Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this single-group, phase 2 study, the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan resulted in a response in 60% of women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer who had received a median of six previous lines of therapy. The drug was associated with myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity; interstitial lung disease was reported in 13.6% of the patients.

Background Current guidelines recommend that patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receive sequentially two antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs): Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), despite a similar payload. However, the effectiveness of one after another is unknown. Methods ADC-Low is a multicentre, retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of SG and T-DXd, one after another, with or without intermediary lines of chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-low MBC. Results One hundred and seventy-nine patients were included: the majority with HR-negative tumours received SG first (ADC1) ( n  = 100/108) while most with HR-positive tumours received T-DXd first ( n  = 56/71). Median progression-free survival 2 was short: 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.4–3.3) in the whole population, respectively, 3.1 (95% CI: 2.6–3.6) and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.9–2.7) for patients receiving T-DXd or SG second (ADC2). Intermediary lines of chemotherapy between ADC1 and ADC2 had no impact. Primary resistance to ADC2 occurred in 54.4% of patients. Certain patients showed initial response to ADC2. Conclusions Clinical benefit of sequentially administered SG and T-DXd is limited for most patients. Nevertheless, a subset of patients might benefit—on the short term—from a second ADC. Additional studies are needed to identify patients who could benefit from two ADCs with similar payloads.

Bioorthogonal chemistry capable of operating in live animals is needed to investigate biological processes such as cell death and immunity. Recent studies have identified a gasdermin family of pore-forming proteins that executes inflammasome-dependent and -independent pyroptosis 1 – 5 . Pyroptosis is proinflammatory, but its effect on antitumour immunity is unknown. Here we establish a bioorthogonal chemical system, in which a cancer-imaging probe phenylalanine trifluoroborate (Phe-BF 3 ) that can enter cells desilylates and ‘cleaves’ a designed linker that contains a silyl ether. This system enabled the controlled release of a drug from an antibody–drug conjugate in mice. When combined with nanoparticle-mediated delivery, desilylation catalysed by Phe-BF 3 could release a client protein—including an active gasdermin—from a nanoparticle conjugate, selectively into tumour cells in mice. We applied this bioorthogonal system to gasdermin, which revealed that pyroptosis of less than 15% of tumour cells was sufficient to clear the entire 4T1 mammary tumour graft. The tumour regression was absent in immune-deficient mice or upon T cell depletion, and was correlated with augmented antitumour immune responses. The injection of a reduced, ineffective dose of nanoparticle-conjugated gasdermin along with Phe-BF 3 sensitized 4T1 tumours to anti-PD1 therapy. Our bioorthogonal system based on Phe-BF 3 desilylation is therefore a powerful tool for chemical biology; our application of this system suggests that pyroptosis-induced inflammation triggers robust antitumour immunity and can synergize with checkpoint blockade. In mouse models of cancer, a biorthogonal chemical system based on desilylation catalysed by phenylalanine trifluoroborate enables the controlled release of gasdermin to induce pyroptosis selectively in tumour cells

The treatment outcome for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has not been improved in nearly 20 years. However, the replacement of vincristine in R-CHOP with polatuzumab vedotin, an anti-CD79b antibody linked to emtansine, led to a progression-free survival benefit over R-CHOP at 2 years (76.7% vs. 70.2%), with a similar safety profile.

Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor α (FRα), is approved for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in the United States. We conducted a phase 3, global, confirmatory, open-label, randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of MIRV with the investigator's choice of chemotherapy in the treatment of platinum-resistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Participants who had previously received one to three lines of therapy and had high FRα tumor expression (≥75% of cells with ≥2+ staining intensity) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive MIRV (6 mg per kilogram of adjusted ideal body weight every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival; key secondary analytic end points included objective response, overall survival, and participant-reported outcomes. A total of 453 participants underwent randomization; 227 were assigned to the MIRV group and 226 to the chemotherapy group. The median progression-free survival was 5.62 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.34 to 5.95) with MIRV and 3.98 months (95% CI, 2.86 to 4.47) with chemotherapy (P<0.001). An objective response occurred in 42.3% of the participants in the MIRV group and in 15.9% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.44 to 5.94; P<0.001). Overall survival was significantly longer with MIRV than with chemotherapy (median, 16.46 months vs. 12.75 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.89; P = 0.005). During the treatment period, fewer adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred with MIRV than with chemotherapy (41.7% vs. 54.1%), as did serious adverse events of any grade (23.9% vs. 32.9%) and events leading to discontinuation (9.2% vs. 15.9%). Among participants with platinum-resistant, FRα-positive ovarian cancer, treatment with MIRV showed a significant benefit over chemotherapy with respect to progression-free and overall survival and objective response. (Funded by ImmunoGen; MIRASOL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04209855.).

Key Points The development of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) has benefited from general improvements in the design of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and from specific improvements in regard to methods for conjugate synthesis through which both homogeneity and stability is enhanced. Diversification of linking strategies and payloads has opened new perspectives to improve drug delivery to tumours while reducing drug exposure to normal tissues. To enhance the therapeutic index of ADCs, either the potency of the cytotoxic agent has to be improved to lower the minimum effective dose or the tumour selectivity has to be improved to increase the maximum tolerated dose. Protein structural characterization tools such as mass spectrometry and the development of quantitative bioanalytical assays will contribute to the identification of early-developability criteria for all of the ADC components (antibody, drug and linker). Recent ADC development has created a renewed interest in natural cytotoxic products, which are typically highly potent cytotoxic agents but often have unacceptable toxicities. In the future, breakthroughs in the efficacy of ADCs are likely to involve conjugates with previously unknown mechanisms of action. Alternative formats to mAbs, such as protein scaffolds (designed ankyrin-repeat proteins (DARPins), nanobodies, single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) and peptide–drug conjugates), dual-labelled ADCs and biparatopic drug conjugates, present new research avenues. There are several possible indications for ADCs: as single agents in patients with refractory or relapsing disease; in palliative settings, for consolidation or maintenance; and in combination with other agents as first-line therapy or in relapsed patients. Antibody–drug conjugate (ADCs), which aim to target highly cytotoxic drugs specifically to cancer cells, are one of the fastest growing classes of anticancer therapeutics, with more than 50 such agents currently in clinical trials. This Review discusses lessons learned and emerging strategies in the development of ADCs, including aspects such as target selection, the development of warheads, the optimization of linkers and new conjugation chemistries, and provides an overview of agents that are currently in clinical trials. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are one of the fastest growing classes of oncology therapeutics. After half a century of research, the approvals of brentuximab vedotin (in 2011) and trastuzumab emtansine (in 2013) have paved the way for ongoing clinical trials that are evaluating more than 60 further ADC candidates. The limited success of first-generation ADCs (developed in the early 2000s) informed strategies to bring second-generation ADCs to the market, which have higher levels of cytotoxic drug conjugation, lower levels of naked antibodies and more-stable linkers between the drug and the antibody. Furthermore, lessons learned during the past decade are now being used in the development of third-generation ADCs. In this Review, we discuss strategies to select the best target antigens as well as suitable cytotoxic drugs; the design of optimized linkers; the discovery of bioorthogonal conjugation chemistries; and toxicity issues. The selection and engineering of antibodies for site-specific drug conjugation, which will result in higher homogeneity and increased stability, as well as the quest for new conjugation chemistries and mechanisms of action, are priorities in ADC research.

Brain glioma treatment with checkpoint inhibitor antibodies to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (a-CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (a-PD-1) was largely unsuccessful due to their inability to cross blood–brain barrier (BBB). Here we describe targeted nanoscale immunoconjugates (NICs) on natural biopolymer scaffold, poly(β-L-malic acid), with covalently attached a-CTLA-4 or a-PD-1 for systemic delivery across the BBB and activation of local brain anti-tumor immune response. NIC treatment of mice bearing intracranial GL261 glioblastoma (GBM) results in an increase of CD8+ T cells, NK cells and macrophages with a decrease of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the brain tumor area. Survival of GBM-bearing mice treated with NIC combination is significantly longer compared to animals treated with single checkpoint inhibitor-bearing NICs or free a-CTLA-4 and a-PD-1. Our study demonstrates trans-BBB delivery of tumor-targeted polymer-conjugated checkpoint inhibitors as an effective GBM treatment via activation of both systemic and local privileged brain tumor immune response. Glioma therapy with checkpoint inhibitors has limited blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration and therapeutic effects. Here, the authors develop nanopolymer-conjugated checkpoint inhibitors and show their trans-BBB delivery and anti-glioma efficacy.

Among patients with metastatic breast cancer with low HER2 expression, treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan prolonged progression-free survival as compared with the physician’s choice of chemotherapy.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T‐DXd: DS‐8201a) is an anti‐human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) Ab–drug conjugated with deruxtecan (DXd), a derivative of exatecan. The objective of this study was to characterize T‐DXd‐induced lung toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys. Trastuzumab deruxtecan was injected i.v. into monkeys once every 3 weeks for 6 weeks (10, 30, and 78.8 mg/kg) or for 3 months (3, 10, and 30 mg/kg). To evaluate the involvement of DXd alone in T‐DXd‐induced toxicity, DXd monohydrate was given i.v. to monkeys once a week for 4 weeks (1, 3, and 12 mg/kg). Interstitial pneumonitis was observed in monkeys given T‐DXd at 30 mg/kg or more. The histopathological features of diffuse lymphocytic infiltrates and slight fibrosis were similar to interstitial lung diseases (ILD)/pneumonitis related to anticancer drugs in patients, with an incidence that was dose‐dependent and dose‐frequency‐dependent. Monkeys receiving DXd monohydrate did not suffer lung toxicity, although the DXd exposure level was higher than that of DXd in the monkeys given T‐DXd. The HER2 expression in monkey lungs was limited to the bronchial level, although the lesions were found at the alveolar level. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that T‐DXd localization was mainly in alveolar macrophages, but not pulmonary epithelial cells. These findings indicate that monkeys are an appropriate model for investigating T‐DXd‐related ILD/pneumonitis. The results are also valuable for hypothesis generation regarding the possible mechanism of T‐DXd‐induced ILD/pneumonitis in which target‐independent uptake of T‐DXd into alveolar macrophages could be involved. Further evaluation is necessary to clarify the mechanism of ILD/pneumonitis in patients with T‐DXd therapy. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T‐DXd; DS‐8201a), an anti‐human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 Ab–drug conjugate with a derivative of exatecan (DXd), has been associated with interstitial lung diseases (ILD)/pneumonitis in clinical trials. This work indicates that the histopathological features of T‐DXd‐induced lung toxicity in monkeys are similar to ILD/pneumonitis associated with anticancer drugs in patients.

Based on the encouraging activity and manageable safety profile observed in a phase 1 study, the ECHELON-2 trial was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) for the treatment of CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas. ECHELON-2 is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, placebo-controlled, active-comparator phase 3 study. Eligible adults from 132 sites in 17 countries with previously untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas (targeting 75% with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either A+CHP or CHOP for six or eight 21-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by histological subtype according to local pathology assessment and by international prognostic index score. All patients received cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle intravenously and prednisone 100 mg once daily on days 1 to 5 of each cycle orally, followed by either brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg and a placebo form of vincristine intravenously (A+CHP group) or vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 and a placebo form of brentuximab vedotin intravenously (CHOP group) on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review, was analysed by intent-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01777152. Between Jan 24, 2013, and Nov 7, 2016, 601 patients assessed for eligibility, of whom 452 patients were enrolled and 226 were randomly assigned to both the A+CHP group and the CHOP group. Median progression-free survival was 48·2 months (95% CI 35·2–not evaluable) in the A+CHP group and 20·8 months (12·7–47·6) in the CHOP group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·54–0·93], p=0·0110). Adverse events, including incidence and severity of febrile neutropenia (41 [18%] patients in the A+CHP group and 33 [15%] in the CHOP group) and peripheral neuropathy (117 [52%] in the A+CHP group and 124 [55%] in the CHOP group), were similar between groups. Fatal adverse events occurred in seven (3%) patients in the A+CHP group and nine (4%) in the CHOP group. Front-line treatment with A+CHP is superior to CHOP for patients with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas as shown by a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with a manageable safety profile. Seattle Genetics Inc, Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmacuetical Company Limited, and National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Cancer Center.