Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a recent publication dealing with the sectional-level taxonomy of Garcinia , an illegitimate superfluous sectional name and two illegitimate homonyms were published. Herein we choose a legitimate sectional name, Garcinia section Rheediopsis Pierre, for the superfluous name Garcinia section Rheedia (L.) S.W.Jones ex P.W.Sweeney; and create two new legitimate names in Garcinia for Allanblackia gabonensis (Pellegr.) Bamps and A. parviflora A.Chev.

The uncertain taxonomic identity and provenance of the gecarcinucid karst crab Parathelphusa (Liothelphusa) nobilii Colosi, 1920 is resolved through the examination of historical type material and newly collected specimens. Stygothelphusa nobilii (Colosi, 1920) is confirmed as a distinct species closely related to S. bidiensis Lanchester, 1900, but it can be easily distinguished by its more quadrate carapace, the anterolateral margin being armed with a low epibranchial tooth, proportionally shorter ambulatory legs, and diagnostic gonopod morphology. The originally stated type locality, \"Mt Saribau\" is considered erroneous. Evidence from the collector's records and recent collections indicate that the species was very likely obtained from the limestone karsts around Gua Chupak in southwestern Sarawak. In addition, Parathelphusa nobilii Ng, 2014 from Sambas in Indonesian Kalimantan is identified a junior primary homonym of Parathelphusa (Liothelphusa) nobilii Colosi, 1920. A replacement name, P. daisyae nom. nov., is therefore proposed.

Nitela carinifrons Li, Li & Ma, 2025 a junior homonym of N. carinifrons Menke, 1968, is replaced with Nitela scabrirugata Li, Li & Ma, nom. nov.

During the second half of the twentieth century, housing complexes were constructed near the Biobío River, in the homonymous region of Chile, which while distant from industrial plants nevertheless maintained a close connection. Information was gathered from documentary research and other primary sources, in addition to interviews with neighbors and former residents who worked at the ENAP refinery. Keywords: Worker housing, industrial paternalism, collective habitat, oil refineries. Esto resulta relevante porque los registros, investigaciones y valoración del espacio productivo, social y urbano han centrado sus análisis en aquellos conjuntos urbanos de mayor escala, que fueron creados directamente por la gran industria hasta la primera mitad del siglo XX, siguiendo el modelo de company town.

A comprehensive nomenclatural analysis of the generic and suprageneric names used for an extinct conifer group, treated as a distinct family under the names Cheirolepidaceae, Cheirolepidiaceae or Hirmeriellaceae or a distinct order, Cheirolepidiales or Hirmeriellales, is presented. The fossil generic name Cheirolepis Schimp. (1870) is an illegitimate later homonym of the name of the extant genus Cheirolepis Boiss. (1849; Asteraceae). It has been superfluously substituted with a new generic name, Cheirolepidium Takht. (1957). The authorship and place of valid publication of Cheirolepidium is corrected based on newly discovered information. The correct generic name for these fossils is Hirmeriella Hörhammer (1933), established originally for a cone consisting of persistent bract scales lacking seed scales, because it has priority over the generic name Cheirolepidium Takht. All three fossil generic names were employed for the same fossil cone taxon, which represented different stages of maturity of the same seed cone. The inclusion of both Cheirolepis and Cheirolepidium under Hirmeriella was proposed by Jung (1968) in his formal lectotypification of the type of the genus name, Cheirolepis muensteri (≡ Brachyphyllum muensteri), with a cone specimen that was cited in the protologues of the types of both genera, Cheirolepis muensteri and Hirmeriella rhaetoliassica. The lectotypification of Cheirolepis muensteri and Hirmeriella rhaetoliassica using the same elements results in the three generic names being homotypic synonyms. As a consequence, the correct family name for the fossil conifer group is Hirmeriellaceae, to be proposed for conservation against Cheirolepidiaceae. Cheirolepidaceae is inadmissible being based on the illegitimate later homonym Cheirolepis Schimp. and thus itself illegitimate.

In this study, the process of becoming homonym due to the expansion of meaning within the historical journey of polysemy, which are actually very meaningful and based on the same origin, in the Turkish Dictionary of the Türk Dil Kurumu, was examined. Homonym; it is defined as words whose phone and spelling are the same and their meanings are different. In polysemy words involve more than one meaning. While there is a single origin in polysemy words, there are more than one but related meanings, in homonyms, there are at least two different origins and different meanings from each other. Tagged with the general scanning model in the Turkish Dictionary, acımak, ağıl, ağız, ağmak, altıparmak, basılmak, biçim, bir bir, bitmek, boy, bozuk, çakmak, çil, çöğür, dayak, dikilmek, dikmek, dil, dokunma, dokunmak, dokunuş, el, gen, güç, günlük, öz, sağ, sormak, ters, terslemek, uçuk, uğur, uz, yaş, yaşlı, yazı, yazmak, yordurmak, yormak, yorulmak have turned into polysemy from homonym. In the spelling of homonyms in the dictionary, to two separate lexical entry and (I) (II) (III) Roman numerals form besides homonyms is preferred. Expanded meanings of polysemys are shown with the numbers 1, 2, and 3 at the beginning of generally prioritizing the basic meaning. Based on the etymology and historical dictionaries of the determined 40 words, it has been determined that the dictionary units of the polysemy words with the same origin are decomposed through the expansion and change of meaning over time and become polysemy.

Background: When confronting typographical errors in sentences, we guess what the writer intends to say. This process requires us to have the ability to understand the context of sentences. The aim of this study was to examine whether the ability of detecting typographical errors in sentences might be different among participants with or without autistic tendencies. Furthermore, we analyzed the accuracy rates of the task to reveal the characteristics of participants with autistic tendencies. Method: Thirty-two Japanese adolescents participated in this study (13 men and 19 women). By using a typographical error detection task (5 paragraphs containing Japanese sentences of 100–150 characters including mistyped words) and psychological questionnaires (the autism–spectrum quotient), we scored the degree of autistic tendencies and the ability of the subjects to detect typographical errors in paragraphs. Results: Our results showed that there was no relationship between autistic tendencies and the detection of typographical errors in paragraphs, suggesting that a person with autistic tendencies may not have any trouble in understanding the context in paragraphs. However, among 23 typographical errors used, 1 typographical error word, which could be read less uncomfortably from the viewpoint of a broad context, was significantly associated with autistic tendencies. Conclusions: These results showed for the first time that people with autistic tendencies can detect typographical errors without being affected by their context. This finding provides the possibility of creating a task that can predict accurately the autistic tendencies of a person.

We synthesize data on all known extant and fossil Coleoptera family-group names for the first time. A catalogue of 4887 family-group names (124 fossil, 4763 extant) based on 4707 distinct genera in Coleoptera is given. A total of 4492 names are available, 183 of which are permanently invalid because they are based on a preoccupied or a suppressed type genus. Names are listed in a classification framework. We recognize as valid 24 superfamilies, 211 families, 541 subfamilies, 1663 tribes and 740 subtribes. For each name, the original spelling, author, year of publication, page number, correct stem and type genus are included. The original spelling and availability of each name were checked from primary literature. A list of necessary changes due to Priority and Homonymy problems, and actions taken, is given. Current usage of names was conserved, whenever possible, to promote stability of the classification.New synonymies (family-group names followed by genus-group names): Agronomina Gistel, 1848 syn. nov. of Amarina Zimmermann, 1832 (Carabidae), Hylepnigalioini Gistel, 1856 syn. nov. of Melandryini Leach, 1815 (Melandryidae), Polycystophoridae Gistel, 1856 syn. nov. of Malachiinae Fleming, 1821 (Melyridae), Sclerasteinae Gistel, 1856 syn. nov. of Ptilininae Shuckard, 1839 (Ptinidae), Phloeonomini Ádám, 2001 syn. nov. of Omaliini MacLeay, 1825 (Staphylinidae), Sepedophilini Ádám, 2001 syn. nov. of Tachyporini MacLeay, 1825 (Staphylinidae), Phibalini Gistel, 1856 syn. nov. of Cteniopodini Solier, 1835 (Tenebrionidae); Agronoma Gistel 1848 (type species Carabus familiaris Duftschmid, 1812, designated herein) syn. nov. of Amara Bonelli, 1810 (Carabidae), Hylepnigalio Gistel, 1856 (type species Chrysomela caraboides Linnaeus, 1760, by monotypy) syn. nov. of Melandrya Fabricius, 1801 (Melandryidae), Polycystophorus Gistel, 1856 (type species Cantharis aeneus Linnaeus, 1758, designated herein) syn. nov. of Malachius Fabricius, 1775 (Melyridae), Sclerastes Gistel, 1856 (type species Ptilinus costatus Gyllenhal, 1827, designated herein) syn. nov. of Ptilinus Geoffroy, 1762 (Ptinidae), Paniscus Gistel, 1848 (type species Scarabaeus fasciatus Linnaeus, 1758, designated herein) syn. nov. of Trichius Fabricius, 1775 (Scarabaeidae), Phibalus Gistel, 1856 (type species Chrysomela pubescens Linnaeus, 1758, by monotypy) syn. nov. of Omophlus Dejean, 1834 (Tenebrionidae). The following new replacement name is proposed: Gompeliina Bouchard, 2011 nom. nov. for Olotelina Báguena Corella, 1948 (Aderidae).Reversal of Precedence (Article 23.9) is used to conserve usage of the following names (family-group names followed by genus-group names): Perigonini Horn, 1881 nom. protectum over Trechicini Bates, 1873 nom. oblitum (Carabidae), Anisodactylina Lacordaire, 1854 nom. protectum over Eurytrichina LeConte, 1848 nom. oblitum (Carabidae), Smicronychini Seidlitz, 1891 nom. protectum over Desmorini LeConte, 1876 nom. oblitum (Curculionidae), Bagoinae Thomson, 1859 nom. protectum over Lyprinae Gistel 1848 nom. oblitum (Curculionidae), Aterpina Lacordaire, 1863 nom. protectum over Heliomenina Gistel, 1848 nom. oblitum (Curculionidae), Naupactini Gistel, 1848 nom. protectum over Iphiini Schönherr, 1823 nom. oblitum (Curculionidae), Cleonini Schönherr, 1826 nom. protectum over Geomorini Schönherr, 1823 nom. oblitum (Curculionidae), Magdalidini Pascoe, 1870 nom. protectum over Scardamyctini Gistel, 1848 nom. oblitum (Curculionidae), Agrypninae/-ini Candèze, 1857 nom. protecta over Adelocerinae/-ini Gistel, 1848 nom. oblita and Pangaurinae/-ini Gistel, 1856 nom. oblita (Elateridae), Prosternini Gistel, 1856 nom. protectum over Diacanthini Gistel, 1848 nom. oblitum (Elateridae), Calopodinae Costa, 1852 nom. protectum over Sparedrinae Gistel, 1848 nom. oblitum (Oedemeridae), Adesmiini Lacordaire, 1859 nom. protectum over Macropodini Agassiz, 1846 nom. oblitum (Tenebrionidae), Bolitophagini Kirby, 1837 nom. protectum over Eledonini Billberg, 1820 nom. oblitum (Tenebrionidae), Throscidae Laporte, 1840 nom. protectum over Stereolidae Rafinesque, 1815 nom. oblitum (Throscidae) and Lophocaterini Crowson, 1964 over Lycoptini Casey, 1890 nom. oblitum (Trogossitidae); Monotoma Herbst, 1799 nom. protectum over Monotoma Panzer, 1792 nom. oblitum (Monotomidae); Pediacus Shuckard, 1839 nom. protectum over Biophloeus Dejean, 1835 nom. oblitum (Cucujidae), Pachypus Dejean, 1821 nom. protectum over Pachypus Billberg, 1820 nom. oblitum (Scarabaeidae), Sparrmannia Laporte, 1840 nom. protectum over Leocaeta Dejean, 1833 nom. oblitum and Cephalotrichia Hope, 1837 nom. oblitum (Scarabaeidae).

AbstractSmicromyrme burgeri Schmid-Egger, 2021, a junior homonym of S. (Eremotilla) burgeri Lelej, 2020, is replaced with Smicromyrme (Smicromyrme) frankburgeri Schmid-Egger, nom. nov.

In this paper we analyze relations between ontology in anthropology and philosophy beyond simple homonymy or synonymy and show how this diagnosis allows for new interdisciplinary links and insights, while minimizing the risk of cross-disciplinary equivocation. We introduce the ontological turn in anthropology as an intellectual project rooted in the critique of dualism of culture and nature and propose a classification of the literature we reviewed into first-order claims about the world and second-order claims about ontological frameworks. Next, rather than provide a strict definition of ontology in anthropological literature, we argue that the term is used as a heuristic addressing a web of sub-concepts relating to interpretation, knowledge, and self-determination which correspond to methodological, epistemic, and political considerations central to the development of the ontological turn. We present a case study of rivers as persons to demonstrate what the ontological paradigm in anthropology amounts to in practice. Finally, in an analysis facilitated by a parallel between the first- and second-order claims in anthropology, and ontology and meta-ontology in philosophy (respectively), we showcase the potential for contribution of ontological anthropology to contemporary philosophical debates, such as ontological gerrymandering, relativism and social ontology, and vice versa.