Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Approximately 40% of hormone receptor positive/human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR + /HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients harbor phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha ( PIK3CA ) mutations. However, associations between PIK3CA mutation status and clinical outcomes among patients with HR + /HER2- mBC have been heterogeneous across clinical trials. This meta-analysis was conducted to survey recently available trial data to assess the prognostic effects of PIK3CA among patients with HR + /HER2- mBC.  Methods Randomized clinical trials reporting progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) stratified by PIK3CA status in HR + /HER2- mBC were identified via systematic literature review. Trial arms receiving phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase ( PI3K)- targeted therapies were excluded. Meta-regression analysis was used to estimate the association between PIK3CA status and PFS and OS among included studies. Results The analyzed data included 3,219 patients from 33 study arms across 11 trials ( PIK3CA mutated: 1,386, wild type: 1,833). PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter median PFS (difference [95% CI] (months): -1.8 [-3.4, -0.1], I 2  = 35%) and shorter median OS (-8.4 [-13.4, -3.5], I 2  = 58%, N  = 1,545). Findings were similar for PFS rates at 6 months (odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.74 [0.59, 0.94], I 2  = 42%, N  = 3,160) and 12 months (0.76 [0.59, 0.99], I 2  = 42%, N  = 2,468) and directionally consistent but not statistically significant at 18 months ( N  = 1,726). Conclusions Pooling evidence across multiple studies, PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter PFS and OS. These findings suggest a negative prognostic value of PIK3CA mutations in patients with HR + /HER2- mBC.

Background Hyperglycemia is an on-target effect of PI3Kα inhibitors. Early identification and intervention of treatment-induced hyperglycemia is important for improving management of patients receiving a PI3Kα inhibitor like alpelisib. Here, we characterize incidence of grade 3/4 alpelisib-related hyperglycemia, along with time to event, management, and outcomes using a machine learning model. Methods Data for the risk model were pooled from patients receiving alpelisib ± fulvestrant in the open-label, phase 1 X2101 trial and the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial. The pooled population ( n  = 505) included patients with advanced solid tumors (X2101, n  = 221) or HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (SOLAR-1, n  = 284). External validation was performed using BYLieve trial patient data ( n  = 340). Hyperglycemia incidence and management were analyzed for SOLAR-1. Results A random forest model identified 5 baseline characteristics most associated with risk of developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, HbA 1c , monocytes, age). This model was used to derive a score to classify patients as high or low risk for developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia. Applying the model to patients treated with alpelisib and fulvestrant in SOLAR-1 showed higher incidence of hyperglycemia (all grade and grade 3/4), increased use of antihyperglycemic medications, and more discontinuations due to hyperglycemia (16.7% vs. 2.6% of discontinuations) in the high- versus low-risk group. Among patients in SOLAR-1 (alpelisib + fulvestrant arm) with PIK3CA mutations, median progression-free survival was similar between the high- and low-risk groups (11.0 vs. 10.9 months). For external validation, the model was applied to the BYLieve trial, for which successful classification into high- and low-risk groups with shorter time to grade 3/4 hyperglycemia in the high-risk group was observed. Conclusions A risk model using 5 clinically relevant baseline characteristics was able to identify patients at higher or lower probability for developing alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia. Early identification of patients who may be at higher risk for hyperglycemia may improve management (including monitoring and early intervention) and potentially lead to improved outcomes. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01219699 (registration date: October 13, 2010; retrospectively registered), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02437318 (registration date: May 7, 2015); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03056755 (registration date: February 17, 2017).

Purpose This research designeded to: 1. Analyze the efficacy and safety of Palbociclib treatment in HR-positive and HER2-negative (HR + /HER2-) metastatic breast cancer(MBC) patients. 2. Establish and validate a nomogram model for predicting the progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months in HR + /HER2- MBC patients after receiving Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET). Patients and methods 1. This research retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of Palbociclib combined with ET in 214 patients with HR + /HER2- MBC. 2. A nomogram was designed and constructed with the retrospective clinical data of 214 patients with HR + /HER2- MBC who received Palbociclib plus ET at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in China from August 2018 to August 2022. Among these patients, 161 were randomly assigned to the training cohort, while 53 to the validation cohort. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was assessed through the analysis the area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis(DCA). Results 1. Median PFS was 7.17 months (95% CI: 7.61—10.05 months), with an objective response rate (ORR) of 2.80% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 34.58%. The most prevalent grade 3–4 adverse event was neutropenia (38.79%). 2. Multiple variable analysis of the training set revealed that age < 60 years old, PR < 20%, Ki-67 ≥ 20%, luminal B molecular subtype, primary resistance to ET, receipt of late-stage chemotherapy, and presence of liver metastasis or ≥ 2 visceral metastases were independent prognostic factors associated with poor PFS ( P  < 0.05). Then, the predictive model underwent development and validation utilizing the aforementioned parameters. On the one hand, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the training set at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months were 0.771, 0.783, and 0.790, respectively, indicating a strong predictive ability of the developed model. On the other hand, the AUC of the validation set at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months were 0.720, 0.766, and 0.754, respectively, suggesting the favorable discriminatory ability of the model. The calibration curves also exhibited a good fit with the ideal curves, and the DCA demonstrated the clinical applicability of the model. The nomogram's different scores could distinguish PFS. Conclusion This retrospective study demonstrates the efficacy of Palbociclib in Chinese breast cancer patients. Moreover, the clinical parameters showed a significant association with the prognosis of HR + /HER2- MBC, and the prognostic models constructed based on these variables also displayed robust predictive power, which could offer more intuitive and convenient references for clinical doctors to formulate follow-up treatment plans.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, are widely used in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) breast cancer. Despite their efficacy, these drugs are associated with a range of adverse events (AEs), including dermatologic toxicities. This case report presents a rare instance of lichenoid dermatitis in a 48-year-old woman following treatment with abemaciclib. The patient developed erythematous, edematous plaques and papules on her hands and forearms, which resolved after discontinuation of the drug and treatment with topical corticosteroids. This report highlights the need for awareness of cutaneous side effects associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, particularly abemaciclib.

Background Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) is an antibody–drug conjugate composed of an anti-TROP2 monoclonal antibody coupled to a cytotoxic belotecan-derived topoisomerase I inhibitor (KL610023) via a novel linker. We report results from the phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts in advanced solid tumors and phase 2 expansion cohorts for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from the first-in-human MK-2870-001 (KL264-01) study (NCT04152499). Methods Patients had unresectable locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapies. In the phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, patients had unresectable locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapies. Sac-TMT was administered by intravenous administration every 2 weeks at 2 to 12 mg/kg. In phase 2, patients with TNBC and HR+/HER2− breast cancer received sac-TMT per recommended doses for expansion (RDEs) identified in phase 1. Primary objectives were determining maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sac-TMT and establishing RDEs (phase 1) and determining ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment (phase 2). Adverse events were assessed per NCI-CTCAE version 5.0. Results Thirty patients were enrolled in phase 1 and received sac-TMT 2 mg/kg ( n  = 4), 4 mg/kg ( n  = 7), 5 mg/kg ( n  = 7), 5.5 mg/kg ( n  = 5), and 6 mg/kg ( n  = 7). Five patients had dose-limiting toxicities: grade 3 stomatitis at 4, 5.5, and 6 mg/kg; grade 3 rash at 5 mg/kg; and grade 3 urticaria at 6 mg/kg. MTD was 5.5 mg/kg and RDEs were 4 and 5 mg/kg. In the phase 2 dose expansion, ORR (95% CI) was 34.8% (16.4%, 57.3%) in the 4-mg/kg group ( n  = 23) and 38.9% (23.1%, 56.5%) in the 5-mg/kg group ( n  = 36) for TNBC. ORR (95% CI) was 31.7% (18.1%, 48.1%) for HR+/HER2− breast cancer ( n  = 41). Conclusions Sac-TMT demonstrated manageable safety profile in patients with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors and promising antitumor activity in metastatic TNBC and HR+/HER2 − breast cancer. Sac-TMT is being investigated in phase 3 studies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04152499.

Background Cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities and concurrent medications with risk of heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation can impact treatment decisions and safety discussions for patients with breast cancer. However, limited data are available regarding their prevalence in patients with HR + /HER2– metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We evaluated the prevalence of CV comorbidities, the use of concurrent medications with risk of QTc prolongation, and treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed HR + /HER2 − mBC. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized claims data from Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare databases. Claims-based algorithms identified patients with newly diagnosed HR + /HER2– mBC between January 2016 and December 2022. The index date was defined as the first date of an mBC claim during this period. For each patient, data on pre-existing CV comorbidities and first-line treatments were captured for 12 months before and 6 months after the index date, respectively. Results A total of 6525 patients with newly diagnosed HR + /HER2 − mBC were identified. At mBC diagnosis, 61.7% of patients had ≥ 1 CV comorbidity. Of patients with CV comorbidities, 22.5% and 30.6% took 1 or ≥ 2 medications, respectively, with risk of QTc prolongation. First-line use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors increased from 22.1% of patients with CV comorbidities diagnosed in 2016–2017 to 31.5% of those diagnosed in 2018–2022. Conclusions We found that CV comorbidities and use of medications with risk of QTc prolongation were common in patients with newly diagnosed HR + /HER2 − mBC. These factors should inform treatment decision-making (including CDK4/6 inhibitor selection), safety discussions with patients, and CV monitoring. Graphical Abstract

This review compared the real-world effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy versus endocrine monotherapy or chemotherapy in postmenopausal hormone receptor positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients with multiple metastatic sites. This retrospective chart review examined a nationwide sample of postmenopausal HR+/HER2− mBC women with ≥2 non–lymph-node metastatic sites. Patients must have initiated everolimus-based therapy (monotherapy or combination therapy including everolimus), endocrine monotherapy (any endocrine agent), or chemotherapy (monotherapy or combination with another chemotherapeutic or endocrine agent) for mBC between July 1, 2012 and August 15, 2013 after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor failure. Progression-free survival and time on treatment were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for line of therapy and baseline characteristics. One hundred patients received everolimus-based therapy, 79 received endocrine monotherapy, and 86 received chemotherapy. Everolimus-based therapy was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and time on treatment than endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy. Among HR+/HER2− mBC patients with multiple metastatic sites, everolimus-based therapy was associated with better real-world effectiveness than endocrine monotherapy or chemotherapy.

Background: Ribociclib has demonstrated a statistically significant overall survival benefit in pre- and postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer. New Adjuvant Trial with Ribociclib [LEE011] (NATALEE) is a trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone in patients with HR+/HER2− early nonmetastatic breast cancer (EBC). Methods/design: NATALEE is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III trial in patients with HR+/HER2− EBC. Eligible patients include women, regardless of menopausal status, and men aged ⩾18 years. Select patients with stage IIA, stage IIB, or stage III disease (per the anatomic classification in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition) with an initial diagnosis ⩽18 months prior to randomization are eligible. Patients receiving standard (neo)adjuvant ET are eligible if treatment was initiated ⩽12 months before randomization. Patients undergo 1:1 randomization to ribociclib 400 mg/day (3 weeks on/1 week off) +ET (letrozole 2.5 mg/day or anastrozole 1 mg/day [investigator’s discretion] plus goserelin [men or premenopausal women]) or ET alone. Ribociclib treatment duration is 36 months; ET treatment duration is ⩾60 months. The primary end point is invasive disease-free survival. Discussion: The 36-month treatment duration of ribociclib in NATALEE is extended compared with that in other adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor trials and is intended to maximize efficacy due to longer duration of CDK4/6 inhibition. Compared with the 600-mg/day dose used in advanced breast cancer, the reduced ribociclib dose used in NATALEE may improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy. NATALEE includes the broadest population of patients with HR+/HER2− EBC of any Phase III trial currently evaluating adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03701334 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03701334)

Background The treatment landscape for HR(+)HER2(−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is evolving for patients with ESR1 mutations (mut) and PI3K/AKT pathway genomic alterations (GA). We sought to inform clinical utility for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using tissue (TBx) and liquid biopsies (LBx) in HR(+)HER2(−) MBC. Methods Records from a de-identified breast cancer clinicogenomic database for patients who underwent TBx/LBx testing at Foundation Medicine during routine clinical care at ~ 280 US cancer clinics between 01/2011 and 09/2023 were assessed. GA prevalence [ ESR1 mut, PIK3CA mut, AKT1 mut, PTEN mut, and PTEN homozygous copy loss ( PTEN loss)] were calculated in TBx and LBx [stratified by ctDNA tumor fraction (TF)] during the first three lines of therapy. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were compared between groups by Cox models adjusted for prognostic factors. Results  ~ 60% of cases harbored 1 + GA in 1st-line TBx (1266/2154) or LBx TF ≥ 1% (80/126) and 26.5% (43/162) in LBx TF < 1%. ESR1 mut was found in 8.1% TBx, 17.5% LBx TF ≥ 1%, and 4.9% LBx TF < 1% in 1st line, increasing to 59% in 3rd line (LBx TF ≥ 1%). PTEN loss was detected at higher rates in TBx (4.3%) than LBx (1% in TF ≥ 1%). Patients receiving 1st-line aromatase inhibitor + CDK4/6 inhibitor ( n  = 573) with ESR1 mut had less favorable rwPFS and rwOS versus ESR1 wild-type; no differences were observed for fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor ( n  = 348). Conclusion Our study suggests obtaining TBx for CGP at time of de novo/recurrent diagnosis, followed by LBx for detecting acquired GA in 2nd + lines. Reflex TBx should be considered when ctDNA TF < 1%.

Background Findings from randomized clinical trials may have limited generalizability to patients treated in routine clinical practice. This study examined the effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone on survival outcomes in patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor–negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated in routine clinical practice in the USA. Patients and methods This was a retrospective observational analysis of electronic health records within the Flatiron Health Analytic Database. A total of 1430 patients with ≥ 3 months of follow-up received palbociclib plus letrozole or letrozole alone in the first-line setting between February 3, 2015, and February 28, 2019. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results After sIPTW adjustment, median follow-up was 24.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 14.2–34.9) in the palbociclib group and 23.3 months (IQR, 12.7–34.3) in those taking letrozole alone. Palbociclib combination treatment was associated with significantly longer median rwPFS compared to letrozole alone (20.0 vs 11.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49–0.69; P  < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the palbociclib group and was 43.1 months with letrozole alone (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.82; P  = 0.0002). The 2-year OS rate was 78.3% in the palbociclib group and 68.0% with letrozole alone. A propensity score matching analysis showed similar results. Conclusions In this “real-world” population of patients with HR+/HER2− MBC, palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with patients treated with letrozole alone in the first-line setting. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04176354