Explore the vast range of titles available.

To investigate for the presence of central and peripheral physiological fatigue in electrical injury (EI) patients with experiential fatigue. Eight EI patients and eight age-matched healthy volunteers were recruited. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and M-waves from ulnar nerve stimulation at the wrist were measured from the right abductor digiti minimi. Fatigue was induced by 2 min of maximal voluntary contraction, and subjects were followed for 15 min of recovery. The experiment was performed twice for each subject. In one of the two sessions (randomly assigned), a blood pressure (BP) cuff was inflated during the first 75 s of recovery period to prolong muscle ischemia. Baseline measures showed no difference in central and peripheral conduction times. Cortical silent period was prolonged in patients compared to controls with no differences in abduction force. Decrement of MEP amplitude with consecutive TMS pulses was observed in the post-recovery period only with EI patients who had prolonged muscle ischemia induced by the BP cuff. The post-exercise M-wave area during contraction was significantly higher for patients. Prolonged cortical silent period in EI patients suggests that they had increased GABAB receptor-mediated cortical inhibition. The ischemia-induced decrement in consecutive MEP amplitudes post-exercise demonstrates greater physiological fatigue in EI patients after exercise. The greater increase in M-wave area of EI patients post-exercise suggests larger decrease in conduction velocity of muscle action potentials with exercise. These findings provide preliminary physiological correlates for increased central and peripheral fatigue in EI patients with experiential fatigue.

Electric shocks may have neurological consequences for the victims. Although the literature on the neurological consequences of electric shocks is limited by retrospective designs, case studies and studies of selected patient groups, previous research provides some evidence of a link between electric shocks, and diseases and symptoms of the central nervous system (CNS)(e.g. epilepsy, migraine and vertigo) and the peripheral nervous system (PNS)(e.g. loss of sensation, neuropathy and muscle weakness). This study aims to employ a register-based, matched cohort study, to investigate whether individuals demonstrate a greater risk of neurological diseases and symptoms of the CNS or PNS in the years following an electrical injury. We identified 14,112 electrical injuries over a period of 19 years in two Danish registries, and matched these with three different groups of persons in a prospective matched cohort study: (1) patients with dislocation/sprain injuries, (2) patients with eye injuries and (3) persons employed in the same occupation. Year of injury, sex and age were used as matching variables. The outcomes we identified comprised neurological disorders and central or peripheral nervous system symptoms that covered a range of diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Register. The associations were analysed using conditional logistic regression for a range of time periods (six months to five years) and conditional Cox regression for analyses of the complete follow-up period (up to 20 years). For victims of electric shock, the CNS sequelae we identified included an increased risk of epilepsy, convulsions, abnormal involuntary movements, headache, migraine and vertigo. We also identified an uncertain, increased risk of spinal muscular atrophy and dystonia, whereas we identified no increased risk of Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, multiple sclerosis or other degenerative diseases of the nervous system. For victims of electric shock, the PNS sequelae we identified included an increased risk of disturbances of skin sensation, mononeuropathy in the arm or leg and nerve root and plexus disorders. We also identified an uncertain, increased risk of facial nerve disorders, other mononeuropathy, and polyneuropathy. Our results confirm that electrical injuries increase the risk of several neurological diseases and symptoms of the CNS or PNS in the years following the injury. Most often the diseases and symptoms are diagnosed within the first six months of the injury, but delayed onset of up to 5 years cannot be ruled out for some symptoms and diagnoses. Some of the conditions were rare in our population, which limited our ability to identify associations, and this warrants cautious interpretation. Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm our findings, as are studies that examine the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Cardiac arrhythmias following electrical shocks are significant concerns in emergency medicine, yet predictive factors remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of cardiac arrhythmias in patients presenting with electrical injuries to the emergency department. In this retrospective study conducted between January 2019 and December 2023, we analysed 189 patients aged ≥18 years who presented with electrical injuries. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they developed an arrhythmia. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters were compared between groups. Cardiac arrhythmia developed in 21.2% (n = 40) of patients. The arrhythmia group showed significantly higher mean age (32.4 ± 16.7 vs 26.5 ± 14.8 years, p = 0.023) and high-voltage exposure rates (≥1000 V) (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis identified age (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), CK > 850 U/L (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.17-1.81), troponin >250 ng/mL (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.72), lactate >2.1 mmol/L (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.67-5.91), and high voltage (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.64-5.39) as independent risk factors. ROC analysis showed high voltage (AUC: 0.804) as the strongest predictor of developing arrhythmia. This study demonstrates that high voltage exposure, advanced age, and elevated biomarkers are significant predictors of developing arrhythmia in patients with electrical injuries. These findings may guide clinical decision-making regarding cardiac monitoring in the emergency department.

Electrical injury can affect any system and organ. Central nervous system (CNS) complications are especially well recognised, causing an increased risk of morbidity, while peripheral nervous system (PNS) complications, neurourological and cognitive and psychological abnormalities are less predictable after electrical injuries. PubMed was searched for English language clinical observational, retrospective, review and case studies published in the last 30 years using the key words: electrical injury, electrocution, complications, sequelae, neurological, cognitive, psychological, urological, neuropsychological, neurourological, neurogenic, and bladder. In this review, the broad spectrum of neurological, cognitive, psychological and neurourological consequences of electrical trauma are discussed, and clinical features characteristic of an underlying neurological, psychological or neurourological disorder are identified. The latest information about the most recently discovered forms of nervous system disorders secondary to electrical trauma, such as the presentation of neurological sequelae years after electrocution, in other words long-term sequelae, are presented. Unexpected central nervous system or muscular complications such as hydrocephalus, brain venous thrombosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are described. Common and uncommon neuropsychological syndromes after electrical trauma are defined. Neurourological sequelae secondary to spinal cord or brain trauma or as independent consequences of electrical shock are also highlighted.

BackgroundEven though electrical injuries are common in the emergency room, guidelines, consensus, and general recommendations for the management of these patients do not exist in Europe. Documented cases of delayed arrhythmias are rare and their connection with electrical injury has not been fully confirmed. We also use cardio-specific markers for the risk stratification of myocardial injury, but there is no significant study referring to their utility in this clinical situation. These reasons led us to retrospectively analyze all cases of electrical injuries over 23 years to determine the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias (mainly malignant arrhythmias and delayed arrhythmias).MethodsWe retrospectively searched all patients admitted to the University Hospital in Pilsen, CZ, with a diagnosis of electric injury (ICD diagnostic code T754) from 1997 to 2020. The hospital´s information system was used to research the injury; data were drawn from patient medical records.ResultsWe identified 333 cases of electrical injury in our hospital. Men accounted for about two-thirds, and women one-third. Children accounted for about one-third of cases. Most were low-voltage injuries (< 1000 V, 91.6%). All participants had an initial ECG, and 77.5% of patients had continuous ECG monitoring, usually lasting 24 h. Cardiac arrhythmias were noticed in 39 patients (11.7%). The most frequent arrhythmias were: ventricular fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, bradycardia and arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia. The ECG showed cardiac conduction abnormalities in 28 patients (8.1%), and ten patients (3%) had supraventricular or ventricular extrasystoles. In ten cases (3%), we found changes in ST segments and T waves on the initial ECG. Thirty-one patients (9.3%) suffered a loss of consciousness and 50 patients (15.02%) reported paresthesia. The most frequent ion disbalances were hypokalemia (18%) and hypocalcemia (3.3%). Patients with an ion disbalance had significantly more arrhythmias and newly diagnosed cardiac conduction abnormalities. Troponin levels (cTnI or hs-cTnT) were measured in 258 cases (77.48%) and found to be elevated above the 99th percentile in 19 cases (5.7%). Almost one-third of patients had burns of various degrees of seriousness, and 41 patients (12.3%) had concomitant traumatic injuries. Eleven patients underwent pre-hospital resuscitation, three died in the hospital, and another died as result of intracranial hemorrhage.ConclusionAll malignant arrhythmias occurred immediately after the electrical injury, delayed life-threatening arrhythmias were not observed, and no predictive factors of malignant arrhythmias were found. While elevations of cardiac troponins were observed sporadically, they did not appear helpful for risk stratification. In patients with arrhythmias, ion disbalance may be more critical. We concluded that asymptomatic, uninjured adult and pediatric patients with normal initial ECG findings do not need continuous ECG monitoring and may be discharged home. Recommendations for high-risk patients and patients with mild ECG abnormalities at admission are less obvious.

Rescue centres play an important role in the protection of raptors living in the wild by caring for injured or debilitated animals and abandoned young with the aim of returning them to the wild. A total of 22,538 raptors were admitted to 34 rescue centres in the Czech Republic in the years 2010–2019, with an increasing trend during the monitored period (rSp = 0.7333, p < 0.05). The most frequent reasons for their admission were other injuries and fractures (26.52%), the admission of young (22.98%), and the admission of raptors injured by electric shock injuries (20.51%). It proved possible to release 42.45% of admitted raptors back into the wild, the majority of which (91.05%) were released using the hard-release method. Foster parents were used in 1% of cases and a replacement nest in 0.2% of cases involving the rearing of young. In spite of all the care provided at rescue centres, a total of 39.97% of raptors admitted either died or had to be euthanized. Among them, most raptors were euthanized or died due to injuries caused by collision with a vehicle, electric shock injuries, and other injuries. This generally occurred shortly after admission (a median of two days). The importance of the work of rescue centres lies not merely in returning injured raptors back into the wild (which proves possible in around half of all cases), but also in obtaining information about the factors endangering raptors in the wild and contributing toward a decline in their populations. The findings provide information about human-wildlife interactions in the Czech Republic and their implications for conservation as well as on the effectiveness of rescue centres to successfully treat and subsequently release raptors back into the wild.

ObjectiveThis study investigates whether individuals who have sustained an electrical injury (EI) are diagnosed with unspecified pain or pain related to the musculoskeletal system in the years following the injury.MethodsIndividuals listed in Danish registers as having sustained EIs were matched for sex, age, and year of injury in a cohort study with individuals having experienced dislocations/sprains (match 1), eye injuries (match 2), and a sample of individuals with the same occupation without a history of electrical injuries (match 3). Outcomes were unspecified pain and unspecified soft tissue disorders. Conditional logistic regression and conditional Cox regression were applied.ResultsWe identified 14,112 individuals who sustained EIs. A higher risk of both outcomes was observed for all three matches, and was highest at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. The risk of both outcomes was considerably higher for match 3.ConclusionsThis study confirms that exposure to EIs increases the risk of being diagnosed with unspecified pain or unspecified soft tissue disorders both at short and long terms. Our results also showed that the risk of unspecified pain as sequelae is related to the severity of the injury.

Electrocution related death remains an ambiguous judgement and requires numerous valid evidence for proper medico-legal diagnosis. While the presence of electrical burn marks is a significant macroscopic indicator, it can be absent, especially on moist skin. The electrical mark still represents a fundamental indicator above all in the medico-legal field, but the identification of pathognomonic elements and signs not limited to the skin alone could be a valid help in the future, especially in unclear cases. The deceased was brought-in-dead to the hospital from their workplace, with no signs of fatal natural diseases. External examination revealed a Y-shaped burn mark on the right side of the neck and collapsed blisters with greying rings on both heels. Internal examination showed no alarming findings. Further, histopathological analysis of the foot blisters and neck burn revealed intraepidermal detachment, elongated nuclei, and coagulative necrosis. Notably, the presence of muscle fibre casts in kidney tubules and microthrombi in lung sections which indicate rhabdomyolysis and vascular thrombosis supported electrocution-related death. These positive findings of the electrical burn marks externally and significant histopathological changes, collectively support the death was due to electrocution, after excluding any major, fatal injuries. Albeit, a detailed inspection of the crime scene plays an important role, in order to classify the electrocution related death.

There is no specificity of emergency or long-term management of benign electrical injuries (EI). The main objective of our work was to describe the occurrence of long-term complications of EI considered as benign. Single-center retrospective study of a cohort of adult patients who consulted for EI without initials signs of severity in an emergency department between 2012 and 2019. All included patients were secondarily contacted by telephone at least one year after their EI to complete a questionnaire. 76 adult patients visited the emergency department and 48 of them could be contacted by phone. 82% of the recalled patients had at least one complication following their EI. The main long-term complications were neurological (65%), psychological (58%) and cardiological (31%). Patients recalled eight years after EI had higher rates of neuropsychological complications than those recalled one year after EI. Only the time spent in the emergency department was statistically longer in patients who developed long-term complications compared to those who did not. The occurrence of long-term neuropsychological complications predominates. The knowledge and management of these long-term consequences must be particularly well known by emergency physicians because they are often the first medical contact of the patient. Our results also seem to show a crescendo in time of the occurrence of long-term complications. all health professionals involved in the care of victims of a EI must be made widely aware of the occurrence of these long-term complications, particularly neuropsychological ones, in order to improve the long-term patient care. •Electrical injuries without initial signs of severity have long-term consequences in 82% of cases.•Main complications were neurological (65%), psychological (58%) and cardiological (31%).•Management of these sequelae must be known by emergency physician who is the first medical contact.

ObjectivePatients with electrical injury are considered to be at high risk of cardiac arrhythmias. Due to the small number of studies, there is no widely accepted guideline regarding the risk assessment and management of arrhythmic complications after electrical accident (EA). Our retrospective observational study was designed to determine the prevalence of ECG abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmias after EA, to evaluate the predictive value of cardiac biomarkers for this condition and to assess in-hospital and 30-day mortality.MethodsConsecutive patients presenting after EA at the emergency department of our institution between 2011 and 2016 were involved in the current analysis. ECG abnormalities and arrhythmias were analyzed at admission and during ECG monitoring. Levels of cardiac troponin I, CK and CK-MB were also collected. In-hospital and 30-day mortality data were obtained from hospital records and from the national insurance database.ResultsOf the 480 patients included, 184 (38.3%) had suffered a workplace accident. The majority of patients (96.2%) had incurred a low-voltage injury (< 1000 V). One hundred and four (21.7%) patients had a transthoracic electrical injury while 13 (2.7%) patients reported loss of consciousness. The most frequent ECG disorders at admission were sinus bradycardia (< 60 bpm, n = 50, 10.4%) and sinus tachycardia (> 100 bpm, n = 21, 4.4%). Other detected arrhythmias were as follows: newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (n = 1); frequent multifocal atrial premature complexes (n = 1); sinus arrest with atrial escape rhythm (n = 2); ventricular fibrillation terminated out of hospital (n = 1); ventricular bigeminy (n = 1); and repetitive nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 1). ECG monitoring was performed in 182 (37.9%) patients for 12.7 ± 7.1 h at the ED. Except for one case with regular supraventricular tachycardia terminated via vagal maneuver and one other case with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, no clinically relevant arrhythmias were detected during the ECG monitoring. Cardiac troponin I was measured in 354 (73.8%) cases at 4.6 ± 4.3 h after the EA and was significantly elevated only in one resuscitated patient. CK elevation was frequent, but CK-MB was under 5% in all patients. Both in-hospital and 30-day mortality were 0%.ConclusionsMost of cardiac arrhythmias in patients presenting after EA can be diagnosed by an ECG on admission, thus routine ECG monitoring appears to be unnecessary. In our patient cohort cardiac troponin I and CK-MB were not useful in risk assessment after EA. Late-onset malignant arrhythmias were not observed.