Explore the vast range of titles available.

With the increase in the number of routine vaccinations the development of pentavalent and hexavalent combination vaccines fitting the routine vaccination schedules became a necessity. In this respect, Europe has taken the lead in comparison with other world regions, and routine vaccination with pentavalent and hexavalent combinations including DTPa, Hib, HepB and IPV has been on European vaccination programs for >15years. Since the marketing authorization of Hexavac® and Infanrix Hexa® in 2000, immunization schedules in most European countries have included hexavalent vaccines. In the last years, two new hexavalent vaccines have been licensed and commercialized worldwide. This paper presents a review of the pharmaceutical profiles of the three hexavalent vaccines currently available. In addition, we aim to review safety, co-administration, tolerability and other practical concerns of their use.

In 2015 in Quebec, Canada, the passive vaccine adverse event reporting system detected an increase in large local reactions associated with vaccines recommended at the 18-month visit. This followed changes to the pediatric vaccine schedule to include hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertusis-inactivated polio-Haemophilus influenzae type b-hepatitis B vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HB, Infanrix-hexa®, GSK) and quadrivalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV, ProQuad®, Merck) as 18-month booster doses. To determine if the excess of large local reactions was caused by a specific vaccine or their co-administration in the same limb or during the same visit. A case-control study was conducted among cases born between January 2012 and April 2015 with a large local reaction following MMR ± V or DTaP-IPV-Hib ± HB vaccines administered between 16 and 23 months of age. Controls were randomly selected from the provincial medicare database among children born during the same period. Our analysis included 96 cases and 494 controls vaccinated with MMRV or DTaP-IPV-Hib ± HB vaccines. Among the 96 cases, 46% had a cellulitis and 54% had an injection site reaction extending beyond the nearest joint and/or lasting ≥ 4 days. Among the 39 cases who were immunized in different limbs, 77% of the large local reactions were located at the Infanrix-hexa® site, 5% at the DTaP-IPV-Hib site and 18% at the ProQuad® site. Large local reactions were significantly more frequent with Infanrix-hexa® than with DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine (OR 5.9 95% CI: 1.4–25.7). Administration of ProQuad® and Infanrix-hexa® in the same limb did not increase the risk of large local reactions. This investigation suggested that most large local reactions were causally associated with the Infanrix-hexa® vaccine and that the risk was not greater when ProQuad® and Infanrix-hexa® were administered in the same limb. Given the improved vaccine coverage for hepatitis B, benefit-risk analysis likely still favours ongoing use of Infanrix-hexa® with informed parental consent.

► Concerns about immunogenicity of hepatitis B virus component of Hexavac vaccine. ► T response to establish differences in Hexavac/Infanrix primary vaccinated children. ► Both vaccines are efficient in generating T recall responses 5 years after vaccination. ► Less immunogenic Hexavac induces strong HBsAg recall proliferation/memory subsets. ► Cellular immune and serological responses are important as surrogate of protection. In 2005, in accordance with recommendations made by the European Medicines Agency, the Italian Drug Agency ordered withdrawal of the hexavalent Hexavac® vaccine (Sanofi Pasteur MSD) from the market. Concerns had been raised about the low immunogenicity of the hepatitis B virus component of the vaccine, assessed by measurement of serum antibody levels, and its potential consequences on long-term protection against hepatitis B infection. We evaluated memory T cell response to establish whether there are differences in the protective mechanisms among children who had received either Hexavac® or Infanrix-hexa® (GlaxoSmithKline) as their primary vaccination. Immunological memory was determined by measuring the ability of T cells to proliferate and secrete IFNγ by ELISA and intracellular cytokines (IFNγ and IL-2) when cultured with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The different memory subsets of T cells were also measured. The results indicate that, although they generate different serum antibody levels, both vaccines are efficient in generating T recall responses in vitro five years after the primary vaccination. The less immunogenic Hexavac® vaccine induces a strong T antigen response, as indicated by increased blast proliferation and the enhanced presence of memory subsets after HBsAg recall stimulation. These findings suggest that cellular immune response should be considered alongside serological markers as a surrogate of protection.

► Post-challenge anti-HBs ≥10mIU/ml occurred in >90% of all children. ► Post/pre-challenge anti-HBs GMCR were comparable in all children. ► Post-challenge anti-HBs ≥10mIU/ml was >85% of children with <10mIU/ml pre-challenge. ► Post-challenge anti-HBs GMC were comparable in children with <10mIU/ml pre-challenge. ► The immune responses did not differ between HBVaxPro and Engerix-B challenge dose. The anamnestic response to a challenge dose of vaccine can assess immune memory and protection against hepatitis B infection. This study investigated responses to a challenge dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine in children immunised with three doses of either Hexavac or Infanrix-Hexa during infancy. This open-label, randomised, controlled, four-arm study enrolled 410 healthy children aged 4–7 years who had received either Hexavac (n=201) or Infanrix-Hexa (n=209) at 3, 5 and 11 months of life. Children received a single intramuscular challenge dose of either hepatitis B vaccine, HBVaxPro (Hexavac, n=34; Infanrix-Hexa, n=28) or Engerix-B (Hexavac, n=167; Infanrix-Hexa, n=181). Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) concentrations were measured before and 1 month after the challenge vaccine dose. The analysis was descriptive and no formal hypothesis was tested. One month post-challenge, 91.2% of children in the Hexavac group (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.3, 94.8) and 98.0% (95% CI 94.9, 99.4) in the Infanrix-Hexa group had anti-HBs concentrations ≥10mIU/ml (primary endpoint). In a post hoc analysis, most children with pre-challenge anti-HBs concentration <10mIU/ml achieved anti-HBs concentrations ≥10mIU/ml (Hexavac group, 85.3% [95% CI 77.6, 91.2]; Infanrix-Hexa group, 91.9% [95% CI 78.1, 98.3]). Both challenge vaccines were well tolerated. These data suggest that immune memory persists for long-term (5 years) after a primary vaccination in infancy with a hexavalent vaccine (Hexavac or Infanrix-Hexa).

Combination vaccines that include multiple antigens within one formulation are now widely accepted as an effective means of eliciting protection against several diseases at the same time. Owing to improvements in quality and convenient modes of administration, they have become part of routine pediatric practice. Hexavalent vaccines, including diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b antigens represent the latest advance in the development of combination vaccines. Over 8 years since its first licensure, this review looks at the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety profile of the only hexavalent pediatric vaccine currently in use - Infanrix hexa™ (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertusis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated poliovirus vaccine/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine [DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib]; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) - through published clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance data. These data show DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib to be highly immunogenic and well tolerated across a range of different primary and booster vaccination schedules, as well as when administered concomitantly with other licensed vaccines (e.g., pneumococcal conjugate vaccine). Additional issues surrounding the use of hexavalent vaccines are also reviewed.