Explore the vast range of titles available.

Non-randomised trials have reported benefits of kyphoplasty in patients with cancer and vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical management for patients with cancer who have painful VCFs. The Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation (CAFE) study was a randomised controlled trial at 22 sites in Europe, the USA, Canada, and Australia. We enrolled patients aged at least 21 years who had cancer and one to three painful VCFs. Patients were randomly assigned by a computer-generated minimisation randomisation algorithm to kyphoplasty or non-surgical management (control group). Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was back-specific functional status measured by the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ) score at 1 month. Outcomes at 1 month were analysed by modified intention to treat, including all patients with data available at baseline and at 1 month follow-up. Patients in the control group were allowed to crossover to receive kyphoplasty after 1 month. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00211237. Between May 16, 2005, and March 11, 2008, 134 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to kyphoplasty (n=70) or non-surgical management (n=64). 65 patients in the kyphoplasty group and 52 in the control group had data available at 1 month. The mean RDQ score in the kyphoplasty group changed from 17·6 at baseline to 9·1 at 1 month (mean change −8·3 points, 95% CI −6·4 to −10·2; p<0·0001). The mean score in the control group changed from 18·2 to 18·0 (mean change 0·1 points; 95% CI −0·8 to 1·0; p=0·83). At 1 month, the kyphoplasty treatment effect for RDQ was −8·4 points (95% CI −7·6 to −9·2; p<0·0001). The most common adverse events within the first month were back pain (four of 70 in the kyphoplasty group and five of 64 in the control group) and symptomatic vertebral fracture (two and three, respectively). One patient in the kyphoplasty group had an intraoperative non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, which resolved and was attributed to anaesthesia. Another patient in this group had a new VCF, which was thought to be device related. For painful VCFs in patients with cancer, kyphoplasty is an effective and safe treatment that rapidly reduces pain and improves function. Medtronic Spine LLC.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty is increasingly used for treatment of pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, but the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of the procedure remain uncertain. We aimed to clarify whether vertebroplasty has additional value compared with optimum pain treatment in patients with acute vertebral fractures. Patients were recruited to this open-label prospective randomised trial from the radiology departments of six hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients were aged 50 years or older, had vertebral compression fractures on spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss; level of fracture at Th5 or lower; bone oedema on MRI), with back pain for 6 weeks or less, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more. Patients were randomly allocated to percutaneous vertebroplasty or conservative treatment by computer-generated randomisation codes with a block size of six. Masking was not possible for participants, physicians, and outcome assessors. The primary outcome was pain relief at 1 month and 1 year as measured by VAS score. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00232466. Between Oct 1, 2005, and June 30, 2008, we identified 431 patients who were eligible for randomisation. 229 (53%) patients had spontaneous pain relief during assessment, and 202 patients with persistent pain were randomly allocated to treatment (101 vertebroplasty, 101 conservative treatment). Vertebroplasty resulted in greater pain relief than did conservative treatment; difference in mean VAS score between baseline and 1 month was −5·2 (95% CI −5·88 to −4·72) after vertebroplasty and −2·7 (−3·22 to −1·98) after conservative treatment, and between baseline and 1 year was −5·7 (−6·22 to −4·98) after vertebroplasty and −3·7 (−4·35 to −3·05) after conservative treatment. The difference between groups in reduction of mean VAS score from baseline was 2·6 (95% CI 1·74–3·37, p<0·0001) at 1 month and 2·0 (1·13–2·80, p<0·0001) at 1 year. No serious complications or adverse events were reported. In a subgroup of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and persistent pain, percutaneous vertebroplasty is effective and safe. Pain relief after vertebroplasty is immediate, is sustained for at least a year, and is significantly greater than that achieved with conservative treatment, at an acceptable cost. ZonMw; COOK Medical.

In this randomized trial involving patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, patients who underwent vertebroplasty had improvements in pain and disability measures that were similar to those in patients who underwent a sham procedure. Patients who underwent vertebroplasty had improvements in pain and disability measures that were similar to those in patients who underwent a sham procedure. Spontaneous vertebral fractures are associated with pain, disability, and death in patients with osteoporosis. Percutaneous vertebroplasty, the injection of medical cement, or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), into the fractured vertebral body has gained widespread acceptance as an effective method of pain relief and has become routine therapy for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Guidelines recommend vertebroplasty for fractures that have not responded to medical treatment. 1 Typically, the duration of such fractures ranges from several weeks to several months or longer for fractures that have not healed. Numerous case series and several small, unblinded, nonrandomized, controlled studies have suggested the effectiveness of vertebroplasty in relieving . . .

Balloon kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of painful vertebral fractures, which is intended to reduce pain and improve quality of life. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the procedure. Adults with one to three acute vertebral fractures were eligible for enrolment in this randomised controlled trial at 21 sites in eight countries. We randomly assigned 300 patients by a computer-generated sequence to receive kyphoplasty treatment (n=149) or non-surgical care (n=151). The primary outcome was the difference in change from baseline to 1 month in the short-form (SF)-36 physical component summary (PCS) score (scale 0–100) between the kyphoplasty and control groups. Quality of life and other efficacy measurements and safety were assessed up to 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00211211. 138 participants in the kyphoplasty group and 128 controls completed follow-up at 1 month. By use of repeated measures mixed effects modelling, all 300 randomised participants were included in the analysis. Mean SF-36 PCS score improved by 7·2 points (95% CI 5·7–8·8), from 26·0 at baseline to 33·4 at 1 month, in the kyphoplasty group, and by 2·0 points (0·4–3·6), from 25·5 to 27·4, in the non-surgical group (difference between groups 5·2 points, 2·9–7·4; p<0·0001). The frequency of adverse events did not differ between groups. There were two serious adverse events related to kyphoplasty (haematoma and urinary tract infection); other serious adverse events (such as myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism) did not occur perioperatively and were not related to procedure. Our findings suggest that balloon kyphoplasty is an effective and safe procedure for patients with acute vertebral fractures and will help to inform decisions regarding its use as an early treatment option. Medtronic Spine LLC.

SummaryWe performed a 1-year prospective study to see whether zoledronic acid infusion combined with percutaneous kyphoplasty could provide more benefits in the treatment of T12 or L1 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).IntroductionTo investigate and analyze the clinical effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in combination with percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of OVCF in postmenopausal women.MethodsIncluded in this study were 101 postmenopausal women patients with T12 or L1 OVCF who received PKP in our hospital between August 2015 and July 2017. They were randomly assigned to a zoledronic acid (ZOL) group (n = 50) or a control group (n = 51). Patients in ZOL group were treated preoperatively with IV infusion of 5 mg ZOL in combination with 0.25μg/d calcitriol and D3 600 mg/d calcium carbonate for a year. Patients in the control group were treated with the same dose of calcitriol and calcium carbonate D3 without ZOL.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), menopause age, and the fractured vertebral body between the two groups. At 6 and 12 months after treatment, bone mineral density (BMD) in ZOL group was higher than that in the control group (p < 0.01); bone markers (NMID, P1NP, and β-CTX) and the VAS score in ZOL group were significantly lower than those in the control group. No new fracture occurred in ZOL group. The incidence of recompression vertebral fracture (RVF) in the control group was 11.7%, while no RVF was detected in any patient in ZOL group. Mild adverse reactions in ZOL group were significantly higher than those in the control group, but all of them were relieved after symptomatic treatment.ConclusionsZOL IV infusion in combination with PKP is beneficial for the treatment of T12 or L1 OVCF.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are serious health problems. We conducted a randomized, open‐label, phase I/IIa study to determine the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of Wharton's jelly‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ‐MSCs) and teriparatide (parathyroid hormone 1‐34) in OVCFs. Twenty subjects with recent OVCFs were randomized to teriparatide (20 μg/day, daily subcutaneous injection for 6 months) treatment alone or combined treatment of WJ‐MSCs (intramedullary [4 × 107 cells] injection and intravenous [2 × 108 cells] injection after 1 week) and teriparatide (20 μg/day, daily subcutaneous injection for 6 months). Fourteen subjects (teriparatide alone, n = 7; combined treatment, n = 7) completed follow‐up assessment (visual analog scale [VAS], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Short Form‐36 [SF‐36], bone mineral density [BMD], bone turnover measured by osteocalcin and C‐terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen, dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry [DXA], computed tomography [CT]). Our results show that (a) combined treatment with WJ‐MSCs and teriparatide is feasible and tolerable for the patients with OVCFs; (b) the mean VAS, ODI, and SF‐36 scores significantly improved in the combined treatment group; (c) the level of bone turnover markers were not significantly different between the two groups; (d) BMD T‐scores of spine and hip by DXA increased in both control and experimental groups without a statistical difference; and (e) baseline spine CT images and follow‐up CT images at 6 and 12 months showed better microarchitecture in the combined treatment group. Our results indicate that combined treatment of WJ‐MSCs and teriparatide is feasible and tolerable and has a clinical benefit for fracture healing by promoting bone architecture. Clinical trial registration: https://nedrug.mfds.go.kr/, MFDS: 201600282‐30937. Combined treatments of Wharton's jelly‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ‐MSCs) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increased the T‐scores of the spine and hip and improved the microarchitecture in the fractured vertebral body. These effects provided satisfactory improvement of pain, function, and quality of life for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Combined treatment of WJ‐MSCs and PTH is feasible and tolerable and has a clinical benefit for treatment of OVCFs.

To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) combined with zoledronic acid in treatment of primary osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A perspective cohort study was conducted at a single institution for patients, who received PKP operation due to primary osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture between January 2014 and January 2015. According to whether they received postoperative zoledronic acid or not, patients were divided into treatment or control groups, with 30 randomly-selected cases per group. The visual analogue scale (VAS), which was used to assess the degree of pain, and the bone mineral density, was analyzed at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. In general, patients experienced marked pain relief after surgery. No significant difference in pain relief was observed in the control group between the 6 and 12-month follow-up. In contrast, the VAS score of the treatment group at 12-month follow-up was significantly lower than that at 6-month (P value = 0.03). Moreover, it was also significantly lower than the VAS score in the control group at the 12-month follow-up (P value = 0.0018). The bone mineral density of patients from the treatment group increased significantly and progressively after the surgery (pre-operation versus 6-month follow-up: P value = 0.01; 6-month versus 12-month follow-up: P value < 0.001), and it was also remarkably higher than that of the control group at the 12-month follow-up (P value < 0.0001). Patients were collected from a single hospital. The maximum postoperative follow-up time was 12 months. The sample size was relatively small. Thus, bias could occur in the selection of cases if they are not representative of the population. The combined treatment of zoledronic acid with PKP for primary osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures safely and effectively relieved low back pain, significantly increased bone density, and improved the quality of life. The clinical effectiveness is promising and worthy of further study. Kyphoplasty, zoledronic acid, primary osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

IntroductionPatients with osteoporosis may suffer from a fracture after minimal trauma. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are among the most common fractures, often leading to substantial pain. There is a need for evidence-based conservative treatment to aid in the management of OVCFs. The objective of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing in addition to standard care for improving quality of life (QoL) in patients suffering from an OVCF.Methods and analysisNinety-eight postmenopausal women from two academic and four community hospitals with a recent symptomatic thoracolumbar OVCF will be randomised into either the standard care or dynamic bracing group. In the dynamic bracing group, the Spinova Osteo orthosis will be used in addition to standard care. Standard care comprises pain control with analgesics, physical therapy and osteoporosis medication. The primary outcome parameter is QoL 1 year after inclusion, as measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41). Secondary outcome parameters are pain, pain medication used, functional disability, sagittal spinal alignment, recurrence rate of OVCFs and physical activity in daily life. A trial-based economic evaluation consisting of both cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis will be performed based on empirical data obtained in the RCT. A process evaluation will assess the feasibility of dynamic bracing. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, University Hospital Maastricht and Maastricht University (METC azM/UM) (NL74552.068.20/METC 20-055). Patients will be included only after verification of eligibility and obtaining written informed consent. Results will be disseminated via the Dutch National Osteoporosis Patient Society and via publications and conferences.Trial registration numberNL8746.

BackgroundCapacitively coupling electric fields (CCEF) is a method of non-invasive biophysical stimulation that enhances fracture repair and spinal fusion. This multicentre randomized controlled trial aimed to further examine the roles of CCEF in (1) the resolution of vertebral bone marrow oedema (VBME) using a follow-up MRI study and (2) pain relief, analgesic drug consumption and quality of life improvement in stimulated patients who were referred with acute vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) compared to non-stimulated patients.MethodsBetween September 2016 and December 2019, patients who were referred to the spine centres that participated in this multicentre randomized clinical study with acute VFFs of type OF1 or OF2 were included in the present study. All the VFFs were conservatively managed according to Good Clinical Practice. Moreover, the patients were randomized into two groups: the CCEF group received, as an adjunct to the clinical study protocol, biophysical stimulation with a CCEF device (Osteospine, IGEA) for 8 h per day for 60 days, whereas the control group was treated according to the clinical study protocol. At baseline (T0), the 30-day follow-up (T1), the 60-day follow-up (T2), and the 6-month follow-up (T3), each patient underwent clinical evaluation using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Analgesic therapy with paracetamol 1000 mg tablets for 7 days—or longer, depending on the pain intensity—was performed; patients were required to report their paracetamol consumption on a specific sheet between study day 8 to 180 days of follow-up. MRI studies of the thoracolumbar spine were performed at 0 (T0), 30 (T1) and 60 days of follow-up (T2) using a 1.5-T MRI system in all of the centres that took part in the study. For each VBME area examined via MRI, the vertebral body geometry (i.e. anterior wall height/posterior wall height and vertebral kyphosis) were assessed.ResultsA total of 66 patients (male: 9, 13.63%; mean age: 73.15 years old) with 69 VFFs were included in the present study and randomized as follows: 33 patients were included in the control group and the remaining 33 patients were randomized into the CCEF group. In the CCEF group, good compliance with CCEF therapy was observed (adherence = 94%), and no adverse effects were recorded. In the stimulated patients, faster VBME resolution and significantly less vertebral body collapse during follow-up were observed compared to the control patients. Moreover, in the active group, faster pain reduction and improvement in the ODI mean score were observed. Stimulated patients also reported a significantly lower paracetamol consumption rate from the third follow-up after treatment until the 6-month follow-up. In terms of sex-related differences, in the CCEF group, VBME showed a faster resolution in male patients compared with females.ConclusionBiophysical stimulation with CCEF, as an adjunct to traditional conservative treatment, is a useful tool to hasten the VBME resolution process and prevent vertebral body deformation. These MRI findings also correlate with faster back pain resolution and quality of life improvement. From the third follow-up after treatment until the 6-month follow-up, stimulated patients reported a significantly lower paracetamol consumption than control patients, even though back pain and quality of life showed no significant differences between the two groups.Level of evidenceII.Trial Registration Register: ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT05803681.

IntroductionLateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic fractures are the most common type of pelvic fracture. The majority of LC1 fractures are considered stable. Fractures where a complete sacral fracture is present increases the degree of potential instability and have the potential to displace over time. Non-operative management of these unstable fractures may involve restricted weight bearing and significant rehabilitation. Frequent monitoring with X-rays is also necessary for displacement of the fracture. Operative stabilisation of these fractures may be appropriate to prevent displacement of the fracture. This may allow patients to mobilise pain-free, quicker.Methods and analysisThe study is a feasibility study to inform the design of a full definitive randomised controlled trial to guide the most appropriate management of these injuries. Participants will be recruited from major trauma centres and randomly allocated to either operative or non-operative management of their injuries. A variety of outcome instruments, measuring health-related quality of life, functional outcome and pain, will be completed at several time points up to 12 months post injury. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken with participants to explore their views of the treatments under investigation and trial processes.Eligibility and recruitment to the study will be analysed to inform the feasibility of a definitive trial. Completion rates of the measurement instruments will be assessed, as well as their sensitivity to change and the presence of floor or ceiling effects in this population, to inform the choice of the primary outcome for a definitive trial.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for the study was given by the South West—Central Bristol NHS Research Ethics Committee on 2nd July 2018 (Ref; 18/SW/0135). The study will be reported in relevant specialist journals and through presentation at specialist conferences.Trial registration number ISRCTN10649958