Explore the vast range of titles available.

Sweden has been known for having one of the most equal income distributions in the world. However, in recent decades, Sweden has experienced increasing income inequality. An alternative way of measuring the development of inequality is to study and compare the income development within and between two birth cohorts according to gender and different positions of income distribution. The focus in this paper is to study how individual disposable personal income has changed by aging and at various positions of the income distribution, as well as the gender disposable income gap and intragenerational income mobility. Three positions of the income distribution were chosen: percentile 10; median; and percentile 99. Two cohorts, including all individuals born in 1948 and 1958, were tracked from 35 years of age to 53 years of age – with two 18-year overlapping periods, 1983–2000, and 1993–2010. The results show a complex and multifaceted image of the development of income inequality and mobility, within and between the two birth cohorts. Especially male low-income earners, born 1958, have been left behind. Income mobility differ according to gender where women have increased mobility in the bottom quintile and decreased in the top quintile, men experienced the opposite. When modelling mobility education have decreased to contribute to an upward mobility, especial for cohort born 1958. Taking all the results together, the development of increasing income inequality in Sweden is apparent.

Background Late‐stage diagnosis of oral cavity cancer (OCC) often results from diagnostic delays due to healthcare access limitations or financial barriers. This study investigates how area‐level (“place”) and individual‐level (“pocketbook”) income influence the stage at OCC diagnosis. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed data on patients diagnosed with OCC between 2010 and 2013 sourced from Taiwan's National Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance databases. The primary outcome was late‐stage diagnosis, defined as those initially diagnosed at stage III or IV. Multivariable analyses were conducted to estimate the association between area‐level, individual‐level, and late‐stage diagnosis. Results This study included 16,652 incident OCC patients, with 6639 (39.9%) diagnosed at a late stage and 10,013 (60.1%) at an early stage. Patients with low individual incomes residing in low‐income areas had 1.48 times higher odds (95% CI = 1.09 to 2.00, p = 0.011) of late‐stage diagnosis compared to high‐income patients in high‐income areas. High‐income patients; however, in low‐income areas had 1.34 times higher odds (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.71, p = 0.02) to be diagnosed at a late stage compared to high‐income patients in high‐income areas. Conclusions While area‐level income plays a significant role in late‐stage OCC diagnosis, higher individual income does not fully protect against late‐stage diagnosis in low‐income areas.

Objective This article evaluates whether the federal marriage tax penalty (penalty) or federal marriage bonus (bonus) affects the marriage decisions of same‐sex couples (SSCs). Background Extant studies provide limited, mixed evidence that the penalty has a nominal economic effect on different‐sex couples' marriage decisions. No evidence exists indicating that the marriage bonus impacts couples' marriage decisions. We use the 2013 federal recognition of same‐sex marriage (SSM) to explore whether the penalty or bonus influences SSCs' marriage decisions. Method To examine the penalty or bonus influence, a difference‐in‐differences regression compares how the 2013 federal recognition of SSM (which imposes the penalty on SSCs) influenced the marriage–penalty and marriage–bonus relation for SSCs. We obtain household level data for 2012–2016 from American Community Survey's Public Use Microdata Sample and use the National Bureau of Economic Research tax simulation model to estimate each household's penalty or bonus. Results Our evidence indicates that the penalty is negatively related to SSCs' marriage decisions only after 2013. Overall, a 1% increase in the penalty as a percentage of household income reduces the odds of marriage by up to 6.41%. In contrast, we do not find consistent evidence that the bonus effectively encourages marriage. Conclusion Our results indicate that only the marriage tax penalty has an economically significant effect on SSCs' marriage decisions.

The increase in nonrenewable energy (non-RE) has been a growing concern for low-income individuals’ quality of life, health, economy, and environment. At the same time, the use of non-RE is also a great concern for the whole population as we are breathing the same environment. The photovoltaics (PV) solar panel is one solution to decrease low-income individuals’ energy bills and increase the quality of life of all individuals. Knowing the behavioral theory of why low-income individuals do not adopt PV would allow further insights and possible interventions to help low-income individuals install PV. Research has found that low-income individuals are more likely to have financial and knowledge barriers that hinder them from installing PV. Providing a way for low-income individuals to combat these barriers would help them to use PV. This review showed that low-income individuals are likely to benefit from policy programs that incentivize them to use PV. More knowledge about PV can also be aided by policy programs that inform low-income individuals how to save financially and at the same time work their way to install PV. Social groups could also be formed in the same policy programs to help low-income individuals share strategies on saving financially and knowledge about the benefit of installing PV. These social groups can act as a social reinforcement to low-income individuals to install PV. Helping low-income individuals to install PV would help low-income individuals financially and improve the population’s quality of life.

Background Low income has been associated with a higher risk of transportation-related injury however, previous studies have largely relied on area-level income, due to the limited availability of individual-level data. Methods To examine the independent and combined roles of individual- and area-level income, this prospective cohort study followed ~ 6,557,000 Canadians from the Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts (2006, 2011, 2016), for pedestrian, bicycling, or motor vehicle hospitalizations. Income was measured (1) individually by the low-income cut-off and (2) at the area level using neighbourhood income quintiles. Poisson regression estimated the incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for transportation-related hospitalizations. Results After adjusting for covariates, low-income individuals had higher risks of hospitalizations for pedestrian (IRR = 1.93, 95%CI (1.62, 2.29)), bicycling (IRR = 1.16, 95%CI (1.01, 1.34)) and motor vehicle injuries (IRR = 1.18, 95%CI (1.06, 1.31)). When both individual and neighbourhood income were assessed together we estimated, that those who lived in the lowest income neighbourhoods (compared to the highest) had a higher risk of pedestrian (IRR = 1.80, 95%CI (1.51, 2.14)) and motor vehicle injury (IRR = 1.33, 95%CI (1.22, 1.42)) but lower risk of bicycling injury (IRR = 0.73, 95%CI (0.65, 0.81)). Conclusions The interaction between individual and neighbourhood income revealed an increased injury risk for low-income individuals in all neighbourhoods, with large inequities in pedestrian and motor vehicle injury risk persisting even in the highest-income neighbourhoods. These findings demonstrate individual income independently contributes to transportation injury risk, underscoring the importance of considering both individual- and area-level income.

The economic results of the development of Muslim countries have raised the question of the existence of an increasingly focused Islamic financial and tax model. Taxes in the Islamic economic model provide an implicit link in the relations between the state and individuals, thus determining the limits of conditioned freedom and mutual obligations. The article is aimed at identifying the indicative features of progressive taxation of individual income in some Islamic countries. The research results show that Islamic countries are characterized by the unity of religion (faith) and such elements of the social system as the organization of power, as well as family, economic and other relations. The boundaries of the personal and the public, the individual and the national are transparent and strictly regulated. The peculiarities of the Tax Institute in Muslim countries, terms of taxation and tax usage rules are considered. It is proven that nowadays approaches to taxation in Islamic countries are diverse. It is determined that progressive taxation of individual income is widely used in Turkey, Pakistan, Tunisia, Indonesia, Nigeria, and other countries, and partly in Saudi Arabia; \"tax heavens\" are typical for the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Omani; proportional taxation is still used in Malaysia, Sudan, and Kazakhstan. The main types of taxes in Muslim countries are analyzed, their evolution is studied. Modern foci of progressive taxation of individual incomes in specific Muslim countries are revealed. The advantages of the Islamic financial model in terms of tax policy modernization and compliance with tax discipline, unconditional fulfillment of obligations and concluded agreements are identified. It is substantiated that using some elements of the progressive tax scale applied in the practice of Islamic finance can prove useful in a number of areas, providing budgetary and social balance in the \"corridor of opportunities\", bringing mutual responsibility of citizens and the state in fulfilling obligations, creating an annuity and mutually beneficial economic behavior pattern. It is proved that the progressive tax withdrawal of a part of large incomes will give a restrictive and restraining result of control over their redistribution in the public interest, as the socio-economic behavior of individuals, their powers and responsibilities must be balanced.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) devotes substantial resources to audit tax returns of earned income tax credit (EITC) claimants, but little is known about the deterrence effect of these audits. Our paper examines the impact of this tax enforcement on subsequent individual taxpaying among those who claimed an EITC. Using evidence from randomized IRS audits during the 2006–2009 period, we find that EITC participants who are audited show much larger increases in reported income in subsequent years, both compared to a control group of EITC filers and compared to audited filers who were not EITC claimants. We find behavioral impacts on the extensive margin as well, with the probability of a filer claiming an EITC dropping by over 6 percentage points within four years following the audit, as well as changes in filing status and the reported number of dependents.

BackgroundThe Nutri-Score, a front-of-pack nutrition label, has been adopted in 2017 in France but its impact on low-income populations is unknown, and they are more at risk of having unhealthy diets. The present study assessed the effects of the Nutri-Score on the nutritional quality of purchasing intentions among low-income individuals, compared with the current French labelling situation: references intakes (RIs) and no label, using a three-arm parallel-group randomised controlled trial.MethodsLow-income active adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort (household income below €1200/month) were asked to perform a shopping task in an experimental online supermarket after being randomised in one of the three conditions (Nutri-Score, RIs or no labelling). The main outcome was the overall nutritional quality of the virtual shopping cart, assessed with the French-modified Food Standards Agency Nutrient Profiling System (FSAm-NPS), and secondary outcomes were the nutrient content of the shopping carts. 524 subjects were randomised, and 336 included in the analyses.ResultsThe Nutri-Score resulted in the highest overall nutritional quality of the shopping cart, as reflected by a FSAm-NPS score (1.86 (SD 3.59) points) significantly lower (reflecting higher nutritional quality) than the RIs (3.21 (SD 4.14) points, p≤0.05) but not significantly lower than no label (2.60 (SD 3.09) points, p=0.3). The Nutri-Score also resulted into significantly lower contents in calories and saturated fatty acids in the shopping cart, compared with the RIs only (p≤0.05).ConclusionThe implementation of the front of pack nutrition label Nutri-Score, adopted in France and in different European countries, appears to have the potential to encourage purchasing intentions of foods from higher nutritional quality among low-income individuals, compared with the RIs label promoted by food manufacturers.Trial registration number: NCT02769455

This study provides new evidence about the effects of income on population health. To do so, our first research question controls for the absolute income hypothesis: Has the recent deterioration of individual income had as a result a lower health status in population across European countries? We assume, as the bulk of the associated studies have found, that the lower the income of an individual, the lower his/her health status. Our second research objective is to examine the validity of the relative income hypothesis. To shed light on this issue, we test two different questions: What is the relationship between an individual’s health status and a country’s wealth and how self-rated health is associated with the degree of income inequality in a society? We expect that the population in wealthier countries report higher health status and individuals who live in countries with higher income inequalities report lower health status. By employing a multilevel binomial model and treating data from the latest European Social Survey Round 8 (2016/2017) from 23 countries in Europe, we have found strong evidence in favor of the above-mentioned hypotheses.

Recent research highlights the importance of academic achievement as a determinant of economic well-being. Individual earnings, income growth in states, and national growth rates for GDP are each significantly determined by the population’s cognitive skills, which in turn are proxied by scores on standardized achievement tests. This well-documented relationship between education and economic outcomes underscores the importance of using test information to guide both school policy and school operations. While test-based accountability has been controversial, scientific evidence about the economic value of school improvement and about the efficacy of various accountability approaches points to holding schools and teachers accountable for their contributions to the academic performance of students.