Explore the vast range of titles available.

Idiopathic hypereosinophilia (IHE) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) are benign haematological disorders. Studies have suggested that venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a rare but sometimes fatal complication of hypereosinophilia; however, data are limited. We retrospectively analysed clinical features and short-term outcomes of 63 consecutive patients (82.5% men; mean age, 40.92 ± 10.89 years) with IHE or HES with concurrent VTE from January 1998 through December 2018. Risk factors for pulmonary embolism (PE) were explored by multivariate logistic analysis. DVT and/or PE was detected by imaging in all patients. Independent risk factors for PE were a body mass index of >24.1 kg/m 2 (odds ratio [OR]: 5.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–26.13, P = 0.028), peak absolute eosinophil count of >6.3 × 10 9 /L (OR: 5.55, 95% CI: 1.292–23.875, P = 0.021), and >13.9-month duration of hypereosinophilia (OR: 4.51, 95% CI: 1.123–18.09, P = 0.034). All patients were treated with corticosteroids and anticoagulants. The short-term hypereosinophilia remission rate was 100%; no recurrent VTE or major bleeding was observed. Hypereosinophilia is a potential risk factor for VTE. PE in patients with IHE/HES and DVT is associated with a higher body mass index, higher peak absolute eosinophil count, and longer duration of hypereosinophilia. Corticosteroids and anticoagulants provided effective short-term control of hypereosinophilia and VTE.

Hypereosinophilia (HE) is currently defined by a peripheral blood absolute eosinophil count (AEC) of ≥1,500 cells/microL. Although mild blood eosinophilia (AEC 500-1,500 cells/microL) is observed relatively frequently within the pediatric population, persistent HE is uncommon and should prompt additional clinical evaluation. While the clinical manifestations and underlying etiologies of HE in adults have been well-characterized, there is a paucity of data on HE in children. Limited evidence suggests that many similarities between adult and pediatric HE likely exist, but some important differences remain between these populations. The evaluation of HE in children can be challenging given the broad differential diagnosis, which includes primary hematologic disorders and secondary eosinophilia in which the increased eosinophil levels are propagated by disease states that promote eosinophil production and survival. On the basis of the underlying etiology, clinical manifestations can range from benign, self-resolving elevations in the AEC to life-threatening disorders with the potential for significant end-organ damage. Given the broad differential diagnosis of HE, it remains essential to systematically approach the evaluation of unexplained HE in children. This review will discuss the differential diagnosis for pediatric HE, highlighting etiologies that are more prevalent within the pediatric population. Additionally, a summary of the epidemiology of pediatric HE will be presented, with focus on some of the differences that exist between pediatric and adult HE. Finally, a directed approach to the diagnostic evaluation of children with HE will be discussed.

Purpose of ReviewHypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is characterized by persistent hypereosinophilia associated with end-organ damage. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of various forms of HES broadens, so does our ability to tailor steroid-sparing therapies for each subtype. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature related to the etiology, diagnosis, and management of HES.Recent FindingsMutations involved in subsets of HES can guide the choice of tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond just imatinib. Several biologics that target interleukin-5 or its receptor have shown beneficial and selective eosinophil-reducing effects in clinical trials for asthma and other disorders including HES. Early clinical data with emerging therapies such as dexpramipexole and anti-Siglec-8 antibody show promise, but need to be confirmed in randomized trials.SummarySeveral new biologics and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been shown to lower eosinophil numbers, but more randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy in HES.

Thrombotic risk is increased in eosinophil-mediated disorders, and several hypotheses have been proposed to link eosinophilia and thrombosis. In particular, eosinophils have been described as source of tissue factor (TF), the main initiator of blood coagulation; however, this aspect is still controversial. This study was aimed to evaluate whether TF expression varies in eosinophils isolated from normal subjects and patients with different hypereosinophilic conditions. Eosinophils were immunologically purified from peripheral blood samples of 9 patients with different hypereosinophilic conditions and 9 normal subjects. Western blot analysis and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were performed to test eosinophil TF expression. For comparison, TF expression was evaluated in monocytes from blood donors and in human endothelial (ECV304) and fibroblast (IMR90) cell lines. Western blot analysis revealed a major band of 47,000 corresponding to native TF in homogenates of purified eosinophils with a higher intensity in the 9 patients than in the 9 controls (p<0.0001). According to RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct), TF gene expression was higher in eosinophils from patients than in those from controls, median (range) 35.10 (19.45-36.50) vs 37.17 (35.33-37.87) (p = 0.002), and was particularly abundant in one patient with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome and ischemic heart attacks (Ct: 19.45). TF gene expression was moderate in monocytes, Ct: 31.32 (29.82-33.49) and abundant in endothelial cells, Ct: 28.70 (27.79-29.57) and fibroblasts, Ct: 22.77 (19.22-25.05). Our results indicate that human blood eosinophils contain variable amounts of TF. The higher TF expression in patients with hypereosinophilic disorders may contribute to increase the thrombotic risk.

Gleich's syndrome (GS) is characterized by recurrent episodes of angioedema, increase in body weight, fever, hypereosinophilia, and elevated serum IgM. The exact etiology remains unclear. Currently, the only treatment strategy is the administration of high dose of steroids during the acute phases. We report the case of a 37-year-old man suffering from GS with recurrent episodes of angioedema, fever, hypereosinophilia [6,000/mm (45%)], and high eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) (>200 μg/l), treated with oral steroids during the acute phase (prednisone 50-75 mg/day), the dose of maintenance being 25 mg/day. No monoclonal components were identified, and genetic tests exclude mutations including Bcr/Abl, JAK2 V617F, c-KIT D816V, and FIP1L1-PDGFRA. Using Luminex technology, we observed higher serum levels of interleukin (IL)-5, CCL2, and CCL11 during the acute exacerbations in comparison with the clinical remission phases though CCL11 did not achieve statistical significance. The flow-cytometric analysis identified a CD3+ CD8- lymphocyte population with high frequency of IL-4-, IL-5-, and IL-13-producing cells. No clinical benefit was observed after therapeutic strategies with imatinib, interferon-α, cyclosporine-A, and azathioprine. Due to high IL-5 serum levels, an intravenous treatment with anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody mepolizumab (750 mg every 4 weeks) was started. A reduction in the rate of exacerbation phases/year (10 ± 3 vs 2 ± 1;  < 0.005), in the eosinophils count both in percentage (28.8 ± 12.8 vs 9.8 ± 3.9;  < 0.001) and absolute value (2,737 ± 1,946 vs 782 ± 333;  < 0.001) were observed as well as the ECP serum levels (132.7 ± 62.7 vs 21 ± 14.2 μg/l;  < 0.05). The daily dose of prednisone was significantly reduced (25 vs 7.5 mg). Any adverse effects were recorded. To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first report of the disease successfully treated with mepolizumab, and it could represent a novel therapeutic strategy in GS.

Evaluation of peripheral blood and bone marrow for an indication of persistent eosinophilia can be a challenging task because there are many causes of eosinophilia and the morphologic differences between reactive and neoplastic causes are often subtle or lack specificity. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the differential diagnosis for eosinophilia, to recommend specific steps for the pathologist evaluating blood and bone marrow, and to emphasize 2 important causes of eosinophilia that require specific ancillary tests for diagnosis: myeloproliferative neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement and lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Eosinophils are leukocytes that are released into the peripheral blood in a phenotypically mature state and are capable of being recruited into tissues in response to appropriate stimuli. Eosinophils, traditionally considered cytotoxic effector cells, are leukocytes recruited into the airways of asthma patients where they are believed to contribute to the development of many features of the disease. This perception, however, has been challenged by recent findings suggesting that eosinophils have also immunomodulatory functions and may be involved in tissue homeostasis and wound healing. Here we describe a transcriptome-based approach-in a limited number of patients and controls-to investigate the activation state of circulating human eosinophils isolated by flow cytometry. We provide an overview of the global expression pattern in eosinophils in various relevant conditions, e.g., eosinophilic asthma, hypereosinophilic dermatological diseases, parasitosis and pulmonary aspergillosis. Compared to healthy subjects, circulating eosinophils isolated from asthma patients differed in their gene expression profile which is marked by downregulation of transcripts involved in antigen presentation, pathogen recognition and mucosal innate immunity, whereas up-regulated genes were involved in response to non-specific stimulation, wounding and maintenance of homeostasis. Eosinophils from other hypereosinophilic disorders displayed a very similar transcriptional profile. Taken together, these observations seem to indicate that eosinophils exhibit non-specific immunomodulatory functions important for tissue repair and homeostasis and suggest new roles for these cells in asthma immunobiology.

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a myeloproliferative disease of unknown etiology. Recently, it has been reported that imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), an inhibitor of Bcr-Abl kinase useful in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, is also effective in treating HES; however, the molecular target of imatinib in HES is unknown. This report identifies a genetic rearrangement in the eosinophilic cell line EOL-1 that results in the expression of a fusion protein comprising an N-terminal region encoded by a gene of unknown function with the GenBank accession number NM_030917 and a C-terminal region derived from the intracellular domain of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα). The fusion gene was also detected in blood cells from two patients with HES. We propose naming NM_030917 Rhe for Rearranged in hypereosinophilia. Rhe-PDGFRα fusions result from an apparent interstitial deletion that links Rhe to exon 12 of PDGFRα on chromosome 4q12. The fusion kinase Rhe-PDGFRα is constitutively phosphorylated and supports IL-3-independent growth when expressed in BaF3 cells. Proliferation and viability of EOL-1 and BaF3 cells expressing Rhe-PDGFRα are ablated by the PDGFRα inhibitors imatinib, vatalanib, and THRX-165724.

The term “hypereosinophilia of undetermined significance” (HE us ) previously known as idiopathic, benign eosinophilia relates to patients who have a long-lasting, unexplained and asymptomatic blood HE. These patients have not been studied so far in terms of demographic characteristics and clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to present the clinical characteristics and outcome of HE us patients. This is a retrospective, single-center study of 40 patients with HE us . All patients underwent the basic and specialized evaluations in order to rule out the most common causes of blood HE, but no abnormalities were detected. Twelve patients with at least moderate blood hypereosinophilia (defined as greater than 3.0 × 10 9 /L) for more than 1-year duration were treated with corticosteroids (CS) to avoid end-organ damage. Twenty-one patients (52 %) had an increased leukocyte count at diagnosis. Median blood eosinophilia was 4.2 × 10 9 /L (range 1.5–55.4). HE > 3.0 × 10 9 /L was demonstrated in 17 patients. 65 % of studied population had an increased serum IgE levels, whereas only 2 % demonstrated an increased serum vitamin B12 levels. A median bone marrow infiltration by eosinophils was 30.5 % (range 11–78.2). All treated patients responded promptly to CS and remained in complete remission while receiving low doses of CS (20 mg/day to 5 mg every 2-day). One patient developed hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) after 11 years of follow-up. Further studies are needed to define risk factors of HES development. The use of CS for HE us patients is controversial and should be individualized.

A 31-year-old man with a mitral bioprosthetic valve presented with recent worsening of exertional dyspnoea 7 years after the mitral valve replacement. Evaluation revealed an increased gradient across the thickened mitral bioprosthetic valve leaflets. Marked eosinophilia was present and was considered as a putative cause for bioprosthetic valve thrombosis. The treatment with systemic corticosteroids and oral anticoagulation led to complete resolution of symptoms with significant decrease in mitral bioprosthetic valve gradient and leaflet thinning. The case is reported to highlight the fact that eosinophilia may cause reversible bioprosthetic valve thrombosis.