Explore the vast range of titles available.

In response to flood risk, design flood estimation is a cornerstone of planning, infrastructure design, setting of insurance premiums, and emergency response planning. Under stationary assumptions, flood guidance and the methods used in design flood estimation are firmly established in practice and mature in their theoretical foundations, but under climate change, guidance is still in its infancy. Human-caused climate change is influencing factors that contribute to flood risk such as rainfall extremes and soil moisture, and there is a need for updated flood guidance. However, a barrier to updating flood guidance is the translation of the science into practical application. For example, most science pertaining to historical changes to flood risk focuses on examining trends in annual maximum flood events or the application of non-stationary flood frequency analysis. Although this science is valuable, in practice, design flood estimation focuses on exceedance probabilities much rarer than annual maximum events, such as the 1 % annual exceedance probability event or even rarer, using rainfall-based procedures, at locations where there are few to no observations of streamflow. Here, we perform a systematic review to summarize the state-of-the-art understanding of the impact of climate change on design flood estimation in the Australian context, while also drawing on international literature. In addition, a meta-analysis, whereby results from multiple studies are combined, is conducted for extreme rainfall to provide quantitative estimates of possible future changes. This information is described in the context of contemporary design flood estimation practice to facilitate the inclusion of climate science into design flood estimation practice.

The quantification of flood risk in estuarine regions relies on accurate estimation of flood probability, which is often challenging due to the rareness of hazardous flood events and their multi-causal (or “compound”) nature. Failure to consider the compounding nature of estuarine floods can lead to significant underestimation of flood risk in these regions. This study provides a comparative review of alternative approaches for estuarine flood estimation – namely, traditional univariate flood frequency analysis applied to both observed historical data and simulated data, as well as multivariate frequency analysis applied to flood events. Three specific implementations of the above approaches are evaluated on a case study – the estuarine portion of Swan River in Western Australia – highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The theoretical understanding of the three approaches, combined with findings from the case study, enable the generation of guidance on method selection for estuarine flood probability estimation, recognizing issues such as data availability, the complexity of the application/analysis process, the location of interest within the estuarine region, the computational demands, and whether or not future conditions need to be assessed.

In traditional flood frequency analysis, a minimum of 30 observations is required to guarantee the accuracy of design results with an allowable uncertainty, however, there has not been a recommendation for the requirement on the length of data in NFFA (nonstationary flood frequency analysis). Therefore, this study has been carried out with three aims: (i) to evaluate the predictive capabilities of nonstationary (NS) and stationary (ST) models with varying flood record lengths; (ii) to examine the impacts of flood record lengths on the NS and ST design floods and associated uncertainties; and (iii) to recommend the probable requirements of flood record length in NFFA. To achieve these objectives, 20 stations with record length longer than 100 years in Norway were selected and investigated by using both GEV (generalized extreme value)-ST and GEV-NS models with linearly varying location parameter (denoted by GEV-NS0). The results indicate that the fitting quality and predictive capabilities of GEV-NS0 outperform those of GEV-ST models when record length is approximately larger than 60 years for most stations, and the stability of the GEV-ST and GEV-NS0 is improved as record lengths increase. Therefore, a minimum of 60 years of flood observations is recommended for NFFA for the selected basins in Norway.

Flood is one of the worst natural disasters, which causes significant damage to economy and society. Flood risk assessment helps to reduce flood damage by managing flood risk in flood affected areas. For ungauged catchments, regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA) is generally used for design flood estimation. This study develops a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based RFFA technique using data from 201 catchments in south-east Australia. The CNN based RFFA technique is compared with multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree (DT) based RFFA models. Based on a split-sample validation using several statistical indices such as relative error, bias and root mean squared error, it is found that the CNN model performs best for annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs) in the range of 1 in 5 to 1 in 100, with median relative error values in the range of 29–44%. The DT model shows the best performance for 1 in 2 AEP, with a median relative error of 24%. The CNN model outperforms the currently recommended RFFA technique in Australian Rainfall and Runoff (ARR) guideline. The findings of this study will assist to upgrade RFFA techniques in ARR guideline in near future.

Assessing the risk of a historical-level flood is essential for regional flood protection and resilience establishment. However, due to the limited spatiotemporal coverage of observations, the impact assessment relies on model simulations and is thus subject to uncertainties from cascade physical processes. This study assesses the flood hazard map with uncertainties subject to different combinations of runoff inputs, variables for flood frequency analysis and fitting distributions based on estimations by the CaMa-Flood global hydrodynamic model. Our results show that deviation in the runoff inputs is the most influential source of uncertainties in the estimated flooded water depth and inundation area, contributing more than 80 % of the total uncertainties investigated in this study. Global and regional inundation maps for floods with 1-in-100 year return periods show large uncertainty values but small uncertainty ratios for river channels and lakes, while the opposite results are found for dry zones and mountainous regions. This uncertainty is a result of increasing variation at tails among various fitting distributions. In addition, the uncertainty between selected variables is limited but increases from the regular period to the rarer floods, both for the water depth at points and for inundation area over regions. The uncertainties in inundation area also lead to uncertainties in estimating the population and economy exposure to the floods. In total, inundation accounts for 9.1 % [8.1 %–10.3 %] of the land area for a 1-in-100 year flood, leading to 13.4 % [12.1 %–15 %] of population exposure and 13.1 % [11.8 %–14.7 %] of economic exposure for the globe. The flood exposure and uncertainties vary by continent and the results in Africa have the largest uncertainty, probably due to the limited observations to constrain runoff simulations, indicating a necessity to improve the performance of different hydrological models especially for data-limited regions.

Floods are among the most severe natural hazards, causing substantial damage and affecting millions of lives. These events are inherently multi-dimensional, requiring analysis across multiple factors. Traditional research often uses a bivariate framework relying on historical data, but climate change is expected to influence flood frequency analysis and flood system design in the future. This study assesses the projected changes in flood characteristics based on eight downscaled and bias-corrected General Circulation Models (GCMs) that participated in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6. The analysis considers two emission scenarios, including SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 for far-future (2070–2100), mid-term future (2040–2070), and historical (1982–2012) periods. Downscaled GCM outputs are utilized as predictors of the machine learning model to simulate daily streamflow. Then, a trivariate copula-based framework assesses flood events in terms of duration, volume, and flood peak in the Kan River basin, Iran. These analyses are carried out using the hierarchical Archimedean copula in three structures, and their accuracy in estimating the flood frequencies is ultimately compared. The results show that a heterogeneous asymmetric copula offers more flexibility to capture varying degrees of asymmetry across different parts of the distribution, leading to more accurate modeling results compared to homogeneous asymmetric and symmetric copulas. Also it has been found that climate change can influence the trivariate joint return periods, particularly in the far future. In other words, flood frequency may increase by approximately 50% in some cases in the far future compared to the mid-term future and historical period. This demonstrates that flood characteristics are expected to show nonstationary behavior in the future as a result of climate change. The results provide insightful information for managing and accessing flood risk in a dynamic environment.

This paper analyses flood frequency and performs flood simulation modeling along the Chenab River from Trimmu–Panjnad reach, to simulate flood 2014 and identify resultant flood inundated areas, under different return periods of floods. The aim of this study is to assist policymakers in designing efficient flood mitigation policies for the Chenab River, Pakistan which has been frequently hit by floods, especially in September 2014. Flood frequency analysis was carried out using log-Pearson type III (LP3) distributions to estimate peak flows with various return periods. The peak floods were incorporated into the Hydrologic Engineering Centre River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model to predict the relevant flood levels for river stretches from Trimmu to Panjnad reach. The HEC-RAS model outcomes were integrated with ArcGIS to prepare flood risk maps that helped in identifying different flood-vulnerable areas. Two flood risk zones were developed; low to moderate and high to very high flood risk zones. The simulation analysis of a 50-year flood period showed that about 400% of the land would be submerged when compared to normal river flow. The simulation of the flood 2014 extent was found to clearly match the MODIS images provided by the United Nations Satellite Centre (UNOSAT). The surface areas of floods having different return periods, were also estimated. The utilization of the HEC-RAS model for simulating the 2014 flood, presents an opportunity for flood policymakers to enhance their understanding and formulate effective risk reduction strategies in the Chenab River basin.

In the current study, the one-dimensional/two-dimensional (1D/2D) coupled hydrodynamic model is used for the development of flood hazard maps for the frequently flooded coastal urban floodplain of the Surat city, India. The releases from the Ukai dam and tidal levels at the Arabian Sea are considered as upstream and downstream boundary conditions, respectively. The floodplain roughness was estimated using the existing land use land cover (LULC) classification, and the performance of the developed coupled hydrodynamic model was evaluated against the past flood data of year 2006 and 2013. The flood frequency analysis was carried out for peak inflow into the Ukai reservoir, and subsequently, the design flood hydrographs for different return periods have been developed. Finally, the simulated model output has been used to develop multi-parameter flood hazard maps defining the stability of people, vehicles, and buildings. More than 80% of the entire coastal urban floodplain of the Surat city is submerged during 100-year return period flood, with West and North zone of the city being the worst affected regions. Out of the total flooded area, nearly 20% area is under significant hazard for adults. The 27% area offers instability hazard to large four-wheel drive vehicles, whereas 14% area is affected with moderate to high hazard for buildings. The instability index for specific vehicle types is dominated by floating of small and large cars over 90% of the flooded area. Further, the combined hazard maps revealed that 14% of the flooded area is under very severe hazard category, posing a threat to the stability of people, vehicles, and buildings. The developed hazard maps will work as an effective non-structural measure for local administrative agencies to minimize the losses and better future planning.

Flood hazard is typically evaluated by computing extreme flood probabilities from a flood frequency distribution following nationally defined procedures in which observed peak flow series are fit to a parametric probability distribution. These procedures, also known as flood frequency analysis, typically recommend only one probability distribution family for all watersheds within a country or region. However, large uncertainties associated with extreme flood probability estimates (>50-year flood or Q50) can be further biased when fit to an inappropriate distribution model because of differences in the tails between distribution families. Here, we demonstrate that hydroclimatic parameters can aid in the selection of a parametric flood frequency distribution. We use L-moment diagrams to visually show the fit of gaged annual maxima series across the United States, grouped by their Köppen climate classification and the precipitation intensities of the basin, to a general extreme value (GEV), log normal 3 (LN3), and Pearson 3 (P3) distribution. Our results show that in real space basic hydroclimatic properties of a basin exert a significant influence on the statistical distribution of the annual maxima. The best-fitted family distribution shifts from a GEV towards an LN3 distribution across a gradient from colder and wetter climates (Köppen group D, continental climates) towards more arid climates (Köppen group B, dry climates). Due to the diversity of hydrologic processes and flood-generating mechanisms among watersheds within large countries like the United States, we recommend that the selection of distribution model be guided by the hydroclimatic properties of the basin rather than relying on a single national distribution model.

The role of rainfall space–time structure, as well as its complex interactions with land surface properties, in flood response remains an open research issue. This study contributes to this understanding, specifically for small (<15 km2) urban watersheds. Using a flood frequency analysis framework that combines stochastic storm transposition (SST)-based rainfall scenarios with the physically based distributed Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) model, we examine the role of rainfall spatial and temporal variability in flood frequency across drainage basin scales in the highly urbanized Dead Run watershed (14.3 km2), Maryland, USA. The results show the complexities of flood response within several subwatersheds for both short (<50 years) and long (>100 years) rainfall return periods. The impact of impervious area on flood response decreases with increasing rainfall return period. For extreme storms, the maximum discharge is closely linked to the spatial structure of rainfall, especially storm core spatial coverage. The spatial heterogeneity of rainfall increases flood peak magnitudes by 50 % on average at the watershed outlet and its subwatersheds for both small and large return periods. The framework of SST–GSSHA-coupled frequency analysis also highlights the fact that spatially distributed rainfall scenarios are needed in quick-response flood frequency, even for relatively small basin scales.