Explore the vast range of titles available.

Palmar hyperhidrosis is common condition that is challenging to treat. Nonsurgical treatments include topical antiperspirants, iontophoresis, anticholinergic drugs and botulinum toxin injections. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ablative fractional laser therapy, combined with topically applied botulinum toxin versus its injection for the treatment of hyperhidrosis. This study included 40 patients with pimary hyperhydrosis divided into two groups. Group A ( n  = 20) diagnosed with primary axillary hyperhidrosis was further subdivided into 2 equal subgroups; for which was used fractional laser assisted drug delivery of botulinum toxin in right axilla and botulinum toxin injection in left axilla. Group B ( n  = 20) diagnosed with primary palmer hyperhidrosis was further subdivided into 2 equal subgroups; for which was used fractional laser assisted drug delivery of botulinum toxin in right palm and botulinum toxin injection in left palm. There was a statistically significant decrease in the hyperhidrosis disease severity scale (HDSS) in all subgroups after treatment as compared to before treatment. Following 3 months of treatment, the amount of sweat as detected by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was statistically significantly lower in the injection subgroup in both the axillary group ( p  = 0.075) and the palmer group ( p  < 0.001). The use of both botulinum toxin injection and laser assisted botulinum toxin drug delivery were associated with significant improvement in the manifestation, disease severity and quality of life in the cases with both axillary and palmer hyperhidrosis. Fractional CO 2 laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) represents a safe, minimally invasive procedure that enhances the delivery of BTX-A.

Primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH) is a challenging condition characterized by excessive underarm sweating. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved onabotulinum toxin A (OnaBTX-A, Botox ® , Allergan Inc, USA) as the only botulinum toxin treatment for severe axillary hyperhidrosis, and it has demonstrated positive results. Recently, the off-label use of letibotulinum toxin A (LetiBTX-A, Hugel ® , Hugel Inc, Korea) has risen significantly for cosmetic purposes due to its effectiveness. For the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis, the authors proposed that LetiBTX-A is at least as effective as OnaBTX-A. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of letibotulinum toxin A (LetiBTX-A) in comparison to onabotulinum toxin A (OnaBTX-A) for treating primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH). All participants with a diagnosis of moderate to severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis (Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score ≥ 2) received random injections of 50 U of LetiBTX-A in one armpit and 50 U of OnaBTX-A in the other site. HDSS score and hyperhidrosis area were measured by using the Minor’s iodine starch test. Participant satisfaction was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months following the injection. Onset of action and adverse events were also assessed. All 30 participants completed the study protocol, with the mean age was 34.44 ± 7.82 years and most of the participants were female. The mean age at onset was 20.47 ± 3.01 years and more than 50% of participants had a HDSS score of 3. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the reduction of HDSS scores, hyperhidrosis area, and participant satisfaction between the axillae treated with LetiBTX-A and those treated with OnaBTX-A at 1, 3 and 6 months after injections. The median onset of action of both LetiBTX-A and OnaBTX-A were 2 ± 1 day ( p  = 0.317). Procedure-related pain was comparable between 2 formulations ( P  = 0.876). No serious adverse event was observed. This study concluded that LetiBTX-A and OnaBTX-A demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles in treating primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH).

Background Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) is a topical anticholinergic approved in the USA for primary axillary hyperhidrosis in patients aged ≥ 9 years. GT was evaluated for primary axillary hyperhidrosis in replicate, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, phase III trials. GT reduced sweating severity and production versus vehicle and was generally well tolerated. Objective Our objective was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from these trials. Methods Patients aged ≥ 9 years with primary axillary hyperhidrosis ≥ 6 months, gravimetrically measured sweat production ≥ 50 mg/5 min in each axilla, Axillary Sweating Daily Diary (ASDD) Item 2 severity score ≥ 4, and Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score ≥ 3 were randomized 2:1 to GT 3.75% or vehicle applied once daily to each axilla for 4 weeks. The 4-item ASDD, 6 Weekly Impact (WI) items, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), HDSS, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were utilized. Results In the pooled population, 463 patients were randomized to GT and 234 to vehicle; 426 (92.0%) and 225 (96.2%) completed the trials. At baseline, most patients considered their axillary sweating to be at least moderate in severity, impact, and bothersomeness (ASDD items 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Improvement was substantially greater for GT than for vehicle at every study week, and, at week 4, ASDD scores improved from baseline by 62.6 versus 34.0% (severity), 65.5 versus 40.3% (impact), and 65.4 versus 39.0% (bothersomeness). Improvements favoring GT versus vehicle also occurred for WI items, PGIC, HDSS, and DLQI. Conclusions PRO results demonstrated that GT reduced the disease burden of primary axillary hyperhidrosis. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; ATMOS-1 (NCT02530281), ATMOS-2 (NCT02530294).

BackgroundBotulinum toxin type A is widely used to treat primary axillary hyperhidrosis and has proven to be an effective and safe approach. Onabotulinumtoxin A was approved by the FDA as a treatment for primary axillary hyperhidrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Neu-BoNT/A in subjects diagnosed with primary axillary hyperhidrosis. MethodsThe Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale, gravimetric measurement of sweat, and Global Assessment Scale were analyzed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 to determine the effect of treatment. Adverse events, physical examination, and vital signs were monitored. ResultsSubjects treated with Neu-BoNT/A showed statistically significant improvement by all 3 methods at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (P value = 0.00). There were no severe adverse events or significant changes in vital signs, physical examination, or laboratory tests.ConclusionNeu-BoNT/A can be effectively and safely used for primary axillary hyperhidrosis.Level of Evidence IIThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Hyperhidrosis is excessive sweating that affects patients' quality of life, resulting in social and work impairment and emotional distress. Primary hyperhidrosis is bilaterally symmetric, focal, excessive sweating of the axillae, palms, soles, or craniofacial region not caused by other underlying conditions. Secondary hyperhidrosis may be focal or generalized, and is caused by an underlying medical condition or medication use. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale is a validated survey used to grade the tolerability of sweating and its impact on quality of life. The score can be used to guide treatment. Topical aluminum chloride solution is the initial treatment in most cases of primary focal hyperhidrosis. Topical glycopyrrolate is first-line treatment for craniofacial sweating. Botulinum toxin injection (onabotulinumtoxinA) is considered first- or second-line treatment for axillary, palmar, plantar, or craniofacial hyperhidrosis. Iontophoresis should be considered for treating hyperhidrosis of the palms and soles. Oral anticholinergics are useful adjuncts in severe cases of hyperhidrosis when other treatments fail. Local microwave therapy is a newer treatment option for axillary hyperhidrosis. Local surgery and endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy should be considered in severe cases of hyperhidrosis that have not responded to topical or medical therapies.

Secondary hyperhidrosis is a multifactorial condition that poses unique diagnostic and management challenges. Distinguishing secondary from primary hyperhidrosis remains difficult due to overlapping symptoms. This review consolidates existing evidence on the numerous underlying causes and pathophysiologic mechanisms of secondary hyperhidrosis across various disciplines. Secondary hyperhidrosis typically manifests in the fourth decade of life or later, whereas primary hyperhidrosis usually begins earlier. Generalized hyperhidrosis often suggests a secondary cause, though the distribution can vary, including focal symmetric/asymmetric or regional patterns depending on the underlying condition. Key clinical features such as lack of family history and associated symptoms provide additional clues favoring a secondary etiology. Recognizing these distinct characteristics is crucial for accurate differentiation between secondary and primary hyperhidrosis, thereby guiding appropriate evaluation and management of the underlying cause.

Primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH) is a pathologic condition of excessive sweating on hands that has adverse impacts on patients' social activity, professional life, and psychological state. Endoscopic thoracic sympathicotomy (ETS) is by far the treatment choice for PPH with the most stable and durable curative effects, but special attention should be given to the side effects of the surgery, especially compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH). This consensus is the second version of the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Surgical Treatment of PPH by the China Expert Committee on Palmar Hyperhidrosis (CECPH), which was published 10 years ago. This consensus emphasizes the need for special attention and careful assessment of the patients' feelings, as well as their emotional and mental state, and emphasizes that distress due to palmar sweating and the desire for treatment are prerequisites for diagnosis. It also provides a more nuanced delineation of CH and reviews all new attempts to prevent and treat this side effect. New evidence of the epidemiology, pathogenesis of PPH, and indications for surgery were also assessed or recommended.

Primary hyperhidrosis (PH) is the presence of increased sweating in the absence of a physiological trigger or underlying identifiable pathological cause. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of primary hyperhidrosis on patients' quality of life in Damietta; one of Egypt's governorates. This cross sectional study included 302 patients aged between 8 and 35 years and fulfilling diagnostic criteria of primary hyperhidrosis. Data were collected using a hyperhidrosis quality of life index (HidroQoL) questionnaire and to assess the severity of hyperhidrosis (HH), we used the hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS). The majority of the participants had experienced some emotional sequelae as a result of the hyperhidrosis, and these were the most prevalent psychosocial domains of hyperhidrosis quality of life index. Patients were often very much embarrassed (57.6%) and were often nervous (51%) about sweat breaking out at any moment and very much frustrated (46.7%). Hyperhidrosis has a profound psycho-social impact on patients. Results demonstrated a significantly impactful and distressing illness that warrants equal attention as other more well-known skin conditions. Further multicenter large-scale and adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to provide an integrated approach for tackling the psychosocial impairment associated with hyperhidrosis.

To obtain current epidemiological information on primary focal hyperhidrosis in Japan, a large epidemiological survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire. The prevalence of primary focal hyperhidrosis was 10.0% and the site-specific prevalence was highest for primary axillary hyperhidrosis (5.9%). The proportion of respondents with primary focal hyperhidrosis who had consulted a physician was 4.6%, which was similar to the low prevalence reported previously in 2013 in Japan. A questionnaire survey for physicians and individuals with primary axillary hyperhidrosis on the current medical management of primary axillary hyperhidrosis showed that physicians recognized the existence of patients who were very worried about hyperhidrosis, but failed to provide active treatment. Regarding the information provided by patients to physicians at presentation, it was found that patients failed to provide sufficient information to the physicians about their worries in daily life. Among individuals who had sought medical care with primary axillary hyperhidrosis, 62.3% reported that they were not currently receiving treatment, highlighting a challenge to be addressed regarding continued treatment. Frequently chosen options leading to willingness to receive treatment were less expensive treatment and highly effective treatment as well as feeling free to consult a physician, suggesting a desire for an improved medical environment.

Background Negative pressure fractional microneedle radiofrequency (NPFMR) therapy has emerged as a potential minimally invasive treatment for axillary osmidrosis (AO), a condition characterized by persistent strong body odor from the armpit area. Methods This case study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of NPFMR for AO treatment. From January to September 2024, 30 patients with AO were recruited, with a gender distribution of 19 females and 11 males, aged 17–34 years (mean 23). AO was diagnosed based on the presence of strong armpit odor in the absence of significant hyperhidrosis. The severity of AO was classified into four grades. All patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-treatment. The efficacy and complications were recorded and assessed. Results The efficacy rates observed at 3 months and 6 months post-treatment were 83.67% and 76.67% respectively, with the efficacy rate remaining the same as that at 6 months after 1 year of follow-up. There were four cases of complications, At the 3-month follow-up, three patients developed punctate scars in the treated area, with the largest scar measuring 0.5 cm in diameter. One patient reported a numbness in their upper limb at the 3-month follow-up, which resolved after oral administration of mecobalamin at the 6-month follow-up. The total complication rate for this group was 13.3%. Conclusion NPFMR therapy demonstrates promising short-term efficacy for AO treatment. However, caution should be exercised due to potential complications, and comprehensive patient education is necessary. Longer-term follow-up studies are needed to evaluate the durability of the therapeutic effects and to monitor for any delayed adverse effects. Strategies for managing complications should also be explored to improve patient care outcomes.