Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction Chopart injuries can be allocated into 4 broad groups, ligamentous injury with or without dislocation and fracture with or without dislocation, which must occur at the talonavicular joint (TNJ) and/or calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ). Chopart dislocations are comprised of pure-dislocations and fracture-dislocations. We aim to review the literature, to enable evidence-based recommendations. Methods A literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles from the electronic databases, PubMed, Medline and Scopus. The PRISMA flow chart was used to scrutinise the search results. Articles were screened by title, abstract and full text to confirm relevance. Results We identified 58 papers for analysis, 36 case reports, 4 cohort studies, 4 case series and 14 other articles related to the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of Chopart dislocations. Diagnostic recommendations included routine imaging to contain computed tomography (CT) and routine examination for compartment syndrome. Treatment recommendations included early anatomical reduction, with restoration and maintenance of column length and joint congruency. For both pure-dislocations and fracture-dislocations urgent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) provided the most favourable long-term outcomes. Conclusions Chopart dislocations are a complex heterogenous midfoot injury with historically poor outcomes. There is a relative paucity of research discussing these injuries. We have offered evidence-based recommendations related to the clinical and surgical management of these rare pathologies.

Background To determine if temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixator (ex-fix) in ankle fracture-dislocations with delayed surgery or moderate soft-tissue injury, we analysed the early complications and re-dislocation rates of cast immobilization in relation to ex-fix in patients sustaining these injuries. Methods All skeletally mature patients with a closed ankle fracture-dislocation and a minimum 6-months follow-up treated between 2007 and 2017 were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, injury description, treatment history and complications were assessed. Results In 160 patients (94 female; mean age 50 years) with 162 ankle fracture-dislocations, 35 underwent primary ex-fix and 127 temporizing cast immobilizations. Loss of reduction (LOR) was observed in 25 cases (19.7%) and 19 (15.0%) were converted to ex-fix. The rate of surgical site infections (ex-fix: 11.1% vs cast: 4.6%) and skin necrosis (ex-fix: 7.4% vs cast: 6.5%) did not differ significantly between groups ( p  = 0.122 and p  = 0.825). Temporizing cast immobilization led to an on average 2.7 days earlier definite surgery and 5.0 days shorter hospitalization when compared to ex-fix ( p  < 0.001). Posterior malleolus fragment (PMF) size predicted LOR with ≥ 22.5% being the threshold for critical PMF-size ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion Temporizing cast immobilization was a safe option for those ankle fracture-dislocations in which immediate definite treatment was not possible. Those temporized in a cast underwent definite fixation earlier than those with a fix-ex and had a complication rate no worse than the ex-fix patients. PMF-size was an important predictor for LOR. Primary ex-fix seems appropriate for those with ≥ 22.5% PMF-size. Trial registration The study does not meet the criteria of a prospective, clinical trial. There was no registration.

Purpose Radiocarpal dislocation fractures (RCDF) are rare injuries that usually occur in a violent trauma setting. Our work aimed to analyze our patients’ functional and radiological results after surgery and identify potential medium- and long-term complications while reviewing other series previously reported in the literature. Methods We have performed a retrospective study over five years at our university hospital, eleven patients were selected, and the mean follow-up was about 33 months. We used Dumontier’s and Moneim’s classifications for classifying the injuries. All the patients underwent surgery followed by cast immobilization. The QuickDash score and Green O’Brien score modified by Cooney were used to assess the functional result, while the radiological result was judged on standard wrist radiographs. Results Out of the eleven patients, only one described a Dumontier type I radiocarpal dislocation; all the others were type II. Following the Moneim classification, two patients were type II. Most cases showed posterior displacement. In 80% of cases, the radiocarpal fracture-dislocation was combined with other bone or ligament injuries. All patients received surgical treatment followed by cast immobilization for 45 days. The mean loss of range of motion at the last follow-up was about 39%, keeping the arch intact in most cases. Quick dash score was 29.54, and Green O’Brien’s score was 71.1. Three of the patients showed osteoarthritic remodeling. Conclusion A careful clinical and radiological evaluation, followed by an anatomic surgical reduction of the articulating surface of the distal radius, as well as the handling of the associated lesions, are major conditions for a satisfactory clinical result.

Background Complete fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine are usually associated with severe spinal cord injury. However, a very small number of patients do not have severe spinal cord injury symptoms, patients with normal muscle strength or only partial nerve root symptoms, known as “lucky fracture dislocation”. The diagnosis and treatment of such patients is very difficult. Recently, we successfully treated one such patient. Case presentation A 73-year-old male patient had multiple neck and body aches after trauma, but there was sensory movement in his limbs. However, preoperative cervical radiographs showed no significant abnormalities, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed complete fracture and dislocation of C7. Before operation, the halo frame was fixed traction, but the reduction was not successful. Finally, the fracture reduction and internal fixation were successfully performed by surgery. The postoperative pain of the patient was significantly relieved, and the sensory movement of the limbs was the same as before. Two years after surgery, the patient’s left little finger and ulnar forearm shallow sensation recovered, and the right flexion muscle strength basically returned to normal. Conclusion This case suggests that when patients with trauma are encountered in the clinic, they should be carefully examined, and the presence of cervical fracture and dislocation should not be ignored because of the absence of neurological symptoms or mild symptoms. In addition, positioning during handling and surgery should be particularly avoided to increase the risk of paralysis.

Purpose Most elbow dislocations can be treated conservatively, with surgery indicated in special circumstances. Surgical options, apart from fracture fixation, range from repair or reconstruction of the damaged ligaments to static external fixation, usually entailing either a long period of immobilization followed by carefully monitored initiation of movement or dynamic external fixation. In general, no consensus regarding surgical treatment has been reached. A new method of open ligament repair and augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament using a non-absorbable suture tape in cases of acute and subacute elbow instability following dislocations has been described here, which allows an early, brace-free initiation of the full range of motion. This is the first description of the technique of internal bracing of the lateral elbow with preliminary patient outcome parameters for acute treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability. Methods Seventeen patients (14 males and 3 females) with acute or subacute posterolateral elbow instability as a result of dislocation or fracture dislocation were treated in our centre (Sporthopaedicum, Straubing, Regensburg, Germany) from 2014 to 2015 with open LUCL re-fixation and non-absorbable suture tape augmentation. The elbows were actively mobilized immediately after the operation and a maximum bracing period of 3 days. Results At 10 month median follow-up, none of the patients showed clinically apparent signs of instability or suffered subluxation or re-dislocation. One patient required re-operation for heterotopic ossification. The median range of motion was from 10° (0–40) to 130° (90–50) and median Oxford, Mayo Elbow Performance score, Simple Elbow Value, and DASH Scores were 41(29–48), 100 (70–100), 83% (60–95), and 18.5 (1.6–66), respectively. All patients reported a complete return to pre-injury level of activity. Conclusion Augmentation with a non-absorbable suture tape acting as an ‘Internal Brace’ following an elbow dislocation is a safe adjunct to primary ligament repair and may allow the early mobilization and recovery of elbow stability and range of motion. Level of evidence IV.

Introduction Ankle fractures represent a significant portion of orthopedic injuries, with fracture dislocations tending to have worse outcomes. Logsplitter fractures represent a subset of fracture dislocations in which the talus is axially wedged in the tibiofibular joint. We aim to comprehensively investigate and report on the complications and functional outcomes associated with ankle fracture-dislocations. Materials and Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a medical librarian conducted a literature search in Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Studies examining ankle fracture-dislocations and reporting on functional or employment outcomes were included. Excluded were non-English studies, abstracts, conference proceedings, letters, perspective pieces, reviews, editorials, and case reports or series with fewer than five patients. Data on functional outcomes were extracted and reported using descriptive statistics. A comparative analysis of AOFAS scores between Logsplitter and ankle fracture-dislocations was conducted using pooled means and independent t-tests. Results A total of 21 studies involving 810 cases of ankle fracture-dislocations were included. The pooled mean AOFAS score across 13 studies was 81.5, indicating “good” outcomes, while Logsplitter injuries had a significantly lower mean score of 75.8 compared to 82.9 for other ankle fracture-dislocations ( p  = 0.016). Complications included wound infection (7.3%), posttraumatic osteoarthritis (29.2%), nonunion/malunion (12.6%), and malunion. No studies reported on employment outcomes. Conclusions Ankle fracture-dislocations are high-energy injuries that affect a younger population compared to non-dislocated ankle fractures. Their functional outcomes resemble those of pilon fractures more than common ankle fractures. Logsplitter injuries are a subset of fracture dislocations that occur in even younger patients, with worse functional outcomes. This information can guide perioperative discussion and expectations for functional recovery. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of these injuries on return to employment.

Background Although the Neer and AO/OTA classifications have been widely accepted, observer reliability studies of these two classifications have questioned their reliability and reproducibility to date. We developed an entirely new classification, the Mitsuzawa classification, for dislocated and displaced proximal humeral fractures and tested all three classifications for their intra- and interobserver reliability. Methods Two experienced shoulder surgeons and two orthopedic residents independently evaluated the Xray (xR) values of 100 proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). The inclusion criteria for PHFs were (1) fracture-dislocation of the glenohumeral joint, (2) severely displaced fracture that required arthroplasty, such as hemi-arthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and (3) age > 18 years. Four reviewers classified all 100 fractures according to the Neer, AO/OTA, and Mitsuzawa classifications on two occasions. The intraobserver reliability was calculated using a Cohen κ statistic, while the interobserver reliability was calculated using a Fleiss κ statistic. Results The average intraobserver agreements for the Neer, AO/OTA, and Mitsuzawa classifications were 0.57 (moderate), 0.67 (substantial), and 0.77 (substantial), respectively. The average interobserver agreements for the Neer, AO/OTA, and Mitsuzawa classifications were 0.49 (moderate), 0.56 (moderate), and 0.73 (substantial), respectively. The most common fracture type in each classification was an anterior dislocated fracture with a greater tuberosity fragment, which corresponded to A3a (57 cases) in the Mitsuzawa classification. Conclusions The Mitsuzawa classification of PHF incorporates different perspectives regarding glenohumeral compatibility, assessment before and after shoulder dislocation reduction, and the degree of displacement of the proximal stump of the humeral shaft. Compared with the Neer and AO/OTA classifications, our new classification system adopted a user-friendly flowchart format and provided satisfactory intra- and interobserver reliability. Level of evidence Level IV.

Anterior reduction and interbody fusion fixation has not been compared directly with posterior reduction and short-segmental pedicle screw fixation for lower cervical dislocation, and so consensus is lacking as to which is the optimal method. The purpose of this paper is to compare long-term outcomes of the anterior versus posterior approach for traumatic cervical dislocation with spinal cord injury. One hundred and fifty-nine patients could be followed for more than 10 years (follow-up rate 84.1%). Ninety-two patients underwent anterior reduction and interbody fusion and fixation, and 67 patients underwent posterior reduction and short-segmental pedicle screw fixation. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the American Spinal Injury Association grading (ASIA), Odom’s criteria, cervical kyphosis, operative parameters, and surgical or post-operative complications were evaluated. Patients were followed for 10 to 17 years. There was no significant difference in main JOA scores, NDI scores or ASIA scores between the two groups at follow-up. The posterior approach was associated with greater loss of alignment by two years (P = 0.012) and at final follow-up (P < 0.001). The posterior approach group had more blood loss (P < 0.001), longer operation times (P < 0.001), longer hospital stays (P < 0.001) and fewer complications than the anterior approach group. The anterior approach is better than the posterior approach for preserving cervical lordosis, which is associated with a better long-term effect.

Introduction Perilunate dislocations (PLD) and perilunate fracture-dislocations (PLFD) are high-energy wrist injuries often linked to significant post-traumatic osteoarthritis. This study aims to determine whether PLD and PLFD yield different radiological outcomes following surgical treatment while identifying prognostic factors for worse outcomes. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients treated for perilunate injuries between 2000 and 2022. Radiographic evaluation included postoperative carpal alignment, scapholunate distance, ulnar translocation, and postoperative arthrosis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. Logistic regression models were used in the study. The analyzed explanatory variables included: type of injury (PLFD/PLD), Mayfield classification, capsulodesis, repair of intercarpal- and extrinsic ligaments, and number of wrist transfixations. The significance level was set at p  ≤ 0.05. The calculations were performed with R (version 4.3.2). Results Among 51 patients, the mean follow-up was 4.33 years (1-22.13), and the mean age was 37.76 years. PLFD accounted for 55% of cases. Patients in the PLD group were older at the time of injury ( p  = 0.0031) compared to PLFD. Older patients presented also with higher stages of perilunate instability ( p  = 0.0061). Midcarpal arthrosis was the most common site of wrist degeneration (58.8%). Ordinal logistic regression indicated that PLFD was associated with a lower risk of midcarpal arthrosis (OR = 0.293, p  = 0.04), while a higher number of wrist transfixations increased the risk of advanced arthrosis (OR = 2.427, p  = 0.02), The logistic regression model detected a positive effect of the number of wrist transfixations on lunate fovea arthrosis ( p  = 0.048). The number of wrist transfixations did not correlate with the number of fractures ( p  = 0.06), Mayfield classification ( p  = 0.16), or intraoperative reduction outcome ( p  = 0.6). Conclusion PLD and a greater number of wrist transfixations were associated with a higher risk of wrist arthrosis. Limiting wrist pinning to essential procedures may help prevent additional iatrogenic chondral lesions.

Fracture-dislocations of the elbow are a spectrum of injuries that have varying outcomes and complications, such as limited range of motion and long-term pain. The Monteggia fracture-dislocation and terrible triad fracture-dislocation are 2 such injury patterns that occur secondary to different mechanisms. This study sought to compare complication profiles and patient outcomes associated with these 2 distinct injury patterns. A retrospective chart review of all adult patients treated by 1 of 3 orthopedic traumatologists at a major academic center for operative fixation for either a Monteggia fracture-dislocation or a terrible triad elbow fracture-dislocation over a 12-year period was performed. Data collected included demographics, surgical data, patient-reported pain and elbow stiffness, elbow range of motion, presence of elbow joint contracture, nerve injuries, healing complications, and need for reoperation. The review included 105 patients, 58 with Monteggia injury and 47 with terrible triad injury, who had complete follow-up and radiographic imaging available. At latest follow-up, the 2 groups had similar rates of pain, reoperation, and ultimate elbow range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination. Elbow contractures requiring operative release were more commonly associated with terrible triad injury, and the incidence of nonunion was significantly greater in Monteggia fractures. A Monteggia fracture-dislocation portends a higher risk of ulna nonunion, whereas terrible triad injury is associated with elbow contracture. Despite their unique complications, both patterns ultimately have high rates of reoperation as their unique complications are both indications for operative repair. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the complication profile of their unique injury pattern. [Orthopedics. 202X;XX(X):xx–xx.]