Explore the vast range of titles available.

Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) data have been widely used to analyze extreme precipitation, but the data have never been validated for the Indonesian Maritime Continent (IMC). This study evaluated the capability of IMERG Early (E), Late (L), and Final (F) data to observe extreme rain in the IMC using the rain gauge data within five years (2016–2020). The capability of IMERG in the observation of the extreme rain index was evaluated using Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) matrices. The IMERG well captured climatologic characteristics of the index of annual total precipitation (PRCPTOT), number of wet days (R85p), number of very wet days (R95p), number of rainy days (R1mm), number of heavy rain days (R10mm), number of very heavy rain days (R20mm), consecutive dry days (CDD), and max 5-day precipitation (RX5day), indicated by KGE value >0.4. Moderate performance (KGE = 0–0.4) was shown in the index of the amount of very extremely wet days (R99p), the number of extremely heavy precipitation days (R50mm), max 1-day precipitation (RX1day), and Simple Daily Intensity Index (SDII). Furthermore, low performance of IMERG (KGE < 0) was observed in the consecutive wet days (CWDs) index. Of the 13 extreme rain indices evaluated, IMERG underestimated and overestimated precipitation of nine and four indexes, respectively. IMERG tends to overestimate precipitation of indexes related to low rainfall intensity (e.g., R1mm). The highest overestimation was observed in the CWD index, related to the overestimation of light rainfall and the high false alarm ratio (FAR) from the daily data. For all indices of extreme rain, IMERG showed good capability to observe extreme rain variability in the IMC. Overall, IMERG-L showed a better capability than IMERG-E and -F but with an insignificant difference. Thus, the data of IMERG-E and IMERG-L, with a more rapid latency than IMERG-F, have great potential to be used for extreme rain observation and flood modeling in the IMC.

The new generation of weather observatory satellites, namely Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) constellation satellites, is the lead observatory of the 10 highly advanced earth orbiting weather research satellites. Indeed, GPM is the first satellite that has been designed to measure light rain and snowfall, in addition to heavy tropical rainfall. This work compares the final run of the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) product, the post real time of TRMM and Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA-3B42) and the Era-Interim product from the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) against the Iran Meteorological Organization (IMO) daily precipitation measured by the synoptic rain-gauges over four regions with different topography and climate conditions in Iran. Assessment is implemented for a one-year period from March 2014 to February 2015. Overall, in daily scale the results reveal that all three products lead to underestimation but IMERG performs better than other products and underestimates precipitation slightly in all four regions. Based on monthly and seasonal scale, in Guilan all products, in Bushehr and Kermanshah ERA-Interim and in Tehran IMERG and ERA-Interim tend to underestimate. The correlation coefficient between IMERG and the rain-gauge data in daily scale is far superior to that of Era-Interim and TMPA-3B42. On the basis of daily timescale of bias in comparison with the ground data, the IMERG product far outperforms ERA-Interim and 3B42 products. According to the categorical verification technique in this study, IMERG yields better results for detection of precipitation events on the basis of Probability of Detection (POD), Critical Success Index (CSI) and False Alarm Ratio (FAR) in those areas with stratiform and orographic precipitation, such as Tehran and Kermanshah, compared with other satellite/model data sets. In particular, for heavy precipitation (>15 mm/day), IMERG is superior to the other products in all study areas and could be used in future for meteorological and hydrological models, etc.

The evaluation of satellite precipitation products (SPPs) at regional and local scales is essential in improving satellite-based algorithms and sensors, as well as in providing valuable guidance when choosing alternative precipitation data for the local community. The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) has made significant contributions to the development of various SPPs since its launch in 1997. The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission launched in 2014 and is expected to continue the success of TRMM. During the transition from the TRMM era to the GPM era, it is necessary to assess GPM products and make comparisons with TRMM products in different regions to achieve a global view of the performance of GPM products. To this end, this study aims to assess the capability of the latest Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) and two TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) products (TMPA 3B42 and TMPA 3B42RT) in estimating precipitation over Singapore that represents a typical tropical region. The evaluation was conducted at daily, monthly, seasonal and annual scales from 1 April 2014 to 31 January 2016. The capability of SPPs in detecting rainy/non-rainy days and different precipitation classes was also evaluated. The findings showed that: (1) all SPPs correlated well with measurements from gauges at the monthly scale, but moderately at the daily scale; (2) SPPs performed better in the northeast monsoon season (1 December–15 March) than in the inter-monsoon 1 (16 March–31 May), southwest monsoon (1 June–30 September) and inter-monsoon 2 (1 October–30 November) seasons; (3) IMERG had better performance in the characterization of spatial precipitation variability and precipitation detection capability compared to the TMPA products; (4) for the daily precipitation estimates, IMERG had the lowest systematic bias, followed by 3B42 and 3B42RT; and (5) most of the SPPs overestimated moderate precipitation events (1–20 mm/day), while underestimating light (0.1–1 mm/day) and heavy (>20 mm/day) precipitation events. Overall, IMERG is superior but with only slight improvement compared to the TMPA products over Singapore. This study is one of the earliest assessments of IMERG and a comparison of it with TMPA products in Singapore. Our findings were compared with existing studies conducted in other regions, and some limitations of the IMERG and TMPA products in this tropical region were identified and discussed. This study provides an added value to the understanding of the global performance of the IMERG product.

Satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs) are essential for climate monitoring, especially in regions with sparse observational data. This study compares the performance of the latest version (V07B) and its predecessor (V06B) of the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) across South America and the adjacent oceans. It focuses on evaluating their accuracy under different precipitation regimes in Brazil using 22 years of IMERG Final data (2000–2021), aggregated into seasonal totals (summer, autumn, winter, and spring). The observations used for the evaluation were organized into 0.1° × 0.1° grid points to match IMERG’s spatial resolution. The analysis was restricted to grid points containing at least one rain gauge, and in cases where multiple gauges were present within a grid point the average value was used. The evaluation metrics included the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and categorical indices. The results reveal that while both versions effectively capture major precipitation systems such as the mesoscale convective system (MCS), South Atlantic Convergence Zone (SACZ), and Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), significant discrepancies emerge in high-rainfall areas, particularly over oceans and tropical zones. Over the continent, however, these discrepancies are reduced due to the correction of observations in the final version of IMERG. A comprehensive analysis of the RMSE across Brazil, both as a whole and within the five analyzed regions, without differentiating precipitation classes, demonstrates that version V07B effectively reduces errors compared to version V06B. The analysis of statistical indices across Brazil’s five regions highlights distinct performance patterns between IMERG versions V06B and V07B, driven by regional and seasonal precipitation characteristics. V07B demonstrates a superior performance, particularly in regions with intense rainfall (R1, R2, and R5), showing a reduced RMSE and improved categorical indices. These advancements are linked to V07B’s reduced overestimation in cold-top cloud regions, although both versions consistently overestimate at rain/no-rain thresholds and for light rainfall. However, in regions prone to underestimation, such as the interior of the Northeastern region (R3) during winter, and the northeastern coast (R4) during winter and spring, V07B exacerbates these issues, highlighting challenges in accurately estimating precipitation from warm-top cloud systems. This study concludes that while V07B exhibits notable advancements, further enhancements are needed to improve accuracy in underperforming regions, specifically those influenced by warm-cloud precipitation systems.

Evaluation of Global Precipitation Measurement‐Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrieval for GPM (GPM‐IMERG) final precipitation product is performed over Japan, Nepal, and Philippines regions against further improved APHRODITE‐2 V1801R1 product. The evolution is carried out for nearly two consecutive years 2014–2015. Various qualitative and quantitative statistical indices such as mean bias, root‐mean‐square error, correlation coefficient, false alarming ratio, and probability of detection are considered to evaluate GPM‐IMERG precipitation estimates with APHRODITE‐2. Intraseasonal variability of two products is shown to explore the seasonal dependency of GPM‐IMERG performance. The performance of GPM‐IMERG research product with respect to rainfall intensity is shown by the cumulative probability distribution of target and reference data sets. Percentile‐based statistics is implemented for evaluating the advantages of GPM‐IMERG over Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission‐3B42 while detecting the light and heavy rainfall events during wet/dry seasons. The overall performance of GPM‐IMERG seems to be good over Japan followed by Philippines and Nepal regions. This feature is clearly evidenced in terms of mean bias, root‐mean‐square error, and correlation magnitudes over three regions. GPM‐IMERG shows ability to follow the intraseasonal variability as shown by APHRODITE‐2 product with minor differences observed in precipitation maximum values during rainy season. Good agreement is seen between GPM‐IMERG and APHRODITE‐2 at different rainfall intensities except underestimation during heavy rainfall events. GPM‐IMERG seems to be improved in detecting light/heavy rainfall event magnitude than TRM‐3B42. However, the performance of both data sets encountered clear dependency on seasons. Key Points Evaluation of GPM‐IMERG final precipitation estimates was performed over Japan, Nepal, and Philippines with APHRODITE‐2 data Special focus is given to test the detecting ability of light/heavy rainfall events by IMERG GPM‐IMERG shows noticeable improvement over TRMM‐3B42; however, IMERG shows seasonal dependency in performance

Predicting rainfall-induced landslides hinges on the quality of the rainfall product. Satellite rainfall estimates or rainfall reanalyses aid in studying landslide occurrences especially in ungauged areas, or in the absence of ground-based rainfall radars. Quality of these rainfall estimates is critical; hence, they are commonly crosschecked with their ground-based counterparts. Beyond their temporal precision compared to ground-based observations, we investigate whether these rainfall estimates are adequate for hindcasting landslides, which particularly requires accurate representation of spatial variability of rainfall. We developed a logistic regression model to hindcast rainfall-induced landslides in two sites in Japan. The model contains only a few topographic and geologic predictors to leave room for different rainfall products to improve the model as additional predictors. By changing the input rainfall product, we compared GPM IMERG and ERA5 rainfall estimates with ground radar–based rainfall data. Our findings emphasize that there is a lot of room for improvement of spatiotemporal prediction of landslides, as shown by a strong performance increase of the models with the benchmark radar data attaining 95% diagnostic performance accuracy. Yet, this improvement is not met by global rainfall products which still face challenges in reliably capturing spatiotemporal patterns of precipitation events.

Understanding the nature and origin of errors in satellite precipitation products is important for applications and product improvement. Here we propose a new error decomposition scheme incorporating precipitation event (continuous rainy periods) information to characterize satellite errors. Under this framework, the errors are attributed to the inaccuracies in event occurrence, timing (event start/end time), and intensity. The Integrated MultisatellitE Retrieval for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) is used as our test product to apply the method over CONUS. The above‐listed factors contribute approximately 30%, 20%, and 50% to the total bias, respectively. Significant asymmetry exists in the temporal distribution of biases throughout events: early event endings cause threefold more precipitation amount bias than late event beginnings, while early event beginnings cause fourfold more bias than late event endings. Dominant contributors vary across seasons and regions. The proposed error decomposition provides insight into sources of error for improved retrievals. Plain Language Summary Satellite remote sensing offers unique capabilities to map global precipitation at daily to sub‐daily scales, important for hydrologic applications and decision‐making. However, inherent uncertainties and errors in satellite precipitation products necessitate a comprehensive understanding of their characteristics and sources for effective utilization and enhancement. Here, we propose a new event‐based error decomposition scheme to characterize satellite errors. This approach is based on the understanding that precipitation occurs as individual events (continuous rainy periods); hence, any quantitative inaccuracy in a satellite product can be attributed to the imperfect delineation of diverse event facets: (a) occurrence (completely missed/falsely detected events), (b) timing (wrong start/end times of the detected events), and (c) intensity (inaccurate precipitation rates during the events). We apply the method to a popular high‐resolution satellite product, the Integrated MultisatellitE Retrieval for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) over CONUS. Results show that, nationwide, the above three error types contribute on average about 30%, 20%, and 50% to the total bias, respectively. A large fraction of errors is associated with events starting/ending too early in the satellite product. Dominant error types are season‐ and region‐dependent. The event‐based error breakdown offers potential to diagnose error sources and guide algorithm improvement for satellite precipitation products. Key Points A new event‐based error decomposition scheme for satellite precipitation products is proposed, dividing the total bias into 10 components Inaccuracies in event occurrence, timing, and intensity contribute on average to about 30%, 20%, and 50% of the total amount bias A large fraction of errors is associated with events starting/ending too early in the satellite product

Satellite precipitation products provide alternative precipitation data in mountain areas. This study aimed to assess the performance of the latest Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) version 5 (IMERG V5) and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation version 7 (GSMaP V7) products and their hydrological utilities over the Tibetan Plateau (TP). Here, two IMERG Final Run products (uncalibrated IMERG (IMERG-UC) and gauge-calibrated IMERG (IMEEG-C)) and two GSMaP products (GSMaP Moving Vector with Kalman Filter (GSMaP-MVK) and gauge-adjusted GSMaP (GSMaP-Gauge)) were evaluated from April 2014 to March 2017. Results show that all four satellite precipitation products could generally capture the spatial patterns of precipitation over the TP. The two gauge-adjusted products were more consistent with the ground measurements than the satellite-only products in terms of statistical assessment. For hydrological simulation, IMERG-UC and GSMaP-MVK showed unsatisfactory performance for hydrological utility, while GSMaP-Gauge demonstrated comparable performance with gauge reference data, suggesting that GSMaP-Gauge can be selected for hydrological application in the TP. Our study also indicates that accurately measuring light rainfall and winter snow is still a challenging task for the current satellite precipitation retrievals.

The constellation approach underpinning precipitation products such as the Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) is key to achieving high resolution, but the use of data from multiple sources can unintentionally incorporate instrumental artifacts. Here, we introduce a machine learning–based anomaly detection scheme called SPEEDe, which processes a two‐dimensional precipitation field into a re‐estimated precipitation field that can be compared with the input. Large differences identify IMERG fields with bad orbit data, separating most of the bad cases from the good cases. When modified to process the passive microwave inputs, SPEEDe can pick out orbits with bad data, enabling quality control on these IMERG inputs. SPEEDe works by producing a locally realistic‐looking precipitation field when given unphysical data, which results in a larger‐than‐normal difference between the input and the output. SPEEDe is implemented as an automated quality control for GPM precipitation products. Plain Language Summary A machine learning–based scheme, SPEEDe, has been developed to identify bad data in satellite precipitation products. This scheme is able to pick out precipitation maps that have unrealistic patterns better than a conventional approach based on the distribution of values. It can be run as the precipitation data are being produced, thus allowing for automated quality control. Avoiding manual intervention is important in computing quality‐controlled precipitation data in near‐real time for applications such as flood monitoring that require highly reliable data with minimal delay. Key Points A machine learning scheme called SPEEDe can detect artifacts in satellite precipitation fields based on an aggregate grid‐wide score SPEEDe identifies bad data by modifying anomalous inputs substantially to produce realistic‐looking outputs, leading to a large score SPEEDe is being applied operationally in GPM data production for quality control

The performance of the latest released Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM mission (IMERG) version 5 (IMERG v5) and the TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis 3B42 version 7 (3B42 v7) are evaluated and compared at multiple temporal scales over a semi-humid to humid climate transition area (Huaihe River basin) from 2015 to 2017. The impacts of rainfall rate, latitude and elevation on precipitation detection skills are also investigated. Results indicate that both satellite estimates showed a high Pearson correlation coefficient (r, above 0.89) with gauge observations, and an overestimation of precipitation at monthly and annual scales. Mean daily precipitation of IMERG v5 and 3B42 v7 display a consistent spatial pattern, and both characterize the observed precipitation distribution well, but 3B42 v7 tends to markedly overestimate precipitation over water bodies. Both satellite precipitation products overestimate rainfalls with intensity ranging from 0.5 to 25 mm/day, but tend to underestimate light (0–0.5 mm/day) and heavy (>25 mm/day) rainfalls, especially for torrential rains (above 100 mm/day). Regarding each gauge station, the IMERG v5 has larger mean r (0.36 for GPM, 0.33 for TRMM) and lower mean relative root mean square error (RRMSE, 1.73 for GPM, 1.88 for TRMM) than those of 3B42 v7. The higher probability of detection (POD), critical success index (CSI) and lower false alarm ratio (FAR) of IMERG v5 than those of 3B42 v7 at different rainfall rates indicates that IMERG v5 in general performs better in detecting the observed precipitations. This study provides a better understanding of the spatiotemporal distribution of accuracy of IMERG v5 and 3B42 v7 precipitation and the influencing factors, which is of great significance to hydrological applications.