Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
641,692
result(s) for
"Evidence"
Sort by:
Evidence-based clinical supervision
by
Milne, Derek
in
Clinical Psychology
,
Mental health personnel
,
Mental health personnel -- Supervision of
2009
Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision critiques and summarises the best available psychological evidence relating to clinical supervision, clarifying the key principles, setting out the related practice guidelines and specifying the research and practice implications. A best-practice guide to clinical supervision, an approach used across psychotherapy and health services where professionals meet regularly with each other to discuss casework and training issues Summarises the best available clinical evidence relating to clinical supervision, and relates this information to key principles with a strong applied focus, drawing out practice guidelines and implications Aims to motivate health professionals to practice supervision with greater enthusiasm and proficiency Represents the culmination of two years' intensive research on supervision and twenty years of involvement in supporting and developing supervisors
The impossible clinic : a critical sociology of evidence-based medicine
\"The Impossible Clinic' explores the conundrum of evidence-based medicine's (EBM) attempt to translate evidence from medical research into recommendations for practice. Ironically, when medical institutions combine disciplinary regulations with EBM to produce clinical practice guidelines, the outcomes are antithetical to the aim. Such guidelines fail to increase individual physicians' capacity to judge - as EBM promises - because they externalize judgment while imposing disciplinary control. The Impossible Clinic is the first book to interrogate the history, practice, and the pitfalls of EBM and how it persists due to intersecting relationships between professional medical regulation and liberal governance strategies. \"-- Provided by publisher.
Evaluation of Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Chronic Disease
by
Ball, Ray
,
Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Qualification of Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Chronic Disease
,
Micheel, Christine
in
Biochemical markers
,
Biochemical markers -- Evaluation
,
Biological Markers
2010
Many people naturally assume that the claims made for foods and nutritional supplements have the same degree of scientific grounding as those for medication, but that is not always the case. The IOM recommends that the FDA adopt a consistent scientific framework for biomarker evaluation in order to achieve a rigorous and transparent process.
Evidence-Based Psychotherapy: Advantages and Challenges
by
Kaslow, Nadine J.
,
Schwartz, Ann C.
,
Cook, Sarah C.
in
Biomedical and Life Sciences
,
Biomedicine
,
Evidence-Based Medicine
2017
Evidence-based psychotherapies have been shown to be efficacious and cost-effective for a wide range of psychiatric conditions. Psychiatric disorders are prevalent worldwide and associated with high rates of disease burden, as well as elevated rates of co-occurrence with medical disorders, which has led to an increased focus on the need for evidence-based psychotherapies. This chapter focuses on the current state of evidence-based psychotherapy. The strengths and challenges of evidence-based psychotherapy are discussed, as well as misperceptions regarding the approach that may discourage and limit its use. In addition, we review various factors associated with the optimal implementation and application of evidence-based psychotherapies. Lastly, suggestions are provided on ways to advance the evidence-based psychotherapy movement to become truly integrated into practice.
Journal Article
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
by
Munn, Zachary
,
Jordan, Zoe
,
Lockwood, Craig
in
Correspondence
,
Evidence-based healthcare
,
Evidence-based medicine
2018
Background
Systematic reviews have been considered as the pillar on which evidence-based healthcare rests. Systematic review methodology has evolved and been modified over the years to accommodate the range of questions that may arise in the health and medical sciences. This paper explores a concept still rarely considered by novice authors and in the literature: determining the type of systematic review to undertake based on a research question or priority.
Results
Within the framework of the evidence-based healthcare paradigm, defining the question and type of systematic review to conduct is a pivotal first step that will guide the rest of the process and has the potential to impact on other aspects of the evidence-based healthcare cycle (evidence generation, transfer and implementation). It is something that novice reviewers (and others not familiar with the range of review types available) need to take account of but frequently overlook. Our aim is to provide a typology of review types and describe key elements that need to be addressed during question development for each type.
Conclusions
In this paper a typology is proposed of various systematic review methodologies. The review types are defined and situated with regard to establishing corresponding questions and inclusion criteria. The ultimate objective is to provide clarified guidance for both novice and experienced reviewers and a unified typology with respect to review types.
Journal Article
Epidemiology for Athletic Trainers
by
Adams, Melanie
,
Swiger, Wanda
in
Athletic Injuries -- epidemiology
,
Athletic Injuries -- prevention & control
,
Epidemiology
2016
Evidence-based practice requires clinicians to be knowledgeable of the current standards of care and be willing to consider the effectiveness of new methods. Athletic trainers especially must understand how epidemiology shapes health care practices for physically active patients.
To meet this need,
Epidemiology for Athletic Trainers: Integrating Evidence-Based Practice
is a succinct and comprehensive reference meant to develop and refine student and clinician evidence-based practice skills. This text addresses the prevalence, risk factors, and surveillance of sport-related injury and illness at youth, college, and professional levels.
Inside
Epidemiology for Athletic Trainers: Integrating Evidence-Based Practice
, Drs. Melanie Adams and Wanda Swiger guide the reader through the steps of evidence-based practice by presenting basic research and statistical methods needed to read medical literature. Key sport epidemiology studies are reviewed for both historical and clinical significance. This foundation is built on with a deeper discussion of injury and illness prevention and future research. Chapters cover a wide range of topics including the health benefits of physical activity, concussion return-to-play guidelines, ACL prevention, and mental health concerns. This text provides an exceptional approach to integrating evidence-based practice skills with clinical practice.
Features:
Meets the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE) outcomes
Includes classroom activities to make the text interactive and expand the student's or clinician's research skills
Fosters the use of prevention practices and health promotion within athletic training
Instructors in educational settings can visit www.routledge.com/9781617119163 for additional materials to be used for teaching in the classroom.
Epidemiology for Athletic Trainers: Integrating Evidence-Based Practice
is a must-have for any athletic training student or clinician looking to improve his or her decision-making skills within an evidence-based context.