Explore the vast range of titles available.

Grade inflation must be abated. The effect of grade inflation weakens academic standards to the point where accurately assessing levels of competency and student knowledge is difficult to determine. Using intrinsic case study design, I contacted 411 online instructors in the United States exploring potential solutions to abate grade inflation. Of 411 faculty members contacted via personal e-mail, 27 instructors at three regionally accredited online universities in the United States agreed to be interviewed by the use of an interview protocol and recorded via Skype. The research question guiding the study was “What are potential solutions to abate grade inflation?” The research addressed a gap in research related to potential solutions to abate grade inflation at online universities located in the United States. Concepts developed from data analysis were (a) use rubrics, (b) revising student evaluations (c) re-evaluating academic policies, (d) instituting objective exams, (e) instructor training program, (f) take instructors out of grading, (g) pass / fail grading, (h) ranking rather than GPA, and (i) best practices.

The term “grade inflation” covers a multitude of phenomena, some of which are even alleged to be sins. Continuing increases in average grades have been widely documented in many universities over the last several decades. Also widely documented, and often associated with grade inflation, are systematic differences in grade levels by field of study, with a common belief that the sciences and math grade harder than the social sciences, which in turn grade harder than the humanities—and that economics behaves more like the natural sciences than like the social sciences. The general persistence of these relative differences in grades seem to us to be more interesting and more difficult to explain than the persistence of modest grade inflation in general, and they are the principal focus of this paper. Why, for example, should average grades in English be much higher than average grades in chemistry? And what is going on when relative grades change, when a department's grading practices change markedly relative to other departments? We explore such questions using detailed data on grades at the University of Michigan from Fall 1992 through Winter 2008.

Grade inflation and high grade levels have been subjects of concern and public debate in recent decades. In the mid-1990s, Cornell University's Faculty Senate had a number of discussions about grade inflation and what might be done about it. In April 1996, the Faculty Senate voted to adopt a new grade reporting policy which had two parts: 1) the publication of course median grades on the Internet; and 2) the reporting of course median grades in students' transcripts. The policy change followed the determination of a university committee that “it is desirable for Cornell University to provide more information to the reader of a transcript and produce more meaningful letter grades.” It was hoped that “More accurate recognition of performance may encourage students to take courses in which the median grade is relatively low.” The median grade policy has remained to date only partially implemented: median grades have been reported online since 1998 but do not yet appear in transcripts. We evaluate the effect of the implemented policy on patterns of course choice and grade inflation. Specifically, we test two related hypotheses: First, all else being equal, the availability of online grade information will lead to increased enrollment into leniently graded courses. Second, high-ability students will be less attracted to the leniently graded courses than their peers. Building on these results we perform an exercise that identifies the extent to which the change in student behavior resulted in an increase in the university-wide mean grade.

In this article, I address the paradox that university grade point averages have increased for decades, whereas the time students invest in their studies has decreased. I argue that one major contributor to this paradox is grading leniency, encouraged by the practice of university administrators to base important personnel decisions on student evaluations of teaching. Grading leniency creates strong incentives for instructors to teach in ways that would result in good student evaluations. Because many instructors believe that the average student prefers courses that are entertaining, require little work, and result in high grades, they feel under pressure to conform to those expectations. Evidence is presented that the positive association between student grades and their evaluation of teaching reflects a bias rather than teaching effectiveness. If good teaching evaluations reflected improved student learning due to effective teaching, they should be positively related to the grades received in subsequent courses that build on knowledge gained in the previous course. Findings that teaching evaluations of concurrent courses, though positively correlated with concurrent grades, are negatively related to student performance in subsequent courses are more consistent with the assumption that concurrent evaluations are the result of lenient grading rather than effective teaching. Policy implications are discussed.

Average grades in colleges and universities have risen markedly since the 1960s. Critics express concern that grade inflation erodes incentives for students to learn; gives students, employers, and graduate schools poor information on absolute and relative abilities; and reflects the quid pro quo of grades for better student evaluations of professors. This paper evaluates an anti-grade-inflation policy that capped most course averages at a B+. The cap was biding for high-grading departments (in the humanities and social sciences) and was not binding for low-grading departments (in economics and sciences), facilitating a difference-in-differences analysis. Professors complied with the policy by reducing compression at the top of the grade distribution. It had little effect on receipt of top honors, but affected receipt of magna cum laude. In departments affected by the cap, the policy expanded racial gaps in grades, reduced enrollments and majors, and lowered student ratings of professors.

The COVID-19 pandemic required adaptation to a new learning environment creating challenges for students and instructors. A reduction in student-teacher contact and the lack of supervision should have led to a decline in students’ academic performance. Nonetheless, studies report increases in grades during the pandemic. Yet, limited information is available regarding the persistence of this impact. This study utilizes a hierarchical mixed effect model to estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on university grades. Using unique class-level data containing chronological variables and institutional, instructor, and student characteristics, spanning Fall 2010 to Spring 2021 of 7,852 undergraduate classes, it is shown class average grade point averages (GPAs) in the College of Agriculture at Texas A&M University increased for the three semesters most impacted by COVID-19. Average class GPAs increased by 0.22 points in Spring 2020 because of COVID-19 and then approximately 0.18 points in the subsequent next two semesters. The negative effect of class size decreased during COVID-19, implying online classes have different size effects than traditional classes. Additionally, the positive effect of SAT scores on grades decreased. One implication of this study is that COVID-19 may not only have a direct, significant, impact on GPAs but may also indirectly affect GPAs through altering the effects of variables on GPAs. The causal mechanisms by which the changes occurred are an area for further research. JEL Codes: I21, I29

Grade inflation in higher education poses challenges to maintaining academic standards, particularly in pharmacy education, where assessing student competency is crucial. This study investigates the impact of AI-generated multiple-choice questions (MCQs) on exam difficulty and reliability in a pharmacy management course at a Saudi university. A quasi-experimental design compared the 2024 midterm exam, featuring ChatGPT-generated MCQs, with the 2023 exam that utilized human-generated questions. Both exams covered identical topics. Exam reliability was assessed using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20), while difficulty and discrimination indices were analyzed. Statistical tests, including t-tests and chi-square tests, were conducted to compare performance metrics. The 2024 exam demonstrated higher reliability (KR-20 = 0.83) compared to the 2023 exam (KR-20 = 0.78). The 2024 exam included a greater proportion of moderate questions (30%) and one difficult question (3.3%), whereas the 2023 exam had 93.3% easy questions. The mean student score was significantly lower in 2024 (17.75 vs. 21.53, p < 0.001), and the discrimination index improved (0.35 vs. 0.25, p = 0.007), indicating enhanced differentiation between students. The findings suggest that AI-generated MCQs contribute to improved exam rigor and a potential reduction in grade inflation. However, careful review of AI-generated content remains essential to ensure alignment with course objectives and accuracy. AI tools like ChatGPT offer promising opportunities to enhance assessment integrity and support fairer evaluations in pharmacy education.

At least one third of all U.S. college students don't get a degree, even six years after they enroll. Earlier research focusing on trends through 1990 found broad declines in college graduation rates, especially among men attending less-selective four-year schools. Since then, however, the picture of college enrollment has changed dramatically, with increases in both high-school graduation and college matriculation rates. Have completion rates changed as well? To find out, the authors analyzed federal education and Census data and found that rates of college completion have gone up since 1990, at a broad mix of institution types and among both men and women. This trend is confirmed in federal data, the Census, and registrar data from 10 public universities. What's driving this growth? The authors looked at student background and academic preparation, as well as institutional practices like support-service spending, and find that none of these potential factors explain the changes. But one trend is clear across all the datasets: compared to decades past, college students have been earning better grades in recent years, and better college grades are strongly associated with higher rates of graduation. The authors explore a range of factors that could influence student performance, such as high-school preparation and rates of labor-force participation in college and find that these would predict students to be less likely to graduate, not more. While earning a degree is something to be lauded, evidence of grade inflation raises important questions about the meaning of some college degrees. And with growing uncertainty about the relative return on investment in terms of both time and tuition, both students and institutions should take a hard look at the ultimate value of their efforts.

The present study examined how information about different grading systems affects students’ course expectations, particularly in ways that may have downstream consequences for learning and other academic outcomes.   In an online experiment using a preregistered design, we prompted two samples of current and recent college students (N = 547) with a hypothetical course that adopted either a norm- or criterion-referenced grading system, two common grading policies in higher education. We then examined students’ expectations for their own course-related goals, perceptions, and behaviors. We found that, compared to criterion-referenced grading, norm-referenced grading led participants to expect higher performance-goal orientation, lower mastery-goal orientation, lower course self-efficacy, and fewer help-related behaviors. Norm-referenced grading also increased perceptions that the instructor believes intelligence to be nonuniversal and fixed (i.e., not malleable). Some effects of grading system were stronger for students from non-minoritized backgrounds and lacking prior experience with the assigned grading system. Although participants reported experiencing criterion-referenced grading more often in college, both grading policies were commonly experienced by participants. Our findings suggest that norm-referenced grading policies negatively impact student expectations. More broadly, these findings highlight the importance of grading policies in shaping students' course-related expectations.

Stress, we are told, is toxic, and a school is doing its part to ensure the wellbeing of the next generation if it removes the deleterious effects of competition, comparison, and anxiety. There's a healthy debate about how placing different forms of \"performance\" on the vertical axis influences the shape of the curve-the optimal level of stress is different for an athlete and a laboratory scientist-but learning is one form of performance, and the principles of the curve apply. [...]if my teacher applies a bit of pressure-\"There's a test on Monday\" or \"There's a paper due\"-suddenly I am more apt to study over the weekend, to work hard on the paper. [...]even if the test isn't graded, the stress involved in the process of recall helps encode learning.