Explore the vast range of titles available.

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

Background Suspicious gallbladder wall thickening encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses challenges in its management. This study aims to address this problem by proposing a technique that involves laparoscopic transhepatic needle decompression and modified cystic plate cholecystectomy. Methods In this report, we describe the case of a 36-year-old female with symptomatic gallstone disease and ultrasound findings of a well-distended gallbladder with a uniform wall thickness. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a distended, tense gallbladder with suspicious areas of thickness. Transhepatic aspiration was performed for gallbladder decompression, followed by modified cystic plate cholecystectomy with preservation of the thin rim of liver tissue over the cystic plate. The gallbladder was removed in a specimen bag, and final histopathology showed a hyalinized gallbladder wall with calcification and pyloric gland metaplasia, with liver tissue adhered to the gallbladder wall (Video). Results The proposed technique aimed to minimize the risk of bile spillage and violation of oncological planes while maintaining surgical integrity. It offers a middle path between standard and extended cholecystectomy, reducing the chance of over- or under-treatment. This approach ensures patient safety, minimizes the need for conversion to open surgery, and preserves the tumour-tissue interface. Conclusion Intraoperatively encountered suspicious gallbladder wall thickening can be effectively managed with laparoscopic transhepatic needle decompression and modified cystic plate cholecystectomy.

KCI Citation Count: 0

Background Ultrasound (US) has been widely used in screening and differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening (GWT). However, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer are limited, leading to delayed treatment or overtreatment. We aim to explore the value of high frame rate contrast enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) in distinguishing wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (malignant) from GWT mimicking malignancy (benign). Methods This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with non-acute GWT who underwent US and H-CEUS examination before cholecystectomy. Clinical information, US image and H-CEUS image characteristics between malignant and benign GWT were compared. The independent risk factors for malignant GWT on H-CEUS images were selected by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of H-CEUS in determining malignant GWT was compared with that of the gallbladder reporting and data system (GB-RADS) score. Results Forty-six patients included 30 benign GWTs and 16 malignant GWTs. Only mural layering and interface with liver on US images were significantly different between malignant and benign GWT ( P  < 0.05). Differences in enhancement direction, vascular morphology, serous layer continuity, wash-out time and mural layering in the venous phase of GWT on H-CEUS images were significant between malignant and benign GWT ( P  < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of H-CEUS based on enhancement direction, vascular morphology and wash-out time in the diagnosis of malignant GWT were 93.75%, 90.00%, and 91.30%, respectively. However, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the GB-RADS score were only 68.75%, 73.33% and 71.74%, respectively. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of H-CEUS was significantly higher than that of the GB-RADS score (AUC = 0.965 vs. 0.756). Conclusions H-CEUS can accurately detect enhancement direction, vascular morphology and wash-out time of GWT, with a higher diagnostic performance than the GB-RADS score in determining wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer. This study provides a novel imaging means with high accuracy for the diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer, thus may be better avoiding delayed treatment or overtreatment.

KCI Citation Count: 0

Thickening of the gallbladder wall is often associated with acute or chronic cholecystitis, adenomyomatosis and gallbladder carcinoma or seen in the context of liver and systemic diseases (acute hepatitis, cirrhosis, sepsis). Here we present a case of a 61 y.o. man with focal thickening of the gallbladder wall, in whom all imaging techniques were inconclusive. Pathological examination of the resected gallbladder revealed acute-on-chronic cholecystitis. We describe focal acute cholecystitis in absence of the classic clinical and imaging findings (Murphy’s sign, fever, gallstones, hydrops, pericholecystic fluid) and mimicking a gallbladder carcinoma.

Background IgG4-related cholecystitis, which is a manifestation of IgG4-related disease in the gallbladder, is associated with autoimmune pancreatitis or IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis in most cases; isolated gallbladder lesions without systemic manifestations are very rare. Gallbladder wall thickening is often diffuse, but sometimes localized, in which case, differentiation from gallbladder cancer becomes difficult. The characteristic features of IgG4-related cholecystitis on imaging that would enable differentiation from gallbladder cancer remain poorly described. Case presentation We present a rare case of isolated IgG4-related cholecystitis with localized gallbladder wall thickening that was clinically difficult to distinguish from malignancy before resection. An 82-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of gallbladder wall thickening on abdominal ultrasonography without any symptoms. Dynamic computed tomography of the abdomen showed localized wall thickening from the body to the fundus of the gallbladder that was enhanced from an early stage with a prolonged contrast effect. There were no other findings, such as pancreatic enlargement and bile duct dilatation. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed neither dilatation nor stenosis of the bile duct and pancreatic duct. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed a smooth layered thickening of the gallbladder wall with a maximum thickness of 6 mm and a well-preserved outermost hyperechoic layer in the same area. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed because malignancy could not be completely ruled out. Pathological examination of a resected specimen revealed IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration, fibrosis, and phlebitis. Although the serum IgG4 level measured after resection was normal, the condition was ultimately diagnosed as probable IgG4-related cholecystitis according to the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease. The EUS images reflected the pathological findings, in which lymphocytic infiltration was distributed in a laminar fashion in the gallbladder wall. Conclusions Although rare, isolated IgG4-related cholecystitis with localized wall thickening mimicking gallbladder cancer remains a clinical problem. A smooth laminar thickening of the gallbladder wall on EUS imaging could be one of the most informative characteristics for differentiating IgG4-related cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer.

Gallbladder wall thickening is relatively common in clinical settings, and for appropriate diagnosis, the size, shape, internal structure, surface contour, and vascularity of the gallbladder wall must be evaluated. Morphological evaluation is the most important; however, some gallbladder lesions resemble gallbladder cancer in imaging studies, making differential diagnosis challenging. Vascular evaluation is indispensable for a precise diagnosis in these cases. In this review, we present the current status of vascular evaluation using US and diagnosis using vascular imaging for gallbladder lesions, including those presenting with wall thickening. To date, several ultrasound imaging techniques have been developed to assess vascularity, including Doppler imaging with high sensitivity, use of contrast agents, and microvascular imaging using a novel filter for Doppler imaging. Although conventional color Doppler imaging is rarely used for the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions, the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing the vascularity, enhancement pattern, or timing of enhancement/washout has been reported. Presence of multiple irregular microvessels has been speculated to indicate malignancy. However, few reports on microvessels have been published, and further studies are required for the precise diagnosis of gallbladder lesions with microvascular evaluation.

Background Recently, the clinical application of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) has been expanding to abdominal organs. However, only a few studies on gallbladder diseases have been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and limitations of high b-value DWI for gallbladder diseases. Methods A total of 153 patients (mean age 60 ± 15 years, 78 males) who had undergone DWI for evaluating gallbladder wall thickening or polypoid lesions were included in this study. Of these 153 patients, 36 had gallbladder cancer and 117 had benign gallbladder diseases (67 chronic cholecystitis, 44 adenomyomatosis, four cholesterol polyp, one gallbladder adenoma, and one xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis). We evaluated the positive signal rate with DWI and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of each disease. Results The positive signal rate with DWI was significantly higher in gallbladder cancer (78 %) than in benign gallbladder diseases (22 %) ( p  < 0.001). The mean ADC value of gallbladder cancer was (1.83 ± 0.69) × 10 −3  mm 2 /s and that of benign gallbladder diseases was (2.60 ± 0.54) × 10 −3  mm 2 /s ( p  < 0.001). Benign gallbladder diseases with acute cholecystitis or a history of that had a higher positive signal rate with DWI ( p  < 0.001) and a lower ADC value ( p  = 0.018) than those without such conditions. Conclusion DWI can contribute to the improvement of the diagnostic capability for gallbladder wall thickening or polypoid lesions by compensating for weaknesses of other modalities by its many advantages, although cases with acute cholecystitis or such history sometimes show false-positive on DWI.

Background and Aims Differentiation of gallbladder (GB) carcinoma from benign GB wall thickening is challenging. The recent introduction of second-generation ultrasonic contrast agents has made contrast harmonic imaging with EUS possible. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) for the differential diagnosis of GB wall thickening. Methods Thirty-six consecutive patients with GB wall thickening imaged by CH-EUS and then underwent surgery were enrolled in this study. After the lesions were observed with conventional harmonic EUS (H-EUS), CH-EUS was performed with intravenous injection of 0.015 ml/kg of Sonazoid. Three reviewers with various levels of experience of EUS (Reviewer A: experienced endosonographer, B: EUS trainee, C: experienced gastroenterologist with expertise in transabdominal ultrasound but no EUS experience) were blinded to findings of recorded video of H-EUS and CH-EUS. The diagnostic accuracy of H-EUS and CH-EUS for malignant GB wall thickening was compared. Results Final diagnoses based on surgical histology were GB carcinoma in 16, cholecystitis in 11, adenomyomatosis in 6 and cholesterolosis in 3. Overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing malignant GB wall thickening of H-EUS and CH-EUS were 83.3 versus 89.6, 65 versus 98 % ( p  < 0.001) and 73.1 versus 94.4 % ( p  < 0.001). The inter-observer agreement for H-EUS was moderate ( κ  = 0.51), whereas that for CH-EUS was substantial ( κ  = 0.77). The inhomogeneous enhanced pattern on CH-EUS was a strong predictive factor of malignant GB wall thickening. Conclusion CH-EUS has the potential to improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement in the differential diagnosis of GB wall thickening.