Explore the vast range of titles available.

The Eph receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family is the largest subfamily of RTKs playing critical roles in many developmental processes such as tissue patterning, neurogenesis and neuronal circuit formation, angiogenesis, etc. How the 14 Eph proteins, via their highly similar cytoplasmic domains, can transmit diverse and sometimes opposite cellular signals upon engaging ephrins is a major unresolved question. Here, we systematically investigated the bindings of each SAM domain of Eph receptors to the SAM domains from SHIP2 and Odin, and uncover a highly specific SAM–SAM interaction-mediated cytoplasmic Eph-effector binding pattern. Comparative X-ray crystallographic studies of several SAM–SAM heterodimer complexes, together with biochemical and cell biology experiments, not only revealed the exquisite specificity code governing Eph/effector interactions but also allowed us to identify SAMD5 as a new Eph binding partner. Finally, these Eph/effector SAM heterodimer structures can explain many Eph SAM mutations identified in patients suffering from cancers and other diseases. As an animal’s body develops, its cells need to find their way to the right place to form its tissues and organs. On top of this, nerve cells need to set up connections as they grow. A family of receptors called Eph receptors help to make this happen. They sit across cell membranes, waiting for signals from molecules called ephrins. Once activated, these receptors interact with other proteins inside the cell. There are 14 different Eph receptors, but the parts inside the cell are similar, with three domains arranged in a set order. Next to the membrane, there is a tyrosine kinase domain, an enzyme that can add a phosphate group to a protein. Then, there is a SAM domain, which interacts with other proteins. Finally, there is a PDZ domain binding motif, which anchors the receptor to the cell's internal skeleton. The similarity between the internal portions of the Eph receptors suggests that they should work in the same way. But, different receptors on the same cell, responding to the same external signal, can have opposite effects. Here, Wang et al. tested each of the 14 SAM domains to find out how this happens. SAM domains on Eph receptors interact with SAM domains on other proteins, including SHIP2 and Odin. Analysis of the interactions revealed specific patterns for each receptor. Even though SAM domains are similar in shape, their exact amino acids – the basic building blocks of proteins – differ at particular positions. This changes the way they interact, allowing them to bind to different partners. Wang et al. then used a technique called X-ray crystallography to reveal the three-dimensional structures of SHIP2 bound to EphA2 and Odin bound to EphA6, to see how the proteins interact in fine detail. It turns out that a piece of each Eph receptor called the “end helix” binds to a “mid-loop” structure in SHIP2 or Odin. Crucial amino acids in each ensure that these interactions are specific. Changing these critical positions prevented the proteins coming together or allowed them to bind to a completely different partner. The structures revealed the importance of negatively charged amino acids within the mid-loop of the Eph binding partners. Using this information, Wang et al. predicted and confirmed a brand-new interaction between EphA5 and one of the 127 SAM-containing proteins found in mice, a protein called SAMD5. Understanding the impact of protein structure on Eph receptors could aid research into human disease. Lastly, an analysis of a database containing genetic changes found in cancer patients revealed that many of the mutations occur inside SAM domains. Pinpointing the positions that affect Eph receptor binding could point the way to future treatments.

In the developing mouse anterior forebrain, the rostral migratory stream (RMS) supports continued proliferation and efficient transportation of large quantities of neuroblasts from the ventricular-subventricular (V-SVZ) stem cell niche to the olfactory bulb (OB). Astrocytes aid this migration by providing a glial network through which chains of fasciculated neuroblasts move. The largest receptor tyrosine kinase family, Eph receptors, and their ephrin ligands have been implicated in controlling neuroblast migration and astrocyte organization within this pathway. However, a clear understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying Eph/ephrin signaling remains elusive due, in part, to the complexity of heterogeneous expression patterns in both neuroblasts and astrocytes, as well as the cytoarchitectural changes that occur during postnatal development. To address this gap, we analyzed RMS cytoarchitecture together with transcriptomic and proteomic profiles at postnatal days P6, P12, and P60, and mapped Eph-ephrin interactions using predictive interaction models. Our data revealed temporally regulated, cell type-specific, receptor-ligand interactions, highlighting the prevalence and dynamic shifts of neuroblast-neuroblast, neuroblast-astrocyte, astrocyte-astrocyte interactions. Together, these findings established a framework that deconvoluted and characterized Eph and ephrin signaling as the RMS changed from a diffuse stream of migratory neuroblasts to a highly constricted pathway of neuroblast chains within astrocytic networks.

Eph receptors and their ligands, Ephrins, are involved in the thymocyte-thymic epithelial cell (TEC) interactions, key for the functional maturation of both thymocytes and thymic epithelium. Several years ago, we reported that the lack of EphA4, a Eph of the subfamily A, coursed with reduced proportions of double positive (DP) thymocytes apparently due to an altered thymic epithelial stroma [Munoz et al. in J Immunol 177:804–813, 2006]. In the present study, we reevaluate the lymphoid, epithelial, and extracellular matrix (ECM) phenotype of EphA4 −/− mice grouped into three categories with respect to their proportions of DP thymocytes. Our results demonstrate a profound hypocellularity, specific alterations of T cell differentiation that affected not only DP thymocytes, but also double negative and single positive T cell subsets, as well as the proportions of positively and negatively selected thymocytes. In correlation, thymic histological organization changed markedly, especially in the cortex, as well as the proportions of both Ly51 + UEA-1 − cortical TECs and Ly51 − UEA-1 + medullary TECs. The alterations observed in the expression of ECM components (Fibronectin, Laminin, Collagen IV), integrin receptors (VLA-4, VLA-6), chemokines (CXCL12, CCL25, CCL21) and their receptors (CXCR4, CCR7, CCR9) and in vitro transwell assays on the capacity of migration of WT and mutant thymocytes suggest that the lack of EphA4 alters T-cell differentiation by presumably affecting cell adhesion between TECs and T-TEC interactions rather than by thymocyte migration.

The Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands, known as ephrins, play a crucial role in vascular development during embryogenesis. The function of these molecules in adult angiogenesis has not been well characterized. Here, we report that blocking Eph A class receptor activation inhibits angiogenesis in two independent tumor types, the RIP-Tag transgenic model of angiogenesis-dependent pancreatic islet cell carcinoma and the 4T1 model of metastatic mammary adenocarcinoma. Ephrin-A1 ligand was expressed in both tumor and endothelial cells, and EphA2 receptor was localized primarily in tumor-associated vascular endothelial cells. Soluble EphA2-Fc or EphA3-Fc receptors inhibited tumor angiogenesis in cutaneous window assays, and tumor growth in vivo. EphA2-Fc or EphA3-Fc treatment resulted in decreased tumor vascular density, tumor volume, and cell proliferation, but increased cell apoptosis. However, EphA2-Fc had no direct effect on tumor cell growth or apoptosis in culture, yet inhibited migration of endothelial cells in response to tumor cells, suggesting that the soluble receptor inhibited blood vessel recruitment by the tumor. These data provide the first functional evidence for Eph A class receptor regulation of pathogenic angiogenesis induced by tumors and support the function of A class Eph receptors in tumor progression.

Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their ephrin ligands have been implicated in embryonic vascular development and in in vivo models of angiogenesis. Eph proteins may also regulate tumor neovascularization, but this role has not been previously investigated. To screen for Eph proteins expressed in tumor blood vessels, we used tumor xenografts grown in nude mice from MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cells or KS1767 human Kaposi's sarcoma cells. By immunohistochemistry, the ephrin-A1 ligand and one of its receptors, EphA2, were detected throughout tumor vasculature. Double-labeling with anti-CD34 antibodies demonstrated that both ephrin-A1 and EphA2 were expressed in xenograft endothelial cells and also tumor cells. Furthermore, EphA2 was tyrosine-phosphorylated in the xenograft tumors, indicating that it was activated, presumably by interacting with ephrin-A1. Ephrin-A1 and EphA2 were also detected in both the vasculature and tumor cells of surgically removed human cancers. In an in vitro angiogenesis model, a dominant negative form of EphA2 inhibited capillary tube-like formation by human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), demonstrating a requirement for EphA receptor signaling. These data suggest that ephrin-A1 and EphA2 play a role in human cancers, at least in part by influencing tumor neovascularization. Eph proteins may represent promising new targets for antiangiogenic cancer treatments.

Experimental evidence has associated receptor tyrosine kinase EphB4 with tumor angiogenesis also in malignant melanoma. Considering the limited in vivo data available, we have conducted a systematic multitracer and multimodal imaging investigation in EphB4-overexpressing and mock-transfected A375 melanoma xenografts. Tumor growth, perfusion, and hypoxia were investigated by positron emission tomography. Vascularization was investigated by fluorescence imaging in vivo and ex vivo. The approach was completed by magnetic resonance imaging, radioluminography ex vivo, and immunohistochemical staining for blood and lymph vessel markers. Results revealed EphB4 to be a positive regulator of A375 melanoma growth, but a negative regulator of tumor vascularization. Resulting in increased hypoxia, this physiological characteristic is considered as highly unfavorable for melanoma prognosis and therapy outcome. Lymphangiogenesis, by contrast, was not influenced by EphB4 overexpression. In order to distinguish between EphB4 forward and EphrinB2, the natural EphB4 ligand, reverse signaling a specific EphB4 kinase inhibitor was applied. Blocking experiments show EphrinB2 reverse signaling rather than EphB4 forward signaling to be responsible for the observed effects. In conclusion, functional expression of EphB4 is considered a promising differentiating characteristic, preferentially determined by non-invasive in vivo imaging, which may improve personalized theranostics of malignant melanoma.

Eph receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) mediate numerous developmental processes. Their activity is regulated by auto‐phosphorylation on two tyrosines within the juxtamembrane segment (JMS) immediately N‐terminal to the kinase domain (KD). Here, we probe the molecular details of Eph kinase activation through mutational analysis, X‐ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy on auto‐inhibited and active EphB2 and EphA4 fragments. We show that a Tyr750Ala gain‐of‐function mutation in the KD and JMS phosphorylation independently induce disorder of the JMS and its dissociation from the KD. Our X‐ray analyses demonstrate that this occurs without major conformational changes to the KD and with only partial ordering of the KD activation segment. However, conformational exchange for helix αC in the N‐terminal KD lobe and for the activation segment, coupled with increased inter‐lobe dynamics, is observed upon kinase activation in our NMR analyses. Overall, our results suggest that a change in inter‐lobe dynamics and the sampling of catalytically competent conformations for helix αC and the activation segment rather than a transition to a static active conformation underlies Eph RTK activation.

Eph receptors and ephrin ligands represent the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Beyond their well-defined meaning in developmental processes, these molecules also have important functions in adult human tissues and cancer. However, the Eph/ephrin expression profile in human skin is only marginally studied. We therefore investigated the mRNA expression of 21 Eph receptors and ephrin ligands in adult human skin in comparison to 13 other adult human tissues using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. In addition, immunohistochemistry was established for some members (EphA1, EphA2 and EphA7) to confirm the results of the RT-PCR and to identify the expressing cells in the skin. We found all investigated family members expressed in human skin, but at highly varying levels. EphA1, EphB3 and ephrin-A3 turned out to be most prominently expressed in skin compared to other adult human tissues. EphA1 was exclusively expressed in the epidermis. We therefore investigated the expression of EphA1 in nonmelanoma skin cancers derived from the epidermis (56 basal cell carcinomas and 32 squamous cell carcinomas). As demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, both skin cancers displayed a significant downregulation of EphA1 compared to the normal epidermis. In squamous cell carcinoma, the EphA1 downregulation was associated with increased tumor thickness, although this was not significant. Our results indicate that Eph receptors and ephrin ligands are widely expressed in the adult human skin, particularly in the epidermis, and may play an important role in skin homeostasis. EphA1 seems to be a marker of the differentiated normal epidermis and its downregulation in nonmelanoma skin cancer may contribute to carcinogenesis of these very frequent human tumors. EphA1 represents a new potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Eph (erythropoietin-producing hepatoma) receptors and Ephrin ligands constitute the largest subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), which were first discovered in tumors. Heretofore, Eph protein has been shown to be involved in various tumor biological behaviors including proliferation and progression. The occurrence of specific types of tumor is closely related to the virus infection. Virus entry is a complex process characterized by a series of events. The entry into target cells is an essential step for virus to cause diseases, which requires the fusion of the viral envelope and host cellular membrane mediated by viral glycoproteins and cellular receptors. Integrin molecules are well known as entry receptors for most herpes viruses. However, in recent years, Eph receptors and their Ephrin ligands have been reported to be involved in virus infections. The main mechanism may be the interaction between Eph receptors and conserved viral surface glycoprotein, such as the gH/gL or gB protein of the herpesviridae. This review focuses on the relationship between Eph receptor family and virus infection that summarize the processes of viruses such as EBV, KSHV, HCV, RRV, etc., infecting target cells through Eph receptors and activating its downstream signaling pathways resulting in malignancies. Finally, we discussed the perspectives to block virus infection, prevention, and treatment of viral-related tumors via Eph receptor family.

Eph receptors, the largest subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases, are linked with proliferative disease, such as cancer, as a result of their deregulated expression or mutation. Unlike other tyrosine kinases that have been clinically targeted, the development of therapeutics against Eph receptors remains at a relatively early stage. The major reason is the limited understanding on the Eph receptor regulatory mechanisms at a molecular level. The complexity in understanding Eph signalling in cells arises due to following reasons: (1) Eph receptors comprise 14 members, two of which are pseudokinases, EphA10 and EphB6, with relatively uncharacterised function; (2) activation of Eph receptors results in dimerisation, oligomerisation and formation of clustered signalling centres at the plasma membrane, which can comprise different combinations of Eph receptors, leading to diverse downstream signalling outputs; (3) the non-catalytic functions of Eph receptors have been overlooked. This review provides a structural perspective of the intricate molecular mechanisms that drive Eph receptor signalling, and investigates the contribution of intra- and inter-molecular interactions between Eph receptors intracellular domains and their major binding partners. We focus on the non-catalytic functions of Eph receptors with relevance to cancer, which are further substantiated by exploring the role of the two pseudokinase Eph receptors, EphA10 and EphB6. Throughout this review, we carefully analyse and reconcile the existing/conflicting data in the field, to allow researchers to further the current understanding of Eph receptor signalling.