Explore the vast range of titles available.

Forty-eight patients who provided 2 consecutive blood samples that tested positive for cytomegalovirus DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were randomized to receive either full-dose ganciclovir (5 mg/kg intravenously [iv] twice daily) or half-dose ganciclovir (5 mg/kg iv once daily) plus half-dose foscarnet (90 mg/kg iv once daily) for 14 days. In the ganciclovir arm, 17 (71%) of 24 patients reached the primary end point of being CMV negative by PCR within 14 days of initiation of therapy, compared with 12 (50%) of 24 patients in the ganciclovir-plus-foscarnet arm (P = .12). Toxicity was greater in the combination-therapy arm. In patients who failed to reach the primary end point, baseline virus load was 0.77 log10 higher, the replication rate before therapy was faster (1.5 vs. 2.7 days), and the viral decay rate was slower (2.9 vs. 1.1 days) after therapy. Bivariable logistic regression models identified baseline virus load, bone-marrow transplantation, and doubling time and half-life of decay as the major factors affecting response to therapy within 14 days. This study did not support a synergistic effect of ganciclovir plus foscarnet in vivo.

Ganciclovir and foscarnet are two representative anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) agents. A previous regional study revealed a lower risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients who received pre-emptive foscarnet. We conducted a retrospective nationwide study to confirm the results. A total of 8890 patients aged 16 or older with hematological malignancies who received foscarnet ( n  = 1555) or ganciclovir ( n  = 7335) during their first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were included. The risks of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.40; P  < 0.001) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01–1.33; P  = 0.033) were higher with ganciclovir. Among male patients with a female donor, the incidence of extensive chronic GVHD 3 years after HSCT was clearly lower with foscarnet (13%; 95% CI, 9–16%) than with ganciclovir (27%; 95% CI, 25–29%; P  < 0.001). In male patients who received HSCT from female donors, foscarnet recipients showed significantly lower incidence of extensive chronic GVHD than ganciclovir recipients, regardless of donor source or previous acute GVHD. While caution is necessary, these results indicate that foscarnet affects alloimmunization and might reduce the incidence of chronic GVHD.

This is a dose-finding study using foscarnet for CMV prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in 20 high risk patients (unrelated donors, or T cell depleted, and/or advanced disease). Foscarnet was started on day +1 after BMT and continued until day +100. We explored four different dose levels, patients being entered at the lowest dose level until one patient experiences CMV-reactivation, identified as two consecutive positive CMV antigenemias (CMVAg-emia). The four dose levels expressed as mg/kg/day between days 1 and 30 (induction) and between days 31 and 100 (maintenance) were respectively: dose level I = 60/30 (n = 5); dose level II = 120/60 (n = 4); dose level III = 120/90 (n = 5) and dose level IV = 120/120 (n = 6). All patients showed engraftment: PMN > or =0.5 x 109/l at a median interval of 16, 21, 17, 15 days after BMT, and Plt > or =30x10(9)/l on days 19, 16, 17, 17 respectively. CMVAg-emia was seen in 10 patients at a median interval of 53 days post-BMT (range 33-89) with a median of 10 CMV antigen+ cells (range 1-16). There was a dose effect of foscarnet on CMVAg-emia: respectively 4/5 patients (80%), 2/4 (50%), 3/5 (60%) and 1/6 (18%) at dose levels I, II, III, IV (P = 0.1). CMV disease was seen in 3/9 (33%) at dose levels I, II and 0/11 at dose levels III, IV (P = 0. 07). The median number of CMV antigen-positive cells at diagnosis of CMV infection was different: 13 in dose levels I-II and two in dose levels III-IV (P = 0.01). Increased creatininine was seen in 15 patients with a mean of 1.8 mg% (range 1.5-5.7) and was the cause of discontinuation in nine patients (45%). Renal toxicity was reversible in all nine patients. Overall actuarial TRM at 2 years was 31%: 47% for patients at dose levels I-II and 19% for patients at dose levels III-IV. In conclusion, foscarnet exhibits a dose-dependent prophylactic effect on CMVAg-emia, CMV disease and transplant-related mortality with acceptable and reversible renal toxicity.

Patients with symptomatic gastrointestinal disease due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) were randomized to receive open-label ganciclovir (22) or foscarnet (26). Patients were stratified by disease site and concurrent gut infection. Response was assessed by a visual analogue score of symptoms, endoscopic appearances, histologic inflammation, and numbers of CMV inclusions. In each treatment group, 73% had a complete or good clinical response; 83% of foscarnet-treated and 85% of ganciclovir-treated patients showed response by endoscopy, and inclusion bodies disappeared from follow-up biopsies in 73% of these. Most patients (35) developed further evidence of CMV disease during follow-up. The time to progression was not significantly different between recipients (16 weeks) and nonrecipients (13 weeks) of maintenance therapy, although patients were not randomized to receive maintenance or not. Survival in both treatment groups was <40 weeks and was unaffected by maintenance treatment. Both ganciclovir and foscarnet are effective first-line treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) CMV infection. Maintenance therapy does not prevent progression of disease.

Despite significant advances in the day-to-day management of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantations, including the introduction of new antiviral drugs, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to undertake a literature-based review of foscarnet in this therapeutic setting and to align current best-published evidence with recent recommendations presented at the European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia. Ganciclovir remains the mainstay of CMV infection/disease antiviral management protocols. However, approximately a third of patients develop severe neutropenia and others become resistant to ganciclovir, and thus, a reasonably large proportion of patients are not able to receive and/or continue with this medication. Foscarnet is a suitable option as both pre-emptive therapy or for the treatment of active disease in these patients. Randomized trials have demonstrated that foscarnet is equally effective when compared with ganciclovir for pre-emptive treatment of CMV infections: the outcome was comparable with ganciclovir in terms of control of antigenemia and survival rates. There is a paucity of information for its use in the prophylaxis of CMV, although preliminary data show that it was effective in some patients at high risk of CMV reactivation. The main adverse events associated with foscarnet are renal impairment, serum electrolyte and hemoglobin disturbances, seizures and local genital irritation/ulceration. Foscarnet is a well-established antiviral option in immunocompromised patients, and it is usually administered as a second-line option to ganciclovir. In patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it has proven efficacy when used pre-emptively to treat CMV reactivation, as an alternative to and also in combination with ganciclovir.

Thirty-two patients with AIDS and previously untreated cytomegalovirus retinitis completed an induction course of foscarnet, 60 mg/kg every 8 h for 14 days, had retinitis stabilize, and were then randomly assigned to receive foscarnet maintenance as either a 90- or 120-mg/kg/day infusion administered over 2 h. Median survival was 157 and 336 days for the 90- and 120-mg/kg/day groups, respectively (P < .001). In an independent, masked analysis of retinal photographs, median time to progression ofretinitis was 31 versus 95 days (P = .13). Daily intravenous foscarnet at a dose of 120 mg/kg (adjusted for renal function) resulted in significantly longer survival and tended to increase time to retinitis progression compared to the standard 90-mg/kg/day maintenance dose. Although a substantial increase in the risk of serious toxicity at the 120-mg/kg/day dose was not observed, the small sample size in this trial limited the power to detect differences that might be clinically important.

To compare the pharmacokinetics of foscarnet administered as an infusion twice daily (BID) or thrice daily (TID), and to compare the effects on the electrolyte balance, cardiac and renal functions over a 3-week induction treatment of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. Pharmacokinetics/dynamics of foscarnet were investigated on treatment days 1, 14 and 21. Twelve AIDS patients with CMV retinitis completed the investigation period. Concentrations of foscarnet and electrolytes were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and by an ion-selective analyser, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of the two regimens were essentially similar. Foscarnet plasma and creatinine clearances were 2.0 and 1.6 ml.min-1.kg-1, respectively, in the BID group at steady state (day 21). In the TID group the corresponding values were 1.8 and 1.7 ml.min-1.kg-1, respectively. In both regimens the elimination half-life of foscarnet was 2-3 h. Ionized calcium concentrations were transiently decreased and strongly inversely correlated to foscarnet plasma concentrations in both regimens with no significant differences between groups. A trend towards prolongation of the QTc interval was seen when data from both treatments were analysed together. Our data suggest comparable pharmacokinetics of foscarnet after intermittent administration BID or TID during a 3-week induction period.

This trial was designed to compare foscarnet with ganciclovir as pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection in patients undergoing allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Thirty-nine patients were randomized to receive foscarnet 90 mg/kg every 12 h (n = 20) or ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h (n = 19) for 15 days at the time of development of CMVAg-emia. Primary-end points of the study were (1) outcome of CMVAg-emia; (2) progression to CMV disease; and (3) side-effects of treatment. The secondary end-point was transplant-related mortality (TRM). The two groups were comparable for diagnosis, status of disease, donor type, acute graft-versus-host (aGVHD) prophylaxis, interval between HSCT and CMVAg-emia and number of CMVAg positive cells; the donor and recipient age were borderline older in the foscarnet group. Increments of serum creatinine in the foscarnet group, and cytopenia in the ganciclovir group were controlled by reducing the administered dose: in the first 15 days of therapy 9/20 foscarnet and 10/19 ganciclovir patients had a dose reduction greater than 20% (P = 0.43). Clearance of CMVAg-emia was faster in the foscarnet group although with borderline statistical significance. Failures of treatment occurred in 3/20 patients in foscarnet group vs 8/19 patients in ganciclovir group (P= 0.06): causes of failure were the need for combination therapy to control antigenemia (1/20 vs 5/19), and reactivation during treatment for 2 vs 3 patients, respectively. CMV disease was diagnosed in 1 vs 2 patients (P = 0.5) who subsequently died. The actuarial 1-year TRM was 25 vs 12%, respectively (P = 0.3). This study suggests that foscarnet and ganciclovir are both effective for pre-emptive therapy of CMVAg-emia, although the number of failures would seem to be slightly higher in the ganciclovir patients. Side-effects are seen in both groups and can be managed with appropriate dose reduction.

Severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is rare in previously healthy immunocompetent individuals; to our knowledge, only thirty-four such cases have been reported in the worldwide literature. Multiorgan involvement was associated with a high mortality rate among these patients. Disease that clinically involves only the liver or lungs could be fatal; in contrast, none of the patients with isolated central nervous system infection died. Although few patients were treated with specific antiviral therapy, five of six patients with severe infection recovered after receiving therapy with ganciclovir or foscarnet. The rarity of severe CMV disease in immunocompetent patients probably precludes the performance of a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of specific antiviral therapy. However, the historically poor prognosis in the absence of such therapy suggests that rapid diagnosis of CMV disease and early instigation of specific treatment may be important.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important complication of solid-organ transplantation. The availability of potent antiviral therapies has decreased the incidence of CMV disease among solid-organ transplant recipients but has also led to challenges, including ganciclovir resistance, late-onset CMV disease, and uncertainty about the optimal duration of prophylaxis or therapy for CMV disease. Specific therapies and management of CMV resistance will be addressed here. The best approach for CMV disease in solid-organ transplant recipients is prevention, but which strategy--prophylaxis or preemptive therapy--is optimal remains debatable. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir remain the best options for prevention and treatment of CMV disease in solid-organ transplant recipients, but they are costly and associated with toxicity. Foscarnet and cidofovir, indicated for the treatment of patients who fail to respond to ganciclovir, are less attractive alternatives because of renal toxicity. Therefore, new therapeutic agents for CMV and an immunogenic, safe CMV vaccine are critically needed.