Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose This study aimed to compare the effects of a mobile health intervention based on social cognitive theory with standard care on maximal mouth opening, exercise compliance, and self-efficacy in patients receiving proton and heavy ion therapy for head and neck cancer. Methods This open-label, parallel-group, randomized, superiority trial involved a self-developed “Health Enjoy System” intervention. We assessed maximal mouth opening, exercise compliance, and self-efficacy at baseline (T 0 ), post-treatment (T 1 ), and at 1 month (T 2 ) and 3 months (T 3 ) after radiotherapy. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze differences between the groups over time, with results reported as P values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The study included 44 participants. At T 3 , the intervention group showed a 6 mm greater increase in maximal interincisal opening than the control group (mean difference = 6.0, 95% CI = 2.4 to 9.5, P  = 0.001). There was also a significant difference in exercise compliance between the groups (mean difference = 31.7, 95% CI = 4.6 to 58.8, P  = 0.022). However, no significant difference in self-efficacy was found between the groups. Conclusion This study demonstrated that an mHealth intervention incorporating behavior change theory could effectively enhance or maintain maximal mouth opening in patients undergoing proton and heavy ion therapy for head and neck cancer in China. This approach provides valuable support during and after treatment. Trial registration ChiCTR: ChiCTR2300067550. Registered 11 Jan 2023.

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT), proton radiation therapy (PRT), and photon‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of sinonasal malignancies. We identified studies through systematic review and divided them into three cohorts (CIRT group/PRT group/IMRT group). Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and local control (LC). We pooled the outcomes with meta‐analysis and compared the survival difference among groups using Chi2 (χ2) test. A representative sample of 2282 patients with sinonasal malignancies (911 in the CIRT group, 599 in the PRT group, and 772 in the IMRT group) from 44 observation studies (7 CIRT, 16 PRT, and 21 IMRT) was included. The pooled 3‐year OS, LC, distant metastasis–free survival, and progression‐free survival rates were 67.0%, 72.8%, 69.4%, and 52.8%, respectively. Through cross‐group analysis, the OS was significantly higher after CIRT (75.1%, 95% CI: 67.1%‐83.2%) than PRT (66.2%, 95% CI: 57.7%‐74.6%; χ2 = 13.374, P < .0001) or IMRT (63.8%, 95% CI: 55.3%‐72.3%; χ2 = 23.814, P < .0001). LC was significantly higher after CIRT (80.2%, 95% CI: 73.9%‐86.5%) than PRT (72.9%, 95% CI: 63.7%‐82.0%; χ2 = 8.955, P = .003) or IMRT (67.8%, 95% CI: 59.4%‐76.2%; χ2 = 30.955, P < .0001). However, no significant difference between PRT and IMRT for OS and LC was observed. CIRT appeared to provide better OS and LC for patients with malignancies of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. A prospective randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the superiority of CIRT in the treatment of sinonasal tumors. Carbon‐ion radiation therapy achieved higher overall survival and local control rates as compared to both proton radiation therapy and photon based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy through meta‐analysis of 2, 282 patients with sinonasal malignancies from the real world. CIRT appeared to provide better OS and LC for patients with malignancies of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.

Background Some cancers such as sarcomas (bone and soft tissue sarcomas) and adenoid cystic carcinomas are considered as radioresistant to low linear energy transfer radiation (including photons and protons) and may therefore beneficiate from a carbon ion therapy. Despite encouraging results obtained in phase I/II trials compared to historical data with photons, the spread of carbon ions has been limited mainly because of the absence of randomized medical data. The French health authorities stressed the importance of having randomized data for carbon ion therapy. Methods The ETOILE study is a multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial comparing carbon ion therapy to either advanced photon or proton radiotherapy for inoperable or macroscopically incompletely resected (R2) radioresistant cancers including sarcomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas. In the experimental arm, carbon ion therapy will be performed at the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) in Pavia, Italy. In the control arm, photon or proton radiotherapy will be carried out in referent centers in France. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints are overall survival and local control, toxicity profile, and quality of life. In addition, a prospective health-economic study and a radiobiological analysis will be conducted. To demonstrate an absolute improvement in the 5-year PFS rate of 20% in favor of carbon ion therapy, 250 patients have to be included in the study. Discussion So far, no clinical study of phase III has demonstrated the superiority of carbon ion therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy, including proton therapy, for the treatment of radioresistant tumors. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02838602 . Date of registration: July 20, 2016. The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Purpose The complexity of beam delivery and the limited availability of dedicated quality assurance (QA) devices present unique challenges for carbon ion beam therapy. Most existing systems are designed for single‐parameter verification and have been adapted from photon or proton workflows, resulting in time‐consuming QA procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a proton QA prototype device (DQA‐P) in a pencil beam scanning (PBS) carbon ion facility, with the aim of enabling fast, efficient, multiparameter QA. Methods The DQA‐P integrates 25 ionization chambers at three water‐equivalent depths, enabling the simultaneous measurement of multiple beam parameters, such as dose output, range, spot size, and spot position, in accordance with the recommendations of the AAPM TG‐224. Over 60 measurement sessions were performed, including 47 sessions involving intentional deviations in individual beam parameters, in order to assess sensitivity. The measurements were analyzed retrospectively using custom MATLAB scripts to evaluate accuracy, reproducibility, and the impact of setup uncertainties. Results The DQA‐P prototype successfully measured all QA parameters within clinically acceptable tolerances. Dose output measurements showed a standard deviation of 0.5% around the mean, with minimal systematic deviation. Spot position measurements exhibited a mean deviation of 0.16 mm, with a standard deviation of 0.32 mm. The device's sensitivity was demonstrated by its reliable detection of intentional positional offsets of ± ± 3 mm and spot size changes of ± ± 25%. Range validation using the proximal rise of the Bragg peak produced consistent results, albeit with lower accuracy than that achieved with standard multilayer ionization chambers. However, limitations were identified in spot size estimation due to chamber segmentation, and in range verification, as the device only captures three fixed depths. Conclusions The DQA‐P prototype demonstrated feasibility for daily QA in PBS carbon ion beam therapy, offering a short overall measurement time of approximately 5 min, efficient data acquisition, and simultaneous multiparameter verification within a single setup. This is a significant improvement on the conventional daily QA procedure, which uses two different detector types for independent dose and spot position measurements. In the standard workflow, both detectors must be positioned individually using the in‐room laser system, connected to the readout electronics and irradiated using the daily beam plan. Altogether, this procedure takes around 15–20 min. Although certain limitations remain—particularly in spot size accuracy and range determination—the device showed sufficient sensitivity and stability for daily QA purposes. Its use has the potential to streamline QA procedures, reduce beam time, and enhance workflow efficiency in carbon ion therapy.

Background Adenoid cystic carcinoma is a rare form of head and neck cancer with a slow, but aggressive growth pattern which remains a challenge for local tumor control. Based on phase II data, radiation treatment using partially high LET radiation results in a prolonged PFS and OS. There is a paucity of randomized clinical data examining the role of the use of high LET radiation only. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective clinical trial is to analyze local control rates in patients with node negative ACC treated with carbon ion radiotherapy alone compared to a combined modality approach. Methods This trial is conducted as a prospective, open-label, phase II, two-armed, investigator-initiated study comparing the local control rates in node negative ACCs of the head and neck treated either with sole carbon ion radiotherapy or a combination of carbon ions and photons. Secondary outcomes investigated are progression-free survival, overall survival, acute and late toxicity, and quality of life. A total of 314 patients will be randomly assigned to C12 treatment alone or bimodal treatment: Patients in the experimental group will receive a dose of 51 Gy (RBE) in 17 fractions and a boost of 15 Gy (RBE) in 5 fractions. Patients in the control group will receive 25 fractions photon IMRT 50Gy and a boost using 8 × 3 Gy (RBE) carbon ions. Local control will be assessed in regular follow up examinations until 5 years after the completion of treatment. Discussion The present trial aims to evaluate local control rates to compare sole carbon ion radiotherapy to bimodal radiotherapy with carbon ions and photons in patients with node negative ACCs of the head and neck region. Local control is selected as the primary endpoint due to its major clinical relevance because of slow but aggressive growth patterns. Trial registration The study was prospectively registered on 2nd January 2020: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04214366 . “Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Carbon Ion Only Irradiation (ACCO)”. Study status Under recruitment, participant recruitment is not completed. Start of recruitment was January 2020. There are no results been published or submitted to any journal.

Bone and soft-tissue sarcomas of the head and neck have very poor prognoses. This prospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for bone and soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck. The present study was a prospective clinical study that included 10 consecutive patients diagnosed with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck who were treated with C-ion RT between 2012 and 2018 at our institution. C-Ion RT consisted of 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions. The 3-year local control, overall survival, and progression-free survival rates for patients overall were 72.9%, 77.8%, and 36%, respectively. The present study demonstrated the efficacy of C-ion RT for bone and soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck; adverse events were within the expected range.

We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of oligometastatic colorectal cancer in the liver and lung treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT). Nineteen consecutive patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer in the liver or lung who received C-ion RT were analyzed. The doses of C-ion RT were 60.0 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] in 4 fractions, 60.0 Gy (RBE) in 12 fractions, or 64.8 Gy (BRE) in 12 fractions. The median follow-up duration was 19 months. There were 23 tumors in 19 patients. The 2-year overall survival and local control rates for the whole patient cohort were 100% and 67%, respectively. None of the patients developed grade 2 or higher acute or late toxicities. C-ion RT for oligometastatic colorectal cancer in liver and lung provides favorable clinical outcomes. These outcomes suggest C-ion RT is a treatment option for oligometastatic colorectal cancer in liver and lung.

Prognosis is usually grim for those with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) who cannot receive resection. Radiation therapy can be an option for those unsuitable for resection, with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) being more effective and less toxic than X‐ray due to its physio‐biological characteristics. The objective of this study is to identify the optimal dose of single fraction CIRT for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Thirty‐one patients with liver metastasis from CRC were enrolled in the present study. Twenty‐nine patients received a single‐fraction CIRT, escalating the dose from 36 Gy (RBE) in 5% to 10% increments until unacceptable incidence of dose‐limiting toxicity was observed. Dose‐limiting toxicity was defined as grade ≥3 acute toxicity attributed to radiotherapy. The prescribed doses were as follows: 36 Gy (RBE) (3 cases), 40 Gy (2 cases), 44 Gy (4 cases), 46 Gy (6 cases), 48 Gy (3 cases), 53 Gy (8 cases) and 58 Gy (3 cases). Dose‐limiting toxicity was not observed, but late grade 3 liver toxicity due to biliary obstruction was observed in 2 patients at 53 Gy (RBE). Both cases had lesions close to the hepatic portal region, and, therefore, the dose was escalated to 58 Gy (RBE), limited to peripheral lesions. The 3‐year actuarial overall survival rate of all 29 patients was 78%, and the median survival time was 65 months. Local control improved significantly at ≥53 Gy (RBE), with a 3‐year actuarial local control rate of 82%, compared to 28% in lower doses. Treatment for CRC liver metastasis with single‐fraction CIRT appeared to be safe up to 58 Gy (RBE) as long as the central hepatic portal region was avoided. This is a dose escalation study for single fraction carbon ion radiotherapy. Treatment for CRC liver metastasis with single‐fraction CIRT appeared to be safe up to 58 Gy (RBE) as long as the central hepatic portal region was avoided.

The purpose was to evaluate efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) in patients with locally advanced olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs). This study was a sub-analysis of the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group Study (1402 HN, UMIN000024473). Clinical data of T4 ONBs treated with C-ion RT at four Institutions between November 2003 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-one patients underwent C-ion RT. Seven patients had T4a and 14 had T4b tumours without cervical node metastases. The median follow-up period was 39 (range=5-111) months. The 3-year overall survival and local control rates were 88.4% and 83.0%, respectively. Grade 4 late toxicity was observed in three patients, including ipsilateral optic nerve disorder (n=2) and ipsilateral retinopathy (n=1). C-Ion RT is effective and can be a curative modality for T4 ONBs. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Background Due to the physical dose distribution characteristic of “Bragg peak” and the biological effect as a kind of high linear energy transfer ray, heavy ion therapy has advantages over conventional photon therapy in both efficacy and safety. Based on the evidence that prostate cancer lesions before treatment are the most common sites of tumor residual or recurrence after treatment, simultaneous integrated boost radiation therapy for prostate cancer has been proven to have the advantage of improving efficacy without increasing toxicities. Methods This study is a prospective phase II randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of functional imaging-guided carbon ion irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost for localized prostate cancer. One hundred and forty patients with localized prostate cancer will be randomized into carbon ion radiotherapy group and simultaneous integrated boost carbon ion radiotherapy group at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is to compare the incidence of treatment-related grade 2 and higher acute toxicities between the two groups according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. Secondary endpoints are late toxicities, biochemical relapse-free survival, overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life. Discussion This study adopts functional imaging-guided simultaneous integrated boost of carbon ion radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, aiming to evaluate the differences in the severity and incidence of acute toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with carbon ion radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost carbon ion radiotherapy, in order to optimize the carbon ion treatment strategy for localized prostate cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05010343. Retrospectively registered on 18 August 2021