Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
744 result(s) for "G2 Phase - physiology"
Sort by:
Fluorescent indicators for simultaneous reporting of all four cell cycle phases
The far-red fluorescent protein mMaroon1 and a reporter based on stem-loop binding protein enables the generation of Fucci4, a 4-color cell cycle reporter system that can be used to distinguish all phases of the cell cycle. Also online, a paper by Laviv et al . uses mMaroon1 as a FRET acceptor for the newly developed CyRFP1. A robust method for simultaneous visualization of all four cell cycle phases in living cells is highly desirable. We developed an intensiometric reporter of the transition from S to G2 phase and engineered a far-red fluorescent protein, mMaroon1, to visualize chromatin condensation in mitosis. We combined these new reporters with the previously described Fucci system to create Fucci4, a set of four orthogonal fluorescent indicators that together resolve all cell cycle phases.
A topoisomerase II-dependent G2 cycle checkpoint in mammalian cells
THE enzyme DNA topoisomerase II, which removes the caten-ations formed between the DNA molecules of sister chromatids during replication 1 and is a structural component of chromosome cores 2 , is needed for chromosome condensation in yeast 3 and in Xenopus extracts 4–6 . Inhibitors of topoisomerase II arrest mam-malian cells before mitosis in the G2 phase of the cell cycle 7 , but also produce DNA damage, which causes arrest through established checkpoint controls 8 . It is open to question whether cells need topoisomerase II to leave G2, or control late-cycle progres-sion in response to its activity. Bisdioxopiperazines are topoisomerase II inhibitors that act without producing direct DNA damage 9 ; the most potent, ICRF-193, blocks mammalian entry into but not exit from mitosis. Here we show that checkpoint-evading agents such as caffeine override this block to produce abortively condensed chromosomes, indicating that topoisomerase II is needed for complete condensation. We find that exit from G2 is regulated by a catenation-sensitive checkpoint mechanism which is distinct from the G2-damage checkpoint.
Cannabinoid receptor activation inhibits cell cycle progression by modulating 14-3-3β
Cannabinoids display various pharmacological activities, including tumor regression, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the pharmacological effects of cannabinoids, we used a yeast two-hybrid system to screen a mouse brain cDNA library for proteins interacting with type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R). Using the intracellular loop 3 of CB1R as bait, we identified 14-3-3β as an interacting partner of CB1R and confirmed their interaction using affinity-binding assays. 14-3-3β has been reported to induce a cell cycle delay at the G 2 /M phase. We tested the effects of cannabinoids on cell cycle progression in HeLa cells synchronized using a double-thymidine block-and-release protocol and found an increase in the population of G 2 /M phase cells. We further found that CB1R activation augmented the interaction of 14-3-3β with Wee1 and Cdc25B, and promoted phosphorylation of Cdc2 at Tyr-15. These results suggest that cannabinoids induce cell cycle delay at the G2/M phase by activating 14-3-3β.
The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction
How do DNA damage response pathways respond to low levels of DNA damage? Understanding this is essential when assessing environmental cancer risk. This Perspective considers the impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic stability and cancer risk. DNA damage responses (DDR) encompass DNA repair and signal transduction pathways that effect cell cycle checkpoint arrest and/or apoptosis. How DDR pathways respond to low levels of DNA damage, including low doses of ionizing radiation, is crucial for assessing environmental cancer risk. It has been assumed that damage-induced cell cycle checkpoints respond to a single double strand break (DSB) but the G2/M checkpoint, which prevents entry into mitosis, has recently been shown to have a defined threshold of 10–20 DSBs. Here, we consider the impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic stability and cancer risk.
Mechanisms controlling the smooth muscle cell death in progeria via down-regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1
Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a severe human premature aging disorder caused by a lamin A mutant named progerin. Death occurs at a mean age of 13 y from cardiovascular problems. Previous studies revealed loss of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in the media of large arteries in a patient with HGPS and two mouse models, suggesting a causal connection between the SMC loss and cardiovascular malfunction. However, the mechanisms of how progerin leads to massive SMC loss are unknown. In this study, using SMCs differentiated from HGPS induced pluripotent stem cells, we show that HGPS SMCs exhibit a profound proliferative defect, which is primarily caused by caspase-independent cell death. Importantly, progerin accumulation stimulates a powerful suppression of PARP1 and consequently triggers an activation of the error-prone nonhomologous end joining response. As a result, most HGPS SMCs exhibit prolonged mitosis and die of mitotic catastrophe. This study demonstrates a critical role of PARP1 in mediating SMC loss in patients with HGPS and elucidates a molecular pathway underlying the progressive SMC loss in progeria.
Centrosome-associated regulators of the G(2)/M checkpoint as targets for cancer therapy
In eukaryotic cells, control mechanisms have developed that restrain cell-cycle transitions in response to stress. These regulatory pathways are termed cell-cycle checkpoints. The G(2)/M checkpoint prevents cells from entering mitosis when DNA is damaged in order to afford these cells an opportunity to repair the damaged DNA before propagating genetic defects to the daughter cells. If the damage is irreparable, checkpoint signaling might activate pathways that lead to apoptosis. Since alteration of cell-cycle control is a hallmark of tumorigenesis, cell-cycle regulators represent potential targets for therapy. The centrosome has recently come into focus as a critical cellular organelle that integrates G(2)/M checkpoint control and repairs signals in response to DNA damage. A growing number of G(2)/M checkpoint regulators have been found in the centrosome, suggesting that centrosome has an important role in G(2)/M checkpoint function. In this review, we discuss centrosome-associated regulators of the G(2)/M checkpoint, the dysregulation of this checkpoint in cancer, and potential candidate targets for cancer therapy.
Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints
Mitosis and cytokinesis are undoubtedly the most spectacular parts of the cell cycle. Errors in the choreography of these processes can lead to aneuploidy or genetic instability, fostering cell death or disease. Here, I give an overview of the many mitotic kinases that regulate cell division and the fidelity of chromosome transmission.
Opinion: On the Way towards the New Paradigm of Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a multicausal disease characterized by the formation of cholesterol-containing plaque in the pronounced intima nearest to the heart’s elastic-type arteries that have high levels of blood circulation. Plaques are formed due to arterial pressure-induced damage to the endothelium in areas of turbulent blood flow. It is found in the majority of the Western population, including young people. This denies the monogenic mechanism of atherogenesis. In 1988, Orekhov et al. and Kawai et al. discovered that the presence of atherogenic (modified, including oxidized ones) LDLs is necessary for atherogenesis. On the basis of our discovery, suggesting that the overloading of enterocytes with lipids could lead to the formation of modified LDLs, we proposed a new hypothesis explaining the main factors of atherogenesis. Indeed, when endothelial cells are damaged and then pass through the G2 phase of their cell cycle they secrete proteins into their basement membrane. This leads to thickening of the basement membrane and increases its affinity to LDL especially for modified ones. When the enterocyte transcytosis pathway is overloaded with fat, very large chylomicrons are formed, which have few sialic acids, circulate in the blood for a long time, undergo oxidation, and can induce the production of autoantibodies. It is the sialic acids that shield the short forks of the polysaccharide chains to which autoantibodies are produced. Here, these data are evaluated from the point of view of our new model.
PCNA is recruited to irradiated chromatin in late S-phase and is most pronounced in G2 phase of the cell cycle
DNA repair is a complex process that prevents genomic instability. Many proteins play fundamental roles in regulating the optimal repair of DNA lesions. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a key factor that initiates recombination-associated DNA synthesis after injury. Here, in very early S-phase, we show that the fluorescence intensity of mCherry-tagged PCNA after local micro-irradiation was less than the fluorescence intensity of non-irradiated mCherry-PCNA-positive replication foci. However, PCNA protein accumulated at locally irradiated chromatin in very late S-phase of the cell cycle, and this effect was more pronounced in the following G2 phase. In comparison to the dispersed form of PCNA, a reduced mobile fraction appeared in PCNA-positive replication foci during S-phase, and we observed similar recovery time after photobleaching at locally induced DNA lesions. This diffusion of mCherry-PCNA in micro-irradiated regions was not affected by cell cycle phases. We also studied the link between function of PCNA and A-type lamins in late S-phase. We found that the accumulation of PCNA at micro-irradiated chromatin is identical in wild-type and A-type lamin-deficient cells. Only micro-irradiation of the nuclear interior, and thus the irradiation of internal A-type lamins, caused the fluorescence intensity of mCherry-tagged PCNA to increase. In summary, we showed that PCNA begins to play a role in DNA repair in late S-phase and that PCNA function in repair is maintained during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. However, PCNA mobility is reduced after local micro-irradiation regardless of the cell cycle phase.
The Yku70-Yku80 complex contributes to regulate double-strand break processing and checkpoint activation during the cell cycle
DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). HR requires 5′ DSB end degradation that occurs in the presence of cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) activity. Here, we show that a lack of any of the NHEJ proteins Yku (Yku70–Yku80), Lif1 or DNA ligase IV (Dnl4) increases 5′ DSB end degradation in G1 phase, with yku Δ cells showing the strongest effect. This increase depends on MRX, the recruitment of which at DSBs is enhanced in yku Δ G1 cells. DSB processing in G2 is not influenced by the absence of Yku, but it is delayed by Yku overproduction, which also decreases MRX loading on DSBs. Moreover, DSB resection in yku Δ cells occurs independently of CDK activity, suggesting that it might be promoted by CDK‐dependent inhibition of Yku.