Explore the vast range of titles available.

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are abundant in eukaryotic proteomes, play a major role in cell signaling, and are associated with human diseases. To understand IDP function it is critical to determine their configurational ensemble, i.e., the collection of 3-dimensional structures they adopt, and this remains an immense challenge in structural biology. Attempts to determine this ensemble computationally have been hitherto hampered by the necessity of reweighting molecular dynamics (MD) results or biasing simulation in order to match ensemble-averaged experimental observables, operations that reduce the precision of the generated model because different structural ensembles may yield the same experimental observable. Here, by employing enhanced sampling MD we reproduce the experimental small-angle neutron and X-ray scattering profiles and the NMR chemical shifts of the disordered N terminal (SH4UD) of c-Src kinase without reweighting or constraining the simulations. The unbiased simulation results reveal a weakly funneled and rugged free energy landscape of SH4UD, which gives rise to a heterogeneous ensemble of structures that cannot be described by simple polymer theory. SH4UD adopts transient helices, which are found away from known phosphorylation sites and could play a key role in the stabilization of structural regions necessary for phosphorylation. Our findings indicate that adequately sampled molecular simulations can be performed to provide accurate physical models of flexible biosystems, thus rationalizing their biological function.

In this paper, we investigate and characterise an arbitrary admissible curve in terms of its curvature functions in the pseudo-Galilean space \\(G_{1}^{4}\\)% . We also give some special curves in four-dimensional pseudo-Galilean space and their characterisations, such as position curve, osculating curve, normal curve, rectifying curve, slant helices, and spherical curves. Moreover, this study provides classifications of admissible curves in \\(G_{1}^{4}\\). That is, the admissible rectifying curves lying fully in the \\(G_{1}^{4}\\) are expressed and given necessary and sufficient conditions for such a curve to be an admissible rectifying curve, osculating curve, normal curve, slant helices and spherical curves in \\(G_{1}^{4}\\).

Piezo1 and Piezo2 are mechanically activated ion channels that mediate touch perception, proprioception and vascular development. Piezo proteins are distinct from other ion channels and their structure remains poorly defined, which impedes detailed study of their gating and ion permeation properties. Here we report a high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of the mouse Piezo1 trimer. The detergent-solubilized complex adopts a three-bladed propeller shape with a curved transmembrane region containing at least 26 transmembrane helices per protomer. The flexible propeller blades can adopt distinct conformations, and consist of a series of four-transmembrane helical bundles that we term Piezo repeats. Carboxy-terminal domains line the central ion pore, and the channel is closed by constrictions in the cytosol. A kinked helical beam and anchor domain link the Piezo repeats to the pore, and are poised to control gating allosterically. The structure provides a foundation to dissect further how Piezo channels are regulated by mechanical force. The cryo-electron microscopy structure of full-length mouse Piezo1 reveals six Piezo repeats, and 26 transmembrane helices per protomer, and shows that a kinked helical beam and anchor domain link the Piezo repeats to the pore and control gating allosterically. Structure and mechanism of ion channel Piezo1 Mechanosensitive cation channels convert external mechanical stimuli into various biological actions, including touch, hearing, balance and cardiovascular regulation. The eukaryotic Piezo proteins are mechanotransduction channels, although their structure and gating mechanisms are not well elucidated. In related papers in this issue of Nature , two groups report cryo-electron microscopy structures of the full-length mouse Piezo1 and reveal three flexible propeller blades. Each blade is made up of at least 26 helices, forming a series of helical bundles, which adopt a curved transmembrane region. A kinked beam and anchor domain link these Piezo repeats to the pore, giving clues as to how the channel responds to membrane tension and mechanical force.

The mechanosensitive Piezo channels function as key eukaryotic mechanotransducers. However, their structures and mechanogating mechanisms remain unknown. Here we determine the three-bladed, propeller-like electron cryo-microscopy structure of mouse Piezo1 and functionally reveal its mechanotransduction components. Despite the lack of sequence repetition, we identify nine repetitive units consisting of four transmembrane helices each—which we term transmembrane helical units (THUs)—which assemble into a highly curved blade-like structure. The last transmembrane helix encloses a hydrophobic pore, followed by three intracellular fenestration sites and side portals that contain pore-property-determining residues. The central region forms a 90?Å-long intracellular beam-like structure, which undergoes a lever-like motion to connect THUs to the pore via the interfaces of the C-terminal domain, the anchor-resembling domain and the outer helix. Deleting extracellular loops in the distal THUs or mutating single residues in the beam impairs the mechanical activation of Piezo1. Overall, Piezo1 possesses a unique 38-transmembrane-helix topology and designated mechanotransduction components, which enable a lever-like mechanogating mechanism. The electron cryo-microscopy structure of full-length mouse Piezo1 reveals unique topological features such as the repetitive transmembrane helical units that constitute the highly curved transmembrane region, and identifies regions and single residues that are crucial for the mechanical activation of the channel. Structure and mechanism of ion channel Piezo1 Mechanosensitive cation channels convert external mechanical stimuli into various biological actions, including touch, hearing, balance and cardiovascular regulation. The eukaryotic Piezo proteins are mechanotransduction channels, although their structure and gating mechanisms are not well elucidated. In related papers in this issue of Nature , two groups report cryo-electron microscopy structures of the full-length mouse Piezo1 and reveal three flexible propeller blades. Each blade is made up of at least 26 helices, forming a series of helical bundles, which adopt a curved transmembrane region. A kinked beam and anchor domain link these Piezo repeats to the pore, giving clues as to how the channel responds to membrane tension and mechanical force.

Membrane bending is a ubiquitous cellular process that is required for membrane traffic, cell motility, organelle biogenesis, and cell division. Proteins that bind to membranes using specific structural features, such as wedge-like amphipathic helices and crescentshaped scaffolds, are thought to be the primary drivers of membrane bending. However, many membrane-binding proteins have substantial regions of intrinsic disorder which lack a stable three-dimensional structure. Interestingly, many of these disordered domains have recently been found to form networks stabilized by weak, multivalent contacts, leading to assembly of protein liquid phases on membrane surfaces. Here we ask how membrane-associated protein liquids impact membrane curvature. We find that protein phase separation on the surfaces of synthetic and cell-derived membrane vesicles creates a substantial compressive stress in the plane of the membrane. This stress drives the membrane to bend inward, creating protein-lined membrane tubules. A simple mechanical model of this process accurately predicts the experimentally measured relationship between the rigidity of the membrane and the diameter of the membrane tubules. Discovery of this mechanism, which may be relevant to a broad range of cellular protrusions, illustrates that membrane remodeling is not exclusive to structured scaffolds but can also be driven by the rapidly emerging class of liquid-like protein networks that assemble at membranes.

Neurotropic viral infections continue to pose significant global health challenges, with pathogens such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella‐zoster virus, human immunodeficiency virus, poliovirus, enteroviruses, parechovirus, West Nile virus and Japanese encephalitis virus driving the search for more effective therapeutic interventions. Current antiviral strategies, including small molecules and monoclonal antibodies, often face limitations such as drug resistance, narrow spectrum activity and adverse side effects, underscoring the need for alternative approaches. Antiviral peptides are emerging as potential therapeutic agents against these viral infections as entry and fusion inhibitors. However, their clinical development is limited by poor stability, low bioavailability and insufficient cellular penetration. To address these limitations, peptide stapling, a chemical modification that stabilises peptide α‐helices through covalent linkage, has emerged as a transformative technique to enhance the therapeutic potential of peptides, especially in antiviral drug development. Stapling techniques, including hydrocarbon staples, lactam bridges and metal‐coordination bonds, are explored for their ability to improve peptide stability, bioavailability and target binding affinity. This review examines the application of stapling in the development of antiviral peptides with a focus on stapled peptides targeting viral fusion and entry mechanisms, highlighting their potential against neurotropic viruses such as HSV and influenza. By integrating the structural rigidity conferred by stapling, these constructs promise to overcome delivery barriers and achieve superior antiviral efficacy. This paper underscores the pivotal role of peptide stapling by highlighting recent advancements in antiviral therapeutics and presents a roadmap for future research into multifunctional stapled peptides. Human neurotropic viruses like SARS‐CoV‐2, HSV, HOPV and RSV pose significant risks due to their ability to invade and persist in the nervous system. Stapled peptides represent a promising therapeutic approach with enhanced stability, target affinity and bioavailability, emerging as an effective strategy for neutralising human neurotropic viruses.

Apolipoproteins co-deposit with amyloids, yet apolipoprotein–amyloid interactions are enigmatic. To understand how apoE interacts with Alzheimer’s amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide in fibrillary deposits, the NMR structure of full-length human apoE was docked to four structures of patient-derived Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 fibrils determined previously using cryo-electron microscopy or solid-state NMR. Similar docking was done using the NMR structure of human apoC-III. In all complexes, conformational changes in apolipoproteins were required to expose large hydrophobic faces of their amphipathic α-helices for sub-stoichiometric binding to hydrophobic surfaces on sides or ends of fibrils. Basic residues flanking the hydrophobic helical faces in apolipoproteins interacted favorably with acidic residue ladders in some amyloid polymorphs. Molecular dynamics simulations of selected apoE–fibril complexes confirmed their stability. Amyloid binding via cryptic sites, which became available upon opening of flexibly linked apolipoprotein α-helices, resembled apolipoprotein–lipid binding. This mechanism probably extends to other apolipoprotein–amyloid interactions. Apolipoprotein binding alongside fibrils could interfere with fibril fragmentation and secondary nucleation, while binding at the fibril ends could halt amyloid elongation and dissolution in a polymorph-specific manner. The proposed mechanism is supported by extensive prior experimental evidence and helps reconcile disparate reports on apoE’s role in Aβ aggregation. Furthermore, apoE domain opening and direct interaction of Arg/Cys158 with amyloid potentially contributes to isoform-specific effects in Alzheimer’s disease. In summary, current modeling supported by prior experimental studies suggests similar mechanisms for apolipoprotein–amyloid and apolipoprotein–lipid interactions; explains why apolipoproteins co-deposit with amyloids; and helps reconcile conflicting reports on the chaperone-like apoE action in Aβ aggregation.