Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
15,104
result(s) for
"Epilepsy -- therapy"
Sort by:
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
by
Shi, Weixiong
,
Wang, Xiaoshan
,
Shan, Wei
in
Adverse events
,
Antiepileptic agents
,
Biomedical and Life Sciences
2023
This study explored the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with epilepsy. A total of 150 patients were randomly divided into active stimulation group and control group. At baseline and 4, 12, and 20 weeks of stimulation, demographic information, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded; at 20 weeks, the patients underwent assessment of quality of life, Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scale, MINI suicide scale, and MoCA scale. Seizure frequency was determined according to the patient's seizure diary. Seizure frequency reduction > 50% was considered effective. During our study, the antiepileptic drugs were maintained at a constant level in all subjects. At 20 weeks, the responder rate was significantly higher in active group than in control group. The relative reduction of seizure frequency in the active group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 20 weeks. Additionally, no significant differences were shown in QOL, HAMA, HAMD, MINI, and MoCA score at 20 weeks. The main adverse events were pain, sleep disturbance, flu-like symptoms, and local skin discomfort. No severe adverse events were reported in active and control group. There were no significant differences in adverse events and severe adverse events between the two groups. The present study showed that ta-VNS is an effective and safe therapy for epilepsy. Furthermore, the benefit in QOL, mood, and cognitive state of ta-VNS needs further validation in the future study although no significant improvement was shown in this study.
Journal Article
The therapeutic effects of ketogenic diet, lacosamide, and combination therapy in children with refractory epilepsy
by
Li, Jiaoyang
,
Zhang, Suli
,
Pang, Qiming
in
Adolescent
,
Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
,
Care and treatment
2025
Background
Intractable epilepsy in children poses significant clinical challenges due to limited efficacy of conventional anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), leading to persistent neurodevelopmental impairments. This study investigated the therapeutic effects of ketogenic diet (KD), lacosamide (LCM), and their combination on refractory epilepsy, with comprehensive assessment of seizure control, EEG dynamics (including epileptiform patterns and spectral characteristics), cognitive function, lipid metabolism, and endothelial health.
Methods
Ninety children with refractory epilepsy were divided into three treatment groups: KD (
n
= 30), LCM (
n
= 30), and KD + LCM (
n
= 30). Assessments included detailed EEG characterization (seizure types, interictal discharges, spectral bands), cognitive testing (attention/memory), lipid profiles, and endothelial markers at baseline, 3-, and 6-months post-treatment.
Results
The KD + LCM group showed superior seizure reduction at 3/6 months (t = 2.171,
P
= 0.035; t = 3.177,
P
= 0.003), with 76.7% achieving ≥ 50% interictal discharge reduction (
P
= 0.008) and 63.3% seizure type simplification (
P
= 0.003) at 6 months. Cognitive performance significantly improved (attention: Δ=-10.8 ± 2.0; memory: Δ=-9.4 ± 1.8; both
P
< 0.001), strongly correlating with frontal θ-band modulation (|r|>0.68). Combination therapy also enhanced α/β/δ/θ spectral power (
P
≤ 0.019), improved lipid profiles, and restored endothelial function versus monotherapies (all
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions
KD and LCM combination therapy provides comprehensive benefits—superior seizure control, EEG normalization, cognitive enhancement, metabolic optimization, and vascular protection—making it a promising multimodal approach for refractory epilepsy management.
Journal Article
Cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: an open-label interventional trial
2016
Almost a third of patients with epilepsy have a treatment-resistant form, which is associated with severe morbidity and increased mortality. Cannabis-based treatments for epilepsy have generated much interest, but scientific data are scarce. We aimed to establish whether addition of cannabidiol to existing anti-epileptic regimens would be safe, tolerated, and efficacious in children and young adults with treatment-resistant epilepsy.
In this open-label trial, patients (aged 1–30 years) with severe, intractable, childhood-onset, treatment-resistant epilepsy, who were receiving stable doses of antiepileptic drugs before study entry, were enrolled in an expanded-access programme at 11 epilepsy centres across the USA. Patients were given oral cannabidiol at 2–5 mg/kg per day, up-titrated until intolerance or to a maximum dose of 25 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg per day (dependent on study site). The primary objective was to establish the safety and tolerability of cannabidiol and the primary efficacy endpoint was median percentage change in the mean monthly frequency of motor seizures at 12 weeks. The efficacy analysis was by modified intention to treat. Comparisons of the percentage change in frequency of motor seizures were done with a Mann-Whitney U test.
Between Jan 15, 2014, and Jan 15, 2015, 214 patients were enrolled; 162 (76%) patients who had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after the first dose of cannabidiol were included in the safety and tolerability analysis, and 137 (64%) patients were included in the efficacy analysis. In the safety group, 33 (20%) patients had Dravet syndrome and 31 (19%) patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The remaining patients had intractable epilepsies of different causes and type. Adverse events were reported in 128 (79%) of the 162 patients within the safety group. Adverse events reported in more than 10% of patients were somnolence (n=41 [25%]), decreased appetite (n=31 [19%]), diarrhoea (n=31 [19%]), fatigue (n=21 [13%]), and convulsion (n=18 [11%]). Five (3%) patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Serious adverse events were reported in 48 (30%) patients, including one death—a sudden unexpected death in epilepsy regarded as unrelated to study drug. 20 (12%) patients had severe adverse events possibly related to cannabidiol use, the most common of which was status epilepticus (n=9 [6%]). The median monthly frequency of motor seizures was 30·0 (IQR 11·0–96·0) at baseline and 15·8 (5·6–57·6) over the 12 week treatment period. The median reduction in monthly motor seizures was 36·5% (IQR 0–64·7).
Our findings suggest that cannabidiol might reduce seizure frequency and might have an adequate safety profile in children and young adults with highly treatment-resistant epilepsy. Randomised controlled trials are warranted to characterise the safety profile and true efficacy of this compound.
GW Pharmaceuticals, Epilepsy Therapy Project of the Epilepsy Foundation, Finding A Cure for Epilepsy and Seizures.
Journal Article
Neuromodulation in epilepsy: state-of-the-art approved therapies
by
Ryvlin, Philippe
,
Hirsch, Lawrence J
,
Jehi, Lara
in
Cardiac arrhythmia
,
Convulsions & seizures
,
Decision making
2021
Three neuromodulation therapies have been appropriately tested and approved in refractory focal epilepsies: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS), and closed-loop responsive neurostimulation of the epileptogenic zone or zones. These therapies are primarily palliative. Only a few individuals have achieved complete freedom from seizures for more than 12 months with these therapies, whereas more than half have benefited from long-term reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%. Implantation-related adverse events primarily include infection and pain at the implant site. Intracranial haemorrhage is a frequent adverse event for ANT-DBS and responsive neurostimulation. Other stimulation-specific side-effects are observed with VNS and ANT-DBS. Biomarkers to predict response to neuromodulation therapies are not available, and high-level evidence to aid decision making about when and for whom these therapies should be preferred over other antiepileptic treatments is scant. Future studies are thus needed to address these shortfalls in knowledge, approve other forms of neuromodulation, and develop personalised closed-loop therapies with embedded machine learning. Until then, neuromodulation could be considered for individuals with intractable seizures, ideally after the possibility of curative surgical treatment has been carefully assessed and ruled out or judged less appropriate.
Journal Article
Acute Brain Activation Patterns of High- Versus Low-Frequency Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus During Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy
by
Lin, Chen
,
Ritaccio, Anthony L
,
Quiñones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
in
Anterior Thalamic Nuclei
,
Brain surgery
,
Convulsions & seizures
2021
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is an increasingly utilized treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. To date, the effect of high-frequency stimulation (HFS) vs low-frequency stimulation (LFS) in ANT DBS is poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE
To assess differences in the acute effect of LFS vs HFS in ANT DBS utilizing blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
METHODS
In this prospective study of 5 patients with ANT DBS for epilepsy, BOLD activation and deactivation were modeled for 145-Hz and 30-Hz ANT stimulation using an fMRI block design. Data were analyzed with a general linear model and combined via 2-stage mixed-effects analysis. Z-score difference maps were nonparametrically thresholded using cluster threshold of z > 3.1 and a (corrected) cluster significance threshold of P = .05.
RESULTS
HFS produced significantly greater activation within multiple regions, in particular the limbic and default mode network (DMN). LFS produced minimal activation and failed to produce significant activation within these same networks. HFS produced widespread cortical and subcortical deactivation sparing most of the limbic and DMN regions. Meanwhile, LFS produced deactivation in most DMN and limbic structures.
CONCLUSION
Our results show that HFS and LFS produce substantial variability in both local and downstream network effects. In particular, largely opposing effects were identified within the limbic network and DMN. These findings may serve as a mechanistic basis for understanding the potential of HFS vs LFS in various epilepsy syndromes.
Journal Article
Cannabis for the Treatment of Epilepsy: an Update
2018
Purpose of ReviewFor millennia, there has been interest in the use of cannabis for the treatment of epilepsy. However, it is only recently that appropriately powered controlled studies have been completed. In this review, we present an update on the research investigating the use of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive component of cannabis, in the treatment of epilepsy.Recent FindingsWhile the anticonvulsant mechanism of action of CBD has not been entirely elucidated, we discuss the most recent data available including its low affinity for the endocannabinoid receptors and possible indirect modulation of these receptors via blocking the breakdown of anandamide. Additional targets include activation of the transient receptor potential of vanilloid type-1 (TRPV1), antagonist action at GPR55, targeting of abnormal sodium channels, blocking of T-type calcium channels, modulation of adenosine receptors, modulation of voltage-dependent anion selective channel protein (VDAC1), and modulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha release. We also discuss the most recent studies on various artisanal CBD products conducted in patients with epilepsy in the USA and internationally. While a high percentage of patients in these studies reported improvement in seizures, these studies were either retrospective or conducted via survey. Dosage/preparation of CBD was either unknown or not controlled in the majority of these studies. Finally, we present data from both open-label expanded access programs (EAPs) and randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of a highly purified oral preparation of CBD, which was recently approved by the FDA in the treatment of epilepsy. In the EAPs, there was a significant improvement in seizure frequency seen in a large number of patients with various types of treatment-refractory epilepsy. The RCTs have shown significant seizure reduction compared to placebo in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Finally, we describe the available data on adverse effects and drug-drug interactions with highly purified CBD. While this product is overall well tolerated, the most common side effects are diarrhea and sedation, with sedation being much more common in patients taking concomitant clobazam. There was also an increased incidence of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase elevations while taking CBD, with many of the patients with these abnormalities also taking concomitant valproate. CBD has a clear interaction with clobazam, significantly increasing the levels of its active metabolite N-desmethylclobazam in several studies; this is felt to be due to CBD’s inhibition of CYP2C19. EAP data demonstrate other possible interactions with rufinamide, zonisamide, topiramate, and eslicarbazepine. Additionally, there is one case report demonstrating need for warfarin dose adjustment with concomitant CBD.SummaryUnderstanding of CBD’s efficacy and safety in the treatment of TRE has expanded significantly in the last few years. Future controlled studies of various ratios of CBD and THC are needed as there could be further therapeutic potential of these compounds for patients with epilepsy.
Journal Article
TRANscranial direct current stimulation for FOcal Refractory epilepsy in mitochondrial disease (TRANSFORM): delayed-start, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study
2024
Background
Focal epilepsy is common in children and adults with mitochondrial disease. Seizures are often refractory to pharmacological treatment and, in this patient group, frequently evolve to refractory focal
status epilepticus
(also known as
epilepsia partialis continua
). Where this occurs, the long-term prognosis is poor. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) is a promising, non-invasive, adjunctive treatment alternative to common surgical procedures. Limited recruitment of study participants with this rare disease and the ethical challenges of administering a treatment to one group and not another, while maintaining strict methodological rigour can pose challenges to the design of a clinical study.
Method
We designed the first delayed start, double-blinded, sham-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of tDCS as an adjunctive treatment for focal epilepsy. We will include participants with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of mitochondrial disease with drug-resistant focal epilepsy aged ≥ 2 years, aiming to collect 30 episodes of focal
status epilepticus
, each treated for a maximum period of 14 days. The early start intervention arm will receive tDCS from day 1. The delayed start intervention arm will receive sham stimulation until crossover on day 3. Our primary endpoint is a greater than 50% reduction from baseline (on day 0) in seizure frequency assessed by 3x daily reporting, accelerometery, and video monitoring. Changes in the underlying epileptogenic focus within the brain related to the tDCS intervention will be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or electroencephalography (EEG).
Discussion
Study results in favour of treatment efficacy would support development of tDCS into a mainstream treatment option for focal epileptic seizures related to mitochondrial disease.
Trials registration
ISRCTN: 18,241,112; registered on 16/11/2021.
Journal Article
Efficacy of treating Helicobacter pylori infection on seizure frequency in children with drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial
by
Mohamed, Mostafa Ashry
,
Mahmoud, Ekram A.
,
Abdelkreem, Elsayed
in
Adolescent
,
Amoxicillin
,
Amoxicillin - therapeutic use
2025
Background
Helicobacter pylori
(
H. pylori
) causes chronic infection in more than half of the population worldwide. Accumulating body of evidence indicates the possible role of
H. Pylori
infection in extra-intestinal health problems, including epilepsy. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of treating
H. pylori
infection on seizure frequency among children with drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE).
Methods
A parallel, two-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 126 children with drug-resistant IGE and positive
H. pylori
stool antigen test who were randomly assigned to study and comparison groups in 1.2:1 ratio. Only the study group received
H. pylori
eradication therapy (esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) for two weeks. The primary outcome was seizure improvement (≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction compared with baseline) after 2.5 months. Secondary outcomes were occurrence of status epilepticus, escalation of antiseizure medication (ASMs), and adverse effects. Outcomes between the two groups were compared using Chi-square/Fisher exact tests on an intention-to-treat principle. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate possible effects of baseline variables on primary outcome.
Results
Seizure improvement occurred in 23 (33%) children in the study group compared with seven (12%) children in the comparison group (Risk ratio [RR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–5.9;
p
0.006). The study group had lower occurrence of status epilepticus (2.9% vs. 14%; RR 0.21, 95%CI: 0.05–0.93;
p
0.042) and lesser need for ASMs escalation (4.4% vs. 19.3%; RR 0.23, 95%CI: 0.07–0.77;
p
0.010). Adverse effects were more frequent among subjects in the study group, including nausea (15.9% vs. 10.5%) vomiting (8.7% vs. 3.5%), diarrhea (11.6% vs. 5.3%), and skin rash (4.4% vs. 1.8%), but the differences were not statistically significant (
p
> 0.05). None of baseline participants’ variables was significantly associated with the primary outcome.
Conclusion
Treating
H. pylori
infection may improve seizure control in children with drug-resistant IGE, but further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and explore mechanisms behind seizure improvement following
H. pylori
eradication therapy.
Trial registration
Registered on
www.clinicaltrials.gov
(identifier: NCT05297695) on 17 March 2022.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05297695
.
Journal Article
Impact of L-carnitine supplementation on gastric emptying and bowel function in pediatric ketogenic diet therapy: a clinical trial
by
Youssef, Mennatallah Ayman
,
Ibrahim, Haya Essam
,
Shata, Mennatallah Osama
in
631/378
,
692/308
,
692/617
2024
Ketogenic diet (KD) is an excess fat, enough protein, and minimal carbohydrate diet. The high fat content in KD lowers the oesophageal sphincter tone, slows gastric emptying, and decreases intestinal transit time. The primary aim of the current clinical trial was to study the effect of
L
-carnitine supplementation on gastric emptying in children with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) on KD. Assessment of the protective effect of
L
-carnitine on bowel function and habits in those patients was a secondary aim. The current study recruited 30 patients aged 12 months to 18 years newly diagnosed with DRE assigned to start KD who were following up at the Pediatric Clinical Nutrition and Neurology Outpatient Clinics or were admitted due to DRE at the Pediatric Neurology Inpatient Department, Children’s Hospital, Ain Shams University (Egypt). Participants were assigned randomly into 2 arms; arm I: received KD with
L
-carnitine supplementation, arm II: received KD only. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of starting KD, the assessments of children included: 24-hour dietary recall, Chalfont Seizures Severity Scale, gastrointestinal symptoms score and Bristol stool chart, frequency of defecation per week, anthropometric measurements assessment, fasting serum lipid profile and measurement of the antral length by ultrasound. There was significant increase in antral length in the patients who received KD with
L
-carnitine supplementation compared to the non-supplemented group. The antral length showed a significant negative correlation with GI symptoms score in all cases and the
L
-carnitine supplemented group. It also showed a significant positive correlation with Bristol stool score in all patients and a significant positive correlation with stool frequency in the
L
-carnitine supplemented group only.
L
-carnitine supplementation to children with DRE on KD has a significant role in improving gastric motility and it increases the frequency of defecation. Further studies are recommended to explore additional benefits, meanwhile it is prudent to advise
L
-carnitine supplementation for such patients.
Journal Article
Clinical effectiveness of the psychological therapy Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy in addition to usual care compared with assessment-enhanced usual care alone: a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial in the UK
2024
Mental health difficulties are common in children and young people with chronic health conditions, but many of those in need do not access evidence-based psychological treatments. The study aim was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of integrated mental health treatment for children and young people with epilepsy, a common chronic health condition known to be associated with a particularly high rate of co-occurring mental health difficulties.
We conducted a parallel group, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of participants aged 3–18 years, attending epilepsy clinics across England and Northern Ireland who met diagnostic criteria for a common mental health disorder. Participants were randomised (1:1; using an independent web-based system) to receive the Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy (MICE) in addition to usual care, or assessment-enhanced usual care alone (control). Children and young people in both groups received a full diagnostic mental health assessment. MICE was a modular psychological intervention designed to treat common mental health conditions in children and young people using evidence-based approaches such as cognitive behaviour therapy and behavioural parenting strategies. Usual care for mental health disorders varied by site but typically included referral to appropriate services. Participants, along with their caregivers, and clinicians were not masked to treatment allocation but statisticians were masked until the point of analysis. The primary outcome, analysed by modified intention-to-treat, was the parent-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at 6 months post-randomisation. The study is complete and registered with ISRCTN (57823197).
1401 young people were potentially deemed eligible for study inclusion. Following the exclusion of 531 young people, 870 participants were assessed for eligibility and completed the SDQ, and 480 caregivers provided consent for study inclusion between May 20, 2019, and Jan 31, 2022. Between Aug 28, 2019, and Feb 21, 2022, 334 participants (mean ages 10·5 years [SD 3·6] in the MICE group vs 10·3 [4·0] in control group at baseline) were randomly assigned to an intervention using minimisation balanced by age, primary mental health disorder, diagnosis of intellectual disability, and autistic spectrum disorder at baseline. 168 (50%) of the participants were female and 166 (50%) were male. 166 participants were randomly assigned to the MICE group and 168 were randomly assigned to the control group. At 6 months, the mean SDQ difficulties for the 148 participants in the MICE group was 17·6 (SD 6·3) and 19·6 (6·1) for the 148 participants in the control group. The adjusted effect of MICE was –1·7 (95% CI –2·8 to –0·5; p=0·0040; Cohen's d, 0·3). 14 (8%) patients in the MICE group experienced at least one serious adverse event compared with 24 (14%) in the control group. 68% percent of serious adverse events (50 events) were admission due to seizures.
MICE was superior to assessment-enhanced usual care in improving symptoms of emotional and behavioural difficulties in young people with epilepsy and common mental health disorders. The trial therefore shows that mental health comorbidities can be effectively and safely treated by a variety of clinicians, utilising an integrated intervention across ages and in the context of intellectual disability and autism. The evidence from this trial suggests that such a model should be fully embedded in epilepsy services and serves as a model for other chronic health conditions in young people.
UK National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and Epilepsy Research UK Endeavour Project Grant.
Journal Article