Explore the vast range of titles available.

\"This book provides an in-depth practical reference, designed for litigators, investigators, auditors, accountants and other professionals who need to understand and combat accounting irregularities and to uphold the integrity of financial statements. Regulators will find this book a resourceful source of ideas and references when considering reforms. Educators and students will see this book as an alternative, inspiring way of understanding accounting and how to stay alert from accounting irregularities.\"--BOOK JACKET.

The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support - or distort - practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge. The 1992 report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated. Responsible Science served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee's thought process. Fostering Integrity in Research identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.

\"As cryptocurrency rose in popularity during the pandemic, new converts bought into the idea that crypto would not only make them rich, but would usher in imminent revolutions across art, finance, politics, and gaming. Cryptocurrency caught the zeitgeist through figures like FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, who only two years later would be convicted of one of the most calamitous acts of financial fraud in US history. During his meteoric rise, Sam Bankman-Fried outflanked idealists in the movement like Vitalik Buterin, who sought to build fairer, more democratic systems through Ethereum. Bankman-Fried pursued a growth-obsessed, by-any-means approach to crypto, which proved seductive to those who just wanted to get rich. But this Silicon Valley-like approach also drove the creation of a spate of high-risk financial instruments that mirrored those of the 2008 financial crisis. Accused of misleading investors and mishandling funds, Bankman-Fried became a target of prosecutors. Now, Cryptomania unfolds the tumultuous twenty months inside this male-dominated, overhyped industry that led to its downfall. Drawing on exclusive reporting and an extensive network in the global NFT community, Andrew Chow chronicles the battle for crypto's soul, and the human toll of its economic meltdown--from the conmen and eccentrics driving the bubble to the victims caught in its burst\"-- Amazon.com.

Early detection is a key factor in mitigating fraud damage, but it involves more specialized techniques than detecting fraud at the more advanced stages. This invaluable guide details both the theory and technical aspects of these techniques, and provides expert insight into streamlining implementation. --

\"Science is how we understand the world. Yet critical flaws in peer review, statistical methods, and publication procedures have rendered a shocking number of scientific studies useless-or worse, badly misleading. Drawing on surprising new data from \"meta-science\" (the science of how science works), Science Fictions documents the errors that have distorted our knowledge on issues as varied as cancer biology, nutrition, genetics, immigration, education, and extraterrestrial life. Stuart Ritchie's own work challenging an infamous psychology experiment helped spark what's now widely known as the \"replication crisis,\" the realization that many supposed scientific truths cannot be relied upon. Now, he reveals the very human biases, mistakes, and deceptions that undermine the scientific endeavor: from contamination in science labs to the secret vaults of failed studies that nobody gets to see; from outright cheating with fake data to the more common but still ruinous temptation to exaggerate mediocre results for a shot at scientific fame. Yet Science Fictions is far from a counsel of despair. Rather, it's a defense of the scientific method against the pressures and perverse incentives that lead scientists to bend the rules. By illustrating the ways that science goes wrong, Ritchie gives us the knowledge we need to spot dubious research, and points the way to reforms that might save science from itself\"-- Provided by publisher.

Objetivo da Pesquisa: Evidenciar a importância da auditoria como fator para prevenção de fraudes.   Enquadramento Teórico: Construir um breve histórico acerca a auditoria contábil, bem como demonstrar sua importância e função contra as fraudes na administração pública.   Metodologia: Revisão sistemática da literatura e, para tanto, utiliza-se de consulta pelo site de periódicos da Capes e após processo de filtragem, procedeu-se à leitura integral dos artefatos encontrados.   Resultados: Após refinar 245 artigos, em dois momentos de pesquisa, resultaram em 09 artigos aderentes a pesquisa, onde concluiu-se que a auditoria é uma importante ferramenta dentro de uma empresa, tanto para fornecer dados para tomada de decisões, quanto no combate às fraudes.   Contribuições Teóricas e Práticas: Frente a relevância temática, esta pesquisa visa melhorar o debate acerca da temática.

The high-octane story of the enigmatic figure at the heart of one of the 21st century's most spectacular financial collapses 'I asked him how much it would take for him to sell FTX and go do something other than make money. He thought the question over. \"One hundred and fifty billion dollars,\" he finally said-though he added that he had use for \"infinity dollars\"...' Sam Bankman-Fried wasn't just rich. Before he turned thirty he'd become the world's youngest billionaire, making a record fortune in the crypto frenzy. CEOs, celebrities and world leaders vied for his time. At one point he considered paying off the entire national debt of the Bahamas so he could take his business there. Then it all fell apart. Who was this Gatsby of the crypto world, a rumpled guy in cargo shorts, whose eyes twitched across TV interviews as he played video games on the side, who even his million-dollar investors still found a mystery? What gave him such an extraordinary ability to make money - and how did his empire collapse so spectacularly? Michael Lewis was there when it happened, having got to know Bankman-Fried during his epic rise. In Going Infinite he tells us a story like no other, taking us through the mind-bending trajectory of a character who never liked the rules and was allowed to live by his own. Both psychological portrait of a preternaturally gifted 'thinking machine', and wild financial roller-coaster ride, this is a twenty-first-century epic of high-frequency trading and even higher stakes, of crypto mania and insane amounts of money, of hubris and downfall. No one could tell it better.

Seafood mislabeling is common in both domestic and international markets. Studies on seafood fraud often report high rates of mislabeling (e.g., > 70%), but these studies have been limited to a single sampling year, which means it is difficult to assess the impact of stricter governmental truth-in-labeling regulations. We used DNA barcoding to assess seafood labeling in 26 sushi restaurants in Los Angeles over 4 years. Seafood from 3 high-end grocery stores were also sampled (n — 16) in 2014. We ordered 9 common sushi fish from menus, preserved tissue samples in 95% ethanol, extracted the genomic DNA, amplified and sequenced a portion of the mtDNA COI gene, and identified the resulting sequence to known fish sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information nucleotide database. We compared DNA results with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) list of acceptable market names and retail names. We considered sushi-sample labels that were inconsistent with FDA names mislabeled. Sushi restaurants had a consistently high percentage of mislabeling (47%; 151 of 323) from 2012 to 2015, yet mislabeling was not homogenous across species. Halibut, red snapper, yellowfin tuna, and yellowtail had consistently high (< 77%) occurrences of mislabeling on menus, whereas mislabeling of salmon and mackerel were typically low (> 15%). All sampled sushi restaurants had at least one case of mislabeling. Mislabeling of sushi-grade fish from high-end grocery stores was also identified in red snapper, yellowfin tuna, and yellowtail, but at a slightly lower frequency (42%) than sushi restaurants. Despite increased regulatory measures and media attention, we found seafood mislabeling continues to be prevalent. La mala etiquetación de pescados es común tanto en los mercados domésticos como en los internacionales. Los estudios sobre el fraude de pescados generalmente reportan tasas altas de mala etiquetación (p. ej.: >70 %), pero estos estudios han sido limitados a un sólo muestreo al año, lo que significa que es complicado evaluar el impacto de regulaciones gubernamentales más estrictas sobre las etiquetas verídicas. Utilizamos el código de barras de ADN para evaluar el etiquetado de pescados en 26 restaurantes de sushi en Los Ángeles durante cuatro años. Los pescados de tres supermercados lujosos también fueron muestreados (n = 16) en el 2014. Ordenamos nueve pescados comunes en el sushi de los menús, preservamos las muestras de tejido en etanol al 95 %, extrajimos el ADN genómico, amplificamos y secuenciamos la porción del gen COIdelADNmt, e identificamos la secuencia resultante a partir de secuencias de peces de la base de datos de nucleótidos del Centro Nacional para la Información Biotecnológica. Comparamos los resultados de ADN con la lista de nombres aceptables para el mercado y de venta al menudeo de la Administración Estadunidense de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA, en inglés). Consideramos como mal etiquetadas a las muestras de sushi que no fueron consistentes con los nombres de la FDA. Los restaurantes de sushi tuvieron constantemente un porcentaje alto de mala etiquetación (47 %; 151 de 323) de 2012 a 2015, sin embargo, la mala etiquetación no fue homogénea entre las especies. El hipogloso, el huachinango, el atún de aleta amarilla y el jurel tuvieron ocurrencias altas (<77 %) de mala etiquetación en los menús, mientras que la mala etiquetación del salmón y la caballa fue típicamente baja (>15 %). Todos los restaurantes de sushi muestreados tuvieron por lo menos un caso de mala etiquetación. La mala etiquetación de pescado con calidad para sushi de los supermercados lujosos también fue identificada para el huachinango, el atún de aleta amarilla y el jurel, pero a una frecuencia un poco menor (42 %) que en los restaurantes de sushi. A pesar del incremento en las medidas regulatorias y en la atención de los medios, encontramos que la mala etiquetación de los pescados todavía es prevalente.

\"Some $68 billion evaporated during Bernie Madoff's epic confidence game. Two people were driven to suicide in the wake of the Ponzi Scheme's exposure. Others went to prison. But there has never been a satisfying accounting for how Bernie got away with so much, for so long. Until now. Richard Behar's relationship with Madoff began in 2011 with a simple email request from the inmate. By the time Madoff died in 2021, he had sent Behar more than 300 emails and dozens of handwritten letters, participated in some fifty phone conversations, and sat for three in-person jailhouse interviews--a level of access provided to no other reporter. Behar also established relationships with hundreds of regulators, prosecutors, FBI agents, investors, Wall Street experts, ex-employees of Madoff's, family members, school classmates, and others. The result is the final word on the criminal behind history's most enduring fraud--and on those who believed him, covered for him, or locked him up. Behar illuminates not only the fraud's origins--decades earlier than Madoff claimed in his confession--but also the complicity of investors, Wall Street insiders, family members, and some of the largest banks in the US and Europe. Shocking, infuriating, riveting (and at times absurdly funny), Madoff shows us how Bernie ensnared thousands of investors. As Behar's dogged reporting over the last fifteen years makes clear, however, there aren't many innocents left standing by the end of this tale. Just about everyone involved is guilty, at a minimum, of humanity's most consistent weakness: greed\"-- Amazon.com.

An investment scam called “pig butchering” has cost victims around the world an estimated $75 billion in just the last four years, and it's not just the targets who are being harmed. The imposters on the other end of the line are often human trafficking victims forced to run the scheme by large crime syndicates in Asia. Ali Rogin speaks with former prosecutor Erin West to learn more.