Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction: In Poland the health and social care operate independently. Public healthcare expenditures in 2017 accounted for 4,73% of gross domestic product (GDP). The target for public funding level to be achieved in 2025 was set at 6%. Polish health care system is focused on stationary and specialist care. People are rather passive, with low health awareness, and participation in prevention programs, what results in low detectability of diseases in early stage of development. Description of policy context and objective: Health check-ups are the components of \"Preparation, testing and implementation of coordinated care in the healthcare system” - pilot phase: Primary Health Care PLUS (PHC PLUS) project ongoing in Poland, co-financed by European Social Fund, and is targeted at strengthening patient-centered care and increasing the role of primary health care. The main objective of health check-ups is to stratify the population to healthy and potentially ill patients to manage the number and type of services planned. Patients receive support from a team of medical professionals: doctors and coordinators, accompanied by dietitians, health educators and physiotherapists. Targeted population: Health check-ups are planned to be performed every five years to patients at the age of 20 to 65 years, who do not or rarely use PHC services (did not visited a doctor during last 12 months due to a chronic disease, not hospitalized in that time and did not have diagnostic tests within another prophylactic program). Performed at the very beginning of patient’s participation in the project, health check-up includes a set of tests aimed at stratification of the entire population included to one of 4 clusters: (1) healthy, without risk factors, (2) healthy, without symptoms but having risk factors, (3) chronic, without current symptoms but stable, (4) chronically ill,currently with symptoms and requiring stabilization. Check-ups can be performed as a basic or in-depth one. An integral part of the health check-up visit is referral for education in areas related to identified risk factors, to strengthen self-management skills and patient engagement in the treatment. As an outcome, an Individual Health Care Plan (IHCP) is prepared, during. IHCP recommendations include educational activities and referrals for diagnostic tests. Health check-ups started on 1st July 2018; until today, 7672 patients have participated in 45 medical entities. 1414 basic and 6258 in-depth check-ups were carried out. The target number within the project Primary Health Care PLUS is currently 41402. Transferability: The scheme used in the project may be adapted to other projects having the purpose of strengthening patient-centered care at the level of PHC and tailoring the care to patient`s needs. Conclusions: Health check-ups are of preventive nature and can be performed by the PHC staff in health centers with an elementary degree of coordinated care. However, the proposed check-up scheme requires further observation in a larger scale and in centers with different levels of coordinated care.

Background This study aimed to investigate the relationship between migration background and the utilization of preventive healthcare services. Methods Cross-sectional data from wave 5 in the year 2014, with a sample size of 7,684 individuals, were extracted from the nationally representative German Ageing Survey. The survey included community-dwelling individuals aged 40 years and above, with migration background serving as the primary independent variable. The outcomes measured included participation in cancer screenings, flu vaccinations, and routine health check-ups. Multiple logistic regressions were used to examine the association between migration background and preventive healthcare services. Results Regressions showed that the presence of a migration background with personal migration experience (compared with not having a migration background) was associated with a lower likelihood of using preventive healthcare services. More precisely, compared to individuals not having a migration background, individuals with a migration background and personal migration experience had a lower likelihood of routine health check-ups (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.95), flu vaccinations (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.95) and cancer screenings (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.89). In contrast, there was no significant association between the presence of a migration background without personal migration experience (compared with not having a migration background) and the use of preventive healthcare services. Conclusion In conclusion, results showed differences between individuals without migration background and individuals with migration background (and with personal migration experience) in terms of using preventive healthcare services. It may be helpful to specifically address individuals with migration background (and with migration experience) in terms of using preventive healthcare services.

The global older adult population is increasing. Early detection and intervention through health check-ups are crucial for successful aging, as they play a significant role in identifying and addressing diseases. This study explored the relationship between the utilization of senior centers and the promotion of health check-ups. It utilized data from 10,097 individuals aged 65 years and above, sourced from the 2020 Elderly Survey in South Korea. The primary variable of interest was classified into two groups: those who utilized senior centers and those who did not. Subgroups were further categorized based on the frequency of usage and the presence of family members among senior centers users. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between the utilization of senior centers and participation in health check-ups. Both men and women utilizing senior centers demonstrated a higher likelihood of participating in health check-ups compared with those who did not use senior centers. Participants visiting senior centers in a week exhibited a progressively higher likelihood of engaging in health check-ups compared with those who visited such senior centers zero times a week. Senior centers can serve as effective intervention methods to enhance health check-ups among older adults. Furthermore, this can contribute to fostering successful aging among older adults.

Objectives: To assess the effect of health check-ups on health among the elderly Chinese. Methods: The first dataset was panel data extracted from the 2011, 2014, and 2018 waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Health Longevity Survey (CLHLS). The second dataset was cross-sectional data come from CLHLS 2018 linked with the lagged term of health check-ups in CLHLS 2011. Health check-ups were measured by a binary variable annual health check-up (AHC). Health was assessed by a binary variable self-rated health (SRH). A coarsened exact matching method and individual fixed-effects models, as well as logistic regressions were employed. Results: AHC attendance among the elderly increased from 2011 to 2018, with higher utilization of AHC also detected in the rural group. AHC had positive effects on SRH among rural respondents (short-term effect: OR = 1.567, p < 0.05; long-term effect: OR = 3.385, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlights a higher utilization of AHC in rural area, and the effectiveness of AHC in SRH improvement among rural participants. It indicates enhanced access to public healthcare services in rural area and underlying implications of health check-ups for reducing urban–rural health inequalities.

Background As multimorbidity becomes common that imposes a considerable burden to patients, but the extent to which widely-used multimorbidity indexes can be applied to quantify disease burden using primary care data in China is not clear. We applied the Chinese Multimorbidity-Weighted Index (CMWI) to health check-ups data routinely collected among older adults by primary care, to examine its validity in measuring multimorbidity associated risks of disability and mortality in annual follow-ups. Methods The study utilized data from annual health check-ups of older adults, which included information on individual age, sex, and 14 health conditions at primary care in a district of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. The risk of CMWI for mortality was analysed in a total sample of 45,009 persons 65 years and older between 2014 and 2020 (average 2.70-year follow-up), and the risk for disability was in a subsample of 18,320 older adults free of physical impairment in 2019 and followed-up in 2020. Risk of death and disability were assessed with Cox proportional hazard regression and binary logistic regression, respectively, with both models adjusted for age and sex variables. The model fit was assessed by the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and C-statistic or the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results One unit increase in baseline-CMWI (Median= 1.70, IQR: 1.30-3.00) was associated with higher risk in subsequent disability ( OR  = 1.12, 95% CI  = 1.05,1.20) and mortality ( OR  = 1.18, 95% CI  = 1.14, 1.22). Participants in the top tertile of CMWI had 99% and 152% increased risks of disability and mortality than their counterparts in the bottom tertile. Model fit was satisfied with adequate AUC (0.84) or C-statistic (0.76) for both outcomes. Conclusions CMWI, calculated based on primary care’s routine health check-ups data, provides valid estimates of disability and mortality risks in older adults. This validated tool can be used to quantity and monitor older patients’ health risks in primary care.

Background: The proportion of overweight individuals living in the evacuation zone of Fukushima increased after the Great East Japan Earthquake. However, the change in the prevalence of abdominal obesity has not been reported. Lifestyle habits and changes in these habits after the disaster might have affected the onset of abdominal obesity; however, the association between the two is unclear.Methods: This study evaluated 19,673 Japanese participants of the Fukushima Health Management Survey. We used data from general health check-ups conducted in 13 municipalities between 2008 and 2010. Follow-up examinations were performed from June 2011 to March 2013. Changes in the proportion of individuals with abdominal obesity before and after the disaster were compared. Then, lifestyle habits affecting these changes were assessed.Results: We found that 34.2% and 36.6% of participants (P < 0.001), both evacuees (37.0% and 42.1% [P < 0.001]) and non-evacuees (32.8% and 34.0% [P < 0.001]), had abdominal obesity before and after the disaster, respectively. Abdominal obesity was positively associated with smoking cessation, snacking after dinner, and non-breakfast skipping after the disaster and alcohol drinking before and after the disaster (all P < 0.05). Smoking cessation was positively associated with abdominal obesity in both evacuees and non-evacuees and in both men and women (all P < 0.01).Conclusions: The prevalence of abdominal obesity increased among residents in the area affected by nuclear disaster. It might be associated with not only lifestyle habits before the disaster but also changes in these habits after the disaster, especially smoking cessation.

The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is a novel functional endoscopic modality that records intragastric pressure (IGP) waveforms during CO insufflation to evaluate lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function and diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although previous studies have applied EPSIS to symptomatic patients, its utility in asymptomatic individuals remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of EPSIS in detecting silent GERD-defined as asymptomatic erosive esophagitis-and associated risk factors in individuals undergoing routine health check-ups. We retrospectively analyzed 185 participants who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and EPSIS as part of routine health check-ups at a single center between November 2024 and March 2025. Participants were classified into erosive and non-erosive groups based on the presence or absence of mucosal breaks (Grade A or higher) according to the Los Angeles classification. Background characteristics, EPSIS parameters, and endoscopic findings were compared. EPSIS was safely performed in all participants without adverse events. The erosive esophagitis group showed significantly more flat waveform patterns (39.4% vs. 14.5%, = 0.002) and lower maximum IGP values (16.7 mmHg vs. 18.3 mmHg, = 0.008) compared to the non-erosive group. EPSIS enables a safe and objective assessment of LES function and may support the identification of erosive esophagitis in asymptomatic individuals. It may hold promise as a functional diagnostic tool for the detection of silent GERD and may support preventive strategies during routine endoscopy.

The utilization of preventive care services is limited. Previous studies based on communities have looked at many types of barriers to preventive care (i.e., why not do). This study aimed to gain an insight into the key factors and performance gaps (i.e., why do and how to do) of people who attended a regional teaching hospital to undergo health check-ups using a purposive sampling method to recruit people to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Paired sample t-tests and importance–performance gap and regression analyses were performed. The results indicated that the participants’ wish to understand their health status, the quality of medical devices and the completeness of items, and process layout planning were the key factors that affect people’s health check-up behavior. Promoting the effectiveness of hospital performance may improve the positive cycle of people’s health check-up behavior from the community to the hospital. Continuing to promote the knowledge of preventive care services is necessary, and it is very important for people to have a good experience of undergoing health check-ups in the hospital. Important strategies for improving the utilization of preventive care services may include: meeting the person’s personalization needs, improving the quality of medical devices and the completeness of items, and having appropriate process layout planning, a detailed interpretation of the results, and further follow-ups in the hospital.

Background: The proportion of overweight individuals living in the evacuation zone of Fukushima increased after the Great East Japan Earthquake. However, the change in the prevalence of abdominal obesity has not been reported. Lifestyle habits and changes in these habits after the disaster might have affected the onset of abdominal obesity; however, the association between the two is unclear.Methods: This study evaluated 19,673 Japanese participants of the Fukushima Health Management Survey. We used data from general health check-ups conducted in 13 municipalities between 2008 and 2010. Follow-up examinations were performed from June 2011 to March 2013. Changes in the proportion of individuals with abdominal obesity before and after the disaster were compared. Then, lifestyle habits affecting these changes were assessed.Results: We found that 34.2% and 36.6% of participants (P < 0.001), both evacuees (37.0% and 42.1% [P < 0.001]) and non-evacuees (32.8% and 34.0% [P < 0.001]), had abdominal obesity before and after the disaster, respectively. Abdominal obesity was positively associated with smoking cessation, snacking after dinner, and non-breakfast skipping after the disaster and alcohol drinking before and after the disaster (all P < 0.05). Smoking cessation was positively associated with abdominal obesity in both evacuees and non-evacuees and in both men and women (all P < 0.01).Conclusion: The prevalence of abdominal obesity increased among residents in the area affected by nuclear disaster. It might be associated with not only lifestyle habits before the disaster but also changes in these habits after the disaster, especially smoking cessation.

Background Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are routinely measured during health check-ups and are used as an indicator of glycemic control in Japan. However, only a few studies have followed up individuals to assess the risk of diabetes development and worsening based on HbA1c screening results. This study evaluated the relationship between HbA1c screening results and the risk of diabetes development and worsening. Methods Data were collected from the Shizuoka Kokuho Database, a Japanese administrative claims database of insured individuals aged > 40 years. We included individuals available for follow-up from April 2012 to March 2018 who had not received any diabetes treatment before March 2014. HbA1c screening results were categorized into 4 groups based on the HbA1c levels at the 2012 and 2013 health check-ups: group A, those whose HbA1c levels were < 6.5% in 2012 and 2013; group B, those whose HbA1c levels > 6.5% in 2012 but < 6.5% in 2013; group C, those whose HbA1c levels were > 6.5% in 2012 and 2013; and group D, those whose HbA1c levels were < 6.5% in 2012 and > 6.5% in 2013. Logistic regression models were used to analyze diabetes development and worsening, defined as the initiation of diabetes treatment by March 2018 and the use of injection drugs by participants who initiated diabetes treatment by March 2018. Results Overall, 137,852 individuals were analyzed. After adjusting for covariates, compared with group A, group B was more likely to initiate treatment within 4 years (odds ratio: 22.64; 95% confidence interval: 14.66–34.99). In patients who initiated diabetes treatment by March 2018, injection drugs were less likely used by group D than by group A (odds ratio: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.12–0.61). Conclusions Our study suggests that although HbA1c levels measured during health check-ups were correlated with the risk of diabetes development and worsening, HbA1c levels in a single year may not necessarily provide sufficient information to consider these future risks.