Explore the vast range of titles available.

G protein-independent, arrestin-dependent signaling is a paradigm that broadens the signaling scope of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) beyond G proteins for numerous biological processes. However, arrestin signaling in the collective absence of functional G proteins has never been demonstrated. Here we achieve a state of “zero functional G” at the cellular level using HEK293 cells depleted by CRISPR/Cas9 technology of the Gs/q/12 families of Gα proteins, along with pertussis toxin-mediated inactivation of Gi/o. Together with HEK293 cells lacking β-arrestins (“zero arrestin”), we systematically dissect G protein- from arrestin-driven signaling outcomes for a broad set of GPCRs. We use biochemical, biophysical, label-free whole-cell biosensing and ERK phosphorylation to identify four salient features for all receptors at “zero functional G”: arrestin recruitment and internalization, but—unexpectedly—complete failure to activate ERK and whole-cell responses. These findings change our understanding of how GPCRs function and in particular of how they activate ERK1/2. Arrestins terminate signaling from GPCRs, but several lines of evidence suggest that they are also able to transduce signals independently of G proteins. Here, the authors systematically ablate G proteins in cell lines, and show that arrestins are unable to act as genuine signal initiators.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest superfamily of transmembrane proteins and the targets of over 30% of currently marketed pharmaceuticals. Although several structures have been solved for GPCR–G protein complexes, few are in a lipid membrane environment. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of complexes of neurotensin, neurotensin receptor 1 and Gα i1 β 1 γ 1 in two conformational states, resolved to resolutions of 4.1 and 4.2 Å. The structures, determined in a lipid bilayer without any stabilizing antibodies or nanobodies, reveal an extended network of protein–protein interactions at the GPCR–G protein interface as compared to structures obtained in detergent micelles. The findings show that the lipid membrane modulates the structure and dynamics of complex formation and provide a molecular explanation for the stronger interaction between GPCRs and G proteins in lipid bilayers. We propose an allosteric mechanism for GDP release, providing new insights into the activation of G proteins for downstream signaling. Structures of GPCR neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) in complex with neurotensin and Gα i1 β 1 γ 1 in a lipid bilayer environment and without stabilizing antibodies reveal extensive interactions at the GPCR–G protein interface.

The motility of cancer cells in 3D matrices is of two types: mesenchymal motility, in which the cells are elongated and amoeboid motility, in which the cells are round. Amoeboid motility is driven by an actomyosin-based contractile force, which is regulated by the Rho/ROCK pathway. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the motility of elongated cells remain unknown. Here, we show that the motility of elongated cells is regulated by Rac signaling through the WAVE2/Arp2/3-dependent formation of elongated pseudopodia and cell-substrate adhesion in 3D substrates. The involvement of Rac signaling in cell motility was different in cell lines that displayed an elongated morphology in 3D substrates. In U87MG glioblastoma cells, most of which exhibit mesenchymal motility, inhibition of Rac signaling blocked the invasion of these cells in 3D substrates. In HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells, which display mixed cell motility involving both elongated and rounded cells, inhibition of Rac1 signaling not only blocked mesenchymal motility but also caused a mesenchymal–amoeboid transition. Additionally, Rac1 and RhoA signaling regulated the mesenchymal and amoeboid motility in these cells, respectively, and the inhibition of both pathways dramatically decreased cell invasion. Hence, we could conclude that Rac1 and RhoA signaling simultaneously regulate cell invasion in 3D matrices.

G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channel (GIRK) plays a key role in regulating neurotransmission. GIRK is opened by the direct binding of the G protein βγ subunit (Gβγ), which is released from the heterotrimeric G protein (Gαβγ) upon the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GIRK contributes to precise cellular responses by specifically and efficiently responding to the Gi/o-coupled GPCRs. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying this family-specific and efficient activation are largely unknown. Here, we investigate the structural mechanism underlying the Gi/o family-specific activation of GIRK, by combining cell-based BRET experiments and NMR analyses in a reconstituted membrane environment. We show that the interaction formed by the αA helix of Gαi/o mediates the formation of the Gαi/oβγ-GIRK complex, which is responsible for the family-specific activation of GIRK. We also present a model structure of the Gαi/oβγ-GIRK complex, which provides the molecular basis underlying the specific and efficient regulation of GIRK. Opening of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRK) is coupled to the activation of a GPCR. Here the authors use NMR and cell-based BRET assays to gain insights into the mechanisms underlying family-specific activation and find that pre-formation of the Gαi/oβγ-GIRK complex in the inactive state is responsible for specific GIRK activation and present a structural model for the Gαi/oβγ-GIRK complex.

Heterotrimeric G proteinshave been previously linked to plant defense; however a role for the G[beta][gamma] dimer in defense signaling has not been described to date. Using available Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants lacking functional G[alpha] or G[beta] subunits, we show that defense against the necrotrophic pathogens Alternaria brassicicola and Fusarium oxysporum is impaired in G[beta]-deficient mutants while G[alpha]-deficient mutants show slightly increased resistance compared to wild-type Columbia ecotype plants. In contrast, responses to virulent (DC3000) and avirulent (JL1065) strains of Pseudomonas syringae appear to be independent of heterotrimeric G proteins. The induction of a number of defense-related genes in G[beta]-deficient mutants were severely reduced in response to A. brassicicola infection. In addition, G[beta]-deficient mutants exhibit decreased sensitivity to a number of methyl jasmonate-induced responses such as induction of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2, inhibition of root elongation, seed germination, and growth of plants in sublethal concentrations of methyl jasmonate. In all cases, the behavior of the G[alpha]-deficient mutants is coherent with the classic heterotrimeric mechanism of action, indicating that jasmonic acid signaling is influenced by the G[beta][gamma] functional subunit but not by G[alpha]. We hypothesize that G[beta][gamma] acts as a direct or indirect enhancer of the jasmonate signaling pathway in plants.

Control of organ size and shape by cell proliferation and cell expansion is a fundamental developmental process, but the mechanisms that set the size and shape of determinate organs are largely unknown in plants. Molecular, genetic, cytological and biochemical approaches were used to characterize the roles of the Arabidopsis thaliana G protein γ subunit (AGG3) gene in organ growth. Here, we describe A. thaliana AGG3, which promotes petal growth by increasing the period of cell proliferation. Both the N-terminal region and the C-terminal domains of AGG3 are necessary for the function of AGG3. By contrast, analysis of a series of AGG3 derivatives with deletions in specific domains showed that the deletion of any of these domains cannot completely abolish the function of AGG3. The GFP-AGG3 fusion protein is localized to the plasma membrane. The predicted transmembrane domain plays an important role in the plasma membrane localization of AGG3. Genetic analyses revealed that AGG3 action requires a functional G protein α subunit (GPA1) and G protein β subunit (AGB1). Our findings demonstrate that AGG3, GPA1 and AGB1 act in the same genetic pathway to influence organ size and shape in A. thaliana.

Smoothened (SMO), a class Frizzled G protein-coupled receptor (class F GPCR), transduces the Hedgehog signal across the cell membrane. Sterols can bind to its extracellular cysteine-rich domain (CRD) and to several sites in the seven transmembrane helices (7-TMs) of SMO. However, the mechanism by which sterols regulate SMO via multiple sites is unknown. Here we determined the structures of SMO–G i complexes bound to the synthetic SMO agonist (SAG) and to 24( S ),25-epoxycholesterol (24( S ),25-EC). A novel sterol-binding site in the extracellular extension of TM6 was revealed to connect other sites in 7-TMs and CRD, forming an intramolecular sterol channel from the middle side of 7-TMs to CRD. Additional structures of two gain-of-function variants, SMO D384R and SMO G111C/I496C , showed that blocking the channel at its midpoints allows sterols to occupy the binding sites in 7-TMs, thereby activating SMO. These data indicate that sterol transport through the core of SMO is a major regulator of SMO-mediated signaling. Cryo-EM structural work shows sterols binding at four adjacent locations within the class F GPCR Smoothened (SMO), where the transmembrane core functions as a sterol tunnel in which occupancy activates SMO for downstream Hedgehog signaling.

Some 865 genes in man encode G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). The heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide‐binding proteins (G‐proteins) function to transduce signals from this vast panoply of receptors to effector systems including ion channels and enzymes that alter the rate of production, release or degradation of intracellular second messengers. However, it was not until the 1970s that the existence of such transducing proteins was even seriously suggested. Combinations of bacterial toxins that mediate their effects via covalent modification of the α‐subunit of certain G‐proteins and mutant cell lines that fail to generate cyclic AMP in response to agonists because they either fail to express or express a malfunctional G‐protein allowed their identification and purification. Subsequent to initial cloning efforts, cloning by homology has defined the human G‐proteins to derive from 35 genes, 16 encoding α‐subunits, five β and 14 γ. All function as guanine nucleotide exchange on–off switches and are mechanistically similar to other proteins that are enzymic GTPases. Although not readily accepted initially, it is now well established that β/γ complexes mediate as least as many functions as the α‐subunits. The generation of chimeras between different α‐subunits defined the role of different sections of the primary/secondary sequence and crystal structures and cocrystals with interacting proteins have given detailed understanding of their molecular structure and basis of function. Finally, further modifications of such chimeras have generated a range of G‐protein α‐subunits with greater promiscuity to interact across GPCR classes and initiated the use of such modified G‐proteins in drug discovery programmes. British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147, S46–S55. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706405

The three small GTPases Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 are differentially involved in structural long-term potentiation of rodent dendritic spines, simultaneously ensuring signal specificity and also priming the system for plasticity. Mechanisms of neuronal plasticity Secreted messenger molecules such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are known to participate in various forms of neuronal plasticity, such as long-term synaptic potentiation (LTP) and associated changes in dendritic spine morphology, but the exact sites of BDNF release and action remain poorly defined. Two papers from Ryohei Yasuda's lab, published in this issue of Nature , tackle this question. Stephen Harward et al . use live fluorescent imaging of murine hippocampal slices to show that NMDAR-dependent glutamate signalling leads to postsynaptic BDNF release, with associated signalling of its receptor, TrkB, on the same dendritic spine, suggesting autocrine BDNF signalling. In the second study Nathan Hedrick et al . find that the three small GTPases Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 are differentially involved in structural long-term potentiation of rodent dendritic spines, simultaneously ensuring signal specificity while also priming the system for plasticity. Taken together these results suggest molecular mechanisms for both signal specificity at single spines and synaptic cross-talk, a unique biochemical computation involved in neuronal plasticity and learning. The Rho GTPase proteins Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 have a central role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton in dendritic spines 1 , thereby exerting control over the structural and functional plasticity of spines 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 and, ultimately, learning and memory 6 , 7 , 8 . Although previous work has shown that precise spatiotemporal coordination of these GTPases is crucial for some forms of cell morphogenesis 9 , the nature of such coordination during structural spine plasticity is unclear. Here we describe a three-molecule model of structural long-term potentiation (sLTP) of murine dendritic spines, implicating the localized, coincident activation of Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 as a causal signal of sLTP. This model posits that complete tripartite signal overlap in spines confers sLTP, but that partial overlap primes spines for structural plasticity. By monitoring the spatiotemporal activation patterns of these GTPases during sLTP, we find that such spatiotemporal signal complementation simultaneously explains three integral features of plasticity: the facilitation of plasticity by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), the postsynaptic source of which activates Cdc42 and Rac1, but not RhoA; heterosynaptic facilitation of sLTP, which is conveyed by diffusive Rac1 and RhoA activity; and input specificity, which is afforded by spine-restricted Cdc42 activity. Thus, we present a form of biochemical computation in dendrites involving the controlled complementation of three molecules that simultaneously ensures signal specificity and primes the system for plasticity.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are divided phylogenetically into six classes 1 , 2 , denoted A to F. More than 370 structures of vertebrate GPCRs (belonging to classes A, B, C and F) have been determined, leading to a substantial understanding of their function 3 . By contrast, there are no structures of class D GPCRs, which are found exclusively in fungi where they regulate survival and reproduction. Here we determine the structure of a class D GPCR, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone receptor Ste2, in an active state coupled to the heterotrimeric G protein Gpa1–Ste4–Ste18. Ste2 was purified as a homodimer coupled to two G proteins. The dimer interface of Ste2 is formed by the N terminus, the transmembrane helices H1, H2 and H7, and the first extracellular loop ECL1. We establish a class D1 generic residue numbering system (CD1) to enable comparisons with orthologues and with other GPCR classes. The structure of Ste2 bears similarities in overall topology to class A GPCRs, but the transmembrane helix H4 is shifted by more than 20 Å and the G-protein-binding site is a shallow groove rather than a cleft. The structure provides a template for the design of novel drugs to target fungal GPCRs, which could be used to treat numerous intractable fungal diseases 4 . A cryo-electron microscopy structure of the yeast pheromone receptor Ste2, a class D G-protein-coupled receptor, in its active state reveals that Ste2 is a homodimer that couples to two G proteins.