Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
126,947 result(s) for "Fingers"
Sort by:
Busy fingers
A playful list of some of the many things that fingers can do, from counting and poking to waving and squishing.
Clinical effectiveness of Finger gliding Exercise for patients with trigger fingers receiving steroid injection: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Finger gliding exercises are believed to enhance flexor tendons excursion. This study assesses the effectiveness of finger gliding exercises in patients after receiving steroid injections for trigger fingers. Patients with trigger fingers who received corticosteroid injection were randomly assigned (1:1) to control and intervention group. The intervention group was required to do finger exercises and submit online exercise log regularly. The clinical outcomes of trigger fingers at 24 weeks and compliance with finger gliding exercises were assessed via online surveys. A total of 38 participants were allocated to each group. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a longer duration of symptoms in the intervention group (5.2 ± 2.9 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 months, P  = 0.002). At 24 weeks, 34 (89.5%) control and 33 (86.8%) intervention group participants responded to online survey. No statistical significant differences were observed in Numerical Pain Rating Score, Quinelle grading, finger improvement rate, recurrence of triggering, need for repeated injection and occurrence of new trigger finger sites. The exercise log response rate and compliance rate were 85.6% and 68.6%. In conclusion, our study did not establish the clinical effectiveness of finger gliding exercise for trigger finger patients following steroid injections compared to usual care.
Hand, hand, fingers, thumb
Easy-to-read rhyming text describes what can be done on a drum with hand, fingers, and thumb.
Effect of percutaneous release versus steroid injection among adults with trigger fingers: a randomized clinical trial
Background Trigger finger (TF) causes pain and impaired hand function. Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley demonstrates a better outcome than steroid injection in the treatment of TF; however, evidence remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of percutaneous release of the A1 pulley compared to local steroid injection in the treatment of trigger fingers in Nepal. Methods A hospital-based randomized clinical trial among 92 patients aged 18 years and above suffering from trigger fingers that were unresponsive to conservative treatment was conducted to evaluate the effect of the percutaneous release of A1 pulley and steroid injection. Quinnell’s classification, visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring system and thickness of A1 pulley, as well as the flexor tendon in the affected site, were assessed before and after intervention at six months. Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square tests were performed to compare the effectiveness of both treatments. Result Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley showed better functional improvement than steroid injection, with a p-value of < 0.001 and medium effect size of 0.43. The pain score was also decreased more in the percutaneous release group than the steroid group (-5.1 ± 1.4 versus − 3.7 ± 1.8), with the group difference of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.6 to 2.0), with a p-value of < 0.001 and a large effect size of 0.87. Nevertheless, steroid injection decreased the thickness of A1 pulley than percutaneous release (-0.34 ± 0.24 versus − 0.21 ± 0.21), with a p-value of 0.011 and a large effect size of 0.5. Furthermore, tendon thickness was decreased more in the steroid group compared with the percutaneous release group (-1.12 ± 0.73 versus − 0.34 ± 0.41), with a p-value of < 0.001 and a huge effect size of 1.31. Conclusion Percutaneous release of A1 pulley illustrated greater improvement in functional mobility with a moderate effect size and pain with a large effect size compared to steroid injection in trigger fingers. A multicenter trial with a larger sample size and involving a diverse participant cohort may enhance the strength of the evidence. Trial registration NCT05383040, first registered on 17/05/2022 (https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05383040).
Michelangelo's finger : an exploration of everyday transcendence /
Proposes that the index finger and the gesture of pointing distinguishes humans from other species, and that the symbolism behind different types of pointing may have played an important part in human evolution and development.
Beyond the splint: efficacy and safety of kinesio taping for non-operative management of finger injuries
Background This prospective comparative study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of kinesio-taping (KT), buddy taping (BT), and conventional splinting in managing finger joint sprains and fractures across pediatric and adult populations, with a focus on functional recovery and patient-centered outcomes. Materials and methods A total of 175 patients were randomized into three treatment arms: KT (Group 1, n  = 62), BT (Group 2, n  = 52), and splinting (Group 3, n  = 61). Participants were stratified into pediatric (5–18 years) and adult (18–60 years) subgroups. Clinical outcomes—including range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and QuickDASH (QD) scores—were assessed by an independent orthopedic surgeon at 3-week and 3-month follow-ups. Results Baseline demographics (age, sex, injury laterality, and hand dominance) were comparable across groups ( p  > 0.05). Group 1 demonstrated statistically superior outcomes, with significantly greater ROM( p  < 0.001), lower QD scores ( p  < 0.001), and higher grip strength ( p  < 0.001) relative to splinting. Group 2 exhibited intermediate efficacy, outperforming splinting but remaining inferior to Group 1 ( p  < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent therapeutic advantages for KT in both pediatric and adult cohorts ( p  < 0.001). Discussion KT emerged as the most effective modality, offering enhanced patient comfort, superior pain management, and accelerated functional recovery in finger ligament injuries and fractures. Its capacity to facilitate early mobilization without compromising stability positions it as a preferable alternative to conventional splinting methods in diverse age groups.
PXL01 in Sodium Hyaluronate for Improvement of Hand Recovery after Flexor Tendon Repair Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial
Postoperative adhesions constitute a substantial clinical problem in hand surgery. Fexor tendon injury and repair result in adhesion formation around the tendon, which restricts the gliding function of the tendon, leading to decreased digit mobility and impaired hand recovery. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the peptide PXL01 in preventing adhesions, and correspondingly improving hand function, in flexor tendon repair surgery. This prospective, randomised, double-blind trial included 138 patients admitted for flexor tendon repair surgery. PXL01 in carrier sodium hyaluronate or placebo was administered around the repaired tendon. Efficacy was assessed by total active motion of the injured finger, tip-to-crease distance, sensory function, tenolysis rate and grip strength, and safety parameters were followed, for 12 months post-surgery. The most pronounced difference between the treatment groups was observed at 6 months post-surgery. At this timepoint, the total active motion of the distal finger joint was improved in the PXL01 group (60 vs. 41 degrees for PXL01 vs. placebo group, p = 0.016 in PPAS). The proportion of patients with excellent/good digit mobility was higher in the PXL01 group (61% vs. 38%, p = 0.0499 in PPAS). Consistently, the PXL01 group presented improved tip-to-crease distance (5.0 vs. 15.5 mm for PXL01 vs. placebo group, p = 0.048 in PPAS). Sensory evaluation showed that more patients in the PXL01 group felt the thinnest monofilaments (FAS: 74% vs. 35%, p = 0.021; PPAS: 76% vs. 35%, p = 0.016). At 12 months post-surgery, more patients in the placebo group were considered to benefit from tenolysis (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.086 in PPAS). The treatment was safe, well tolerated, and did not increase the rate of tendon rupture. Treatment with PXL01 in sodium hyaluronate improves hand recovery after flexor tendon repair surgery. Further clinical trials are warranted to determine the most efficient dose and health economic benefits. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01022242; EU Clinical Trials 2009-012703-25.
Management of stable proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries with figure-of-8 orthoses: A parallel-group randomized controlled trial
Volar plate injuries of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) finger joint are common. Conservative treatment involves orthoses to limit hyperextension at the PIP joint yet allow movement of the joints to prevent joint stiffness and deformity. Custom-made dorsal blocking orthoses are recommended treatments. Previous research also supports the use of a figure-of-8 orthosis, although the comparative effectiveness of these orthoses is not currently known. This study aimed to compare the figure-of-8 orthosis and dorsal blocking orthosis for changes in the range of movement, pain, and function following stable volar plate PIP joint injuries and to compare the number of hand therapy appointments required. A parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial. This trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: CTRN12619000449134). Participants aged 13-65 years were recruited from an outpatient hand therapy service and randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. The experimental group of 20 participants received a custom-made thermoplastic figure-of-8 orthosis limiting the extension to 15-20 degrees. The control group of 22 participants had a dorsal blocking orthosis, which was serially extended by 10 degrees weekly starting at 30 degrees flexion. Participants were blinded to their group allocation. Outcome measures included range of movement, edema, pain, function, and number of hand therapy appointments. Data collection was completed by the treating therapist who was not blinded to group assignment. Data analysis included a series of mixed-model analyses of variance to examine changes over time. Forty-two participants were recruited and had their data analyzed. No significant between-group differences were observed for DIP flexion, PIP flexion, pain, and function from baseline to follow-up. Both groups exhibited significant improvements in these outcomes over time (p < 0.001); effect sizes ranged from small to large (0.28-0.79). On average, the intervention group required 4 (±1.5) appointments compared to 6 (±1.5) in the control group over the same period representing a significant difference (p < 0.001). Both dorsal blocking and figure-of-8 orthoses provide similar outcomes. The use of a figure-of-8 orthosis, or a dorsal block orthosis fabricated in maximal comfortable extension depending on severity, could reduce the number of appointments and increase convenience for patients. •Dorsal blocking and figure-of-8 orthoses are effective for volar plate injuries.•Improvements in movement, edema, pain, and function were observed in both groups.•Figure-of-8 orthosis, or a dorsal block orthosis fabricated in maximal comfortable extension, could reduce the number of appointments.
Repair of distal finger soft-tissue defects with free fibular great toe neurovascular flaps
Background This work aimed to investigate the change in fingerprint depth and the recovery rule of fingerprint biological recognition function after repairing finger abdominal defects and rebuilding fingerprint with a free flap. Method From April 2018 to March 2023, we collected a total of 43 cases of repairing finger pulp defects using the free flap of the fibular side of the great toe with the digital nerve. After surgery, irregular follow-up visits were conducted to observe fingerprint clarity, perform the ninhydrin test or detect visible sweating with the naked eye. We recorded fingerprint clarity, nail shape, two-point discrimination, cold perception, warm perception and fingerprint recognition using smartphones. The reconstruction process of the repaired finger was recorded to understand the changes in various observation indicators and their relationship with the depth of the fingerprint. The correlation between fingerprint depth and neural repair was determined, and the process of fingerprint biological recognition function repair was elucidated. Result All flaps survived, and we observed various manifestations in different stages of nerve recovery. The reconstructed fingerprint had a clear fuzzy process, and the depth changes of the fingerprint were consistent with the changes in the biological recognition function curve. Conclusion The free flap with the digital nerve is used to repair finger pulp defects. The reconstructed fingerprint has a biological recognition function, and the depth of the fingerprint is correlated with the process of nerve repair. The fingerprint morphology has a dynamic recovery process, and it can reach a stable state after 6–8 months.