Explore the vast range of titles available.

Fitusiran, a subcutaneous investigational small interfering RNA therapeutic, targets antithrombin to rebalance haemostasis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B, irrespective of inhibitor status. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors. This multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study was done at 26 sites (primarily secondary or tertiary centres) in 12 countries. Men, boys, and young adults aged 12 years or older with severe haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors previously treated with on-demand bypassing agents were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive once-a-month 80 mg subcutaneous fitusiran prophylaxis (fitusiran prophylaxis group) or to continue with bypassing agents on-demand (bypassing agents on-demand group) for 9 months. The primary endpoint was mean annualised bleeding rate during the efficacy period in the intention-to-treat population estimated by negative binomial model. Safety was assessed as a secondary endpoint in the safety population. This trial is complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03417102. Between Feb 14, 2018, and June 23, 2021, 85 participants were screened for inclusion, of whom 57 (67%; 57 [100%] men; median age 27·0 years [IQR 19·5–33·5]) were randomly assigned: 19 (33%) participants to the bypassing agent on-demand group and 38 (67%) participants to the fitusiran prophylaxis. Negative binomial model-based mean annualised bleeding rate was significantly lower in the fitusiran prophylaxis group (1·7 [95% CI 1·0–2·7]) than in the bypassing agents on-demand group (18·1 [10·6–30·8]), corresponding to a 90·8% (95% CI 80·8–95·6) reduction in annualised bleeding rate in favour of fitusiran prophylaxis (p<0·0001). 25 (66%) participants had zero treated bleeds in the fitusiran prophylaxis group versus one (5%) in the bypassing agents on-demand group. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event in the fitusiran prophylaxis group was increased alanine aminotransferase in 13 (32%) of 41 participants in the safety population; there were no increased alanine aminotransferase treatment-emergent adverse events in the bypassing agents on-demand group. Suspected or confirmed thromboembolic events were reported in two (5%) participants in the fitusiran prophylaxis group. No deaths were reported. Subcutaneous fitusiran prophylaxis resulted in statistically significant reductions in annualised bleeding rate in participants with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors, with two-thirds of participants having zero bleeds. Fitusiran prophylaxis might show haemostatic efficacy in participants with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors; therefore, the therapeutic might have the potential to improve the management of people with haemophilia. Sanofi.

The current standard of care treatment for severe hemophilia A and B (SHA and SHB) is the prophylactic intravenous replacement of coagulation factor VIII or IX (FVIII/FIX) to prevent spontaneous bleeding. Persons with hemophilia without prophylactic treatment receive therapy in case of bleeding, i.e., on demand. To assess treatment patterns, utilization of products, and bleeding outcomes in a real-world cohort of persons with SHA and SHB, defined as FVIII or FIX activity < 1%, data was retrospectively collected from hemophilia-specific patient diaries used for home treatment, medical records, and entries into the Austrian Hemophilia Registry from the year 2012 to 2017. Fifty-three male persons with SHA (n = 47) and SHB (n = 6) were included; 26 with SHA and 5 with SHB were on prophylaxis, 8 and 1 switched therapy regimen, and 13 and 0 received on-demand therapy. Persons on prophylaxis used a mean factor FVIII or FIX dose of 71.7 and 40.1 IU/kg/week. Median (IQR) annualized bleeding rates (ABR) in SHA were 28.0 (23.4–31.3) in the on-demand, 4.9 (1.6–13.5) in the prophylaxis group, and 3.0 (2.0–6.8) in the prophylactic group of SHB. Three persons with SHA had zero bleeds during the observation period. On-demand therapy and hepatitis B and C were associated with higher ABR but not age, weight, and HIV positivity. Bleeding rates and the proportion of on-demand therapy in persons with hemophilia were high in our real-world cohort. Further improvement is needed, which might be facilitated with the advent of factor products with extended half-life or non-factor therapies.

A fusion protein comprising factor IX and the dimeric Fc domain of IgG1 has a half-life that is five times as long as that of native factor IX, allowing prophylactic injections to be spaced as far as 2 weeks apart while maintaining levels of factor IX that are sufficient to prevent bleeding. In patients with severe hemophilia B, recurrent bleeding leads to painful hemarthroses, disabling hemophilic arthropathy, and other sequelae. 1 , 2 Prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor IX is associated with improved clinical outcomes 3 – 7 ; however, the relatively short half-lives of currently available factor IX products necessitate frequent intravenous injections (two or three times weekly) to maintain protective levels (at or above 1 IU per deciliter). 8 , 9 The frequency of injections is a considerable burden, cited by patients as a key deterrent to undertaking prophylactic treatment. 10 Various strategies to reduce this burden and improve the treatment of hemophilia B are under investigation, . . .

Haemophilia A and B are congenital X-linked bleeding disorders resulting from deficiencies in clotting factors VIII (haemophilia A) and IX (haemophilia B). Patients with severe deficiency, defined as having less than 1% of normal plasma factor activivity, often have spontaneous bleeding within the first few years of life. Those with moderate and mild deficiencies typically present with post-traumatic or post-surgical bleeding later in life. A high index of suspicion and measurement of factor activity in plasma facilitates early diagnosis. In the 21st century, therapeutic advances and comprehensive care have substantially improved both mortality and morbidity associated with these conditions. Management strategies for haemophilia include on-demand treatment for bleeding episodes and all surgeries and regular treatment (ie, prophylaxis) aimed at reducing bleeds, morbidity, and mortality, thereby enhancing quality of life. Treatment options include factor replacement therapy, non-replacement therapies that increase thrombin generation, and gene therapies that facilitate in vivo clotting factor synthesis. The therapies differ in their use for prophylaxis and on-demand treatment, the mode and frequency of administration, duration of treatment effect, degree of haemostatic protection, and side-effects. Monitoring the effectiveness of these prophylactic therapies involves assessing annual bleeding rates and joint damage. Personalised management strategies, which align treatment with individual goals (eg, playing competitive sports), initiated at diagnosis and maintained throughout the lifespan, are crucial for optimal outcomes. These strategies are facilitated by a multidisciplinary team and supported by clinician-led education for both clinicians and patients.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec (etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb; Hemgenix ® ) is an adeno-associated virus vector-based gene therapy being developed by uniQure and CSL Behring for the treatment of haemophilia B. In November 2022, etranacogene dezaparvovec was approved in the USA for the treatment of haemophilia B [congenital factor IX (FIX) deficiency] in adults who are currently using FIX prophylaxis therapy, have current or historical life-threatening haemorrhage or have repeated, serious spontaneous bleeding episodes. In December 2022, etranacogene dezaparvovec also received positive opinion in the EU for the treatment of haemophilia B. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of etranacogene dezaparvovec leading to this first approval.

Fidanacogene elaparvovec ( Pr BEQVEZ™) is an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-based gene therapy developed by Spark Therapeutics (a subsidiary of Roche) and Pfizer (under a license from Spark Therapeutics) for the treatment of haemophilia B. In December 2023, fidanacogene elaparvovec received its first approval for the treatment of adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with moderately severe to severe haemophilia B (congenital factor IX deficiency) who are negative for neutralizing antibodies to variant AAV serotype Rh74 (AAVRh74var). Fidanacogene elaparvovec is under regulatory review in the USA and the European Union and clinical studies are ongoing in multiple countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of fidanacogene elaparvovec leading to this first approval for moderately severe to severe (factor IX activity ≤ 2%) haemophilia B who are negative for neutralizing antibodies to AAVRh74var.

Hemophilia A and B are disorders associated with the deficit of coagulation factors VIII and IX. Was to determine the incidence of complications in a cohort of patients diagnosed with moderate and severe hemophilia A or B under treatment in a specialized institution. A retrospective study of a cohort of patients with replacement therapy for hemophilia A or B, evaluating treatment and complications between January/2012 and July/2019. Sociodemographic, clinical and disease management-related variables were extracted from the medical records. Time to inhibitor development and rate associated with bleeding and hospitalizations were evaluated. A total of 159 male patients were identified with hemophilia A (n = 140; 88.1%) and B (n = 19; 11.9%) with a mean follow-up of 5.9±2.3 years. The mean age was 23.6±16.1 years, hemophilia was reported as severe in 125 patients in hemophilia A (89.3%) and 13 patients in hemophilia B (68.4%). Primary prophylaxis was registered in 17.0% of patients, 44.7% secondary, and 38.3% tertiary, with recombinant factors (n = 84; 52.8%) followed by plasma derived factors (n = 75; 47.2%). The incidence of inhibitor development was 0.3 per 100 patients/year, with mean time to event of 509 days. The incidence of bleeding was 192 per 100 patients/year, especially at the joint (n = 99; 62.3%) and muscle (n = 25; 15.7%) level. The incidence of hospitalization was 3.7 per 100 patients/year. The most common complication was joint bleeding which was expected in this type of patients. Low proportion of patients developed factor inhibitors during the follow up.

In contrast to the standard enzyme-replacement therapy, administered from once per 7–14 days to 2–3 times a week in patients with severe hemophilia B, as a result of a single injection, gene therapy can restore F9 gene expression and maintain it for a prolonged time. In clinical research, the approach of delivering a functional copy of a gene using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is widely used. The scientific community is actively researching possible modifications to improve delivery efficiency and expression. In preclinical studies, the possibility of genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 technology for the treatment of hemophilia B is also being actively studied.

Hemophilia is a bleeding disorder due to coagulation pathway factor deficiency that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of the emergency department (ED) evaluation of hemophilia, including diagnostic procedures, imaging, and management based on current evidence. Hemophilia is marked by deficiency in factor VIII (in hemophilia A) or IX (in hemophilia B), which may result in severe bleeding. The severity of the disease depends upon factor levels. Patients with severe deficiency most commonly present in the first two years of life. Severe bleeding may include intracranial hemorrhage, retroperitoneal bleeding, large hematomas, bleeding within the chest or abdomen/pelvis, and subacute or delayed postpartum bleeding. ED management is the immediate replacement of clotting factors based on the suspicion of bleed rather than the confirmation of one. The doses for factor concentrate replacement to achieve factor levels of 100% are 50 U/kg for FVIII and 100 U/kg for FIX. The development of inhibitors can complicate the clinical picture and treatment possibilities. Consultation with the hematology specialist is recommended to assist with evaluation and management. Emergency physician knowledge of hemophilia, including the presentation, evaluation, and management, can improve the care of these patients.

Marstacimab (marstacimab-hncq; HYMPAVZI™) is a subcutaneously administered human monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody against tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) that is being developed by Pfizer for the treatment of hemophilia A and B. Marstacimab received its first approval on 11 October 2024 in the USA. It was approved for use as routine prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age and older with hemophilia A without factor VIII inhibitors or hemophilia B without factor IX inhibitors. Marstacimab has since been approved on 18 Nov in the EU for the treatment of adults and adolescents with severe hemophilia A or B without inhibitors. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of marstacimab leading to this first approval for hemophilia.