Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
14,136
result(s) for
"Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted"
Sort by:
Convolutional neural networks for medical image processing applications
\"With the development of technology, living standards rise and people's expectations increase. This situation makes itself felt strikingly especially in the medical field. The use of medical devices is rapidly increasing to protect human health. It is very important to quickly evaluate the images obtained from these medical imaging devices. For this purpose, artificial intelligence (AI) methods are used. While hand-crafted methods were preferred in the past, more advanced methods are preferred today. CNN architectures are one of the most effective AI methods today. This book contains applications for the use of CNN methods for medical applications. The content of the book, in which different CNN methods are applied to various medical image processing problems, is quite extensive. Readers will be able to comprehensively analyze the effects of CNN methods presented in the book on medical applications\"-- Provided by publisher.
Deep learning shows the capability of high-level computer-aided diagnosis in malignant lymphoma
by
Yonezawa, Sho
,
Matsuda, Kotaro
,
Yoshimura, Takuro
in
13/56
,
631/1647/245/2226
,
631/67/1990/291/1621/1915
2020
A pathological evaluation is one of the most important methods for the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma. A standardized diagnosis is occasionally difficult to achieve even by experienced hematopathologists. Therefore, established procedures including a computer-aided diagnosis are desired. This study aims to classify histopathological images of malignant lymphomas through deep learning, which is a computer algorithm and type of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. We prepared hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides of a lesion area from 388 sections, namely, 259 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 89 with follicular lymphoma, and 40 with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, and created whole slide images (WSIs) using a whole slide system. WSI was annotated in the lesion area by experienced hematopathologists. Image patches were cropped from the WSI to train and evaluate the classifiers. Image patches at magnifications of ×5, ×20, and ×40 were randomly divided into a test set and a training and evaluation set. The classifier was assessed using the test set through a cross-validation after training. The classifier achieved the highest levels of accuracy of 94.0%, 93.0%, and 92.0% for image patches with magnifications of ×5, ×20, and ×40, respectively, in comparison to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. Comparing the diagnostic accuracies between the proposed classifier and seven pathologists, including experienced hematopathologists, using the test set made up of image patches with magnifications of ×5, ×20, and ×40, the best accuracy demonstrated by the classifier was 97.0%, whereas the average accuracy achieved by the pathologists using WSIs was 76.0%, with the highest accuracy reaching 83.3%. In conclusion, the neural classifier can outperform pathologists in a morphological evaluation. These results suggest that the AI system can potentially support the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma.
This study aims to classify histopathological images of malignant lymphoma through deep learning. The classifier achieved the high levels of accuracy in comparison to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, which were higher than those of pathologists. Artificial intelligence can potentially support diagnosis of malignant lymphoma.
Journal Article
Deep-learning-based accurate hepatic steatosis quantification for histological assessment of liver biopsies
2020
Hepatic steatosis droplet quantification with histology biopsies has high clinical significance for risk stratification and management of patients with fatty liver diseases and in the decision to use donor livers for transplantation. However, pathology reviewing processes, when conducted manually, are subject to a high inter- and intra-reader variability, due to the overwhelmingly large number and significantly varying appearance of steatosis instances. This process is challenging as there is a large number of overlapped steatosis droplets with either missing or weak boundaries. In this study, we propose a deep-learning-based region-boundary integrated network for precise steatosis quantification with whole slide liver histopathology images. The proposed model consists of two sequential steps: a region extraction and a boundary prediction module for foreground regions and steatosis boundary prediction, followed by an integrated prediction map generation. Missing steatosis boundaries are next recovered from the predicted map and assembled from adjacent image patches to generate results for the whole slide histopathology image. The resulting steatosis measures both at the pixel level and steatosis object-level present strong correlation with pathologist annotations, radiology readouts and clinical data. In addition, the segregated steatosis object count is shown as a promising alternative measure to the traditional metrics at the pixel level. These results suggest a high potential of artificial intelligence-assisted technology to enhance liver disease decision support using whole slide images.
Accurate quantification of steatosis in liver biopsies is a key step in the treatment of patients with fatty liver diseases. To assist pathologists for such analysis tasks, we develop a novel deep learning-based framework to segment overlapped steatosis droplets in whole slide liver biopsy images. Quantitative measurements of steatosis at both pixel and object-level present strong correlation with clinical data, suggesting its potential for clinical decision support.
Journal Article
Data mining in biomedical imaging, signaling, and systems
\"Data mining has rapidly emerged as an enabling, robust, and scalable technique to analyze data for novel patterns, trends, anomalies, structures, and features that can be employed for a variety of biomedical and clinical domains. Approaching the techniques and challenges of image mining from a multidisciplinary perspective, this book presents data mining techniques, methodologies, algorithms, and strategies to analyze biomedical signals and images. Written by experts, the text addresses data mining paradigms for the development of biomedical systems. It also includes special coverage of knowledge discovery in mammograms and emphasizes both the diagnostic and therapeutic fields of eye imaging\"--Provided by publisher.
Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging
2017
Objectives
To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of reduced-dose (RD) contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) with standard-dose (SD) CECT for detection of low-contrast liver lesions.
Methods
Seventy adults with non-liver primary malignancies underwent abdominal SD-CECT immediately followed by RD-CECT, aggressively targeted at 60-70 % dose reduction. SD series were reconstructed using FBP. RD series were reconstructed with FBP, ASIR, and MBIR (Veo). Three readers—blinded to clinical history and comparison studies—reviewed all series, identifying liver lesions ≥4 mm. Non-blinded review by two experienced abdominal radiologists—assessing SD against available clinical and radiologic information—established the reference standard.
Results
RD-CECT mean effective dose was 2.01 ± 1.36 mSv (median, 1.71), a 64.1 ± 8.8 % reduction. Pooled per-patient performance data were (sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV/accuracy) 0.91/0.78/0.60/0.96/0.81 for SD-FBP compared with RD-FBP 0.79/0.75/0.54/0.91/0.76; RD-ASIR 0.84/0.75/0.56/0.93/0.78; and RD-MBIR 0.84/0.68/0.49/0.92/0.72. ROC AUC values were 0.896/0.834/0.858/0.854 for SD-FBP/RD-FBP/RD-ASIR/RD-MBIR, respectively. RD-FBP (
P
= 0.002) and RD-MBIR (
P
= 0.032) AUCs were significantly lower than those of SD-FBP; RD-ASIR was not (
P
= 0.052). Reader confidence was lower for all RD series (
P
< 0.001) compared with SD-FBP, especially when calling patients entirely negative.
Conclusions
Aggressive CT dose reduction resulted in inferior diagnostic performance and reader confidence for detection of low-contrast liver lesions compared to SD. Relative to RD-ASIR, RD-FBP showed decreased sensitivity and RD-MBIR showed decreased specificity.
Key Points
•
Reduced-dose CECT demonstrates inferior diagnostic performance for detecting low-contrast liver lesions
.
•
Reader confidence is lower with reduced-dose CECT compared to standard-dose CECT
.
•
Overly aggressive dose reduction may result in misdiagnosis, regardless of reconstruction algorithm
.
•
Careful consideration of perceived risks versus benefits of dose reduction is crucial
.
Journal Article
Rapid Validation of Whole-Slide Imaging for Primary Histopathology Diagnosis
by
Chen, Stephanie J
,
Robinson, Robert A
,
Walhof, Mackenzie L
in
COVID-19 - epidemiology
,
COVID-19 - prevention & control
,
Double-Blind Method
2021
Abstract
Objectives
The ongoing global severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic necessitates adaptations in the practice of surgical pathology at scale. Primary diagnosis by whole-slide imaging (WSI) is a key component that would aid departments in providing uninterrupted histopathology diagnosis and maintaining revenue streams from disruption. We sought to perform rapid validation of the use of WSI in primary diagnosis meeting recommendations of the College of American Pathologists guidelines.
Methods
Glass slides from clinically reported cases from 5 participating pathologists with a preset washout period were digitally scanned and reviewed in settings identical to typical reporting. Cases were classified as concordant or with minor or major disagreement with the original diagnosis. Randomized subsampling was performed, and mean concordance rates were calculated.
Results
In total, 171 cases were included and distributed equally among participants. For the group as a whole, the mean concordance rate in sampled cases (n = 90) was 83.6% counting all discrepancies and 94.6% counting only major disagreements. The mean pathologist concordance rate in sampled cases (n = 18) ranged from 90.49% to 97%.
Conclusions
We describe a novel double-blinded method for rapid validation of WSI for primary diagnosis. Our findings highlight the occurrence of a range of diagnostic reproducibility when deploying digital methods.
Journal Article
Human brain anatomy in computerized images
by
Damasio, Hanna
in
Brain
,
Brain -- anatomy & histology -- Atlases
,
Brain -- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Atlases
2005
This book provides an atlas of the normal human brain based on three dimensional reconstructions of magnetic resonance scans obtained in normal living adults as well as neurological patients with focal brain lesions. It provides detailed descriptions of sulci and gyri and illustrates how they appear in different brains. The book shows how different slice orientations obtained in the same brain produce different images that can be anatomically misinterpreted, in normal brains as well as brains with lesions. The book also addresses quantitative differences between the human brain and the brains of apes; gray and white matter differences between the hemispheres; and differences related to gender, age, and congenital deafness.
Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?
2023
Objectives
To compare the image quality and hepatic metastasis detection of low-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with full-dose filtered back projection (FBP)/iterative reconstruction (IR).
Methods
A contrast-detail phantom consisting of low-contrast objects was scanned at five CT dose index levels (10, 6, 3, 2, and 1 mGy). A total of 154 participants with 305 hepatic lesions who underwent abdominal CT were enrolled in a prospective non-inferiority trial with a three-arm design based on phantom results. Data sets with full dosage (13.6 mGy) and low dosages (9.5, 6.8, or 4.1 mGy) were acquired from two consecutive portal venous acquisitions, respectively. All images were reconstructed with FBP (reference), IR (control), and DLIR (test). Eleven readers evaluated phantom data sets for object detectability using a two-alternative forced-choice approach. Non-inferiority analyses were performed to interpret the differences in image quality and metastasis detection of low-dose DLIR relative to full-dose FBP/IR.
Results
The phantom experiment showed the dose reduction potential from DLIR was up to 57% based on the reference FBP dose index. Radiation decreases of 30% and 50% resulted in non-inferior image quality and hepatic metastasis detection with DLIR compared to full-dose FBP/IR. Radiation reduction of 70% by DLIR performed inferiorly in detecting small metastases (< 1 cm) compared to full-dose FBP (difference: −0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.178 to 0.047) and full-dose IR (difference: −0.123; 95% CI: −0.182 to 0.053) (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusion
DLIR enables a 50% dose reduction for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases while maintaining comparable image quality to full-dose FBP and IR.
Key Points
•
Non-inferiority study showed that deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) can reduce the dose to oncological patients with low-contrast lesions without compromising the diagnostic information.
• Radiation dose levels for DLIR can be reduced to 50% of full-dose FBP and IR for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases, while maintaining comparable image quality.
• The reduction of radiation by 70% by DLIR is clinically acceptable but insufficient for detecting small low-contrast hepatic metastases (< 1 cm).
Journal Article
CT iterative reconstruction algorithms: a task-based image quality assessment
2020
PurposeTo assess the dose performance in terms of image quality of filtered back projection (FBP) and two generations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms developed by the most common CT vendors.Materials and methodsWe used four CT systems equipped with a hybrid/statistical IR (H/SIR) and a full/partial/advanced model-based IR (MBIR) algorithms. Acquisitions were performed on an ACR phantom at five dose levels. Raw data were reconstructed using a standard soft tissue kernel for FBP and one iterative level of the two IR algorithm generations. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and the task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed. A detectability index (d′) was computed to model the detection task of a large mass in the liver (large feature; 120 HU and 25-mm diameter) and a small calcification (small feature; 500 HU and 1.5-mm diameter).ResultsWith H/SIR, the highest values of d′ for both features were found for Siemens, then for Canon and the lowest values for Philips and GE. For the large feature, potential dose reductions with MBIR compared with H/SIR were − 35% for GE, − 62% for Philips, and − 13% for Siemens; for the small feature, corresponding reductions were − 45%, − 78%, and − 14%, respectively. With the Canon system, a potential dose reduction of − 32% was observed only for the small feature with MBIR compared with the H/SIR algorithm. For the large feature, the dose increased by 100%.ConclusionThis multivendor comparison of several versions of IR algorithms allowed to compare the different evolution within each vendor. The use of d′ is highly adapted and robust for an optimization process.Key Points• The performance of four CT systems was evaluated by using imQuest software to assess noise characteristic, spatial resolution, and lesion detection.• Two task functions were defined to model the detection task of a large mass in the liver and a small calcification.• The advantage of task-based image quality assessment for radiologists is that it does not include only complicated metrics, but also clinically meaningful image quality.
Journal Article