 8.7% (4/46), dose interruptions in 6.5% (3/46), and new diuretics in 2.2% (1/46). Treatment discontinuation for peripheral edema was infrequent and occurred in 6.5% (3/46) of affected participants. Time to event analysis showed most participants with an AE related to peripheral edema first experienced the event early in treatment (within the first 6 months), with fewer having new events later. Specifically, 68.0% of participants remained event free at 6 months based on a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusion: Administration of DCCR to patients with PWS was associated with peripheral edema in a minority of C601 + C602-OLE participants. When present, peripheral edema tended to occur early in treatment, was usually Grade 1 or 2, and infrequently resulted in study medication interruption or discontinuation. Overall, DCCR was well tolerated in the intended population. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Preclinical models of stroke have shown that intravenous glyburide reduces brain swelling and improves survival. We assessed whether intravenous glyburide (RP-1127; glibenclamide) would safely reduce brain swelling, decrease the need for decompressive craniectomy, and improve clinical outcomes in patients presenting with a large hemispheric infarction. For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients (aged 18–80 years) with a clinical diagnosis of large anterior circulation hemispheric infarction for less than 10 h and baseline diffusion-weighted MRI image lesion volume of 82–300 cm3 on MRI at 18 hospitals in the USA. We used web-based randomisation (1:1) to allocate patients to the placebo or intravenous glyburide group. Intravenous glyburide was given as a 0·13 mg bolus intravenous injection for the first 2 min, followed by an infusion of 0·16 mg/h for the first 6 h and then 0·11 mg/h for the remaining 66 h. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–4 at 90 days without undergoing decompressive craniectomy. Analysis was by per protocol. Safety analysis included all randomly assigned patients who received the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01794182. Between May 3, 2013, and April 30, 2015, 86 patients were randomly assigned but enrolment was stopped because of funding reasons. The funder, principal investigators, site investigators, patients, imaging core, and outcomes personnel were masked to treatment. The per-protocol study population was 41 participants who received intravenous glyburide and 36 participants who received placebo. 17 (41%) patients in the intravenous glyburide group and 14 (39%) in the placebo group had an mRS score of 0–4 at 90 days without decompressive craniectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·32–2·32; p=0·77). Ten (23%) of 44 participants in the intravenous glyburide group and ten (26%) of 39 participants in the placebo group had cardiac events (p=0·76), and four of 20 had serious adverse events (two in the intravenous glyburide group and two in the placebo group, p=1·00). One cardiac death occurred in each group (p=1·00). Intravenous glyburide was well tolerated in patients with large hemispheric stroke at risk for cerebral oedema. There was no difference in the composite primary outcome. Further study is warranted to assess the potential clinical benefit of a reduction in swelling by intravenous glyburide. Remedy Pharmaceuticals.

A 54 year old lady was referred with a eighteen month history of slowly progressive, asymmetric, periorbital and facial oedema. She was thought to have inflammatory orbital pseudotumour.During this time, she had also developed a dry mouth, joint pains and enlarged salivary glands. A salivary gland ultrasound scan was suggestive of Sjogren’s disease although antinuclear antibody and rheumatoid factor were negative. She had recently been prescribed omeprazole for mild dysphagia and hoarse voice from vocal cord oedema.Past medical history included Hashimoto thyroiditis for which she was taking levothyroxine.Clinical examination revealed peri-orbital and facial oedema causing proptosis of the right globe and complete lid closure. Visual acuity, eye movements and visual fields of the left eye were normal. Her voice was hoarse and she had mouth ulcers. She had a widespread erythematous rash that was thought to be a drug reaction to omeprazole.Apart from mild lymphopenia and mildly deranged liver function, blood tests, including inflammatory markers and thyroid function, were unremarkable.MRI of the brain and orbits revealed diffuse oedema of facial structures, including the orbital muscles. A CT body scan was unremarkable.A temporalis muscle biopsy confirmed a high grade NK/T cell lymphoma.

PurposeTo assess the extended efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension (CLS-TA) among patients with macular oedema (ME) secondary to non-infectious uveitis (NIU).MethodsPatients with uveitic ME were treated with suprachoroidal CLS-TA at baseline and week 12 of the Efficacy and Safety of Suprachoroidal CLS-TA for Macular Edema Secondary to Noninfectious Uveitis: Phase 3 Randomized Trial (PEACHTREE) study. Time to rescue was evaluated over 24 additional weeks for MAGNOLIA. Safety data, visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness (CST) reduction were also evaluated. Of the 53 eligible patients (46 CLS-TA and 7 control), 33 patients were enrolled (28 CLS-TA and 5 control).ResultsOver the entire 48-week period for PEACHTREE and MAGNOLIA, the median time to rescue therapy was 257 days versus 55.5 days for the CLS-TA and sham-control arms, respectively. Of 28 CLS-TA treated patients who participated in MAGNOLIA, 14 (50%) did not require rescue therapy through approximately 9 months after the second treatment. Among CLS-TA patients not requiring rescue, there was a mean gain of 12.1 letters and mean CST reduction of 174.5 µm at week 48. No serious adverse events related to study treatment were observed.ConclusionApproximately 50% of patients did not require additional treatment for up to 9 months following the last CLS-TA administration.

BackgroundGlibenclamide has garnered attention due to its multifaceted neuroprotective effects in cases of acute central nervous system injury. We initiated a trial to explore the effectiveness and safety of a high dose of glibenclamide in the management of cerebral oedema following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH).MethodsThis trial constituted a single-centre, randomised clinical study. Half of the 56 patients assigned to the glibenclamide group received 15 mg of glibenclamide tablets daily for 10 days (5 mg, three times/day). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving the subarachnoid haemorrhage early brain oedema score dichotomy (defined as Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Early Brain Oedema Score 0–2) at the 10-day postmedication. The secondary outcome of cerebral oedema was the concentration of sulfonylurea receptor 1-transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (SUR1-TRPM4) in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.ResultsWe enrolled 56 patients diagnosed with aSAH, who were admitted to the neurosurgery intensive care unit between 22 August 2021 and 25 April 2023. The primary outcome revealed that the glibenclamide group exhibited a notably higher proportion of mild cerebral oedema in comparison to the placebo group (60.7% vs 42.9%, adjusted OR: 4.66, 95% CI 1.14 to 19.10, p=0.032). Furthermore, the concentration of SUR1-TRPM4 in the cerebrospinal fluid of the glibenclamide group was significantly higher than the placebo group (p=0.0002; p=0.026), while the plasma TRPM4 concentration in the glibenclamide group was significantly lower than the placebo group (p=0.001).ConclusionOral administration of high-dose glibenclamide notably reduced radiological assessment of cerebral oedema after 10 days of medication. Significant alterations were also observed in the concentration of SUR1-TRPM4 in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. However, it is worth noting that glibenclamide was associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia. Larger trials are warranted to evaluate the potential benefits of glibenclamide in mitigating swelling and then improving neurological function.Trial registration numberChiCTR2100049908.

ObjectiveTo compare different doses and dosing regimens of RC28-E, a novel bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), with conbercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).DesignProspective, randomised, active comparator-controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 clinical trial.centeParticipantsThe trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with centre-involving DME, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 73 to 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, and central subfield thickness (CST) of 300 µm or more.MethodsPatients were assigned randomly to one of five treatment regimens: 1.0 mg RC28-E for three initial monthly doses and then every 8 weeks (1.0mgQ8); 1.0 mg RC28-E for five initial monthly doses and then on a pro re nata (PRN) basis (1.0mgPRN); 2.0 mg RC28-E for three initial monthly doses and then every 8 weeks (2.0mgQ8); 2.0 mg RC28-E for five initial monthly doses and then on a PRN basis (2.0mgPRN); or 0.5 mg conbercept for three initial monthly doses and then on a PRN basis. Assessments were made at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter.Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was the change in BCVA compared with baseline at 24 and 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the change in CST from baseline at 52 weeks; the proportion of patients who gained/lost ≥15 letters, ≥10 letters and >0 letter in BCVA; and the number of injections and safety outcomes.ResultsThe trial enrolled 156 patients. Mean improvements in BCVA in the RC28-E groups at week 24 were 7.1, 11.0, 7.4 and 10.5 letters for 1.0mgQ8, 1.0mgPRN, 2.0mgQ8 and 2.0mgPRN regimens, respectively, versus 9.7 letters for the conbercept group (p=0.146). By week 52, the RC28-E groups exhibited respective mean BCVA enhancements of 5.5, 9.5, 9.2 and 9.7 letters, compared with 8.4 letters of the conbercept group (p=0.469). Mean reductions in CST in the RC28-E groups at week 52 were −163.2 µm, −136.9 µm, −142.5 µm and −153.6 µm, versus −160.7 µm for the conbercept group (p=0.948). The Per Protocol Set analysis indicated that at 24 weeks, the BCVA improvement in the 2.0mgPRN group was significantly greater than that in the conbercept group (14.0 vs 9.8, p=0.019). In patients with poor baseline glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7.5%), the 2.0mgPRN group showed greater BCVA improvement than the conbercept group (14.4 vs 4.2, p=0.039) at week 52. During the maintenance phase, the 2.0mgPRN group had fewer injections (2.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.7) compared with the conbercept group (4.4, 95% CI 3.5 to 5.2). RC28-E was generally well tolerated. The incidence of ocular adverse events in study eyes was comparable between RC28-E groups (22.6% in 1.0mgQ8 group, 26.7% in 1.0mgPRN group, 34.4% in 2.0mgQ8 group, 25.0% in 2.0 mg PRN group) and conbercept group (32.3%). The number of ocular serious adverse events was 1 (1.0mgQ8), 0 (1.0mgPRN), 1 (2.0mgQ8), 2 (2.0mgPRN) and 0 (conbercept).ConclusionsIntravitreous RC28-E improved BCVA and CST in eyes with centre-involved DME. Compared with conbercept, the 2.0mgPRN regimen of RC28-E was recommended due to its superior efficacy in improving vision particularly for patients with poor glycaemic control, fewer treatment injections during the maintenance phase and comparable safety profile.Trial registration number NCT04782115.

No treatment is available to prevent brain oedema, which can occur after a large hemispheric infarction. Glibenclamide has previously been shown to improve functional outcome and reduce neurological or oedema-related death in patients younger than 70 years who were at risk of brain oedema after an acute ischaemic stroke. We aimed to assess whether intravenous glibenclamide could improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with large hemispheric infarction. CHARM was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial conducted across 143 acute stroke centres in 21 countries. We included patients aged 18–85 years with a large stroke, defined either by an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 1–5 or by an ischaemic core lesion volume of 80–300 mL on CT perfusion or MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either intravenous glibenclamide (8·6 mg over 72 h) or placebo. The study drug was started within 10 h of stroke onset. The primary efficacy outcome was the shift in the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale at day 90, as a measure of functional outcome. The primary efficacy outcome was analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients aged 18–70 years. The safety population comprised all randomly assigned patients who received a dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02864953). The trial was stopped early by the sponsor for strategic and operational reasons (slow enrolment because of COVID-19), before any unblinding or knowledge of the trial results. Between Aug 29, 2018, and May 23, 2023, 535 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 518 received a dose (safety population) and 431 were aged 18–70 years and comprised the modified intention-to-treat population (217 were assigned glibenclamide and 214 placebo). The mean age of patients was 58·7 (SD 9·0) years in the placebo group and 58·0 (9·5) years in the glibenclamide group; the median US National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 19 (IQR 16–23) in the placebo group and 19 (IQR 16–22) in the glibenclamide group; and the mean time from stroke onset to study drug start was 8·9 h (SD 2·1) in the placebo group and 9·2 h (2·1) in the glibenclamide group. Intravenous glibenclamide was not associated with a favourable shift in the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (common odds ratio [OR] 1·17 [95% CI 0·80–1·71], p=0·42). 90-day mortality was 29% (61 of 214) in the placebo group and 32% (70 of 217) in the glibenclamide group (hazard ratio 1·20 [0·85–1·70]; p=0·30). Serious adverse events in the prespecified safety population were consistent with the known safety profile of glibenclamide and included hypoglycaemia in 15 (6%) of 259 patients in the glibenclamide group and in four (2%) of 259 patients in the placebo group, leading to dose interruption or reduction in seven (3%) patients in the glibenclamide group and in one (<1%) in the placebo group. Intravenous glibenclamide did not improve functional outcome in patients aged 18–70 years after large hemispheric infarction, although the trial was underpowered to make definitive conclusions because it was stopped early. Future prospective evaluation could be warranted to identify a possible benefit of intravenous glibenclamide in specific subgroups. Biogen.

Background/aimsTo evaluate the long-term effects of treat-and-extend dosing of ranibizumab with and without navigated focal laser for diabetic macular oedema (DME).MethodsThis is a multicentre, randomised clinical trial where 150 eyes were randomised into three cohorts; Monthly (n=30), TReat and EXtend without macular laser photocoagulation (TREX; n=60), and treat and extend with angiography-GuIded macular LAser photocoagulation (GILA; n=60). During the first 2 years, eyes either received ranibizumab 0.3 mg every 4 weeks or underwent treat-and-extend ranibizumab with or without angiography-guided laser therapy. In the third year, all eyes were treated as needed with ranibizumab for >5 letters vision loss or if the central retinal thickness (CRT) was >325 µm, and all eyes were eligible to receive focal laser.Results109 eyes (73%) completed the 3-year end-point. At week 156, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT improved by 6.9, 9.7, 9.5 letters (p=0.60) and 129, 138, 165 µm (p=0.39), in the Monthly, TREX and GILA cohorts, respectively. These improvements were reached prior to week 104 and no significant changes occurred from week 104 to week 156 (BCVA: p=0.34; CRT: p=0.36). The mean number of injections in the third year was 3.0, 3.1, and 2.4 in the Monthly, TREX and GILA cohorts, respectively (p=0.56). 86 eyes (79%) required at least one ranibizumab injection in the third year.ConclusionThe improvements achieved after 2 years of treat-and-extend ranibizumab for DME were maintained in the third year with a mean of 3 intravitreal injections.Trial registration numberFDA IND 119146, NCT01934556.

Stroke is a leading global cause of mortality and long-term disability, with cerebral edema constituting a major contributor to early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Aquaporin-4 (AQP4), the predominant water channel in the central nervous system, plays a paradoxical role in stroke-related brain edema, facilitating both the formation and clearance of excess fluid depending on the pathological context. This review explores the biphasic function of AQP4 across cytotoxic and vasogenic edema, emphasizing its dynamic regulation, subcellular localization, and implications for therapeutic intervention. Evidence from rodent models shows that AQP4 exacerbates cytotoxic edema in acute ischemia by promoting intracellular water influx into astrocytes, whereas in vasogenic edema, it supports fluid reabsorption and glymphatic clearance, thereby alleviating brain swelling. Human studies corroborate AQP4 upregulation in infarcted regions and suggest a potential role for AQP4 polymorphisms and circulating levels as biomarkers of stroke severity and outcome, although larger cohorts and more robust methodological designs are needed. This review also discusses emerging pharmacological strategies to modulate AQP4 activity, including inhibitors, trafficking modulators, and gene-targeted delivery systems, while highlighting challenges in achieving phase-specific modulation. Given its central role in both injury and recovery, AQP4 emerges as a promising yet complex therapeutic target for personalized management of stroke-induced brain edema. Future directions include real-time imaging of AQP4 function, genotype-stratified clinical trials, and integration of AQP4 modulation with current stroke treatment protocols.

A high-dose formulation of intravitreal aflibercept (8 mg) could improve treatment outcomes in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) by requiring fewer injections than the standard comparator, aflibercept 2 mg. We report efficacy and safety results of aflibercept 8 mg versus 2 mg in patients with DMO. PHOTON was a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial performed at 138 hospitals and specialty retina clinics in seven countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with type 1 or 2 diabetes and centre-involved DMO. Patients were randomly assigned (1:2:1) to intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), or aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), following initial monthly dosing. From week 16, dosing intervals for the aflibercept 8 mg groups were shortened if patients met prespecified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48 (non-inferiority margin of 4 letters). Efficacy and safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429503). Between June 29, 2020, and June 28, 2021, 970 patients were screened for eligibility. After exclusions, 660 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive aflibercept 8q12 (n=329), 8q16 (n=164), or 2q8 (n=167); two patients were randomly assigned in error and did not receive treatment. 658 (99·7%) patients were treated and included in the full analysis set and safety analysis set (8q12 n=328, 8q16 n=163, and 2q8 n=167). Mean patient age was 62·3 years (SD 10·4). 401 (61%) patients were male. 471 (72%) patients were White. Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 demonstrated non-inferior BCVA gains to aflibercept 2q8 (BCVA mean change from baseline 8·8 letters [SD 9·0] in the 8q12 group, 7·9 letters [8·4] in the 8q16 group, and 9·2 letters [9·0] in the 2q8 group). The difference in least squares means was –0·57 letters (95% CI –2·26 to 1·13, p value for non-inferiority <0·0001) between 8q12 and 2q8 and –1·44 letters (–3·27 to 0·39, p value for non-inferiority 0·0031) between aflibercept 8q16 and 2q8. Proportions of patients with ocular adverse events in the study eye were similar across groups (8q12 n=104 [32%], 8q16 n=48 [29%], and 2q8 n=46 [28%]). Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrated efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals and could decrease treatment burden in patients with DMO. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Bayer.