Explore the vast range of titles available.

Evidence is scarce on the efficacy of long-term human albumin (HA) administration in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The human Albumin for the treatmeNt of aScites in patients With hEpatic ciRrhosis (ANSWER) study was designed to clarify this issue. We did an investigator-initiated multicentre randomised, parallel, open-label, pragmatic trial in 33 academic and non-academic Italian hospitals. We randomly assigned patients with cirrhosis and uncomplicated ascites who were treated with anti-aldosteronic drugs (≥200 mg/day) and furosemide (≥25 mg/day) to receive either standard medical treatment (SMT) or SMT plus HA (40 g twice weekly for 2 weeks, and then 40 g weekly) for up to 18 months. The primary endpoint was 18-month mortality, evaluated as difference of events and analysis of survival time in patients included in the modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2008–000625–19, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01288794. From April 2, 2011, to May 27, 2015, 440 patients were randomly assigned and 431 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. 38 of 218 patients died in the SMT plus HA group and 46 of 213 in the SMT group. Overall 18-month survival was significantly higher in the SMT plus HA than in the SMT group (Kaplan-Meier estimates 77% vs 66%; p=0·028), resulting in a 38% reduction in the mortality hazard ratio (0·62 [95% CI 0·40–0·95]). 46 (22%) patients in the SMT group and 49 (22%) in the SMT plus HA group had grade 3–4 non-liver related adverse events. In this trial, long-term HA administration prolongs overall survival and might act as a disease modifying treatment in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Italian Medicine Agency.

Patients with acute decompensated heart failure received intravenous furosemide at either a low or a high dose and either boluses every 12 hours or continuous infusion. At 72 hours, there was no significant difference in symptoms or in the change in creatinine level from baseline for either comparison. Acute decompensated heart failure is the most common cause of hospital admissions among patients older than 65 years of age and is responsible for more than 1 million hospitalizations annually in the United States. 1 Intravenous loop diuretics are an essential component of current treatment and are administered to approximately 90% of patients who are hospitalized with heart failure. 2 Despite decades of clinical experience with these agents, prospective data to guide the use of loop diuretics are sparse, and current guidelines are based primarily on expert opinion. 3 , 4 As a result, clinical practice varies widely with regard to both the mode . . .

Key PointsQuestionDoes an intervention aimed at improving guideline adherence for the management of acute heart failure, including intensive intravenous nitrate therapy and management of precipitating factors, improve hospital discharge and survival at 30 days?FindingsIn this stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial that included 503 patients 75 years and older who presented to the emergency department with acute heart failure, implementation of an early and comprehensive care bundle compared with usual care improved guideline adherence, but had no significant effect on number of days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (median of 19 d in both groups).MeaningsThis emergency department care bundle did not improve 30-day outcomes among older patients with acute heart failure. AbstractImportanceClinical guidelines for the early management of acute heart failure in the emergency department (ED) setting are based on only moderate levels of evidence, with subsequent low adherence to these guidelines.ObjectiveTo test the effect of an early guideline-recommended care bundle on short-term prognosis in older patients with acute heart failure in the ED.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsStepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in 15 EDs in France of 503 patients 75 years and older with a diagnosis of acute heart failure in the ED from December 2018 to September 2019 and followed up for 30 days until October 2019.InterventionsA care bundle that included early intravenous nitrate boluses; management of precipitating factors, such as acute coronary syndrome, infection, or atrial fibrillation; and moderate dose of intravenous diuretics (n = 200). In the control group, patient care was left to the discretion of the treating emergency physician (n = 303). Each center was randomized to the order in which they switched to the “intervention period.” After the initial 4-week control period for all centers, 1 center entered in the intervention period every 2 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was the number of days alive and out of hospital at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day cardiovascular mortality, unscheduled readmission, length of hospital stay, and kidney impairment.ResultsAmong 503 patients who were randomized (median age, 87 years; 298 [59%] women), 502 were analyzed. In the intervention group, patients received a median (interquartile range) of 27.0 (9-54) mg of intravenous nitrates in the first 4 hours vs 4.0 (2.0-6.0) mg in the control group (adjusted difference, 23.8 [95% CI, 13.5-34.1]). There was a significantly higher percentage of patients in the intervention group treated for their precipitating factors than in the control group (58.8% vs 31.9%; adjusted difference, 31.1% [95% CI, 14.3%-47.9%]). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point of the number of days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (median [interquartile range], 19 [0- 24] d in both groups; adjusted difference, −1.9 [95% CI, −6.6 to 2.8]; adjusted ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.64-1.21]). At 30 days, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in mortality (8.0% vs 9.7%; adjusted difference, 4.1% [95% CI, −17.2% to 25.3%]), cardiovascular mortality (5.0% vs 7.4%; adjusted difference, 2.1% [95% CI, −15.5% to 19.8%]), unscheduled readmission (14.3% vs 15.7%; adjusted difference, −1.3% [95% CI, −26.3% to 23.7%]), median length of hospital stay (8 d in both groups; adjusted difference, 2.5 [95% CI, −0.9 to 5.8]), and kidney impairment (1% in both groups).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong older patients with acute heart failure, use of a guideline-based comprehensive care bundle in the ED compared with usual care did not result in a statistically significant difference in the number of days alive and out of the hospital at 30 days. Further research is needed to identify effective treatments for acute heart failure in older patients.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03683212

Furosemide is the most commonly used diuretic in intensive care units (ICU). We aimed to evaluate the physiological effects of adjunctive acetazolamide with furosemide on diuresis and the prevention of potential furosemide-induced metabolic alkalosis. We performed a two-center, pilot, open-label, randomized trial. Where the treating physicians planned intravenous diuretic therapy, we randomized ICU patients to a bolus of furosemide (40 mg) plus acetazolamide (500 mg) (n = 15) or furosemide alone (40 mg) (n = 15). Urine output, additional furosemide use, acid-base parameters, and electrolytes were compared following a Bayesian framework. Adjunctive acetazolamide didn't increase urine output in the first six hours (mean difference: −112 ml, credible interval: [−742, 514]). However, compared with furosemide alone, it maintained a greater urine output response to furosemide over 24 h, with 100 % probability. Acetazolamide also acidified plasma (pH difference: −0.045, [−0.081, −0.008]) while alkalinizing urine (1.10, [0.04, 2.11]) at six hours, compared to furosemide alone with >95 % probability. Finally, we didn't observe severe acidosis or electrolyte disturbances over 24 h. Adjunctive acetazolamide may increase diuretic efficacy and counterbalance furosemide-induced metabolic alkalosis without safety concerns. Larger trials are warranted to verify these findings and assess their impacts on clinical outcomes. ACTRN12623000624684. A pilot trial of single versus dual diuretic therapy in the intensive care unit. •Pathophysiologic effects of adjunctive acetazolamide were assessed in this pilot RCT.•Acetazolamide may have preserved urine output response to furosemide.•Acetazolamide may have counterbalanced furosemide-induced metabolic alkalosis.•Adjunctive acetazolamide may not result in severe acidosis or electrolyte disturbance.•Larger trials to evaluate the effect of adjunctive acetazolamide appear justified.

The act of filling the bladder prior to obtaining an ultrasound is often the rate limiting factor in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion in pediatric females. The objective of this study was to evaluate if low dose furosemide plus IV fluid administration results in faster bladder filling time in comparison to IV fluid administration alone in females age 8–18 with suspected ovarian torsion. This was a randomized, placebo controlled, single blinded pilot study using convenience sampling to target females ages 8 to 18 years seen in the pediatric emergency department and undergoing a trans-abdominal pelvic US to assess for ovarian torsion. Enrolled patients were assigned to the experimental group, receiving 0.1 mg/kg (max 5 mg) of furosemide, or the control group, receiving a 5 mL normal saline (NS) flush. Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) evaluation of the bladder was performed every 30 min until the bladder was determined to be of adequate size and morphology to perform the trans-abdominal pelvic US. Bladder filling as confirmed by POCUS occurred a median of 90 min sooner in the furosemide group compared with the control group (p ≤0.001). Compared with the control group, radiology-performed US occurred 92 min sooner (p ≤0.001) and US interpretation by a radiologist occurred 94 min sooner (p ≤0.001) for individuals receiving furosemide. Furosemide administration leads to a statistically and clinically significant difference in the time to fill the bladder of pediatric females awaiting pelvic US and leads to more rapid ultrasonography and interpretation by a radiologist in our setting. •Bladder filling is time consuming for pediatric females awaiting pelvic ultrasound.•Evaluation of furosemide versus intravenous fluids for bladder filling.•Bladder shape, size, and volume evaluated with point-of-care ultrasound.•Furosemide lead to a 90 min faster bladder filling time.

There are many therapeutic modalities for plantar warts, however treating it remains challenging. Intralesional injection of 5-fluorouarcil and combined digoxin and furosemide were observed to be effective and safe, however no comparison study between them was done. Our study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of both therapies in the treatment of plantar warts. 90 adult patients with multiple recalcitrant plantar warts were included in our study. They were randomly allocated to one of three groups; combined digoxin and furosemide, 5-fluorouarcil, or normal saline group. Fortnightly injections were done into all studied warts till complete clearance or up to 5 sessions. Warts were evaluated clinically and dermoscopically. Clinical response was reported in 24 patients (80%) of the combined digoxin and furosemide group with 40% complete response and in 24 patients (80%) of the 5-fluorouarcil group with 33.3% complete response. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning efficacy and safety. Intralesional injection of 5-fluorouarcil and combined digoxin and furosemide are nearly equivalent in efficacy and safety for plantar wart treatment. Dermoscopy helps to take the truthful judgment about complete clearance of warts.

Diuretic unresponsiveness often occurs during hospital admission for acute heart failure (AHF) and is associated with adverse outcome. This study aims to investigate determinants, clinical outcome, and the effects of nesiritide on diuretic response early after admission for AHF. Diuretic response, defined as weight loss per 40 mg of furosemide or equivalent, was examined from hospital admission to 48 hours in 4,379 patients from the ASCEND-HF trial. As an additional analysis, a urinary diuretic response metric was investigated in 5,268 patients using urine volume from hospital admission to 24 hours per 40 mg of furosemide or equivalent. Mean diuretic response was −0.42 kg/40 mg of furosemide (interquartile range −1.0, −0.05). Poor responders had lower blood pressure, more frequent diabetes, long-term use of loop diuretics, poorer baseline renal function, and lower urine output (all P < .01). Randomized nesiritide treatment was not associated with diuretic response (P = .987). Good diuretic response was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.65, highest vs lowest quintile, P < .001). Diuretic response based on urine output per 40 mg of furosemide showed similar results in terms of clinical predictors, association with outcome, and the absence of an effect of nesiritide. Poor diuretic response early after hospital admission for AHF is associated with low blood pressure, renal impairment, low urine output, and an increased risk of death or rehospitalization early after discharge. Nesiritide had a neutral effect on diuretic response.

SODIUM-HF was a large clinical trial testing dietary sodium restriction compared to usual care in patients with heart failure that showed no reduction in clinical events. It has been suggested that diuretic doses in response to dietary sodium modification may have influenced the trial results. We assessed the effects of baseline diuretic dose and diuretic dose changes on clinical outcomes in the SODIUM-HF trial. Diuretics were converted to furosemide-equivalent diuretic total daily doses. Furosemide dose was treated as a continuous variable and also stratified into 0mg, 1mg to 39mg, 40mg, 41mg to 80mg, and > 80mg daily. The baseline diuretic dose and change in diuretic dose were assessed and correlated with dietary sodium restriction and changes in dietary sodium intake. We then examined the relationship between diuretic dosing and the primary outcomes of SODIUM-HF (cardiovascular-related emergency department visit, cardiovascular-related hospitalization, and all-cause mortality). Of the 806 patients enrolled in the SODIUM-HF trial, 784 had known diuretic status at baseline: 209 patients (26.7%) with 0mg, 134 patients (17%) with 1mg to 39mg, 205 patients (26.1%) with 40mg, 118 patients (15.1%) with 41mg to 80mg, and 118 patients (15.1%) with > 80mg. No correlation was found between dietary sodium intake and diuretic dose, either at baseline or change throughout the study (P > .05). For the primary outcomes, the 2-year risk of primary outcomes was strongly correlated with diuretic dose at baseline across the overall SODIUM-HF population (P < .001). No significant association was found between the treatment arm and the risk of primary outcomes, within each baseline diuretic dose range or with change in diuretic dose (both P > .05). Although a higher baseline diuretic dose was associated with worse clinical outcomes, no association was found between dietary sodium restriction, baseline or change in diuretic dose and the primary outcomes.

Difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation is often associated with fluid overload. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been proposed as a tool for predicting and detecting weaning failure of cardiovascular origin. To investigate whether fluid management guided by daily BNP plasma concentrations improves weaning outcomes compared with empirical therapy dictated by clinical acumen. In a randomized controlled multicenter study, we allocated 304 patients to either a BNP-driven or physician-driven strategy of fluid management during ventilator weaning. To standardize the weaning process, patients in both groups were ventilated with an automatic computer-driven weaning system. The primary end point was time to successful extubation. In the BNP-driven group, furosemide and acetazolamide were given more often and in higher doses than in the control group, resulting in a more negative median (interquartile range) fluid balance during weaning (-2,320 [-4,735, 738] vs. -180 [-2,556, 2,832] ml; P < 0.0001). Time to successful extubation was significantly shorter with the BNP-driven strategy (58.6 [23.3, 139.8] vs. 42.4 [20.8, 107.5] h; P = 0.034). The BNP-driven strategy increased the number of ventilator-free days but did not change length of stay or mortality. The effect on weaning time was strongest in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The two strategies did not differ significantly regarding electrolyte imbalance, renal failure, or shock. Our results suggest that a BNP-driven fluid management strategy decreases the duration of weaning without increasing adverse events, especially in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00473148).

IntroductionFluid overload (FO) is a common complication following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Loop diuretics, particularly furosemide, are widely used to promote sodium and water excretion, but their postoperative use remains largely empirical. International guidelines recommend early assessment of diuretic response using spot urinary sodium concentration, traditionally measured by automated laboratory analysers. Recent advances now enable bedside measurement of natriuresis using point-of-care (POC) urinary sodium sensors. This trial aims to determine whether real-time bedside natriuresis monitoring using a POC device can guide safer and more effective diuretic strategies in the postoperative management of FO.Materials and methodsThe EASY-CS trial is a prospective, single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate whether a natriuresis-guided furosemide titration protocol improves diuresis within 48 hours following cardiac surgery with CPB. A total of 102 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB and requiring postoperative intravenous (IV) furosemide for FO will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either standard care (n=51; furosemide titration based on clinical judgement) or a natriuresis-guided arm (n=51), in which furosemide dosing is adjusted according to urinary sodium concentration. All patients will receive an initial 20 mg dose of IV furosemide. In the intervention group, urinary sodium will be measured every 6 hours using a POC sodium sensor (LAQUAtwin Na+ metre, Horiba, Japan). If the spot urinary sodium is <70 mmol/L, the furosemide dose will be doubled at the next administration, up to a maximum of 200 mg per bolus. The primary endpoint is cumulative urine output at 48 hours post-randomisation.Secondary outcomes include urinary sodium concentration and urine output at 24 hours, natriuresis at 48 hours, and the venous excess ultrasound score at 48 hours, as determined by transthoracic echocardiography. The study will also assess total loop diuretic dose administered, cumulative fluid balance over 48 hours and the incidence of postoperative complications at day 30, including cardiovascular, renal, respiratory and gastrointestinal events. Safety endpoints include the presence of hypotension, hypokalaemia or acute kidney injury before each diuretic administration. Randomisation will be stratified by EuroSCORE II (<4% vs ≥4%) and baseline serum creatinine (<100 vs≥100 µmol/L). Recruitment has not yet started.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Amiens University hospital (IRB-ID: 2025-A00925-44). The study’s results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07077772.