Explore the vast range of titles available.

The geothermal reservoir in Waiwera was not sustainably managed for many decades. Hence, the responsible authority introduced a water management concept, whereby various independent models were developed and calibrated using observations. As these models were not yet able to reproduce all observations, constant model revisions are critical for efficient reservoir management. Results of a recent field campaign were used for the current model revision, considering two new main structural geological findings to reconstruct the natural reservoir state. Our simulation results demonstrate that a recently proven north-south trending fault in the study area plays a key role in improving the model. Further analysis suggests the presence of a not yet confirmed additional west-east aligned geologic fault in the north, since thermal convection is observed inland. Additional field campaigns are needed to acquire more information on the main geological fault zones as well as additional data on temperature and salinity distributions.

In this paper, the geological faults in the zone of stable geodynamic and tectonic activity are studied. The purpose of the analytical research is to establish regularities of rock pressure in the hanging and foot walls of the geological fault and its influence on the state-deformed state of the rock massif. Comprehensive methodology that included analytical calculation will be implemented in the work. Taking into account the complexity of determining the stress-deformed state of the rocks, evaluation method of tension is adopted. Results of previously conducted computer modeling results are compared with analytic data. Conclusions regarding the implementation of the offered method are made on the basis of undertaken investigations. The obtained results with sufficient accuracy in practical application will allow consume coal reserves in the faulting zones.

A nearly 20-year hiatus in major seismic activity in southern California ended on 4 July 2019 with a sequence of intersecting earthquakes near the city of Ridgecrest, California. This sequence included a foreshock with a moment magnitude (M w) of 6.4 followed by a M w 7.1 mainshock nearly 34 hours later. Geodetic, seismic, and seismicity data provided an integrative view of this sequence, which ruptured an unmapped multiscale network of interlaced orthogonal faults. This complex fault geometry persists over the entire seismogenic depth range. The rupture of the mainshock terminated only a few kilometers from the major regional Garlock fault, triggering shallow creep and a substantial earthquake swarm. The repeated occurrence of multifault ruptures, as revealed by modern instrumentation and analysis techniques, poses a formidable challenge in quantifying regional seismic hazards.

Subduction zones are responsible for the most-damaging and tsunami-generating great earthquakes. Hayes et al. updated their Slab1.0 model to include all seismically active subduction zones, including geometrically complex regions like the Philippines. The new model, Slab2, details the geometry of 24 million square kilometers of subducted slabs, from ocean trench to upper mantle. The model will be vital for fully understanding seismic hazard in some of the most populated regions in the world. Science , this issue p. 58 Slab2 is a comprehensive model of all seismically active subduction zones on Earth. Subduction zones are home to the most seismically active faults on the planet. The shallow megathrust interfaces of subduction zones host Earth’s largest earthquakes and are likely the only faults capable of magnitude 9+ ruptures. Despite these facts, our knowledge of subduction zone geometry—which likely plays a key role in determining the spatial extent and ultimately the size of subduction zone earthquakes—is incomplete. We calculated the three-dimensional geometries of all seismically active global subduction zones. The resulting model, called Slab2, provides a uniform geometrical analysis of all currently subducting slabs.

The 2016 moment magnitude (Mw) 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake was one of the largest ever to hit New Zealand. Hamling et al. show with a new slip model that it was an incredibly complex event. Unlike most earthquakes, multiple faults ruptured to generate the ground shaking. A remarkable 12 faults ruptured overall, with the rupture jumping between faults located up to 15 km away from each other. The earthquake should motivate rethinking of certain seismic hazard models, which do not presently allow for this unusual complex rupture pattern. Science, this issue p. eaam7194 On 14 November 2016 (local time), northeastern South Island of New Zealand was struck by a major moment magnitude (Mw) 7.8 earthquake. The Kaikoura earthquake was the most powerful experienced in the region in more than 150 years. The whole of New Zealand reported shaking, with widespread damage across much of northern South Island and in the capital city, Wellington. The earthquake straddled two distinct seismotectonic domains, breaking multiple faults in the contractional North Canterbury fault zone and the dominantly strike-slip Marlborough fault system. Earthquakes are conceptually thought to occur along a single fault. Although this is often the case, the need to account for multiple segment ruptures challenges seismic hazard assessments and potential maximum earthquake magnitudes. Field observations from many past earthquakes and numerical models suggest that a rupture will halt if it has to step over a distance as small as 5 km to continue on a different fault. The Kaikoura earthquake's complexity defies many conventional assumptions about the degree to which earthquake ruptures are controlled by fault segmentation and provides additional motivation to rethink these issues in seismic hazard models. Field observations, in conjunction with interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), Global Positioning System (GPS), and seismology data, reveal the Kaikoura earthquake to be one of the most complex earthquakes ever recorded with modern instrumental techniques. The rupture propagated northward for more than 170 km along both mapped and unmapped faults before continuing offshore at the island's northeastern extent. A tsunami of up to 3 m in height was detected at Kaikoura and at three other tide gauges along the east coast of both the North and South Islands. Geodetic and geological field observations reveal surface ruptures along at least 12 major crustal faults and extensive uplift along much of the coastline. Surface displacements measured by GPS and satellite radar data show horizontal offsets of ~6 m. In addition, a fault-bounded block (the Papatea block) was uplifted by up to 8 m and translated south by 4 to 5 m. Modeling suggests that some of the faults slipped by more than 20 m, at depths of 10 to 15 km, with surface slip of ~10 m consistent with field observations of offset roads and fences. Although we can explain most of the deformation by crustal faulting alone, global moment tensors show a larger thrust component, indicating that the earthquake also involved some slip along the southern end of the Hikurangi subduction interface, which lies ~20 km beneath Kaikoura. Including this as a fault source in the inversion suggests that up to 4 m of predominantly reverse slip may have occurred on the subduction zone beneath the crustal faults, contributing ~10 to 30% of the total moment. Although the unusual multifault rupture observed in the Kaikoura earthquake may be partly related to the geometrically complex nature of the faults in this region, this event emphasizes the importance of reevaluating how rupture scenarios are defined for seismic hazard models in plate boundary zones worldwide. (A and B ) Photos showing the coastal uplift of 2 to 3 m associated with the Papatea block [labeled in (C)]. The inset in (A) shows an aerial view of New Zealand. Red lines denote the location of known active faults. The black box indicates the Marlborough fault system. (C ) Three-dimensional displacement field derived from satellite radar data. The vectors represent the horizontal displacements, and the colored background shows the vertical displacements. On 14 November 2016, northeastern South Island of New Zealand was struck by a major moment magnitude (Mw) 7.8 earthquake. Field observations, in conjunction with interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Global Positioning System, and seismology data, reveal this to be one of the most complex earthquakes ever recorded. The rupture propagated northward for more than 170 kilometers along both mapped and unmapped faults before continuing offshore at the island's northeastern extent. Geodetic and field observations reveal surface ruptures along at least 12 major faults, including possible slip along the southern Hikurangi subduction interface; extensive uplift along much of the coastline; and widespread anelastic deformation, including the ~8-meter uplift of a fault-bounded block. This complex earthquake defies many conventional assumptions about the degree to which earthquake ruptures are controlled by fault segmentation and should motivate reevaluation of these issues in seismic hazard models.

Hydraulic fracturing has been inferred to trigger the majority of injection-induced earthquakes in western Canada, in contrast to the Midwestern United States, where massive saltwater disposal is the dominant triggering mechanism. A template-based earthquake catalog from a seismically active Canadian shale play, combined with comprehensive injection data during a 4-month interval, shows that earthquakes are tightly clustered in space and time near hydraulic fracturing sites. The largest event [moment magnitude (Mw) 3.9] occurred several weeks after injection along a fault that appears to extend from the injection zone into crystalline basement. Patterns of seismicity indicate that stress changes during operations can activate fault slip to an offset distance of >1 km, whereas pressurization by hydraulic fracturing into a fault yields episodic seismicity that can persist for months.

We considered various non‐uniformities such as branch faults, rotation of stress field directions, and changes in tectonic environments to simulate the dynamic rupture process of the 6 February 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake in SE Türkiye. We utilized near‐fault waveform data, GNSS static displacements, and surface rupture to constrain the dynamic model. The results indicate that the high initial stress accumulated in the Kahramanmaraş‐Çelikhan seismic gap leads to the successful triggering of the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) and the supershear rupture in the northeast segment. Due to the complexity of fault geometry, the rupture speed along the southeastern segment of the EAF varied repeatedly between supershear and subshear, which contributed to the unexpectedly strong ground motion. Furthermore, the triggering of the EAF reminds us to be aware of the risk of seismic gaps on major faults being triggered by secondary faults, which is crucial to prevent significant disasters. Plain Language Summary On 6 February 2023, the south‐central Türkiye was hit by two major earthquakes with magnitudes of Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 respectively. Among them, the complex rupture process and unexpected ground motion of the Mw 7.8 event attracted the attention of seismologists. In this paper, the 3D dynamic rupture process of this mainshock is simulated based on complex multi‐fault system and heterogeneous initial stress. And the simulation results are in good agreement with the observations. Our results show that high initial stress is required for the EAF to be triggered. The supershear rupture occurred only in certain fault segments and is unable to sustain itself in a significant area on the fault due to the along‐strike variations in fault geometry and strength. More importantly, the dynamic model suggests that we must be alert to the risk of major fault being triggered by earthquakes on nearby small faults, especially when there are seismic gaps on the major fault. Key Points The high initial stress accumulated in the seismic gap leads to the successful triggering of the East Anatolian Fault The change of fault geometry in the southwest segment prevented the sustained supershear rupture The risk of earthquake nucleation on the secondary fault triggering the major fault rupture and the related disaster was highlighted

The Mj6.5 (Mw6.2) event that occurred on 5 May 2023 near the northern shoreline of the northeastern tip of the Noto Peninsula, central Japan, is the largest event to date in a long‐lasting, intense earthquake swarm. Here we have created a more precise aftershock catalog associated with the 2023 Mj6.5 and the second‐largest 2022 Mj5.4 sequence to understand the rupture process of this largest earthquake. Most of the aftershocks are aligned along a ∼45° SE‐dipping plane. The mainshock initially ruptured the same deep section of the fault zone that had been ruptured by the 2022 Mj5.4 event, before propagating rapidly to shallow depths and to offshore along the ruptured fault plane. The aftershock front migrated at a speed of ∼20 km/hr. This rapid upward migration of the immediate aftershocks might be driven by upwelling of crustal fluids along the intensely fractured and permeable fault zone via mainshock dynamic rupture. Plain Language Summary Near the northeastern tip of the Noto Peninsula, central Japan, a long‐lasting, intense earthquake swarm has continued since November 2020. On 5 May 2023, the largest Mj6.5 (Mw6.2) event to date occurred. We precisely located the aftershock distribution following the 2023 Mj6.5 and the second‐largest 2022 Mj5.4 sequence and enhanced the catalog by searching events based on waveform similarity to understand the rupture process of this largest earthquake. The 2023 Mj6.5 event initially ruptured the same deep section of the fault that had been ruptured by the 2022 Mj5.4 event, before propagating rapidly to shallow depths and to offshore along the ruptured fault. We can see that the aftershock front moved at a speed of ∼20 km/hr, which is a rare case that constrains the rapid movement of aftershocks. The rapid upward movement of the aftershocks may have been caused by the upwelling of crustal fluids along the permeable fault zone created by the dynamic rupture of the mainshock. Key Points We constructed a more precise aftershock catalog associated with the two major ruptures during a long‐lasting intense seismic swarm We identify a rapid migration of early aftershocks following the largest 2023 Mj6.5 earthquake to date during the seismic swarm Upwelling of crustal fluids along the fractured permeable fault zone could drive the rapid migration of early aftershocks

To justify the opportunities to cross the disjunctive geological faults without full coal seam fracturing by underground gasifier, basing on the established time dependencies of underground gasifier output to an effective gasification regime applying the technology of borehole underground coal gasification. The changing dependency of time when the underground gasifier reaches the regime of stabilization during underground coal gasification was found with a laboratory experimental unit. The dependencies of fault plane amplitude in geological fault on the distance at which the gasifier reaches the regime of stabilization on the total output of combustible gases and their heating value were received. The change of the dependency of the coefficient of gasification enhancement, which is influenced by the thermochemical rate processes in reaction channel of the underground gasifier, is presented. The results of the research will allow adjusting the calculation of material and heat balance of the gasification process to determine the optimal qualitative and quantitative composition of injected air.

The prompt identification of faults responsible for moderate‐to‐large earthquakes is fundamental for understanding the likelihood of further, potentially damaging events. This is increasingly challenging when the activated fault is an offshore buried thrust, where neither coseismic surface ruptures nor GPS/InSAR deformation data are available after an earthquake. We show that on 9 November 2022, an Mw 5.5 earthquake offshore Pesaro ruptured a portion of the buried Northern Apennines thrust front (the Cornelia thrust system [CTS]). By post‐processing and interpreting the seismic reflection profiles crossing this thrust system, we determined that the activated fault (CTS) is an arcuate 30‐km‐long, NW‐SE striking, SW dipping thrust and that older structures at its footwall possibly influenced its position and geometry. The activation of adjacent segments of the thrust system is a plausible scenario that deserves to be further investigated to understand the full earthquake potential of this offshore seismogenic source. Plain Language Summary The Northern Apennines chain is characterized by thrust faults running from the Po Plain to the Adriatic Sea on the northeastern side of peninsular Italy. These thrusts are buried below ≈2,000 m cover of Plio‐Pleistocene deposits. Controversies arose about these thrust faults' activity and earthquake potential based on their hidden geological signature and the scanty seismicity that could be associated with them. The earthquake (magnitude 5.5) that occurred on 9 November 2022, offshore Pesaro revived this argument. In this work, we analyze the geological structure of the crustal volume affected by the seismic sequence, exploiting seismic reflection profiles and well‐log data to identify the earthquake causative fault. Our results demonstrate that the earthquake ruptured a well‐known fault of the Northern Apennines' buried thrust front, supporting that it is indeed active and seismogenic. The size and architecture of this thrust front suggest that it could generate even larger earthquakes (Mw > 6.5). This type of geological study is instrumental to understanding the geometry of earthquake faults, particularly in offshore areas, because they constitute reliable inputs for earthquake hazard models and, when done promptly after an earthquake, provide key elements for other studies on the seismic source and the unfolding of the ongoing seismic sequence. Key Points 9 November 2022, earthquake consistent with activity of the Cornelia thrust, a fault system running off the central Adriatic coast The seismic reflection profiles in the area allowed for delineating the thrust and its earthquake potential with a much finer resolution The properties of the causative fault suggest that the activation of adjacent segments is a plausible scenario that deserves consideration