Explore the vast range of titles available.

Recent single-arm studies involving neoadjuvant camrelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, plus chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) have shown promising results. This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 trial aimed to further assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant camrelizumab, compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. A total of 391 patients with resectable thoracic LA-ESCC (T1b-3N1-3M0 or T3N0M0) were stratified by clinical stage (I/II, III or IVA) and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Treatments included camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+nab-TP group; n  = 132); camrelizumab, paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+TP group; n  = 130); and paclitaxel with cisplatin (TP group; n  = 129), followed by surgical resection. Both the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups also received adjuvant camrelizumab. The dual primary endpoints were the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), as evaluated by a blind independent review committee, and event-free survival (EFS), as assessed by investigators. This study reports the final analysis of pCR rates. In the intention-to-treat population, the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups exhibited significantly higher pCR rates of 28.0% and 15.4%, respectively, compared to 4.7% in the TP group (Cam+nab-TP versus TP: difference 23.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1–32.0, P  < 0.0001; Cam+TP versus TP: difference 10.9%, 95% CI 3.7–18.1, P  = 0.0034). The study met its primary endpoint of pCR; however, EFS is not yet mature. The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events during neoadjuvant treatment was 34.1% for the Cam+nab-TP group, 29.2% for the Cam+TP group and 28.8% for the TP group; the postoperative complication rates were 34.2%, 38.8% and 32.0%, respectively. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior pCR rates compared to chemotherapy alone for LA-ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2000040034 . In a randomized phase 3 trial, neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 plus either paclitaxel and cisplatin or nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin elicited a significantly superior pathological complete response rate versus neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin alone in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy (cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) as first line treatment of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.DesignMulticentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial.Setting66 sites in China and 13 sites outside of China between 14 December 2018 and 9 April 2021.Participants659 adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had not received systemic treatment.InterventionParticipants were randomised 1:1 to receive sintilimab or placebo (3 mg/kg in patients weighing <60 kg or 200 mg in patients weighing ≥60 kg) in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every three weeks. The trial was amended to allow investigators to choose the chemotherapy regimen: cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1-5).Main outcome measuresOverall survival in all patients and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 for expression of programmed cell death ligand 1.Results659 patients were randomly assigned to sintilimab (n=327) or placebo (n=332) with chemotherapy. 616 of 659 patients (93%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel and 43 of 659 patients (7%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. At the interim analysis, sintilimab with chemotherapy showed better overall survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (median 16.7 v 12.5 months, hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.78, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (17.2 v 13.6 months, 0.64, 0.48 to 0.85, P=0.002). Sintilimab and chemotherapy significantly improved progression free survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (7.2 v 5.7 months, 0.56, 0.46 to 0.68, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (8.3 v 6.4 months, 0.58, 0.45 to 0.75, P<0.001). Adverse events related to treatment occurred in 321 of 327 patients (98%) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy group versus 326 of 332 (98%) patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Rates of adverse events related to treatment, grade ≥3, were 60% (196/327) and 55% (181/332) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy groups, respectively.ConclusionsCompared with placebo, sintilimab in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed significant benefits in overall survival and progression free survival as first line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Similar benefits of sintilimab with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil seem promising.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748134.

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), possess immunomodulatory properties and have shown promising outcomes when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies. The OASIS phase II trial (NCT04503967) is designed to determine the clinical activity and safety of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and anlotinib hydrochloride (a multi-targets TKI) as second-line or above therapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). From December 2020 to September 2022, 45 patients with GAC and 3 with ESCC were enrolled in this study. The pre-specified endpoints were reached, with the primary endpoint of overall response rate achieving 29.2%. For secondary objectives, disease control rate was 64.6%; median progression-free survival was 4.0 months; and median overall survival was 11.1 months with a manageable toxicity profile. The exploratory analyses unveiled that the balance of gut bacteria and the presence of a pre-existing immune signature characterized by a high percentage of CD68 + PD-L1 + PD-1 + macrophages and low pretreatment variant allele frequencies (VAF), as well as low expression of certain cytokines were significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with GAC. Anlotinib hydrochloride is a multi-target tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, previously combined with anti-PD1 as therapeutic strategy for several cancer types. Here the authors report the results of a phase II trial of nivolumab (anti-PD1) plus anlotinib hydrochloride in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

This randomized, open-label, multi-center phase 2 study (NCT03116152) assessed sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while exploratory endpoint was the association of biomarkers with efficacy. The median OS in the sintilimab group was significantly improved compared with the chemotherapy group (median OS 7.2 vs.6.2 months; P  = 0.032; HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50–0.97). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3–5 was lower with sintilimab than with chemotherapy (20.2 vs. 39.1%). Patients with high T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality and low molecular tumor burden index (mTBI) showed the longest median OS (15.0 months). Patients with NLR < 3 at 6 weeks post-treatment had a significantly prolonged median OS (16.6 months) compared with NLR ≥ 3. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in OS of sintilimab compared to chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic ESCC. Patients with advanced esophageal cancer have poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This randomized, phase II trial compares the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab versus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after first-line therapy

First-line systemic therapeutic options for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are limited. In this multicenter, double-blind phase 3 trial, a total of 551 patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic ESCC and PD-L1 combined positive score of ≥1 were randomized (2:1) to receive serplulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody; 3 mg/kg) or placebo (on day 1), plus cisplatin (50 mg/m 2 ) (on day 1) and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1,200 mg/m 2 ) (on days 1 and 2), once every 2 weeks. The study met the primary endpoints. At the prespecified final analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by the blinded independent radiological review committee, serplulimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS compared with placebo plus chemotherapy (median PFS of 5.8 months and 5.3 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.75; P  < 0.0001). At the prespecified interim analysis of overall survival (OS), serplulimab plus chemotherapy also significantly prolonged OS compared with placebo plus chemotherapy (median OS of 15.3 months and 11.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.53–0.87; P  = 0.0020). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 201 (53%) and 81 (48%) patients in the serplulimab plus chemotherapy group and the placebo plus chemotherapy group, respectively. Serplulimab plus chemotherapy administered every 2 weeks significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with previously untreated, PD-L1-positive advanced ESCC, with a manageable safety profile. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03958890 ). The combination of anti-PD-1 treatment with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with previously untreated, PD-L1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma improved progression-free survival and overall survival.

BackgroundThe optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles remains to be established for treating oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We compared two versus three courses of NAC for treating locally advanced ESCC in a multi-institutional, randomised, Phase II trial.MethodsWe randomly assigned 180 patients with locally advanced ESCC at 6 institutions to either two (N = 91) or three (N = 89) courses of DCF (docetaxel 70 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, fluorouracil 700 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks, prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) with an intention-to-treat analysis.ResultsPatient background parameters were well-balanced. The R0 resection rates were 98.9 and 96.5% in the two- and three-course groups, respectively (P = 0.830). In resected cases, the two- and three-course groups had comparable pN0 rates (P = 0.225) and histological responses (P = 0.898). The 2-year PFS rate was also comparable between the two groups (71.4 vs. 71.1%, P = 0.669). Among subgroups based on baseline characteristics, only patients aged under 65 years old showed a tendency for better survival with the three-course treatment (hazard ratio = 2.612, 95% confidence interval: 1.012–7.517).ConclusionsTwo courses of a DCF regimen showed potential as an optional NAC treatment for locally advanced ESCC.Clinical trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (identification number UMIN 000015788).

Background Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy show promise in treating oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), long-term survival data are limited. This randomized, multicenter phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of perioperative Nivolumab with chemotherapy, followed by surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy, in patients with locally advanced resectable OSCC, and explored the prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status. Methods In this trial, participants recruited from five centers were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either perioperative Nivolumab or a placebo in addition to chemotherapy (cisplatin and paclitaxel), followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy. For those who did not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR), adjuvant treatment with Nivolumab was administered. The main measure of success was the pCR rate, with secondary endpoints including the R0 resection rate, event-free survival, and overall survival. All outcomes and safety measures were assessed based on the intention-to-treat population. ctDNA levels were monitored as exploratory endpoints. Results Ninety patients were enrolled and randomized to Nivolumab or placebo plus chemotherapy. The pCR rate was slightly higher in the Nivolumab group (15%) compared to the control group (13.3%) (relative risk, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.38 to 3.36). No significant differences were observed in R0 resection rates (96.4% vs. 96.6%; P  > 0.05). The median follow-up duration was 24.9 months (interquartile range: 22.8 to 26.7 months). Two-year event-free survival rates were 63.11% in the Nivolumab group versus 60.47% in the chemo group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.92). Two-year overall survival rates were 83.32% and 79.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.29 to 2.31). All participants were ctDNA positive at baseline, but post-treatment, 89% of the Nivolumab group and 62.5% of the placebo group turned ctDNA negative ( P  = 0.01). Those negative for ctDNA at all testing points showed significantly better disease-free survival ( P  < 0.001). Conclusions Perioperative Nivolumab plus chemotherapy is a viable and safe option for systemically treating locally advanced resectable OSCC. Monitoring minimal residual disease through ctDNA could be potentially valuable for assessing the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy and for prognostic evaluation in a systemic manner. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT05213312.

Although antiprogrammed death 1 antibody plus chemotherapy has recently been approved for first-line esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 antibody may offer another combination option in this setting. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial a total of 540 adults (aged 18–75 years) with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC and who had not received systemic treatment were enrolled. All patients were randomized at 2:1 to receive either sugemalimab (an anti-PD-L1 antibody; 1,200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 24 months, plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg m − 2 on day 1 plus 5-fluorouracil 800 mg m − 2  day −1 on days 1–4) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. At the prespecified interim analysis this study had met dual primary endpoints. With a median follow-up of 15.2 months, the prolongation of progression-free survival was statistically significant with sugemalimab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy (median 6.2 versus 5.4 months, hazard ratio 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.54–0.82), P  = 0.0002) as assessed by blinded independent central review. Overall survival was also superior with sugemalimab chemotherapy (median 15.3 versus 11.5 months, hazard ratio 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.55–0.90, P  = 0.0076). A significantly higher objective response rate (60.1 versus 45.2%) as assessed by blinded independent central review was observed with sugemalimab chemotherapy. The incidence of grade 3 or above treatment-related adverse events (51.3 versus 48.4%) was comparable between the two groups. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in treatment-naïve patients with advanced ESCC, with no unexpected safety signal. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT04187352 . In a prespecified interim analysis of the phase 3 trial GEMSTONE-304, anti-PD-L1 with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone led to significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background The standard treatment for elderly patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is definitive chemoradiotherapy with S-1. However, the 3-year overall survival (OS) is limited to approximately 40%. Tislelizumab is the first- and second-line standard treatment for advanced ESCC with tolerable toxicity. In this study, we aimed to explore a new curative strategy for locally advanced unresectable ESCC in the elderly by combining tislelizumab with chemoradiotherapy. Methods This study is an open-label, multicenter, investigator-initiated phase II clinical trial in older patients with inoperable locally advanced ESCC evaluating tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The main inclusion criteria were pathological confirmation of locally advanced inoperable ESCC at clinical cT1N2-3M0 or cT2-4bN0-3M0 (stage II–IVA), age ≥ 70 years, absence of previous systemic anti-tumor therapy, and adequate organ function. A total of 136 patients will be recruited from approximately seven centers (in Tianjin, Chengdu, Taiyuan, Zhengzhou, Shijiazhuang, Changsha, Nanjing) over a period of 18 months and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tislelizumab in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (tislelizumab + S-1 + radiotherapy) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (S-1 + radiotherapy). The efficacy and safety of the treatment will be evaluated during the therapy and follow-up period until disease progression, death, or the end of the trial. The primary study endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary study endpoints were OS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of remission (DOR), and safety. Fresh or archival tumor tissues and peripheral blood samples will be used in exploratory studies. Discussion This study is the first “programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy” for elderly patients with inoperable locally advanced ESCC (NCT06061146). The synergistic efficacy of combined definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with tislelizumab is expected to result in survival benefits for elderly patients with inoperable locally advanced ESCC. Because S-1 plus concurrent radiotherapy is the standard treatment option for locally advanced ESCC in older patients, the combination of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy and tislelizumab has the potential to change the standard ESCC therapeutic strategy with comparable safety. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06061146.Registered 9/10/2023.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) plus 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with platinum‐refractory or intolerant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods In this multicenter, phase 2 study (NCT03712397), patients with advanced HNSCC (n = 43) or ESCC (n = 16) who had failed or were intolerant to platinum‐based chemotherapy received biweekly nal‐IRI 80 mg/m2 (equivalent to 70 mg/m2 of irinotecan base), LV 400 mg/m2, and 5‐FU 2400 mg/m2 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Results In the intent‐to‐treat analysis, the ORR and disease control rate were 8.5% and 59.3% for the entire group. In the HNSCC subgroup, ORR and disease control rate were 11.6% and 65.1%, with a median progression‐free survival (PFS) of 2.7 months and an overall survival (OS) of 8.1 months. By contrast, no objective responses were observed in ESCC (ORR 0%, disease control rate 43.8%, median OS 4.2 months). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia (50.8%), neutropenia (42.4%), leukopenia (33.9%), anemia (28.8%), and anorexia (8.5%). Conclusions Nal‐IRI/5‐FU/LV demonstrates modest activity with acceptable safety profiles in patients with platinum‐refractory or intolerable advanced HNSCC. The exploratory findings warrant confirmation in larger, randomized studies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03712397