Explore the vast range of titles available.

The standard of clinical care in many pediatric and neonatal neurocritical care units involves continuous monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics using hard-wired devices that physically adhere to the skin and connect to base stations that commonly mount on an adjacent wall or stand. Risks of iatrogenic skin injuries associated with adhesives that bond such systems to the skin and entanglements of the patients and/or the healthcare professionals with the wires can impede clinical procedures and natural movements that are critical to the care, development, and recovery of pediatric patients. This paper presents a wireless, miniaturized, and mechanically soft, flexible device that supports measurements quantitatively comparable to existing clinical standards. The system features a multiphotodiode array and pair of light-emitting diodes for simultaneous monitoring of systemic and cerebral hemodynamics, with ability to measure cerebral oxygenation, heart rate, peripheral oxygenation, and potentially cerebral pulse pressure and vascular tone, through the utilization of multiwavelength reflectance-mode photoplethysmography and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Monte Carlo optical simulations define the tissue-probing depths for source–detector distances and operating wavelengths of these systems using magnetic resonance images of the head of a representative pediatric patient to define the relevant geometries. Clinical studies on pediatric subjects with and without congenital central hypoventilation syndrome validate the feasibility for using this system in operating hospitals and define its advantages relative to established technologies. This platformhas the potential to substantially enhance the quality of pediatric care across a wide range of conditions and use scenarios, not only in advanced hospital settings but also in clinics of lower- and middle-income countries.

Background Cardiovascular instability is common in critically ill children. There is a scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Methods Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature—a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. Results Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement,” 20 “weak agreement,” and 2 had “no agreement.” Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following the first round of voting. The agreed 72 recommendations were then coalesced into 36 detailing four key areas of hemodynamic monitoring in the main manuscript. Due to a lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus. Conclusions These expert consensus-based recommendations may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.

PurposeNet ultrafiltration (UFNET) during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can control fluid balance (FB), but is usually 0 ml·h−1 in patients with vasopressors due to the risk of hemodynamic instability associated with CRRT (HIRRT). We evaluated a UFNET strategy adjusted by functional hemodynamics to control the FB of patients with vasopressors, compared to the standard of care.MethodsIn this randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, proof-of-concept trial, adults receiving vasopressors, CRRT since ≤ 24 h and cardiac output monitoring were randomized (ratio 1:1) to receive during 72 h a UFNET ≥ 100 ml·h−1, adjusted using a functional hemodynamic protocol (intervention), or a UFNET ≤ 25 ml·h−1 (control). The primary outcome was the cumulative FB at 72 h and was analyzed in patients alive at 72 h and in whom monitoring and CRRT were continuously provided (modified intention-to-treat population [mITT]). Secondary outcomes were analyzed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.ResultsBetween June 2021 and April 2023, 55 patients (age 69 [interquartile range, IQR: 62; 74], 35% female, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) 13 [11; 15]) were randomized (25 interventions, 30 controls). In the mITT population, (21 interventions, 24 controls), the 72 h FB was −2650 [−4574; −309] ml in the intervention arm, and 1841 [821; 5327] ml in controls (difference: 4942 [95% confidence interval: 2736–6902] ml, P < 0.01). Hemodynamics, oxygenation and the number of HIRRT at 72 h, and day-90 mortality did not statistically differ between arms.ConclusionIn patients with vasopressors, a UFNET fluid removal strategy secured by a hemodynamic protocol allowed active fluid balance control, compared to the standard of care.

Early diagnosis can be crucial to limit both the mortality and economic burden of cardiovascular diseases. Recent developments have focused on the continuous monitoring of cardiac activity for a prompt diagnosis. Nowadays, wearable devices are gaining broad interest for a continuous monitoring of the heart rate (HR). One of the most promising methods to estimate HR is the seismocardiography (SCG) which allows to record the thoracic vibrations with high non-invasiveness in out-of-laboratory settings. Despite significant progress on SCG, the current state-of-the-art lacks both information on standardized sensor positioning and optimization of wearables design. Here, we introduce a soft wearable system (SWS), whose novel design, based on a soft polymer matrix embedding an array of fiber Bragg gratings, provides a good adhesion to the body and enables the simultaneous recording of SCG signals from multiple measuring sites. The feasibility assessment on healthy volunteers revealed that the SWS is a suitable wearable solution for HR monitoring and its performance in HR estimation is strongly influenced by sensor positioning and improved by a multi-sensor configuration. These promising characteristics open the possibility of using the SWS in monitoring patients with cardiac pathologies in clinical (e.g., during cardiac magnetic resonance procedures) and everyday life settings.

Haemodynamic monitoring and management are cornerstones of perioperative care. The goal of haemodynamic management is to maintain organ function by ensuring adequate perfusion pressure, blood flow, and oxygen delivery. We here present guidelines on “Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery” that were prepared by 18 experts on behalf of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und lntensivmedizin; DGAI).

PurposeMortality in circulatory shock is high. Enhanced resolution of shock may improve outcomes. We aim to determine whether adding hemodynamic monitoring with continual transesophageal echocardiography (hTEE) to usual care accelerates resolution of hemodynamic instability.Methods550 patients with circulatory shock were randomly assigned to four groups stratified using hTEE (hTEE vs usual care) and assessment frequency (minimum every 4 h vs 8 h). Primary outcome was time to resolution of hemodynamic instability, analyzed as intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis at day 6 and in a predefined secondary analysis at days 3 and 28.ResultsOf 550 randomized patients, 271 with hTEE and 274 patients with usual care were eligible and included in the ITT analysis. Time to resolution of hemodynamic instability did not differ within the first 6 days [hTEE vs usual care adjusted sub-hazard ratio (SHR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98–1.46, p = 0.067]. Time to resolution of hemodynamic instability during the 72 h of hTEE monitoring was shorter in patients with TEE (hTEE vs usual care SHR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02–1.55, p = 0.034). Assessment frequency had no influence. Time to resolution of clinical signs of hypoperfusion, duration of organ support, length of stay and mortality in the intensive care unit and hospital, and mortality at 28 days did not differ between groups.ConclusionsIn critically ill patients with shock, hTEE monitoring or hemodynamic assessment frequency did not influence resolution of hemodynamic instability or mortality within the first 6 days.Trial registration and statistical analysis planClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02048566.

Abstract Objective To assess whether perioperative management guided by near-infrared spectroscopy to determine tissue oxygen saturation and haemodynamic monitoring reduces postoperative complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Design Assessor blinded, single centre, randomised controlled trial (Bottomline-CS trial). Setting A tertiary teaching hospital in China. Participants 1960 patients aged 60 years or older who were scheduled for elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Interventions All patients had multisite monitoring of tissue oxygen saturation (bilateral forehead and unilateral forearm brachioradialis) and haemodynamic monitoring. Both groups received usual care, including arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, electrocardiography, and transoesophageal echocardiography when indicated. Guided care aimed to maintain tissue oxygenation within 10% above or below preoperative baseline values, established 24-48 hours before surgery, from the start of anaesthesia until extubation or for up to 24 hours postoperatively. In the usual care group, tissue oximetry and haemodynamic data were concealed, and care was routine. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of 30 day postoperative complications, which were cerebral, cardiac, respiratory, renal, infectious, and mortality complications. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and hospital length of stay. Results Of 1960 patients randomly assigned, data from 967 guided care and 974 usual care patients were analysed. During anaesthesia, the area under the curve for tissue oxygen saturation measurements outside the plus and minus 10% baseline range was significantly smaller with guided care than only usual care: left forehead 32.4 versus 57.6 (%×min, P<0.001), right forehead 37.9 versus 62.6 (P<0.001), and forearm 14.8 versus 44.7 (P<0.001). The primary composite outcome occurred in 457/967 (47.3%) patients in the guided care group and 466/974 (47.8%) patients in the usual care group (unadjusted risk ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.08), P=0.83). No secondary outcomes differed significantly between groups. The largest observed difference was in incidence of pneumonia, which was less frequent in the guided care group (88/967, 9.1%) than in the usual care group (121/974, 12.4%) and not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Guided care by use of multisite near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring effectively maintained tissue oxygenation near baseline levels compared with usual care. However, no clear evidence was noted that this approach reduced the incidence of major postoperative complications. These findings do not support the routine use of near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring to maintain tissue oxygenation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04896736.

The review article “Haemodynamic Monitoring During Noncardiac Surgery” offers valuable insights but lacks evidence linking specific haemodynamic strategies to improved outcomes. There’s a need for standardized protocols, ongoing clinician education, and further validation of new technologies. Additionally, balancing the use of invasive versus noninvasive methods and addressing cost-effectiveness and sustainability are essential. Continued research and adaptive practices are crucial for optimizing perioperative care.

Background and Objectives: Liver cirrhosis leads to significant hemodynamic changes, particularly portal hypertension and a hyperdynamic circulatory state. Traditional invasive methods for hemodynamic monitoring, while accurate, carry risks such as infection and hemorrhage in a patient predisposed to these conditions. This study evaluates the accuracy of non-invasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring compared to a minimally invasive method in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Materials and Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 51 patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring continuous hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Patients underwent simultaneous monitoring via the minimally invasive FloTrac system and continuous non-invasive ClearSight sensor over 24 h, with measurements registered at 6 h intervals. Hemodynamic parameters measured included cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume variation (SVV), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Results: Significant discrepancies were observed between the two monitoring methods for most parameters, particularly CO, CI, and MAP, at most time intervals. However, SVV measurements showed no significant differences, indicating similar efficacy in assessing fluid responsiveness between the devices. Conclusions: The ClearSight system, although a valuable non-invasive alternative, demonstrated lower accuracy compared to the FloTrac system for hemodynamic measurements in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Its effectiveness in assessing fluid responsiveness, particularly by SVV, suggests it could play a role in the monitoring of these patients, especially when invasive techniques have increased risks.

Hemodynamic-guided heart failure (HF) management using pulmonary artery (PA) pressures reduces HF hospitalizations (HFHs) in previously hospitalized HF patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III symptoms. It remains uncertain whether this approach reduces not only HFHs but all-cause mortality and if benefits extend to patients with NYHA class II and IV HF or to those symptomatic patients with elevated natriuretic peptides without recent HFH. GUIDE-HF is a prospective trial with 2 arms enrolling patients with HF regardless of ejection fraction (EF). The randomized arm is a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of PA pressure-guided therapy in NYHA class II-IV patients (n = 1,000) with either a previous HFH or elevated natriuretic peptides (B-type natriuretic peptide/NT-pro–B-type natriuretic peptide). All consenting subjects will receive an implantable PA pressure sensor (CardioMEMS HF System) followed by randomization to either a treatment group, managed with provider remote access to the hemodynamic data, or a control group, managed without provider access to these data. Subjects in the control group will receive scheduled, scripted, sham contacts from the study team to maintain blinding as to their study group assignment. The primary study end point is the composite of cumulative HF events and all-cause mortality at 12 months. Secondary end points include quality-of-life and functional assessments. The single arm of the trial is an observational arm in which NYHA class III patients (n = 2,600) with either a previous HFH or elevated natriuretic peptides (but no recent HFH) will be implanted with a PA pressure sensor and observed for occurrence of the primary composite end point of cumulative HF events and mortality at 12 months. This arm will test the hypothesis that hemodynamic-guided care is similarly effective in HF patients enrolled on the basis of elevated natriuretic peptide levels but no recent HFH and those with a recent HFH. GUIDE-HF is the largest clinical trial of hemodynamic-guided HF management across a broad population of HF patients, with a study design and sample size adequate to examine survival, cumulative HF events, quality of life, and functional capacity.