Explore the vast range of titles available.

This book is the first to tell the extraordinary yet unheralded history of monoclonal antibodies. Often referred to as Mabs, they are unfamiliar to most nonscientists, yet these microscopic protein molecules are everywhere, quietly shaping our lives and healthcare. Discovered in the mid-1970s in the laboratory where Watson and Crick had earlier unveiled the structure of DNA, Mabs have radically changed understandings of the pathways of disease. They have enabled faster, cheaper, and more accurate clinical diagnostic testing on a vast scale. And they have played a fundamental role in pharmaceutical innovation, leading to such developments as recombinant interferon and insulin, and personalized drug therapies such as Herceptin. Today Mabs constitute six of the world's top ten blockbuster drugs and make up a third of new introduced treatments. -- From dust jacket.

More than half of breast cancers express low levels of HER2. In a phase 3 trial, the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan resulted in longer survival than the physician’s choice of chemotherapy among patients with HER2-low breast cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) intracranial activity has been observed in small or retrospective patient cohorts with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2 + ) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and stable or active (untreated/previously treated and progressing) brain metastases (BMs). The phase 3b/4 DESTINY-Breast12 study investigated T-DXd in patients with HER2 + mBC and is, to our knowledge, the largest prospective study of T-DXd in patients with BMs in this setting. Patients (stable/active BMs ( n  = 263) and no BMs ( n  = 241)) treated with one or more prior anti-HER2–based regimens received T-DXd (5.4 mg per kg). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS; BMs cohort) and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (non-BMs cohort). Additional endpoints included central nervous system (CNS) PFS, ORR, time to second progression, CNS ORR (BMs cohort), incidence of new symptomatic CNS metastases (non-BMs cohort), time to progression, duration of response, overall survival and safety (both cohorts). No formal hypothesis testing was conducted for this single-arm, open-label study. In the BMs cohort, 12-month PFS was 61.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 54.9–67.6), and 12-month CNS PFS was 58.9% (95% CI: 51.9–65.3). In the non-BMs cohort, ORR was 62.7% (95% CI: 56.5–68.8). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 51% (BMs cohort) and 49% (non-BMs cohort) of patients. Investigator-reported interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in 16% (grade ≥3: 3%) of patients with BMs and 13% (grade ≥3: 1%) of patients without BMs. These data show substantial and durable overall and intracranial activity for T-DXd, supporting its use in previously treated patients with HER2 + mBC irrespective of stable/active baseline BMs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04739761 . In the non-randomized phase 3b/4 DESTINY-Breast12 study, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) treatment of patients with HER2 + advanced breast cancer and active or stable brain metastases showed consistent intracranial activity and systemic efficacy of T-DXd.

Background Current guidelines recommend that patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receive sequentially two antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs): Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd), despite a similar payload. However, the effectiveness of one after another is unknown. Methods ADC-Low is a multicentre, retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of SG and T-DXd, one after another, with or without intermediary lines of chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-low MBC. Results One hundred and seventy-nine patients were included: the majority with HR-negative tumours received SG first (ADC1) ( n  = 100/108) while most with HR-positive tumours received T-DXd first ( n  = 56/71). Median progression-free survival 2 was short: 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.4–3.3) in the whole population, respectively, 3.1 (95% CI: 2.6–3.6) and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.9–2.7) for patients receiving T-DXd or SG second (ADC2). Intermediary lines of chemotherapy between ADC1 and ADC2 had no impact. Primary resistance to ADC2 occurred in 54.4% of patients. Certain patients showed initial response to ADC2. Conclusions Clinical benefit of sequentially administered SG and T-DXd is limited for most patients. Nevertheless, a subset of patients might benefit—on the short term—from a second ADC. Additional studies are needed to identify patients who could benefit from two ADCs with similar payloads.

Nine different antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are currently approved as cancer treatments, with dozens more in preclinical and clinical development. The primary goal of ADCs is to improve the therapeutic index of antineoplastic agents by restricting their systemic delivery to cells that express the target antigen of interest. Advances in synthetic biochemistry have ushered in a new generation of ADCs, which promise to improve upon the tissue specificity and cytotoxicity of their predecessors. Many of these drugs have impressive activity against treatment-refractory cancers, although hurdles impeding their broader use remain, including systemic toxicity, inadequate biomarkers for patient selection, acquired resistance and unknown benefit in combination with other cancer therapies. Emerging evidence indicates that the efficacy of a given ADC depends on the intricacies of how the antibody, linker and payload components interact with the tumour and its microenvironment, all of which have important clinical implications. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the design, mechanism of action and clinical efficacy of ADCs as well as the apparent limitations of this treatment class. We then propose a path forward by highlighting several hypotheses and novel strategies to maximize the potential benefit that ADCs can provide to patients with cancer.Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) constitute a unique class of anticancer agents with demonstrated clinical efficacy against several different cancer types. Herein, the authors discuss the design and mechanisms of action of ADCs and how these properties are reflected in the clinical activity and toxicity profiles of such agents. Potential strategies to overcome the limitations of ADCs and thereby maximize their therapeutic benefit for patients with cancer are also proposed.

In patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer that had progressed after primary therapy, treatment with the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan resulted in a higher response rate and longer progression-free survival than trastuzumab emtansine. Since trastuzumab deruxtecan was associated with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, close monitoring of pulmonary function is warranted.

Approximately 15 to 20% of gastric adenocarcinomas express HER2. Trastuzumab deruxtecan is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of trastuzumab and the topoisomerase I inhibitor deruxtecan. In a randomized trial, the antibody-drug conjugate led to higher response and longer overall survival than physician’s choice of therapy among patients with relapsed disease.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of highly cytotoxic agents, potentially reducing the severity of side effects by preferentially targeting their payload to the tumour site. ADCs are being increasingly used in combination with other agents, including as first-line cancer therapies. As the technology to produce these complex therapeutics has matured, many more ADCs have been approved or are in late-phase clinical trials. The diversification of antigenic targets as well as bioactive payloads is rapidly broadening the scope of tumour indications for ADCs. Moreover, novel vector protein formats as well as warheads targeting the tumour microenvironment are expected to improve the intratumour distribution or activation of ADCs, and consequently their anticancer activity for difficult-to-treat tumour types. However, toxicity remains a key issue in the development of these agents, and better understanding and management of ADC-related toxicities will be essential for further optimization. This Review provides a broad overview of the recent advances and challenges in ADC development for cancer treatment.Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of cytotoxic agents. The technology to develop these agents has improved in past years, but toxicity remains a key issue. This Review provides a broad overview of the recent advances and challenges in ADC development for cancer treatment.

Key Points The development of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) has benefited from general improvements in the design of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and from specific improvements in regard to methods for conjugate synthesis through which both homogeneity and stability is enhanced. Diversification of linking strategies and payloads has opened new perspectives to improve drug delivery to tumours while reducing drug exposure to normal tissues. To enhance the therapeutic index of ADCs, either the potency of the cytotoxic agent has to be improved to lower the minimum effective dose or the tumour selectivity has to be improved to increase the maximum tolerated dose. Protein structural characterization tools such as mass spectrometry and the development of quantitative bioanalytical assays will contribute to the identification of early-developability criteria for all of the ADC components (antibody, drug and linker). Recent ADC development has created a renewed interest in natural cytotoxic products, which are typically highly potent cytotoxic agents but often have unacceptable toxicities. In the future, breakthroughs in the efficacy of ADCs are likely to involve conjugates with previously unknown mechanisms of action. Alternative formats to mAbs, such as protein scaffolds (designed ankyrin-repeat proteins (DARPins), nanobodies, single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) and peptide–drug conjugates), dual-labelled ADCs and biparatopic drug conjugates, present new research avenues. There are several possible indications for ADCs: as single agents in patients with refractory or relapsing disease; in palliative settings, for consolidation or maintenance; and in combination with other agents as first-line therapy or in relapsed patients. Antibody–drug conjugate (ADCs), which aim to target highly cytotoxic drugs specifically to cancer cells, are one of the fastest growing classes of anticancer therapeutics, with more than 50 such agents currently in clinical trials. This Review discusses lessons learned and emerging strategies in the development of ADCs, including aspects such as target selection, the development of warheads, the optimization of linkers and new conjugation chemistries, and provides an overview of agents that are currently in clinical trials. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are one of the fastest growing classes of oncology therapeutics. After half a century of research, the approvals of brentuximab vedotin (in 2011) and trastuzumab emtansine (in 2013) have paved the way for ongoing clinical trials that are evaluating more than 60 further ADC candidates. The limited success of first-generation ADCs (developed in the early 2000s) informed strategies to bring second-generation ADCs to the market, which have higher levels of cytotoxic drug conjugation, lower levels of naked antibodies and more-stable linkers between the drug and the antibody. Furthermore, lessons learned during the past decade are now being used in the development of third-generation ADCs. In this Review, we discuss strategies to select the best target antigens as well as suitable cytotoxic drugs; the design of optimized linkers; the discovery of bioorthogonal conjugation chemistries; and toxicity issues. The selection and engineering of antibodies for site-specific drug conjugation, which will result in higher homogeneity and increased stability, as well as the quest for new conjugation chemistries and mechanisms of action, are priorities in ADC research.

Breast tumors generally consist of a diverse population of cells with varying gene expression profiles. Breast tumor heterogeneity is a major factor contributing to drug resistance, recurrence, and metastasis after chemotherapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are emerging chemotherapeutic agents with striking clinical success, including T-DM1 for HER2-positive breast cancer. However, these ADCs often suffer from issues associated with intratumor heterogeneity. Here, we show that homogeneous ADCs containing two distinct payloads are a promising drug class for addressing this clinical challenge. Our conjugates show HER2-specific cell killing potency, desirable pharmacokinetic profiles, minimal inflammatory response, and marginal toxicity at therapeutic doses. Notably, a dual-drug ADC exerts greater treatment effect and survival benefit than does co-administration of two single-drug variants in xenograft mouse models representing intratumor HER2 heterogeneity and elevated drug resistance. Our findings highlight the therapeutic potential of the dual-drug ADC format for treating refractory breast cancer and perhaps other cancers. Intratumor heterogeneity in breast cancer can limit the clinical success of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). In this study, the authors develop dual payload Her2-ADCs that show potent anti-tumor activity against heterogeneous breast tumors in vivo.