Explore the vast range of titles available.

Size and duration of the neuroplastic effects of tDCS depend on stimulation parameters, including stimulation duration and intensity of current. The impact of stimulation parameters on physiological effects is partially non-linear. To improve the utility of this intervention, it is critical to gather information about the impact of stimulation duration and intensity on neuroplasticity, while expanding the parameter space to improve efficacy. Anodal tDCS of 1–3 mA current intensity was applied for 15–30 minutes to study motor cortex plasticity. Sixteen healthy right-handed non-smoking volunteers participated in 10 sessions (intensity-duration pairs) of stimulation in a randomized cross-over design. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded as outcome measures of tDCS effects until next evening after tDCS. All active stimulation conditions enhanced motor cortex excitability within the first 2 hours after stimulation. We observed no significant differences between the three stimulation intensities and durations on cortical excitability. A trend for larger cortical excitability enhancements was however observed for higher current intensities (1 vs 3 mA). These results add information about intensified tDCS protocols and suggest that the impact of anodal tDCS on neuroplasticity is relatively robust with respect to gradual alterations of stimulation intensity, and duration.

Brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as measured with electroencephalography (EEG) have so far been assessed either by TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs), mostly reflecting phase-locked neuronal activity, or time-frequency-representations (TFRs), reflecting oscillatory power arising from a mixture of both evoked (i.e., phase-locked) and induced (i.e., non-phase-locked) responses. Single-pulse TMS of the human primary motor cortex induces a specific pattern of oscillatory changes, characterized by an early (30–200 ms after TMS) synchronization in the α- and β-bands over the stimulated sensorimotor cortex and adjacent lateral frontal cortex, followed by a late (200–400 ms) α- and β-desynchronization over the stimulated and contralateral sensorimotor cortex. As GABAergic inhibition plays an important role in shaping oscillatory brain activity, we sought here to understand if GABAergic inhibition contributes to these TMS-induced oscillations. We tested single oral doses of alprazolam, diazepam, zolpidem (positive modulators of the GABAA receptor), and baclofen (specific GABAB receptor agonist). Diazepam and zolpidem enhanced, and alprazolam tended to enhance while baclofen decreased the early α-synchronization. Alprazolam and baclofen enhanced the early β-synchronization. Baclofen enhanced the late α-desynchronization, and alprazolam, diazepam and baclofen enhanced the late β-desynchronization. The observed GABAergic drug effects on TMS-induced α- and β-band oscillations were not explained by drug-induced changes on corticospinal excitability, muscle response size, or resting-state EEG power. Our results provide first insights into the pharmacological profile of TMS-induced oscillatory responses of motor cortex. •The response to TMS of M1 is composed of evoked and induced oscillatory activity.•TMS induced early α-/β-synchronization and late α-/β-desynchronization in M1.•GABAAergic vs. GABABergic drugs had opposite effects on early α-synchronization.•GABAAergic and GABABergic drugs enhanced the late β-desynchronization.

Maximal central motor drive is known to decrease during prolonged exercise although it remains to be determined whether a supraspinal deficit exists, and if so, when it appears. The purpose of this study was to evaluate corticospinal excitability and muscle voluntary activation before, during and after a 4-h cycling exercise. Ten healthy subjects performed three 80-min bouts on an ergocycle at 45% of their maximal aerobic power. Before exercise and immediately after each bout, neuromuscular function was evaluated in the quadriceps femoris muscles under isometric conditions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess voluntary activation at the cortical level (VATMS), corticospinal excitability via motor-evoked potential (MEP) and intracortical inhibition by cortical silent period (CSP). Electrical stimulation of the femoral nerve was used to measure voluntary activation at the peripheral level (VAFNES) and muscle contractile properties. Maximal voluntary force was significantly reduced after the first bout (13 ± 9%, P<0.01) and was further decreased (25 ± 11%, P<0.001) at the end of exercise. CSP remained unchanged throughout the protocol. Rectus femoris and vastus lateralis but not vastus medialis MEP normalized to maximal M-wave amplitude significantly increased during cycling. Finally, significant decreases in both VATMS and VAFNES (∼ 8%, P<0.05 and ∼ 14%, P<0.001 post-exercise, respectively) were observed. In conclusion, reductions in VAFNES after a prolonged cycling exercise are partly explained by a deficit at the cortical level accompanied by increased corticospinal excitability and unchanged intracortical inhibition. When comparing the present results with the literature, this study highlights that changes at the cortical and/or motoneuronal levels depend not only on the type of exercise (single-joint vs. whole-body) but also on exercise intensity and/or duration.

Motor learning relies on experience-dependent plasticity in relevant neural circuits. In four experiments, we provide initial evidence and a double-blinded, sham-controlled replication (Experiment I-II) demonstrating that motor learning involving ballistic index finger movements is improved by preceding paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS), a human model for exogenous induction of spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Behavioral effects of PCMS targeting corticomotoneuronal (CM) synapses are order- and timing-specific and partially bidirectional (Experiment III). PCMS with a 2 ms inter-arrival interval at CM-synapses enhances learning and increases corticospinal excitability compared to control protocols. Unpaired stimulations did not increase corticospinal excitability (Experiment IV). Our findings demonstrate that non-invasively induced plasticity interacts positively with experience-dependent plasticity to promote motor learning. The effects of PCMS on motor learning approximate Hebbian learning rules, while the effects on corticospinal excitability demonstrate timing-specificity but not bidirectionality. These findings offer a mechanistic rationale to enhance motor practice effects by priming sensorimotor training with individualized PCMS. Whether paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS)-protocols can promote motor learning and how PCMS protocols interact with mechanisms of experience-dependent plasticity is not fully understood. Here authors show that non-invasively induced plasticity targeting corticomotoneuronal synapses promotes motor learning by interacting positively with experience-dependent plasticity.

Tactile Imagery (TI) remains a fairly understudied phenomenon despite growing attention to this topic in recent years. Here, we investigated the effects of TI on corticospinal excitability by measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The effects of TI were compared with those of tactile stimulation (TS) and kinesthetic motor imagery (kMI). Twenty-two participants performed three tasks in randomly assigned order: imagine finger tapping (kMI); experience vibratory sensations in the middle finger (TS); and mentally reproduce the sensation of vibration (TI). MEPs increased during both kMI and TI, with a stronger increase for kMI. No statistically significant change in MEP was observed during TS. The demonstrated differential effects of kMI, TI and TS on corticospinal excitability have practical implications for devising the imagery-based and TS-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly the ones intended to improve neurorehabilitation by evoking plasticity changes in sensorimotor circuitry.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses a weak electric current to modulate neuronal activity. A neurophysiologic outcome measure to demonstrate reliable tDCS modulation at the group level is transcranial magnetic stimulation engendered motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Here, we conduct a study testing the reliability of individual MEP response patterns following a common tDCS protocol. Fourteen participants (7m/7f) each underwent nine randomized sessions of 1 mA, 10 min tDCS (3 anode; 3 cathode; 3 sham) delivered using an M1/orbito-frontal electrode montage (sessions separated by an average of ~5.5 days). Fifteen MEPs were obtained prior to, immediately following and in 5 min intervals for 30 min following tDCS. TMS was delivered at 130 % resting motor threshold using neuronavigation to ensure consistent coil localization. A number of non-experimental variables were collected during each session. At the individual level, considerable variability was seen among different testing sessions. No participant demonstrated an excitatory response ≥20 % to all three anodal sessions, and no participant demonstrated an inhibitory response ≥20 % to all three cathodal sessions. Intra-class correlation revealed poor anodal and cathodal test–retest reliability [anode: ICC (2,1)  = 0.062; cathode: ICC (2,1)  = 0.055] and moderate sham test–retest reliability [ICC (2,1)  = 0.433]. Results also revealed no significant effect of tDCS at the group level. Using this common protocol, we found the effects of tDCS on MEP amplitudes to be highly variable at the individual level. In addition, no significant effects of tDCS on MEP amplitude were found at the group level. Future studies should consider utilizing a more strict experimental protocol to potentially account for intra-individual response variations.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation tool with potential for managing neuromuscular fatigue, possibly due to alterations in corticospinal excitability. However, inconsistencies in intra- and inter- individual variability responsiveness to tDCS limit its clinical use. Emerging evidence suggests harnessing homeostatic metaplasticity induced via tDCS may reduce variability and boost its outcomes, yet little is known regarding its influence on neuromuscular fatigue in healthy adults. We explored whether cathodal tDCS (ctDCS) prior to exercise combined with anodal tDCS (atDCS) could augment corticospinal excitability and attenuate neuromuscular fatigue. 15 young healthy adults (6 males, 22 ± 4 years) participated in four pseudo-randomised neuromodulation sessions: sham stimulation prior and during exercise, sham stimulation prior and atDCS during exercise, ctDCS prior and atDCS during exercise, ctDCS prior and sham stimulation during exercise. The exercise constituted an intermittent maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) for 10 min. Neuromuscular fatigue was quantified as an attenuation in MVC force, while motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude provided an assessment of corticospinal excitability. MEP amplitude increased during the fatiguing exercise, whilst across time, force decreased. There were no differences in MEP amplitudes or force between neuromodulation sessions. These outcomes highlight the ambiguity of harnessing metaplasticity to ameliorate neuromuscular fatigue in young healthy individuals.

The development of novel strategies to augment motor training success is of great interest for healthy persons and neurological patients. A promising approach is the combination of training with transcranial electric stimulation. However, limited reproducibility and varying effect sizes make further protocol optimization necessary. We tested the effects of a novel cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation protocol (tACS) on motor skill learning. Furthermore, we studied underlying mechanisms by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation and analysis of fMRI-based resting-state connectivity. N = 15 young, healthy participants were recruited. 50 Hz tACS was applied to the left cerebellum in a double-blind, sham-controlled, cross-over design concurrently to the acquisition of a novel motor skill. Potential underlying mechanisms were assessed by studying short intracortical inhibition at rest (SICI rest ) and in the premovement phase (SICI move ), intracortical facilitation at rest (ICF rest ), and seed-based resting-state fMRI-based functional connectivity (FC) in a hypothesis-driven motor learning network. Active stimulation did not enhance skill acquisition or retention. Minor effects on striato-parietal FC were present. Linear mixed effects modelling identified SICI move modulation and baseline task performance as the most influential determining factors for predicting training success. Accounting for the identified factors may allow to stratify participants for future training-based interventions.

Background Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive technique that modulates neural oscillations, yet its specific effects on cortical excitability are not well-understood. This study investigated the effects of tACS on neuroplasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1) across different frequencies. Methods In this randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study, 18 healthy young adults received β-tACS γ-tACS, and sham stimulation over the M1. Neurophysiological responses were assessed using motor evoked potentials (MEPs), electroencephalograms (EEG), and transcranial evoked potentials (TEPs) to determine the frequency-specific effects of tACS on cortical excitability and neuroplasticity. Results γ-tACS significantly enhanced cortical excitability, as reflected by larger MEP amplitudes compared to both β-tACS and sham stimulation. In addition, γ-tACS resulted in significantly smaller M1-P15 amplitudes in TEP than other stimulation conditions. In contrast, β-tACS did not produce significant changes in either MEPs or TEPs compared to sham stimulation. Conclusion These findings provide evidence that tACS induces frequency-dependent effects on cortical excitability and neuroplasticity within the M1. This selective modulation of cortical excitability with γ-tACS suggests its potential as a therapeutic intervention for optimizing motor function and rehabilitation. Trial registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300074898, date of registration: 2023/08/18).

Dopamine, a key neuromodulator in the central nervous system, regulates cortical excitability and plasticity by interacting with glutamate and GABA receptors, which are affected by dopamine receptor subtypes (D1‐ and D2‐like). Non‐invasive brain stimulation techniques can induce plasticity and monitor cortical facilitation and inhibition in humans. In a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded study, we investigated how dopamine and D1‐ and D2‐like receptors impact transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)‐induced plasticity concerning glutamatergic and GABAergic mechanisms. Eighteen healthy volunteers received 1 mA anodal (13 min) and cathodal tDCS (9 min) over the left motor cortex combined with the dopaminergic agents l‐dopa (general dopamine activation), bromocriptine (D2‐like receptor agonist), combined D2 antagonism via sulpiride and general dopaminergic activation via l‐dopa to activate D1‐like receptors, and placebo medication. Glutamate‐related cortical facilitation and GABA‐related cortical inhibition were monitored using transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques, including I–O curve, intracortical facilitation (ICF), short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and I‐wave facilitation protocols. Our results indicate that anodal tDCS alone enhanced the I–O curve and ICF while decreasing SICI. Conversely, cathodal tDCS decreased the I‐O curve and ICF while increasing SICI. General dopamine and D2 receptor activation combined with anodal tDCS decreased the I‐O curve and ICF, but enhanced SICI compared to tDCS alone. When paired with cathodal tDCS, general dopamine and D2‐like receptor activity enhancement prolonged the cathodal tDCS effect on excitability. After anodal tDCS, D1‐like receptor activation increased the I‐O curve and ICF while reducing SICI. These effects were abolished with cathodal tDCS. Dopaminergic substances combined with anodal and cathodal tDCS did not have a significant effect on I‐wave facilitation. These results suggest that D1‐like receptor activation enhanced LTP‐like plasticity and abolished LTD‐like plasticity via glutamatergic NMDA receptor enhancement, while global dopaminergic and D2‐like receptor enhancement weakened LTP‐like but strengthened LTD‐like plasticity primarily via glutamatergic NMDA receptor activity diminution. Background: Dopamine modulates cortical excitability and plasticity by influencing glutamate and GABA receptor activity. This study investigates the impact of general dopaminergic activation and D1‐ and D2‐like receptor modulation on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)‐induced plasticity in humans.Methods:• Pharmacological intervention: l‐dopa (general DA activation), Bromocriptine (D2 agonist), Sulpiride + l‐dopa (D1‐like activation), and placebo.• tDCS: Anodal (1 mA, 13 min) and Cathodal (1 mA, 9 min) over the left motor cortex.• Neurophysiological measures: Glutamatergic activity (I‐O curve, ICF) and GABAergic activity (SICI, I‐wave facilitation).Results:• D2‐like receptor and global dopamine activation + anodal tDCS: decreased the I‐O curve and ICF, but enhanced SICI• D2‐like receptor and global dopamine activation + cathodal tDCS: prolonged the cathodal tDCS effect on SICI‐ICF and IO‐curve• D1‐like receptor activation + anodal tDCS: increased the I‐O curve and ICF while reducing SICI• D1‐like receptor activation + cathodal tDCS: abolished cathodal tDCS effects• No significant effect of dopaminergic substances combined with anodal and on I‐wave facilitationConclusion:D1‐like receptor activation enhanced LTP‐like plasticity and abolished LTD‐like plasticity via glutamatergic NMDA receptor enhancement, while global dopaminergic and D2‐like receptor enhancement weakened LTP‐like but strengthened LTD‐like plasticity primarily via glutamatergic NMDA receptor activity diminution.