Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
44,122
result(s) for
"Hegemony."
Sort by:
Os níveis do comum e as disputas por hegemonia 1
A noção de engajamento com o comum pavimenta e sinaLiza o caminho epistemológico e político, que pode viabilizar a comunicação entre diferentes formas de luta com potencial contra-hegemónico na disputa contra a hegemonia do capital, o comum capitalista. Este ensaio possui como principal objetivo desenvolver reflexáo epistemológica, discussao política e fundamentaçâo teórica para categorizar o comum. A partir desse objetivo central, propomos e desenvolvemos quatro níveis ou subcategorias do comum, que implicam as disputas por hegemonía: o comum natural, o comum do conhecimento, o comum cultural e o comum político. O nivel económico e de classe, determinante em última instancia, atravessa o conceito em seus diferentes níveis de compreensao e existencia. Metodológicamente, o estudo possui centralidade na teoría crítica, realiza pesquisa bibliográfica e utiliza o método materialista dialético. A forma ensaio caracteriza o método de escrita.
Journal Article
Hegemony Now How Big Tech and Wall Street Won the World (and How We Win It Back)
Jeremy Gilbert/Alex Williams Hegemony Now How Big Tech and Wall Street Won the World (and How We Win It Back) London (Verso) 2022 336 S„ EUR 23,50 England hat in kurzerZeit drei neue Premierminsterinnen gesehen. Ihr dichter Essay mit dem uneindeutigen Titel Hegemony Now: How Big Tech and Wall Street Won the World (andHowWe Win It Back) stellt die Machtfrage. Sie werfen ihren Blick auf die Art und Weise, wie neoliberale Annahmen durch Regierungspraktiken über den spezifischen Einsatz neuerTechnologien institutionalisiert werden konnten. Blairs Beziehung zum Neoliberalismus ist viel typischer für die zeitgenössische Ideologie als die Art der expliziten Parteinahme, wie sie von Thatcher vorgelebt wurde. Neben der Rekonstruktion der spezifischen Form, die die Finanzwirtschaft seit den 1970erJahren angenommen hat, und der Koalitionen zwischen der Techund der Finanzbranche versuchen die Autoren, über die im deutschsprachigen Raum bekannten „Hegemonie\"-Studien hinauszugehen und den Verengungen der neueren Cultural Studies mit Arbeiten zu Mikrophänomen aus dem Bereich der populären Kultur zu entgehen.
Journal Article
Hegemony and Wage Labour in the Uk
This thesis seeks to determine the relationship between wage labour as a social relation and hegemony (broadly conceived) as a system of asymmetrical power relations. It argues that wage labour is a 'hegemonic structure' fundamental to capitalist social relations and for this reason is crucial to accounts of hegemony in a number of ways. The dissertation articulates this thesis from two 'directions', that build from engagements with two different theoretical fields: hitherto studies of hegemony on the one hand and theories of the capitalist wage labour process on the other. Firstly it attempts to construct an account of hegemony that coherently includes wage labour by speaking to what I perceive to be a lacuna in the field of study: a sustained engagement with wage labour as a crucial component of capitalist societies and a fortiori any hegemony - or hegemonic situation - that occurs within them. This gap in the field betrays a lack of history in accounts of modern power in (capitalist) societies but also a general neglect of economic logics and their specificity. Secondly, and from the reverse 'direction' of argument, the project aims to contribute to an account of wage labour within capitalist social relations by bringing the categories taken from the analysis of hegemony (coercion, consent, organic intellectuals, sedimentation, etc.) to bear on the analysis of the labour process itself, and also by situating the wage labour process within (the wider) mechanisms of hegemony (that operate at larger scales of social relations). The thesis uses the UK as the context through which the arguments are expounded. The thesis concludes with a selection of possible directions for future research, based on the ground established in the foregoing chapters.
Dissertation
America's global advantage : US hegemony and international cooperation
\"For over 60 years the U.S. has been the largest economy and most powerful country in the world. However, there is growing speculation that this era of hegemony is under threat as it faces huge trade deficits, a weaker currency, and stretched military resources. America's Global Advantage argues that, despite these difficulties, the U.S. will maintain its privileged position. In this original and important contribution to a central subject in International Relations, Carla Norrlof challenges the prevailing wisdom that other states benefit more from U.S. hegemony than the United States itself. By analysing America's structural advantages in trade, money, and security, and the ways in which these advantages reinforce one another, Norrlof shows how and why America benefits from being the dominant power in the world. Contrary to predictions of American decline, she argues that American hegemony will endure for the foreseeable future\"--Provided by publisher.
BOOK
Rethinking Decline of Hegemony : a Historical Comparison Between British and American Financialization
The main purpose of this thesis is to analyse the relationship between financialization and the decline of hegemonic powers. While dominant views in the literature suggest that financialization leads to the decline of hegemonic powers based on historical comparison of the British hegemony between 1870-1890 and American hegemony between 1970-1990, this research argues these two cases are both conceptually and qualitatively different. There are three main shortcomings of the literature. First, they offer state-centric explanations of the decline of hegemonic powers. Second, they separate economics and politics. And finally, the role of ideology is overlooked. Conceptualizing financialization from a neo-Gramscian theoretical framework and rethinking the decline of hegemonic powers through this framework offers a holistic understanding of the congruence between financialization and the decline of hegemonic powers. The main argument of this thesis is that class struggle causes financialization which causes the decline of the hegemonic historical bloc but only if financialization occurs as an outward movement. In this respect, this research offers a fresh conceptualization of financialization as outward and inward financialization. The outward financialization that British hegemony has experienced result in the decline of the hegemonic historical bloc, the inward financialization of the American hegemony during the 1970s resulted in the reconfiguration of social forces in the US and the expansion of neoliberal social relations of production under the aegis of American hegemony. Overall, this research focuses on the period of 1870-1890 and 1970-1990 with a specific focus on the change in the social relations of production, ideology, and institutions from a neo-Gramscian theoretical framework that allows considering the special relationship between the state and civil society as well as the economic and political.
Dissertation