Explore the vast range of titles available.

Acute renal colic has been challenging and has brought many concerns for physicians and patients for centuries. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of a combination of papaverine and ketorolac against ketorolac and placebo in treating acute renal colic. This randomized clinical trial was performed in patients with renal colic from May 2018 to May 2020 in Ahvaz, Iran. Patients with colic pain due to sand or kidney stones underwent clinical examination. The pain intensified based on the visual analog scale (VAS) and the patients' need for rescue analgesia are considered as primary outcomes at various times after treatment. Patients were equally divided into two groups: A (ketorolac plus papaverine) and B (ketorolac plus placebo) by block balanced randomization method. Student test, the Chi square, and ANOVA tests were used for statistical analyses, which were performed by SPSS 19.0. P<0.05 was considered significant. A significant difference was observed in 280 patients (140 patients in each group) in pain intensity between both groups at 45 and 60 min. VAS scores in groups A and B were 5.08±1.23 and 5.56±1.11 in 45 min and 3.35±1.47 and 3.92±1.31 in 60 min (P=0.001, P=0.002), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the VAS score significantly decreased after taking the drug for middle and proximal ureteral stones at 45 and 60 min (P<0.001). Rescue analgesics were required in 7 (5%) and 21 (15%) patients in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.005). Side effects were similar in the two groups. In this study, ketorolac, along with papaverine, was effective in acute renal colic control, and combination therapy with ketorolac and papaverine was associated with reduced use of other rescue analgesics. IRCT20190217042738N1.

Emergency airway management in children is generally considered to be challenging, and endotracheal intubation requires a high level of personal skills and experience. Immobilization of the cervical spine is indicated in all patients with the risk of any cervical spine injury but significantly aggravates endotracheal intubation. The best airway device in this setting has not been established yet, although the use of videolaryngoscopes is generally promising. Seventy-five moderately experienced paramedics of the Emergency Medical Service of Poland performed endotracheal intubations in a pediatric manikin in three airway scenarios: (A) normal airway, (B) manual in-line cervical immobilization, and (C) cervical immobilization using a Patriot cervical extrication collar and using two airway techniques: (1) McGrath videolaryngoscope and (2) Macintosh blade in a randomized sequence. First-attempt intubation success rate, time to intubation, glottis visualization, and subjective ease of intubation were investigated in this study. Intubation of difficult airways, including manual in-line and cervical collar immobilization, using the McGrath was significantly faster, with a higher first-attempt intubation success rate, better glottic visualization, and ease of intubation, compared to Macintosh-guided intubation. In the normal airway, both airway techniques performed equal. Conclusion: Our manikin study indicates that the McGrath may be a reasonable first intubation technique option for endotracheal intubation in difficult pediatric emergencies. Further clinical studies are therefore indicated. What is known : • Airway management in pediatrics is challenging and requires a high level of skills and experience. Cervical immobilization is indicated in all patients with any risk of cervical spine injury, but it significantly aggravates endotracheal intubation in these patients. Videolaryngoscopes have been reported to ease intubation and provide better airway visualization in the regular clinical setting. What is new: • The McGrath is an easy-to-use and clinically often used videolaryngoscope, but it has never been investigated in pediatrics with an immobilized cervical spine. In the normal airway, the McGrath provided better airway visualization compared to Macintosh laryngoscopy. However, better visualization did not lead to decreased time to intubation and a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt. In difficult airways, the McGrath provided better airway visualization and this led to faster intubation, a higher first-attempt intubation success rate, and better ease of intubation compared to Macintosh-guided intubation.

With growing numbers of chronically ill patients surviving longer and receiving novel medical and surgical treatments, emergency departments are increasingly the venue for associated acute presentations. How can emergency physicians respond to these challenging and emerging conditions? This book focuses on the unusual and complex disease presentations not covered in detail in the standard textbooks, helping you manage patients with conditions such as congenital heart disease, cystic fibrosis, morbid obesity, intellectual disability and intestinal failure. Not only does this book provide guidance on evaluation and diagnosis, but it also addresses the practical issues of acute management and continuing referral. The individual chapters are written by high profile emergency physicians, in conjunction with appropriate specialists, and include authoritative evidence to back up the clinical information.

This study was designed to assess the possible superiority of intravenous lidocaine to morphine for pain management. This was a randomized double blind controlled superiority trial, carried on in the emergency department (ED). Traumatic patients older than 18-year-old with the complaint of acute pain greater than 4 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 on their extremities were eligible. One group received IV lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg), and the other received IV morphine (0.1mg/kg). Pain scores and adverse effects were assessed at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes and patients' satisfaction was evaluated two hours later. A minimum pain score reduction of 1.3 from baseline was considered clinically significant. Fifty patients with the mean age of 31.28±8.7 were enrolled (78% male). The demographic characteristics and pain scores of the two groups was similar. The on-arrival mean pain scores in two groups were, lidocaine: 7.9±1.4 and morphine: 8.0±1.4 (p=0.57) and after 1 hour were, lidocaine: 2.28±1.2 and morphine: 3.2±1.7. Although the pain score decreased significantly in both group (p=0.027), there were not any clinically and statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.77). Patients' satisfaction with pain management in both groups were almost similar (p=0.49). The reduction in pain score using IV lidocaine is not superior to IV morphine in adult ED patients with traumatic limb pain.

Procedural sedation for painful procedures in the emergency department (ED) can be accomplished with various pharmacological agents. The choice of the sedative used is highly dependent on procedure- and patient characteristics and on personal- or local preferences. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of procedural sedations performed in the EDs of 5 hospitals in the Netherlands over a 4year period to evaluate the efficacy- (success rate of the intended procedure) and safety (incidence of sedation (adverse) events) of propofol sedations compared to midazolam sedations. A total of 592 ED sedations were included in our study. Patients sedated with propofol (n=284, median dose 75mg) achieved a deeper level of sedation (45% vs. 25% deep sedation, p<0.001), had a higher procedure success rate (92% vs. 81%, p<0.001) and shorter median sedation duration (10 vs. 17min, p<0.001) compared to patients receiving midazolam (n=308, median dose 4mg). A total of 112 sedation events were registered for 99 patients. Transient apnea was the most prevalent event (n=73), followed by oxygen desaturation (n=18) airway obstruction responsive to simple maneuvers (n=13) and hypotension (n=6). Propofol sedations were more often associated with the occurrence of apnea's (20% vs. 10%, p=0.004), whereas clinically relevant oxygen desaturations (<90%) were found more often in patients sedated with midazolam (8% vs. 1%, p=0.001). No sedation adverse events were registered Propofol is more effective and at least as safe as midazolam for procedural sedation in the ED.

Surgical checklists are in use as means to reduce errors. Checklists are infrequently applied during emergency situations in surgery. We aimed to study the effect of a simple self-administered performance-based checklist on the laparoscopic task when applied during an emergency-simulated scenario. The aviation checklist for unexpected situations is commonly used for simulated training of pilots to handle emergency during flights. This checklist was adopted for use as a standardised-performance-based checklist during emergency surgical tasks. Thirty consented laparoscopic novices were exposed unexpectedly to a bleeding vessel in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator as an emergency scenario. The task consisted of using laparoscopic clips to achieve haemostasis. Subjects were randomly allocated into two equal groups; those using the checklist that was applied once every 20 s (checklist group) and those without (control group). The checklist group performed significantly better in 5 out of 7 technical factors when compared to the control group: right instrument path length (m), median (IQR) 1.44 [1.22] versus 2.06 [1.70] ( p  = 0.029), right instrument angular path (degree) 312.10 (269.44 versus 541.80 [455.16] ( p  = 0.014), left instrument path length (m) 1.20 [0.60] versus 2.08 [2.02] ( p  = 0.004), and left instrument angular path (degree) 277.62 [132.11] versus 385.88 [428.42] ( p  = 0.017). The checklist group committed significantly fewer number of errors in the application of haemostatic clips, 3 versus 28 ( p  = 0.006). Although statistically not significant, total blood loss (lit) decreased in the checklist group from 0.83 [1.23] to 0.78 [0.28] ( p  = 0.724) and total time (sec) from 186.51 [145.69] to 125.14 [101.46] ( p  = 0.165). The performance-based intra-procedural checklist significantly enhanced the surgical task performance of novices in an emergency-simulated scenario.

Haemodynamic goal-directed therapies (GDT) may improve outcome following elective major surgery. So far, few data exist regarding haemodynamic optimization during emergency surgery. In this randomized, controlled trial, 50 surgical patients with hypovolemic or septic conditions were enrolled and we compared two algorithms of GDTs based either on conventional parameters and pressure pulse variation (control group) or on cardiac index, global end-diastolic volume index and stroke volume variation as derived from the PiCCO monitoring system (optimized group). Postoperative outcome was estimated by a composite index including major complications and by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score within the first 3 days after surgery (POD1, POD2 and POD3). Data from 43 patients were analyzed (control group, N = 23; optimized group, N = 20). Similar amounts of fluid were given in the two groups. Intraoperatively, dobutamine was given in 45 % optimized patients but in no control patients. Major complications occurred more frequently in the optimized group [19 (95 %) versus 10 (40 %) in the control group, P  < 0.001]. Likewise, SOFA scores were higher in the optimized group on POD1 (10.2 ± 2.5 versus 6.6 ± 2.2 in the control group, P  = 0.001), POD2 (8.4 ± 2.6 vs 5.0 ± 2.4 in the control group, P  = 0.002) and POD 3 (5.2 ± 3.6 and 2.2 ± 1.3 in the control group, P  = 0.01). There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (13 % in the control group and 25 % in the optimized group). Haemodynamic optimization based on volumetric and flow PiCCO-derived parameters was associated with a less favorable postoperative outcome compared with a conventional GDT protocol during emergency surgery.