Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose This work was initiated to extend data on the effect of pharmacogenetics and chemotherapy pharmacokinetics (PK) on clinical outcome in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Methods We assessed 44 gene polymorphisms in 16 genes (TYMS, MTHFR, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, DPYD, XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, ERCC1, RECQ1, RAD54L, ABCB1, ABCC2, ABCG2 and UGT2B7) in 64 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving capecitabine/oxaliplatin and 76 patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) receiving epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine, respectively. Plasma concentrations of anticancer drugs were measured for up to 24 h, and results were submitted to population PK analysis. We calculated the association between gene polymorphisms, chemotherapy exposure, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and chemotherapy-related toxicity using appropriate statistical tests. Results Patients with a low clearance of 5FU were at increased risk of neutropenia ( P  < 0.05) and hand–foot syndrome ( P  = 0.002). DPYD T85C, T1896C and A2846T mutant variants were associated with diarrhea ( P  < 0.05) and HFS ( P  < 0.02), and IVS14+1G>A additionally with diarrhea ( P  < 0.001). The TYMS 2R/3G, 3C/3G or 3G/3G promoter variants were associated with worse PFS in the CRC (HR = 2.0, P  < 0.01) and GEC group (HR = 5.4, P  < 0.001) and worse OS in the GEC group (HR = 4.7, P  < 0.001). The GSTP1 A313G mutant variant was associated with a higher PFS (HR = 0.55, P  = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.60, P  = 0.002) in the CRC group. Conclusions Germline polymorphisms of DPYD, TYMS and GSTP1 have a significant effect on toxicity and clinical outcome in patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced colorectal or gastroesophageal cancer. These data should further be validated in prospective clinical studies.

Background PEP02 (also known as MM-398, nal-IRI) is a novel nanoparticle formulation of irinotecan encapsulated in liposomes. The aims of this study were to investigate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PEP02 in combination with 5-FU and LV, in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. Methods Patients were enrolled in cohorts to receive PEP02 from 60 to 120 mg/m 2 (dose expressed as the irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate salt) as a 90-min intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by 24 h infusion of 5-FU 2,000 mg/m 2 and LV 200 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Results A total of 16 patients were assigned to four dose levels, 60 (three patients), 80 (six patients), 100 (five patients) and 120 mg/m 2 (two patients). DLT was observed in four patients, two at the 100 mg/m 2 dose level (one had grade III infection with hypotension and grade III hemorrhage; the other had grade III diarrhea and grade IV neutropenia), and two at the 120 mg/m 2 dose level (one had grade III diarrhea and grade IV neutropenia; the other had grade III diarrhea). The MTD of PEP02 was determined as 80 mg/m 2 . The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (81%), diarrhea (75%) and vomiting (69%). Among the six patients who received the MTD, one patient exhibited partial response, four patients had stable disease and one showed progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic data showed that PEP02 had a lower peak plasma concentration, longer half-life, and increased area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to time t of SN-38 than irinotecan at similar dose level. Conclusions The MTD of PEP02 on day 1 in combination with 24-h infusion of 5-FU and LV on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks was 80 mg/m 2 , which will be the recommended dose for future studies. Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered ( NCT02884128 ) with date of registration: August 12, 2016.

PurposeSeveral retrospective studies have shown that the antitumor efficacy of capecitabine-containing chemotherapy decreases when co-administered with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Although a reduction in capecitabine absorption by PPIs was proposed as the underlying mechanism, the effects of PPIs on capecitabine pharmacokinetics remain unclear. We prospectively examined the effects of rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites.MethodsWe enrolled patients administered adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) for postoperative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and metastatic CRC patients receiving CapeOX with/without bevacizumab. Patients receiving a PPI before registration were allocated to the rabeprazole group, and the PPI was changed to rabeprazole (20 mg/day) at least 1 week before the initiation of capecitabine treatment. On day 1, oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered 1 h after rabeprazole intake. Oxaliplatin (and bevacizumab) administration on day 1 was shifted to day 2 for pharmacokinetic analysis of the first capecitabine dose. Plasma concentrations of capecitabine, 5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, and 5-fluorouracil were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Effects of rabeprazole on inhibition of cell proliferation by each capecitabine metabolite were examined with colon cancer cells (COLO205 and HCT116).ResultsFive and 9 patients enrolled between September 2017 and July 2018 were allocated to rabeprazole and control groups, respectively. No significant effects of rabeprazole on area under the plasma concentration–time curve divided by capecitabine dose for capecitabine and its three metabolites were observed. Rabeprazole did not affect the proliferation inhibition of colon cancer cells by the respective capecitabine metabolites.ConclusionRabeprazole does not affect capecitabine pharmacokinetics.

Background: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway has been implicated in the molecular pathogenesis of human cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This provides a rationale for the development of MAPK-targeted agents such as pimasertib. Methods: Patients with KRAS mutant mCRC were treated in the second-line setting with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/irinotecan) plus pimasertib. The primary objective of the safety run-in phase was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II dose of pimasertib combined with FOLFIRI. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled in the trial. Ten and six patients were treated daily with 45 and 60 mg of pimasertib plus FOLFIRI, respectively. The MTD was considered to be 45 mg per day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia and skin/rash event. Of the 15 patients in the efficacy analysis group, two patients had partial response, nine patients had stable disease, three patients had progressive disease as their best overall response and one patient could not be evaluated. Conclusions: Dose escalation of pimasertib in combination with FOLFIRI was limited by toxicity. At the MTD of 45 mg per day, pimasertib was adequately tolerated in patients with mCRC and no unexpected or new safety signals or concerns were identified.

Irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan's active metabolite is inactivated by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 ( UGT1A1 ), which is deficient in Gilbert's syndrome. Irinotecan and metabolites are transported by P-glycoprotein, encoded by ABCB1 . 5-FU targets folate metabolism through inhibition of thymidylate synthase ( TYMS ). Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase ( MTHFR ) generates active folate necessary for haematopoiesis. We retrospectively genotyped 140 Swedish and Norwegian irinotecan and 5-FU-treated colorectal cancer patients from the Nordic VI clinical trial for selected variants of UGT1A1 , ABCB1 , TYMS and MTHFR . We found an increased risk of clinically relevant early toxicity in patients carrying the ABCB1 3435 T/T genotype, Odds ratio (OR)=3.79 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.09–13.2), and in patients carrying the UGT1A1 * 28/ * 28 genotype, OR=4.43 (95% CI=1.30–15.2). Patients with UGT1A1 * 28/ * 28 had an especially high risk of neutropenia, OR=6.87 (95% CI=1.70–27.7). Patients who had reacted with toxicity during the first two cycles were in total treated with fewer cycles ( P <0.001), and less often responded to treatment ( P <0.001). Genetic variation in ABCB1 was associated with both early toxicity and lower response to treatment. Carriers of the ABCB 1 1236T-2677T-3435T haplotype responded to treatment less frequently (43 vs 67%, P =0.027), and survived shorter time, OR=1.56 (95% CI=1.01–2.45).

Background Vorinostat is synergistic with 5-FU in vitro and in vivo models. A combination of these two agents was associated with clinical activity in 5-FU refractory colorectal cancer patients in a phase I clinical trial, therefore warranting the conduct of this prospective phase II study. Patients and methods Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized in a two-stage design to receive vorinostat at 800 or 1,400 mg/day once a day × 3, every 2 weeks. 5-FU, preceded by leucovorin, was administered as a bolus followed by a 46-h infusion on days 2 and 3 of vorinostat. A pre-specified 2-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 27/43 patients per arm was needed to deem an arm interesting for further investigation. Results The high-dose vorinostat arm did not reach the needed efficacy endpoint at completion of the first stage, with only 8 out of 15 patients being alive and progression free at 2 months. The low-dose vorinostat arm proceeded to accrue 43 patients with a 2-month PFS rate of 53% (23 out 43), including one partial response. The median PFS and overall survival on the low-dose arm were 2.4 and 6.5 months, respectively. Both treatment arms were well tolerated. No differences were noted in the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat at the 800- or 1,400-mg dose-levels, suggesting bioavailability saturation. Conclusions While the addition of vorinostat to 5-FU resulted in 1 partial response and in some disease stabilizations, the limited activity does not warrant the unselected use of this combination in chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer.

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug consisting of the 5-fluorouracil prodrug tegafur combined with gimeracil and oteracil. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK), bioequivalence, and safety of a newly developed generic formulation of S-1 compared with the branded reference formulation, in Korean gastric cancer patients. This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive the test formulation or reference formulation, followed by a one-week washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Serial blood samples were collected at 0 hrs (predose), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hrs after dosing in each period. The plasma concentrations of tegafur, 5-FU, gimeracil, and oteracil were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method. In total, 29 subjects completed the study. All of the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) fell within the predetermined acceptance range. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. The new S-1 formulation met the Korean regulatory requirement for bioequivalence. Both S-1 formulations were well tolerated in all subjects. https://cris.nih.go.kr CRIS KCT0003855.

Summary Aflibercept, a recombinant fusion protein, is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-B, and the placental growth factor (PlGF). The present study was an open-label, sequential-cohort, dose-escalation trial of intravenous aflibercept administered every 2 weeks in combination with 5-fluorouracil, levofolinate, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of the combination therapy to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) for Japanese patients. Two doses of aflibercept (2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg) were set, and DLTs were evaluated in the first 2 cycles. The subjects comprised 16 patients ( n  = 3 and 13 for 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept, respectively) who received a total of 149 cycles of aflibercept with FOLFIRI. No DLTs were observed at both doses. The frequent adverse events encountered were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, stomatitis, dysphonia, nausea, and epistaxis. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia for both doses and hypertension for the 4.0 mg/kg dose. Free aflibercept exposure increased with the dose, whereas exposure to VEGF-bound aflibercept remained similar at both doses. The response rate and progression-free survival at 4.0 mg/kg was 8.3 % and 7.59 months, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of aflibercept and FOLFIRI was well tolerated at both doses. The RPTD of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI for Japanese patients with mCRC was determined to be 4.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier : NCT00921661

Summary Background This study assessed the preliminary safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-tumor effects of aflibercept in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Chinese patients with previously-treated advanced solid malignancies. Patients and Methods This open-label single-arm Phase I study conducted at two centers in China included adult (≥18 years) patients with metastatic or unresectable solid malignancies who had received ≥1 prior treatment. Patients received aflibercept 4 mg/kg IV on Day 1 followed by FOLFIRI over Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks, and were assessed for safety, tumor response, PK parameters and immunogenicity. Post-hoc analyses included calculation of progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Results A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (35%), hypertension (30%), stomatitis (20%) and proteinuria (20%), and no anti-aflibercept antibodies were detected. Six patients achieved a partial response, and in 15 patients with CRC median PFS was 5.95 months (95% CI: 5.29–8.77). Free aflibercept remained in excess of VEGF-bound aflibercept for the majority of the study treatment duration. The mean free aflibercept values for C max (64.8 μg/mL) AUC (291 μg.day/mL), CL (0.92 L/day) and V ss (5.9 L) were similar to those measured in Caucasian patients. The addition of aflibercept did not influence the PK of the chemotherapy agents. Conclusion For Chinese patients with pre-treated advanced solid malignancies, 4 mg/kg of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI was well-tolerated, demonstrated preliminary anti-tumor activity and had a PK profile consistent with that in Caucasian patients.

Purpose Dose adjustment of 5-fluorouracil (FU) based on pharmacokinetic monitoring has been shown to reduce toxicities and increase efficacy compared with dosing based on body surface area in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetic dose adjustment of FU in a modified FOLFOX7 (mFOLFOX7) plus bevacizumab regimen in Japanese patients with previously untreated mCRC. Methods This single-arm, multicenter phase II trial enrolled 48 patients with mCRC. Treatment consisted of 5 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab followed by mFOLFOX7 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 on day 1, infused leucovorin 200 mg/m 2 , followed by a 2400 mg/m 2 infusion of FU for 46 h starting on day 1), repeated every 2 weeks. FU concentrations were measured by immunoassay between 18 and 36 h after the start of continuous FU infusion, and the FU dose was then adjusted if required in subsequent cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate. Results The median initial area under the concentration–time curve for FU was 23 mg h/L. Twenty-nine patients (60%) achieved the target concentration at the first cycle, and all 48 achieved it within the fourth cycle. The overall frequency of grade 3/4 adverse effects was 38%, with no significant difference between patients who did and not require dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 48% (95% confidence intervals = 34–62%). The median progression-free and overall survival rates were 11.3 and 24.1 months, respectively. Conclusions Pharmacokinetic dose adjustment of FU in mFOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab can optimize FU concentrations promptly and is safe in Japanese patients with mCRC.