Explore the vast range of titles available.

Delayed-start contraception may reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy; however, data on newer formulations, such as estetrol (E4)-containing pills are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of delayed start combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing 15 mg E4 and 3 mg drospirenone (E4/DRSP). In this randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, 36 healthy women aged 18–45 years with regular menstrual cycles were assigned to receive either E4/DRSP or 20 µg ethinyl estradiol/75 µg gestodene (EE/GS), starting treatment between cycle day 7 and 9. The primary outcome was ovulation inhibition, assessed using the modified Hoogland score. The secondary outcomes included cervical mucus changes and adverse effects. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. The mean age and menstrual cycle length were 38.75 ± 5.8 years and 28.67 ± 1.96 days, respectively. More than half (55.56%) of the participants began COC use on day 9, with 50% of them showing active follicular development at baseline (Hoogland score of 4). Ovulation was inhibited in 61.11% of participants in both groups (adjusted relative risks: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56–1.59, p  = 0.841, and absolute risk difference: −0.03, 95% CI: −0.39 to 0.33). Approximately half of the participants who ovulated showed ovarian activity that was not associated with theoretical pregnancy risk. Cervical mucus profiles and adverse events, including unscheduled bleeding, did not differ significantly between the groups. Initiating E4/DRSP on cycle day 7–9 appears comparable to that of EE/GS for ovulation inhibition; however, high ovulation rates limit the confirmation of non-inferiority. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration on April 25, 2024 (ID: NCT06396221; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06396221 ).

This parallel‐arm, phase I study investigated the potential cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A induction effect of NBI‐1065845 (TAK‐653), an investigational α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid receptor potentiator in phase II development for major depressive disorder. The midazolam treatment arm received the sensitive CYP3A substrate midazolam on Day 1, followed by NBI‐1065845 alone on Days 5–13; on Day 14, NBI‐1065845 was administered with midazolam, then NBI‐1065845 alone on Day 15. The oral contraceptive treatment arm received ethinyl estradiol–levonorgestrel on Day 1, then NBI‐1065845 alone on Days 5–13; on Day 14, NBI‐1065845 was administered with ethinyl estradiol–levonorgestrel, then NBI‐1065845 alone on Days 15–17. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. The midazolam treatment arm comprised 14 men and 4 women, of whom 16 completed the study. Sixteen of the 17 healthy women completed the oral contraceptive treatment arm. After multiple daily doses of NBI‐1065845, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence interval) for maximum observed concentration were: midazolam, 0.94 (0.79–1.13); ethinyl estradiol, 1.00 (0.87–1.15); and levonorgestrel, 0.99 (0.87–1.13). For area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity, the GMRs were as follows: midazolam, 0.88 (0.78–0.98); and ethinyl estradiol, 1.01 (0.88–1.15). For levonorgestrel, the GMR for AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was 0.87 (0.78–0.96). These findings indicate that NBI‐1065845 is not a CYP3A inducer and support its administration with CYP3A substrates. NBI‐1065845 was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observed after coadministration of midazolam, ethinyl estradiol, or levonorgestrel.

Venous thromboembolism is a serious safety concern in women using combined oral contraceptives; ethinyl estradiol (EE) is widely used as an estrogen. Estetrol (E4) is a native estrogen with selective tissue activity and exclusively produced by the fetal liver. This study used a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group design to evaluate the effects of E4 combined with drospirenone (DRSP) on coagulation and fibrinolysis in Japanese patients with endometriosis. Participants were randomized to receive either E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg or EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg for 12 weeks. E4/DRSP and EE/DRSP were administered orally once a day in a cyclic regimen, ie, 24-day active use followed by a 4-day hormone-free period, and a flexible extended regimen, respectively, and blood coagulation and fibrinolysis markers were measured. The effect on coagulation and fibrinolysis was considerably less in the E4/DRSP group than in the EE/DRSP group. Major anticoagulant proteins, protein S (free, total) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (free), were reduced following EE/DRSP treatment. Consequently, thrombin generation determined by the activated protein C sensitivity ratio was increased by approximately 4-fold in the EE/DRSP group than in the E4/DRSP group. Eventually, the fibrinolysis cascade was triggered to compensate for disturbed coagulation, and D-dimer levels were 4.7-fold higher in the EE/DRSP group than in the E4/DRSP group. This study demonstrated that the effect of E4/DRSP on the blood coagulation and fibrinolysis cascades was significantly less than that of EE/DRSP in participants with endometriosis, a disease of women of advanced and reproductive age (jRCT2080225090, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2080225090).

Abstract Objective To compare the impact on thrombin generation of the new combined oral contraceptive containing 15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone with ethinylestradiol (30 or 20 mcg) associated either with 150 mcg levonorgestrel or with 3 mg drospirenone. Methods Data were collected from the “E4/DRSP Endocrine Function, Metabolic Control and Hemostasis Study” (NCT02957630). Overall, the per-protocol set population included 24 subjects in the ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel arm, 28 subjects in the ethinylestradiol/drospirenone arm, and 34 subjects in the estetrol/drospirenone arm. Thrombograms and thrombin generation parameters (lag time, peak, time to peak, endogenous thrombin potential, and mean velocity rate index) were extracted for each subject at baseline and after 6 cycles of treatment. Results After 6 cycles of treatment, ethinylestradiol-containing products arms show a mean thrombogram outside the upper limit of the reference range, that is the 97.5th percentile of all baseline thrombograms. On the other hand, the mean thrombogram of estetrol/drospirenone is within this reference interval. After 6 cycles of treatment, all thrombin generation parameters are statistically less affected by estetrol/drospirenone than ethinylestradiol-containing products. Conclusions In conclusion, an association of 15 mg estetrol with 3 mg drospirenone does not have an impact on thrombin generation compared with ethinylestradiol-containing products that, either associated with levonorgestrel or drospirenone, are able to increase the production of procoagulant factors and decrease the production of anticoagulant ones, shifting the patient to a prothrombotic state. Ethinylestradiol-containing products thus generate prothrombotic environments contrary to estetrol which demonstrates a neutral profile on hemostasis.

A drug–drug interaction (DDI) study was conducted to evaluate the effect of icenticaftor (QBW251) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a 5‐probe cytochrome P450 (CYP) substrate cocktail, guided by in vitro studies in human hepatocytes and liver microsomes. Another DDI study investigated the effect of icenticaftor on the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a monophasic oral contraceptive (OC) containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LVG) in premenopausal healthy female subjects. The static‐mechanistic DDI assessment indicated that icenticaftor may moderately induce the metabolic clearance of co‐medications metabolized by CYP3A4 (area under the concentration–time curve [AUC] ratio: 0.47) and potentially CYP2C; icenticaftor may also weakly inhibit the metabolic clearance of co‐medications metabolized by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 (AUC ratio: 1.35 and 1.86, respectively) and moderately inhibit CYP2B6 (AUC ratio: 2.11). In the CYP substrate cocktail DDI study, icenticaftor 300 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) moderately inhibited CYP1A2 (AUC ratio: 3.35) and CYP2C19 (AUC ratio: 2.70). As expected from the results of the in vitro studies, weak induction was observed for CYP3A4 (AUC ratio: 0.51) and CYP2C8 (AUC ratio: 0.66). In the OC DDI study, co‐administration of icenticaftor 450 mg b.i.d. with monophasic OC containing 30‐μg EE and 150‐μg LVG once daily reduced the plasma exposure of both components by approximately 50% and led to increased levels of follicle‐stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. These results provide valuable guidance for the use of icenticaftor in patients taking concomitant medications that are substrates of CYP enzymes or patients using OCs.

This trial randomly assigned girls 5 to 12.5 years of age with Turner's syndrome to receive growth hormone, low-dose estrogen, neither, or both. Growth hormone increased adult height. Combining ultra-low-dose estrogen with growth hormone during childhood may optimize growth. Turner's syndrome, which results from partial or complete X-chromosome monosomy, occurs in about 1 in 2000 live female births 1 and encompasses diverse clinical features, including short stature, ovarian dysgenesis, and neurocognitive problems. 2 The marked short stature in Turner's syndrome (an average, untreated adult height 20 cm below that of the general female population 3 , 4 ) can be ameliorated by treatment with recombinant human growth hormone. Although there is substantial evidence that growth hormone treatment increases adult stature in patients with Turner's syndrome, 5 – 13 data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have been lacking. 13 Ovarian failure, the second major problem associated with . . .

This bioequivalence research aims to evaluate the relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone in the test preparation in comparison to the reference preparation during fasting conditions. A liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine the concentrations of drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol in plasma. The pharmacokinetic parameters that were analyzed were the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to achieve Cmax (tmax), elimination half life, and area under the concentration time curve of plasma (AUC0‐t, AUC0‐∞ for ethinyl estradiol, and AUC0‐72h for drospirenone). Both the AUC and Cmax parameters were determined to be between 80.00% and 125.00% (90% confidence intervals), which is the acceptable range. Based on the study findings, it was concluded that the test formulation, which includes 3 mg of drospirenone and 0.03 mg of ethinyl estradiol, demonstrated bioequivalence when compared to the reference formulation. Mean plasma concentrations following administration of test and reference drugs.

Purpose Laquinimod is an orally dosed immuno-modulator currently under development for Huntington’s disease (HD). Preclinical findings suggest potential teratogenicity of laquinimod, thus the reproductive ability of females with HD treated with laquinimod needs to be closely managed. Because combined oral contraceptives (COC) are often used in this context, the pharmacokinetics of COC containing ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) in combination with laquinimod (0.6 mg/day) was evaluated. Methods In this randomized, phase-1 single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover drug-drug interaction (DDI) study in 48 healthy premenopausal women, COC were administered in a 28-day regimen of 21 days followed by 7 pill-free days for 4 cycles and laquinimod or placebo was administered for 28 days in cycle 1 and cycle 3 starting 7 days prior to COC administration. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling of laquinimod, EE and LNG were collected on day 21 and day 22 of Cycles 1 and 3 pre-dose and multiple times post-dose. Results The ratio of geometric means and 90% confidence intervals for AUC 0-24 and C max of EE and LNG with and without laquinimod were all within the bioequivalence range (80 to 125%). Laquinimod pharmacokinetics was consistent with those observed in previous studies. The adverse event profile was in line with the current knowledge on the safety profile of both drugs, with headache as the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event. Conclusion The combination of COC and laquinimod treatment was found to be safe, tolerable, and devoid of any noticeable pharmacokinetic interaction.

We aimed to compare low-level light therapy with oral contraceptive pills for pain relief and serum levels of nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea. This was a randomised, active comparator-controlled, multicentre study. In total, 156 patients were randomised to receive either low-level light therapy with light-emitting diodes (LED) applying on two acupoints, namely, conception vessel 4 (CV4) and CV6 or conventional treatment with oral Marvelon, 30 µg of ethinyl estradiol and 150 µg of desogestrel (DSG/EE), for three consecutive menstrual cycles. The main outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved 33% or more decrease in pain scores measured using the visual analogue scale, which was deemed as efficient rate. Absolute changes in visual analogue scale scores, serum levels of nitric oxide (assessed by nitrites and nitrates reflecting nitric oxide metabolism) and prostaglandin E2 (measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were the secondary outcomes. A total of 135 patients completed the study (73 in the light therapy group and 62 in the DSG/EE group). The efficient rate at the end of treatment was comparable between the groups (73.6% vs. 85.7%, χ2 = 2.994, p = 0.084). A more significant reduction in pain scores was observed in the DSG/EE group (39.25% vs. 59.52%, p < 0.001). Serum levels of prostaglandin E2 significantly decreased from baseline but did not differ between groups (− 109.57 ± 3.99 pg/mL vs. − 118.11 ± 12.93 pg/mL, p = 0.51). Nitric oxide concentration remained stable in both groups. Low-level light therapy with LED-based device applied on acupuncture points CV4 and CV6 demonstrated a similar level of dysmenorrhoea pain reduction to DSG/EE combined contraceptive. Both treatment modalities achieved clinically meaningful levels of pain reduction. Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov: TRN: NCT03953716, Date: April 04, 2019.

Background and Objective: The hormonal components of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have various metabolic and haemostatic effects. The objective of this study was to compare the metabolic and haemostatic effects of a novel COC comprising estradiol valerate/dienogest (E 2 V/DNG) with ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (EE/LNG). Methods: In a randomized, open-label study conducted in Germany over seven cycles, healthy women aged 18–50 years received E 2 V/DNG (E 2 V 3 mg on days 1–2, E 2 V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3–7, E 2 V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8–24, E 2 V 1 mg on days 25–26, placebo on days 27–28; n = 30) or EE/LNG (EE 0.03 mg/LNG 0.05 mg on days 1–6, EE 0.04 mg/LNG 0.075 mg on days 7–11, EE 0.03 mg/LNG 0.125 mg on days 12–21, placebo on days 22–28; n = 28). The primary variables were the mean intraindividual relative changes from baseline to cycle 7 in high-density lipoprotein ( HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Changes in other lipid parameters, haemostatic parameters, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), cortisol-binding globulin (CBG), carbohydrate metabolism parameters, blood pressure and body weight were also assessed. Results: Mean ± SD HDL cholesterol increased by 7.9%±21.8% with E 2 V/DNG and decreased by 2.3%±14.4% with EE/LNG. Mean ± SD LDL cholesterol decreased by 6.5% ±15.9% with E 2 V/DNG and by 3.0% ±17.4% with EE/LNG. Mean ± SD prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimer levels remained essentially unchanged in the E 2 V/DNG group (−0.6% ± 30.3% and −2.1% ± 43.5%, respectively), but increased in the EE/LNG group (by 117.3% ± 358.0% and 62.9% ± 99.5%, respectively). Changes in other hepatic-induced arameters (SHBG, CBG) and carbohydrate metabolism were generally less pronounced with E 2 V/DNG versus EE/LNG. Body weight and blood pressure remained stable throughout the study in both treatment groups. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusion: E 2 V/DNG had a minimal impact on metabolic and haemostatic parameters, and a more favourable effect than EE/LNG on lipid markers. Trial registration:} ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00185224