Explore the vast range of titles available.

Awakening in a burn ward after being horribly burned in a terrible car accident, the cynical narrator is visited by a beautiful and enigmatic sculptress of gargoyles who tells him that they had once been lovers in medieval Germany.

Continuous and wireless vital sign (VS) monitoring on hospital wards is superior to intermittent VS monitoring at detecting VS abnormalities; however, the impact on clinical outcomes remains to be confirmed. A recent propensity-matched study of primary surgical patients found decreased odds of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality in patients receiving continuous monitoring. Primary surgical patients are inherently different from their medical counterparts who typically have high morbidity, including frailty. Continuous monitoring research has been limited in primary medical patients. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of primary medical patients who received either continuous or, as a contemporaneous control, intermittent vital monitoring as the standard of care using propensity matching. Propensity-matched analysis of a population-based sample of 7971 patients admitted to the medical wards between January 2018 and December 2019 at a single, tertiary United States medical center. The continuous monitoring device measures oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, continuous noninvasive blood pressure, and either 3-lead or 5-lead electrocardiogram. Patients received either 12 hours or more of continuous and wireless VS monitoring (n=1450) or intermittent VS monitoring (n=6521). The primary outcome was the odds of a composite of in-hospital mortality or ICU transfer during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were the odds of individual components of the primary outcome, as well as heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), acute kidney injury (AKI), and rapid response team (RRT) activations. Those who received intermittent VS monitoring had greater odds of a composite of in-hospital mortality or ICU admission (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, 95% CI 1.89-4.25; P<.001) compared with those who had continuous and wireless VS monitoring. The odds of HF (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83-1.28; P=.77), MI (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.77-3.47; P=.23), AKI (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-1.02; P=.06), and RRT activation (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75-1.19; P=.62) were similar in both groups. In this propensity-matched study, medical ward patients who received standard of care intermittent VS monitoring were at nearly 3 times greater odds of transfer to the ICU or death compared with those who received continuous VS monitoring. Our study was primarily limited by the inability to match patients on admission diagnosis due to limitations in electronic health record data. Other limitations included the number of and reasons for false alarms, which can be challenging with continuous monitoring strategies. Given the limitations of this work, these observations need to be confirmed with prospective interventional trials.

Frail older people experience frequent care transitions and an integrated healthcare system could reduce barriers to transitions between different settings. The study aimed to investigate care transitions of frail older people from acute hospital wards to community healthcare or community hospital wards, within a system that had vertically integrated acute hospital and community healthcare services. The research design was a multimethod, qualitative case study of one healthcare system in England; four acute hospital wards and two community hospital wards were studied in depth. The data were collected through: interviews with key staff (n = 17); focus groups (n = 9) with ward staff (n = 36); interviews with frail older people (n = 4). The data were analysed using the framework approach. THREE THEMES ARE PRESENTED: Care transitions within a vertically integrated healthcare system, Interprofessional communication and relationships; Patient and family involvement in care transitions. A vertically integrated healthcare system supported care transitions from acute hospital wards through removal of organisational boundaries. However, boundaries between staff in different settings remained a barrier to transitions, as did capacity issues in community healthcare and social care. Staff in acute and community settings need opportunities to gain better understanding of each other's roles and build relationships and trust.

To determine distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in hospital wards in Wuhan, China, we tested air and surface samples. Contamination was greater in intensive care units than general wards. Virus was widely distributed on floors, computer mice, trash cans, and sickbed handrails and was detected in air ≈4 m from patients.

Inpatient falls are common and concerning. This project evaluated the effectiveness of educating patients, families, and staff on fall prevention and control strategies. Although the fall rate did not change significantly in the 3 months after intervention, significant improvement in staff adherence to fall prevention strategies was noted.

The rapid increase of acute and intensive care capacities in hospitals needed during the response to COVID-19 created an urgent demand for skilled healthcare staff across the globe. To upscale capacity, many hospitals chose to increase their teams in these departments with rapidly re-deployed inter-professional healthcare personnel, many of whom had no prior experience of working in a high-risk environment and were neither prepared nor trained for work on such wards. This systematic review of reviews examines the current evidence base for successful teamwork in rapidly deployed interprofessional teams in intensive and acute care settings, by assessing systematic reviews of empirical studies to inform future deployments and support of rapidly formed clinical teams. This study identified 18 systematic reviews for further analysis. Utilising an integrative narrative synthesis process supported by thematic coding and graphical network analysis, 13 themes were found to dominate the literature on teams and teamwork in inter-professional and inter-disciplinary teams. This approach was chosen to make the selection process more transparent and enable the thematic clusters in the reviewed papers to be presented visually and codifying four factors that structure the literature on inter-professional teams (i.e., team-internal procedures and dynamics, communicative processes, organisational and team extrinsic influences on teams, and lastly patient and staff outcomes). Practically, the findings suggest that managers and team leaders in fluid and ad-hoc inter-professional healthcare teams in an intensive care environment need to pay attention to reducing pre-existing occupational identities and power-dynamics by emphasizing skill mix, establishing combined workspaces and break areas, clarifying roles and responsibilities, facilitating formal information exchange and developing informal opportunities for communication. The results may guide the further analysis of factors that affect the performance of inter-professional teams in emergency and crisis deployment.

•Airborne pathogens ≤1 µm cannot be neglected for long-range transmission.•Submicron-sized pathogens suspended over 5 minutes under normal ventilation.•Sneezing in 24 bed positions demonstrated spatial heterogeneity in cubicle ward.•Privacy curtain installation is more effective in suppressing pathogen spread. Understanding the spatial distribution of viral-sized airborne pathogens helps determine infection control strategies to reduce cross-infection risks in hospital ward-shared environments. Through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of pathogen transmission trajectories with a user-defined bioaerosol drag, this study evaluates the effectiveness of localized ventilation systems and physical barriers in limiting submicron-sized pathogen dispersion within a corridor-linked hospital ward. In particular, sneezing episodes by an infected patient at 24 bed positions in a general inpatient ward with four semi-open cubicles, a nursing station, a washroom and two storage rooms accessible by a common corridor were evaluated numerically. The results showed that only 20% of the released airborne contaminants went into the corridor, with a suspension time of over five minutes. Their movement paths were strongly influenced by exhaust units from adjacent cubicles. Using a privacy curtain was more effective than localized ventilation in reducing particle dispersion, and using both strategies together further improved the reduction performance. These findings emphasize the necessity of considering submicron-sized airborne pathogen in infection risk estimation and inform key design criteria for an effective ventilation system to reduce infection risks in large hospital wards. [Display omitted]

Background Achieving choice is proposed as a quality marker. But little is known about what influences preferences especially among older adults. We aimed to determine and compare, across three countries, factors associated with preferences for place of death and treatment, and actual site of death. Methods We recruited adults aged ≥65-years from hospital-based multiprofessional palliative care services in London, Dublin, New York, and followed them for >17 months. All services offered consultation on hospital wards, support for existing clinical teams, outpatient services and received funding from their National Health Service and/or relevant Insurance reimbursements. The New York service additionally had 10 inpatient beds. All worked with and referred patients to local hospices. Face-to-face interviews recorded most and least preferred place of death, treatment goal priorities, demographic and clinical information using validated questionnaires. Multivariable and multilevel analyses assessed associated factors. Results One hundred and thirty eight older adults (64 London, 59 Dublin, 15 New York) were recruited, 110 died during follow-up. Home was the most preferred place of death (77/138, 56%) followed by inpatient palliative care/hospice units (22%). Hospital was least preferred (35/138, 25%), followed by nursing home (20%) and home (16%); hospice/palliative care unit was rarely least preferred (4%). Most respondents prioritised improving quality of life, either alone (54%), or equal with life extension (39%); few (3%) chose only life extension. There were no significant differences between countries. Main associates with home preference were: cancer diagnosis (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.40–9.90) and living with someone (OR 2.19, 1.33–3.62). Adults with non-cancer diagnoses were more likely to prefer palliative care units (OR 2.39, 1.14–5.03). Conversely, functional independence (OR 1.05, 1.04–1.06) and valuing quality of life (OR 3.11, 2.89–3.36) were associated with dying at home. There was a mismatch between preferences and achievements – of 85 people who preferred home or a palliative care unit, 19 (25%) achieved their first preference. Conclusion Although home is the most common first preference, it is polarising and for 16% it is the least preferred. Inpatient palliative care unit emerges as the second most preferred place, is rarely least preferred, and yet was often not achieved for those who wanted to die there. Factors affecting stated preferences and met preferences differ. Available services, notably community support and palliative care units, require expansion. Contrasting actual place of death with capacity for meeting patient and family needs may be a better quality indicator than simply ‘achieved preferences’.