Explore the vast range of titles available.

Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64). The progression of nephropathy from diagnosis of type 2 diabetes has not been well described from a single population. This study sought to describe the development and progression through the stages of microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria, persistently elevated plasma creatinine or renal replacement therapy (RRT), and death. Using observed and modeled data from 5097 subjects in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study, we measured the annual probability of transition from stage to stage (incidence), prevalence, cumulative incidence, ten-year survival, median duration per stage, and risk of death from all-causes or cardiovascular disease. From diagnosis of diabetes, progression to microalbuminuria occurred at 2.0% per year, from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria at 2.8% per year, and from macroalbuminuria to elevated plasma creatinine (≥175 μmol/L) or renal replacement therapy at 2.3% per year. Ten years following diagnosis of diabetes, the prevalence of microalbuminuria was 24.9%, of macroalbuminuria was 5.3%, and of elevated plasma creatinine or RRT was 0.8%. Patients with elevated plasma creatinine or RRT had an annual death rate of 19.2% (95% confidence interval, CI, 14.0 to 24.4%). There was a trend for increasing risk of cardiovascular death with increasing nephropathy (P < 0.0001), with an annual rate of 0.7% for subjects in the stage of no nephropathy, 2.0% for those with microalbuminuria, 3.5% for those with macroalbuminuria, and 12.1% with elevated plasma creatinine or RRT. Individuals with macroalbuminuria were more likely to die in any year than to develop renal failure. The proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who develop microalbuminuria is substantial with one quarter affected by 10 years from diagnosis. Relatively fewer patients develop macroalbuminuria, but in those who do, the death rate exceeds the rate of progression to worse nephropathy.

The impact of serum uric acid on cardiovascular outcomes in the LIFE study. The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study demonstrated the superiority of a losartan-based regimen over atenolol-based regimen for reduction of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. It has been suggested that the LIFE study results may be related to the effects of losartan on serum uric acid (SUA). SUA has been proposed as an independent risk factor for CV morbidity and death. Cox regression analysis was used to assess relationship of SUA and treatment regimens with the LIFE primary composite outcome (CV death, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke). Baseline SUA was significantly associated with increased CV events [hazard ratio (HR) 1.024 (95% CI 1.017–1.032) per 10 μmol/L, P < 0.0001] in the entire study population. The association was significant in women [HR = 1.025 (1.013–1.037), P < 0.0001], but not in men [HR = 1.009 (0.998–1.019), P = 0.108]. After adjustment for Framingham risk score (FRS), SUA was no longer significant in the entire study population [HR = 1.006 (0.998–1.014), P = 0.122] or in men [HR = 1.006 (0.995–1.017), P = 0.291], but was significant in women [HR = 1.013 (1–1.025), P = 0.0457]. The baseline-to-end-of-study increase in SUA (standard deviation, SD) was greater (P < 0.0001) in atenolol-treated subjects (44.4 ± 72.5 μmol/L) than in losartan-treated subjects (17.0 ± 69.8 μmol/L). SUA as a time-varying covariate was strongly associated with events (P < 0.0001) in the entire population. The contribution of SUA to the treatment effect of losartan on the primary composite end point was 29% (14%-107%), P = 0.004. The association between time-varying SUA and increased CV risk tended to be stronger in women (P < 0.0001) than in men (P = 0.0658), although the gender-outcome interaction was not significant (P = 0.079). The increase in SUA over 4.8years in the LIFE study was attenuated by losartan compared with atenolol treatment, appearing to explain 29% of the treatment effect on the primary composite end point. The association between SUA and events was stronger in women than in men with or without adjustment of FRS.

Cilnidipine, a dual L-/N-type calcium channel blocker, dilates both efferent and afferent arterioles and is renoprotective. Our multi-center, open-labeled, and randomized trial compared the antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine with that of amlodipine in hypertensive patients with kidney disease. A group of 339 patients, already receiving renin–angiotensin system inhibitor treatment, were randomly assigned to cilnidipine or amlodipine. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the urinary protein to creatinine ratio. After 1-year of treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced in both groups which did not differ between them. The urinary protein to creatinine ratio significantly decreased in the cilnidipine compared to the amlodipine group. Cilnidipine exerted a greater antiproteinuric effect than amlodipine even in the subgroup whose blood pressure fell below the target level. This study suggests that cilnidipine is superior to amlodipine in preventing the progression of proteinuria in hypertensive patients when coupled with a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor.

Mycophenolate mofetil in IgA nephropathy: Results of a 3-year prospective placebo-controlled randomized study. Because humoral immunity is believed to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a prospective placebo-controlled randomized study was started in patients with IgAN using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A total of 34 patients with IgAN were treated with salt intake restriction, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and MMF 2g per day (N = 21) or placebo (N = 13). After 36months of follow-up clinical, biochemical, and radiologic data were analyzed using linear mixed models for longitudinal data and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Therapy had to be stopped prematurely in five patients. Two patients (MMF group) evolved to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There was no difference between groups in the percentage of patients with a decrease of 25% or more in the inulin clearance or with a serum creatinine increase of 50% or more over 3years. There was also no significant difference between groups in annualized rate of change of serum creatinine, computed by linear regression analysis. No significant difference was noted between groups for inulin clearance, serum creatinine, proteinuria, blood pressure, or other parameters of renal function. Hemoglobin and C-reactive protein were significantly lower in the MMF group compared with the placebo group. As a function of time, a significant decline in both groups was noted of proteinuria, parenchymal thickness of the kidneys and C3d. In patients with IgAN at risk for progressive disease, no beneficial effect of 3-year treatment with MMF 2g per day could be demonstrated on renal function/outcome or proteinuria. However, larger randomized studies are needed to confirm or reject these results.

Background Fimasartan is the ninth angiotensin receptor blocker to be developed. However, it has not yet been evaluated for reno-protective effects in hypertensive diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). The target blood pressure (BP) for hypertensive diabetic CKD is also a controversial topic. This trial was designed to assess the reno-protective effects of fimasartan compared to those of losartan as a primary outcome. This study also compares the two drugs with regard to cardiovascular and renal outcomes in accordance with target systolic BP (SBP) (as secondary outcomes). Methods This study is a prospective, phase III, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority, four-parallel group, dose-titration, multicenter trial. We recruit patients with hypertensive diabetic CKD with overt proteinuria. Participants will be randomized into four groups (1:1:1:1): fimasartan standard SBP control (SBP < 140 mmHg); fimasartan strict SBP control (SBP < 130 mmHg); losartan standard SBP control; and losartan strict SBP control. After 24 weeks, all individuals are treated with fimasartan for an additional 120 weeks in an open-label design, maintaining their assigned SBP control groups as randomized. The primary endpoint is the rate of change in proteinuria, which is assessed using the spot urine albumin–creatinine ratio at 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints are the cardiovascular and renal outcomes at 144 weeks compared between the strict SBP and standard SBP control groups. Discussion The FANTASTIC is a clinical study to provide: (1) the reno-protective effect of fimasartan; and (2) the target BP to reduce adverse outcomes in hypertensive diabetic CKD with overt proteinuria. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02620306. Registered on 1 December 2015.

Beneficial impact of spironolactone in diabetic nephropathy. Aldosterone has been suggested to play a role in the initiation and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Currently recommended treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers [renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade] does not suppress circulating aldosterone sufficiently. We therefore aimed to evaluate the short-term effect of aldosterone antagonism with spironolactone on albuminuria and blood pressure in diabetic nephropathy. Twenty Caucasian type 1 diabetic patients with persistent macroalbuminuria despite antihypertensive treatment, including RAS blockade, completed this double-masked, randomized cross-over trial. Patients were treated in random order with spironolactone 25mg once daily and matched placebo for two months, respectively, on top of usual antihypertensive treatment. After each treatment period albuminuria, 24-hour blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined. Spironolactone on top of usual antihypertensive treatment induced a 30% (95% CI 17 to 41) reduction in albuminuria from [geometric mean (95% CI)] 831 (624 to 1106) mg/24-hour on placebo treatment (P < 0.001), and a reduction in fractional albumin clearance of 35% (20 to 46, P < 0.001). Twenty-four-hour blood pressure showed an insignificant reduction of [mean reduction (95% CI)] 8 (-1 to 17)/3 (-0.2 to 7) mm Hg (P < 0.10). There was an insignificant reversible reduction in GFR during treatment with spironolactone. On spironolactone treatment, one patient was excluded due to hyperkalemia (plasma potassium 5.7mmol/L) and one due to orthostatic dizziness. Otherwise treatment was well tolerated. Our results suggest that spironolactone treatment on top of recommended antihypertensive treatment reduces blood pressure and may offer additional renoprotection in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis (HD) treatment have a markedly shortened life expectancy in large part owing to cardiovascular disease (CVD), not explained by established risk factors. We tested the hypothesis that therapy with valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker and amlodipine, an antioxidant calcium channel blocker will reduce oxidative stress and the plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase. We confirmed that compared with age- and gender-matched healthy controls, ESRD patients have excessive oxidative stress and arginine methylation as indexed by elevated plasma levels of oxidation products of lipids (13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (13-HODE)), thiols (oxidized:reduced glutathione, oxidized glutathione (GSSG):GSH), proteins, and nucleic acids, and the methylation products ADMA and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA). We undertook a double blind, crossover study of equi-antihypertensive treatment with amlodipine and valsartan for 6 weeks each to test our hypothesis. Both treatments significantly reduced GSSG:GSH, 8-hydroxy 2-deoxyguanosine, ADMA, and SDMA levels and amlodipine reduced 13-HODE. We conclude that hypertensive patients with ESRD receiving HD have evidence of extensive oxidation of lipids, thiols, proteins, and nucleic acids and methylation of arginine that could contribute to CVD. Many of these changes can be reduced by short-term treatment with amlodipine and valsartan.

While the antihypertensive and renoprotective potency of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is well-established in adults with hypertension and/or chronic renal failure, little experience exists in pediatric chronic kidney disease. As part of a prospective assessment of the renoprotective efficacy of ACE inhibition and intensified blood pressure (BP) control, 397 children (ages 3 to 18 years) with chronic renal failure [CRF; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 11 to 80 mL/min/1.73 m2] and elevated or high-normal BP received ramipril (6 mg/m2) following a 6-month run-in period including a two-month washout of any previous ACE inhibitors. Drug efficacy was assessed by two monthly office BP and proteinuria assessments, and by ambulatory BP monitoring at start and after 6 months of treatment. In the 352 patients completing six months of treatment, 24-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP) had decreased by a mean of 11.5 mm Hg (-2.2 SDS) in initially hypertensive subjects, but only by 4.4 mm Hg (-0.8 SDS) in patients with initially normal BP. A linear correlation was found between MAP at baseline and the change of MAP during treatment (r= 0.51; P < 0.0001). The antihypertensive response was independent of changes in concomitant antihypertensive medication or underlying renal disease. BP was reduced with equal efficacy during day- and nighttime. Urinary protein excretion was reduced by 50% on average, with similar relative efficacy in patients with hypo/dysplastic nephropathies and glomerulopathies. The magnitude of proteinuria reduction depended on baseline proteinuria (r= 0.32, P < 0.0001), and was correlated with the antihypertensive efficacy of the drug (r= 0.22, P < 0.001). The incidence of rapid rises in serum creatinine and progression to end-stage CRF during treatment did not differ from the pretreatment observation period. Mean serum potassium increased by 0.3 mmol/L. Ramipril was discontinued in three patients due to symptomatic hypotension or hyperkalemia. Hemoglobin levels decreased by 0.6 g/dL in the first two treatment months and remained stable thereafter. Ramipril appears to be an effective and safe antihypertensive and antiproteinuric agent in children with CRF-associated hypertension. The BP lowering and antiproteinuric effects are greatest in severely hypertensive and proteinuric children.

Stratum 2 of the Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy (REIN) study has already shown that in patients with chronic nephropathies and proteinuria of 3 g or more per 24 h, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition reduced the rate of decline in glomerular filtration and halved the combined risk of doubling of serum creatinine or end-stage renal failure (ESRF) found in controls on placebo plus conventional antihypertensives. In REIN stratum 1, reported here, 24 h proteinuria was 1 g or more but less than 3 g per 24 h. In stratum 1 of this double-blind trial 186 patients were randomised to a ramipril or a control (placebo plus conventional antihypertensive therapy) group targeted at achieving a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg. The primary endpoints were change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and time to ESRF or overt proteinuria (⩾3 g/24 h). Median follow-up was 31 months. The decline in GFR per month was not significantly different (ramipril 0·26 [SE 0·05] mL per min per 1·73m2, control 0·29 [0·06]). Progression to ESRF was significantly less common in the ramipril group (9/99 vs 18/87) for a relative risk (RR) of 2·72 (95% CI 1·22–6·08); so was progression to overt proteinuria (15/99 vs 27/87, RR 2·40 [1·27–4·52]). Patients with a baseline GFR of 45 mL/min/1·73 m2 or less and proteinuria of 1·5 g/24 h or more had more rapid progression and gained the most from ramipril treatment. Proteinuria decreased by 13% in the ramipril group and increased by 15% in the controls. Cardiovascular events were similar. As expected, the rate of decline in GFR and the frequency of ESRF were much lower in stratum 1 than they had been in stratum 2. In non-diabetic nephropathies, ACE inhibition confers renoprotection even to patients with non-nephrotic proteinuria.

Renoprotective effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce angiotensin II formation and induce bradykinin accumulation. Animal studies suggest that bradykinin may play a role for the effects of ACE inhibition on blood pressure and kidney function. Therefore, we compared the renal and hemodynamic effects of specific intervention in the renin-angiotensin system by blockade of the angiotensin II subtype-1 receptor to the effect of ACE inhibition. A randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial was performed in 16 type 1 diabetic patients (10 men), age 42 ± 2 years (mean ± SEM). The study consisted of five periods, each lasting two months. The patients received losartan 50 mg, losartan 100 mg, enalapril 10 mg, enalapril 20 mg, and placebo in random order. At the end of each period, albuminuria, 24-hour blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined. Both doses of losartan and enalapril reduced albuminuria (P < 0.05) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP; P < 0.05), whereas GFR remained stable. Albuminuria was reduced by 33% (95% CI, 12 to 51) on losartan 50 mg, 44% (95% CI, 26 to 57) on losartan 100 mg, 45% (95% CI, 23 to 61) on enalapril 10 mg, and 59% (95% CI, 39 to 72) on enalapril 20 mg, and MABP fell by 9 ± 2, 8 ± 2, 6 ± 3, and 11 ± 3mm Hg (mean ± SEM), respectively. No significant differences were found between the effects of losartan 100 mg and enalapril 20 mg. HbA1C and sodium intake remained unchanged throughout the study, whereas a significant rise in serum potassium occurred during ACE inhibition. The angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist, losartan, reduces albuminuria and MABP similar to the effect of ACE inhibition. These results indicate that the reduction in albuminuria and blood pressure during ACE inhibition is primarily caused by interference in the renin-angiotensin system. Our study suggest that losartan represents a valuable new drug in the treatment of hypertension and proteinuria in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.