Explore the vast range of titles available.

•The clinical significance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in CSF of individuals with suspected CNS infection remains unclear.•EBV DNA in CSF is occasionally found in the immunocompetent population.•EBV was frequently found together with other microbes in CSF and associated with encephalitis and poor prognosis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples has greatly facilitated the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. However, the clinical significance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in CSF of individuals with suspected CNS infection remains unclear. We wanted to gain a better understanding of EBV as an infectious agent in immunocompetent patients with CNS disorders. We identified cases of EBV-associated CNS infections and reviewed their clinical and laboratory characteristics. The study population was drawn from patients with EBV PCR positivity in CSF who visited Pusan National University Hospital between 2010 and 2019. Of the 780 CSF samples examined during the 10-year study period, 42 (5.4 %) were positive for EBV DNA; 9 of the patients (21.4 %) were diagnosed with non-CNS infectious diseases, such as optic neuritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and idiopathic intracranial hypotension, and the other 33 cases were classified as CNS infections (22 as encephalitis and 11 as meningitis). Intensive care unit admission (13/33 patients, 39.3 %) and presence of severe neurological sequelae at discharge (8/33 patients, 24.2 %) were relatively frequent. In 10 patients (30.3 %), the following pathogens were detected in CSF in addition to EBV: varicella-zoster virus (n = 3), cytomegalovirus (n = 2), herpes simplex virus 1 (n = 1), herpes simplex virus 2 (n = 1), Streptococcus pneumomiae (n = 2), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 1). The EBV-only group (n = 23) and the co-infection group (n = 10) did not differ in age, gender, laboratory data, results of brain imaging studies, clinical manifestations, or prognosis; however, the co-infected patients had higher CSF protein levels. EBV DNA in CSF is occasionally found in the immunocompetent population; the virus was commonly associated with encephalitis and poor prognosis, and frequently found together with other microbes in CSF.

Encephalitis is parenchymal brain inflammation due to infectious or immune-mediated processes. However, in 15-60% the cause remains unknown. This study aimed to determine if the cytokine/chemokine-mediated host response can distinguish infectious from immune-mediated cases, and whether this may give a clue to aetiology in those of unknown cause. We measured 38 mediators in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients from the Health Protection Agency Encephalitis Study. Of serum from 78 patients, 38 had infectious, 20 immune-mediated, and 20 unknown aetiology. Of CSF from 37 patients, 20 had infectious, nine immune-mediated and eight unknown aetiology. Heat-map analysis of CSF mediator interactions was different for infectious and immune-mediated cases, and that of the unknown aetiology group was similar to the infectious pattern. Higher myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentrations were found in infectious than immune-mediated cases, in serum and CSF (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006). Serum MPO was also higher in unknown than immune-mediated cases (p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis selected serum MPO; classifying 31 (91%) as infectious (p = 0.008) and 17 (85%) as unknown (p = 0.009) as opposed to immune-mediated. CSF data also selected MPO classifying 11 (85%) as infectious as opposed to immune-mediated (p = 0.036). CSF neutrophils were detected in eight (62%) infective and one (14%) immune-mediated cases (p = 0.004); CSF MPO correlated with neutrophils (p<0.0001). Mediator profiles of infectious aetiology differed from immune-mediated encephalitis; and those of unknown cause were similar to infectious cases, raising the hypothesis of a possible undiagnosed infectious cause. Particularly, neutrophils and MPO merit further investigation.

Background and Objectives Recognition of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) can be difficult as typical radiological or cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities may be lacking. We investigated the yield of comprehensive diagnostic testing for anti‐neuronal antibodies in patients suspected of encephalitis in an acute setting. Methods In a prospective multicenter cohort, we included patients suspected of encephalitis in whom a lumbar puncture was performed. We retrospectively selected patients from this cohort in whom no infectious cause was identified and an autoimmune CNS disease was considered. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the CSF samples as an index test to screen for anti‐neuronal antibodies, and confirmatory cell‐based assays were performed. Results Between 2017 and 2021, 723 episodes were included in 707 patients. The median age was 55 years, and 347 (48%) of the episodes occurred in women. In 59 of 723 episodes (8%), a clinical diagnosis of autoimmune CNS disease was made. Twenty‐three (3%) of them fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for possible AIE, and 9 (1%) had antibody‐positive AIE (five anti‐NMDAR encephalitis, two anti‐LGi1 encephalitis, one anti‐Ma2 encephalitis and anti‐CV2 encephalitis). Extensive antibody testing identified no additional anti‐neuronal antibodies in the remaining 47 episodes. Discussion In a cohort of patients with a suspected encephalitis presenting in an acute setting, the incidence of possible AIE was low, and in only one‐third of possible AIE episodes an anti‐neuronal antibody was detected. Anti‐neuronal antibody testing beyond what was done in the clinical setting did not yield additional cases of antibody‐positive AIE. In a retrospective analysis of suspected autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) cases from a prospective cohort including patients with an acute presentation, nine cases of antibody‐positive AIE were identified during hospitalization. Extensive additional anti‐neuronal antibody testing did not yield additional cases of antibody‐positive AIE.

Background and Objectives Infectious encephalitis is a serious global health problem linked to high rates of mortality and morbidity. However, clinical and laboratory factors that impact neurological outcomes following infectious encephalitis remain poorly understood. Accordingly, we undertook a systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical and laboratory factors influencing neurological outcomes following infectious encephalitis. Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to 25th September 2023 for observational studies that reported on neurological outcomes at discharge or at ≥ 6 months. We assessed the prognostic value of a priori selected clinical and laboratory‐based features by estimating pooled risk ratios (RRs) through a random‐effects meta‐analysis. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485045). Results There were several key findings. First, immunocompromised status, status epilepticus, and Glasgow coma scale of < 8 during initial admission were significantly associated with poor neurological outcomes both at discharge and ≥ 6 months after infectious encephalitis onset. Second, CSF leucocytosis [RR: 0.83 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, p = 0.03, n = 5, I2 = 0%] conferred better neurological outcomes while elevated CSF protein [RR: 1.25 95% CI: 1.07–1.46, p = 0.006, n = 7, I2 = 0%] was linked to worse neurological outcomes at discharge. Third, there was no significant association between adjunct steroid therapy and neurological outcomes at discharge and ≥ 6 months. Discussion This is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate prognostic factors linked to neurological outcomes following infectious encephalitis. The results highlight the prognostic value of a range of easily accessible clinical and laboratory parameters. Clinical and laboratory predictors of long‐term neurological outcomes after infectious encephalitis.

Background Encephalitis originates from diverse autoimmune and infectious etiologies. Diagnostic challenges arise due to the spectrum of presentation and the frequent absence of specific biomarkers. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize and differentiate autoimmune encephalitis (AE) from infectious encephalitis (IE) in adults, and disentangle clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic differences. Methods A cohort study spanning 10 years was conducted across three Austrian tertiary care hospitals. Inclusion criteria comprised adults with probable or definite encephalitis. Demographics, clinical features, technical findings, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected from the electronic patient files. A follow-up was performed via telephone interviews and clinical visits. Results Of 149 patients, 17% had AE, 73% IE, and 10% encephalitis of unknown etiology. Significant differences between AE and IE included the prevalence of acute symptomatic seizures (AE: 85% vs. IE: 20%, p  < 0.001), fever (8% vs. 72%, p  < 0.001), headache (15% vs. 61%, p  < 0.001), and focal neurological deficits (56% vs. 23%, p  = 0.004), respectively. Paraclinical differences comprised lower CSF pleocytosis in AE compared to IE (median 6 cells/µl vs. 125 cells/µl, p  < 0.001). Epileptic discharges on EEG and MRI lesions were more prevalent in AE than IE (50% vs. 14%, p  < 0.001; 50% vs. 28%, p  = 0.037). The modified Rankin Scale scores at discharge and last follow-up (median duration 2304 days, IQR 1433–3274) indicated favorable outcomes in both groups. Conclusion This comprehensive analysis provides insights into the epidemiology, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic aspects and the outcomes of AE and IE in adults. We developed a diagnostic tool that facilitates early differentiation between AE and IE, aiding in timely therapeutic decision-making.

Background. Cryptococcus can cause meningoencephalitis (CM) among previously healthy non-HIV adults. Spinal arachnoiditis is under-recognized, since diagnosis is difficult with concomitant central nervous system (CNS) pathology. Methods. We describe 6 cases of spinal arachnoiditis among 26 consecutively recruited CM patients with normal CD4 counts who achieved microbiologic control. We performed detailed neurological exams, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) immunophenotyping and biomarker analysis before and after adjunctive immunomodulatory intervention with high dose pulse corticosteroids affording causal inference into pathophysiology. Results. All 6 exhibited severe lower motor neuron involvement in addition to cognitive changes and gait disturbances from meningoencephalitis. Spinal involvement was associated with asymmetric weakness and urinary retention. Diagnostic specificity was improved by MRI imaging which demonstrated lumbar spinal nerve root enhancement and clumping or lesions. Despite negative fungal cultures, CSF inflammatory biomarkers, sCD27 and sCD21, as well as the neuronal damage biomarker, neurofilament light chain (NFL), were elevated compared to healthy donor (HD) controls. Elevations in these biomarkers were associated with clinical symptoms and showed improvement with adjunctive high dose pulse corticosteroids. Conclusions. These data suggest that a post-infectious spinal arachnoiditis is an important complication of CM in previously healthy individuals, requiring heightened clinician awareness. Despite microbiological control, this syndrome causes significant pathology likely due to increased inflammation and may be amenable to suppressive therapeutics.

Objectives The incidence of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) has risen in the last decade, yet recent studies are lacking. We compared the epidemiology of autoimmune and infectious encephalitis cases in Tel‐Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (TASMC) between 2010 and 2020. Methods All encephalitis cases, aged 18 and above, admitted to TASMC between the years 2010 and 2020 were reviewed for demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data and categorized based on etiology. Results Two hundred and twenty‐five patients with encephalitis were identified. The most common identifiable cause was viral (42%), followed by autoimmune encephalitis (35%), bacterial (18%), and fungal/parasitic (5%). The incidence of AIE cases out of the yearly admitted cases increased substantially, from 3.8/100 K in 2010 to 18.8/100 K in 2020. The incidence of viral cases also increased while those of bacterial and fungal/parasitic infections remained stable. Patients with AIE were younger compared to infectious patients (p‐value <0.001) and had lower markers of systemic and cerebrospinal fluid inflammation (p‐value for all <0.001). Seizures were more common among AIE patients (p‐value <0.001), yet one‐year mortality rates were higher among infectious patients (p‐value <0.001). Interpretation AIE incidence has risen significantly in our institution during the past decade, with current rates comparable to those of all infectious causes combined. Based on this cohort, clinical clues for an autoimmune etiology include a non‐inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid profile, the presence of seizures, and temporal lobe imaging abnormalities (also common in herpetic encephalitis). In light of its rising incidence and the importance of early treatment, AIE should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all encephalitis cases.

We assessed the performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and meningitis. This was a prospective multicenter study. Cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with viral encephalitis and/or meningitis, tuberculous meningitis, bacterial meningitis, fungal meningitis, and non-central nervous system (CNS) infections were subjected to mNGS. In total, 213 patients with infectious and non-infectious CNS diseases were finally enrolled from November 2016 to May 2019; the mNGS-positive detection rate of definite CNS infections was 57.0%. At a species-specific read number (SSRN) ≥2, mNGS performance in the diagnosis of definite viral encephalitis and/or meningitis was optimal (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.659, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.566-0.751); the positivity rate was 42.6%. At a genus-specific read number ≥1, mNGS performance in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (definite or probable) was optimal (AUC=0.619, 95% CI=0.516-0.721); the positivity rate was 27.3%. At SSRNs ≥5 or 10, the diagnostic performance was optimal for definite bacterial meningitis (AUC=0.846, 95% CI = 0.711-0.981); the sensitivity was 73.3%. The sensitivities of mNGS (at SSRN ≥2) in the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis and cerebral aspergillosis were 76.92 and 80%, respectively. mNGS of cerebrospinal fluid effectively identifies pathogens causing infectious CNS diseases. mNGS should be used in conjunction with conventional microbiological testing. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800020442.

Herpes simplex encephalitis can trigger autoimmune encephalitis that leads to neurological worsening. We aimed to assess the frequency, symptoms, risk factors, and outcomes of this complication. We did a prospective observational study and retrospective analysis. In the prospective observational part of this study, we included patients with herpes simplex encephalitis diagnosed by neurologists, paediatricians, or infectious disease specialists in 19 secondary and tertiary Spanish centres (Cohort A). Outpatient follow-up was at 2, 6, and 12 months from onset of herpes simplex encephalitis. We studied another group of patients retrospectively, when they developed autoimmune encephalitis after herpes simplex encephalitis (Cohort B). We compared demographics and clinical features of patients who developed autoimmune encephalitis with those who did not, and in patients who developed autoimmune encephalitis we compared these features by age group (patients ≤4 years compared with patients >4 years). We also used multivariable binary logistic regression models to assess risk factors for autoimmune encephalitis after herpes simplex encephalitis. Between Jan 1, 2014, and Oct 31, 2017, 54 patients with herpes simplex encephalitis were recruited to Cohort A, and 51 were included in the analysis (median age 50 years [IQR 5–68]). At onset of herpes simplex encephalitis, none of the 51 patients had antibodies to neuronal antigens; during follow-up, 14 (27%) patients developed autoimmune encephalitis and all 14 (100%) had neuronal antibodies (nine [64%] had NMDA receptor [NMDAR] antibodies and five [36%] had other antibodies) at or before onset of symptoms. The other 37 patients did not develop autoimmune encephalitis, although 11 (30%) developed antibodies (n=3 to NMDAR, n=8 to unknown antigens; p<0·001). Antibody detection within 3 weeks of herpes simplex encephalitis was a risk factor for autoimmune encephalitis (odds ratio [OR] 11·5, 95% CI 2·7–48·8; p<0·001). Between Oct 7, 2011, and Oct 31, 2017, there were 48 patients in Cohort B with new-onset or worsening neurological symptoms not caused by herpes simplex virus reactivation (median age 8·8 years [IQR 1·1–44·2]; n=27 male); 44 (92%) patients had antibody-confirmed autoimmune encephalitis (34 had NMDAR antibodies and ten had other antibodies). In both cohorts (n=58 patients with antibody-confirmed autoimmune encephalitis), patients older than 4 years frequently presented with psychosis (18 [58%] of 31; younger children not assessable). Compared with patients older than 4 years, patients aged 4 years or younger (n=27) were more likely to have shorter intervals between onset of herpes simplex encephalitis and onset of autoimmune encephalitis (median 26 days [IQR 24–32] vs 43 days [25–54]; p=0·0073), choreoathetosis (27 [100%] of 27 vs 0 of 31; p<0·001), decreased level of consciousness (26 [96%] of 27 vs seven [23%] of 31; p<0·001), NMDAR antibodies (24 [89%] of 27 vs 19 [61%] of 31; p=0·033), and worse outcome at 1 year (median modified Rankin Scale 4 [IQR 4–4] vs 2 [2–3]; p<0·0010; seizures 12 [63%] of 19 vs three [13%] of 23; p=0·001). The results of our prospective study show that autoimmune encephalitis occurred in 27% of patients with herpes simplex encephalitis. It was associated with development of neuronal antibodies and usually presented within 2 months after treatment of herpes simplex encephalitis; the symptoms were age-dependent, and the neurological outcome was worse in young children. Prompt diagnosis is important because patients, primarily those older than 4 years, can respond to immunotherapy. Mutua Madrileña Foundation, Fondation de l'Université de Lausanne et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Instituto Carlos III, CIBERER, National Institutes of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya, Fundació CELLEX.

There are few detailed investigations of neurologic complications in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. We describe 3 patients with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease who had encephalopathy and encephalitis develop. Neuroimaging showed nonenhancing unilateral, bilateral, and midline changes not readily attributable to vascular causes. All 3 patients had increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of anti-S1 IgM. One patient who died also had increased levels of anti-envelope protein IgM. CSF analysis also showed markedly increased levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-10, but severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was not identified in any CSF sample. These changes provide evidence of CSF periinfectious/postinfectious inflammatory changes during coronavirus disease with neurologic complications.