Explore the vast range of titles available.

Current influenza vaccines induce immune responses to hemagglutinin (HA), a surface glycoprotein of seasonal influenza viruses, but have suboptimal effectiveness. mRNA vaccines may improve protection by targeting additional antigens such as neuraminidase (NA), for which immune responses independently correlate with protection. In this phase 1/2 trial (NCT05333289), healthy adults 18–75 years were randomly assigned to receive different doses of mRNA-1020 or mRNA-1030 (encoding HA and NA at different ratios), mRNA-1010 (encoding HA), or a licensed active comparator (recombinant HA). Primary endpoints were safety and reactogenicity, and HA and NA antibody responses against vaccine-matched influenza strains. Most common local and systemic solicited ARs were injection site pain and fatigue. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events nor significant associated safety concerns through 181 days. mRNA-1020 and mRNA-1030 elicited high HA-specific immune responses and induced NA-specific immune responses with no additional reactogenicity at equivalent dose levels beyond an mRNA-based, HA-only–containing vaccine. Improving neuraminidase content of influenza vaccines is a major focus of vaccine development. Here the authors present safety and immunogenicity of seasonal influenza mRNA vaccine candidates simultaneously encoding hemagglutinin and neuraminidase antigens in a first in-human study.

Recently, the World Health Organization confirmed 120 new human cases of avian H7N9 influenza in China resulting in 37 deaths, highlighting the concern for a potential pandemic and the need for an effective, safe, and high-speed vaccine production platform. Production speed and scale of mRNA-based vaccines make them ideally suited to impede potential pandemic threats. Here we show that lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-formulated, modified mRNA vaccines, encoding hemagglutinin (HA) proteins of H10N8 (A/Jiangxi-Donghu/346/2013) or H7N9 (A/Anhui/1/2013), generated rapid and robust immune responses in mice, ferrets, and nonhuman primates, as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and microneutralization (MN) assays. A single dose of H7N9 mRNA protected mice from a lethal challenge and reduced lung viral titers in ferrets. Interim results from a first-in-human, escalating-dose, phase 1 H10N8 study show very high seroconversion rates, demonstrating robust prophylactic immunity in humans. Adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate with only a few severe and no serious events. These data show that LNP-formulated, modified mRNA vaccines can induce protective immunogenicity with acceptable tolerability profiles. Potential pandemic influenzas and the need for an effective, safe, and high-speed vaccine production platform have been widely discussed in the scientific community. Bahl et al. report the rapid and robust immune responses achieved against H10N8 and H7N9 viruses from modified mRNA vaccines with an acceptable safety profile.

Improving the efficacy of influenza vaccination in older adults is a challenge. In this randomized clinical trial, a high-dose influenza vaccine was shown to be more effective than a standard-dose vaccine in the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Between 1990 and 1999, seasonal influenza caused an average of 36,000 deaths and 226,000 hospitalizations per year in the United States. 1 – 3 Adults 65 years of age or older are particularly vulnerable to complications associated with influenza and account for most seasonal influenza–related hospitalizations and deaths. 2 , 3 Although vaccination currently represents the most effective intervention against influenza and associated complications, 3 , 4 antibody response and protection elicited by the vaccine are lower among persons 65 years of age or older than among younger adults. 5 – 7 Strategies to improve antibody responses to influenza vaccine in the older population, such as increasing the . . .

Several vaccines are approved in the United States for seasonal influenza vaccination every year. Here we compare the impact of repeat influenza vaccination on hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers, antibody binding and affinity maturation to individual hemagglutinin (HA) domains, HA1 and HA2, across vaccine platforms. Fold change in HI and antibody binding to HA1 trends higher for H1N1pdm09 and H3N2 but not against B strains in groups vaccinated with FluBlok compared with FluCelvax and Fluzone. Antibody-affinity maturation occurs against HA1 domain of H1N1pdm09, H3N2 and B following vaccination with all vaccine platforms, but not against H1N1pdm09-HA2. Importantly, prior year vaccination of subjects receiving repeat vaccinations demonstrated reduced antibody-affinity maturation to HA1 of all three influenza virus strains irrespective of the vaccine platform. This study identifies an important impact of repeat vaccination on antibody-affinity maturation following vaccination, which may contribute to lower vaccine effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines in humans Here, Khurana et al. report the results of a phase 4 clinical trial with three FDA approved influenza vaccines and show that repeat influenza vaccination results in reduced antibody affinity maturation to hemagglutinin domain 1 irrespective of vaccine platform.

Influenza epidemics cause substantial morbidity. The seasonal vaccine, an important control measure, is not completely efficacious. This trial assessed the efficacy of a recombinant seasonal vaccine (made in a cell culture rather than with viruses grown in eggs). Reducing the burden of influenza disease requires improved vaccines, and a recombinant influenza vaccine may contribute to this public-health goal. 1 This vaccine contains recombinant hemagglutinin (HA) proteins produced in a serum-free medium by expres SF+ cells. These cells contain recombinant baculovirus vectors carrying genes that code for HA. The process yields recombinant HA that is genetically identical to the selected influenza strains without extraneous egg proteins, formaldehyde, antibiotics, or preservatives. Influenza viruses are grown in eggs to produce the inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV); these viruses typically contain mutations in the genes that code for HA that may reduce vaccine effectiveness. . . .

Novel influenza viruses continue to pose a potential pandemic threat worldwide. In recent years, plants have been used to produce recombinant proteins, including subunit vaccines. A subunit influenza vaccine, HAC1, based on recombinant hemagglutinin from the 2009 pandemic A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) strain of influenza virus, has been manufactured using a plant virus-based transient expression technology in Nicotiana benthamiana plants and demonstrated to be immunogenic and safe in pre-clinical studies (Shoji et al., 2011). A first-in-human, Phase 1, single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study was conducted to investigate safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an HAC1 formulation at three escalating dose levels (15μg, 45μg and 90μg) with and without Alhydrogel®, in healthy adults 18–50 years of age (inclusive). Eighty participants were randomized into six study vaccine groups, a saline placebo group and an approved monovalent H1N1 vaccine group. Recipients received two doses of vaccine or placebo (except for the monovalent H1N1 vaccine cohort, which received a single dose of vaccine, later followed by a dose of placebo). The experimental vaccine was safe and well tolerated, and comparable to placebo and the approved monovalent H1N1 vaccine. Pain and tenderness at the injection site were the only local solicited reactions reported following vaccinations. Nearly all adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. The HAC1 vaccine was also immunogenic, with the highest seroconversion rates, based on serum hemagglutination-inhibition and virus microneutralization antibody titers, in the 90μg non-adjuvanted HAC1 vaccine group after the second vaccine dose (78% and 100%, respectively). This is the first study demonstrating the safety and immunogenicity of a plant-produced subunit H1N1 influenza vaccine in healthy adults. The results support further clinical investigation of the HAC1 vaccine as well as demonstrate the feasibility of the plant-based technology for vaccine antigen production.

Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based influenza vaccines have the potential to improve upon limitations of current vaccine approaches to seasonal influenza. Here we report findings on the primary and secondary objectives of the safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity of the quadrivalent mRNA vaccine, mRNA-1010, versus licensed standard-dose and high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines from a three-part, phase 3 clinical trial in adults aged ≥18 years (Part A), 18–64 years (Part B), and ≥ 65 years (Part C) (NCT05827978). A single 50-μg dose of mRNA-1010 elicited hemagglutination inhibition titers against vaccine-matched strains that were statistically noninferior and superior to licensed standard-dose and high-dose egg-based quadrivalent vaccine comparators. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with receipt of mRNA-1010; adverse reactions were lower in frequency and severity among adults aged ≥65 years than younger adults. No safety concerns were identified. These findings support the potential benefit of mRNA-1010 as a seasonal influenza vaccine. •Seasonal influenza viral infections are a global health concern.•mRNA platform may improve upon limitations of current influenza vaccine technology.•mRNA-1010 is an mRNA-based vaccine targeting seasonal influenza A and B strains.•mRNA-1010 elicited strong immune responses in adults of all ages.•No safety concerns were identified with mRNA-1010 in this phase 3 study.

Influenza poses a significant global healthcare burden, with up to 1 billion infections annually, and poorer outcomes in vulnerable populations such as older adults. Vaccination effectiveness is often lower in elderly individuals. By adding an adjuvant and using cell-based vaccine production methods, the MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent cell-based influenza vaccine (aQIVc) may boost immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness in this population. We report the results of a randomised proof-of-concept study, investigating the immunogenicity and safety of aQIVc. Eligible participants aged ≥50 years were randomised 1: 1:1:1 to receive aQIVc (n = 116), a non-adjuvanted quadrivalent cell-based influenza vaccine (QIVc; n = 119), an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent egg-based influenza vaccine (aQIV; n = 116), or a high-dose quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (QIVr; n = 120). The primary objective was to assess immunogenicity of aQIVc vs the comparators by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay 28 days post-vaccination. Secondary objectives included immunogenicity of aQIVc vs comparators 28 days and 180 post-vaccination by microneutralisation assay and 180 days post-vaccination by HI assay; and reactogenicity and safety of all study vaccines. Compared with QIVc and aQIV, aQIVc elicited a higher immune response (adjusted geometric mean titre [GMT] ratio range 1.18–1.85) against all four influenza strains at Day 29. Against QIVr, aQIVc elicited lower responses against A strains (adjusted GMT ratio range 0.79–0.84), and higher responses against B strains (adjusted GMT ratio range 1.15–1.26). Estimated GMT ratios were generally higher in the subgroup of participants aged ≥65 years vs those aged 50–64 years. aQIVc was well tolerated, eliciting similar rates of solicited local adverse events (AE) and slightly higher rates of solicited systemic AE than aQIV, and a higher rate of all solicited AE than QIVc and QIVr. No safety concern was identified. These data support further investigation of additional formulations of aQIVc in adults aged ≥50 years. Clinical trial registry:NCT04576702 •We assessed an adjuvanted, cell-based influenza vaccine (aQIVc) in adults ≥50 years•aQIVc elicited higher immune responses than a non-adjuvanted comparator•aQIVc elicited higher immune responses than an egg-based adjuvanted comparator•aQIVc showed an acceptable safety profile; no safety concerns were identified•These data are proof-of-concept for seasonal aQIVc vaccination in adults ≥50 years

Inclusion of additional influenza A/H3N2 strains in seasonal influenza vaccines could expand coverage against multiple, antigenically distinct, cocirculating A/H3N2 clades and potentially replace the no longer circulating B/Yamagata strain. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of three next-generation seasonal influenza mRNA vaccines with different compositions that encode for haemagglutinins of multiple A/H3N2 strains, with or without the B/Yamagata strain, in adults. This randomised, open-label, phase 1/2 trial enrolled healthy adults aged 50–75 years across 22 sites in the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1:1) via interactive response technology to receive a single dose of mRNA-1011.1 (pentavalent; containing one additional A/H3N2 strain [Newcastle]), mRNA-1011.2 (quadrivalent; B/Yamagata replaced with one additional A/H3N2 strain [Newcastle]), mRNA-1012 at one of two dose levels (pentavalent; B/Yamagata replaced with two additional A/H3N2 strains [Newcastle and Hong Kong]), or one of three quadrivalent mRNA-1010 controls each encoding one of the A/H3N2 study strains. The primary outcomes were safety, evaluated in all randomly assigned participants who received a study vaccination (safety population), and reactogenicity, evaluated in all participants from the safety population who contributed any solicited adverse reaction data (solicited safety population). The secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity of investigational mRNA vaccines at day 29 versus mRNA-1010 control vaccines based on haemagglutination inhibition antibody (HAI) assay in the per-protocol population. Here, we summarise findings from the planned interim analysis after participants had completed day 29. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05827068, and is ongoing. Between March 27 and May 9, 2023, 1183 participants were screened for eligibility, 699 (59·1%) were randomly assigned, and 696 (58·8%) received vaccination (safety population, n=696; solicited safety population, n=694; per-protocol population, n=646). 382 (55%) of the 696 participants in the safety population self-reported as female and 314 (45%) as male. Frequencies of solicited adverse reactions were similar across vaccine groups; 551 (79%) of 694 participants reported at least one solicited adverse reaction within 7 days after vaccination and 83 (12%) of 696 participants reported at least one unsolicited adverse event within 28 days after vaccination. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. All three next-generation influenza vaccines elicited robust antibody responses against vaccine-matched influenza A and B strains at day 29 that were generally similar to mRNA-1010 controls, and higher responses against additional A/H3N2 strains that were not included within respective mRNA-1010 controls. Day 29 geometric mean fold rises in HAI titres from day 1 against vaccine-matched A/H3N2 strains were 3·0 (95% CI 2·6–3·6; Darwin) and 3·1 (2·6–3·8; Newcastle) for mRNA-1011.1; 3·3 (2·7–4·1; Darwin) and 4·2 (3·4–5·2; Newcastle) for mRNA-1011.2; 3·4 (2·9–4·0; Darwin), 4·5 (3·6–5·5; Newcastle), and 5·1 (4·2–6·2; Hong Kong) for mRNA-1012 50·0 μg; and 2·6 (2·2–3·1; Darwin), 3·7 (3·0–4·6; Newcastle), and 4·1 (3·3–5·1; Hong Kong) for mRNA-1012 62·5 μg. Inclusion of additional A/H3N2 strains did not reduce responses against influenza A/H1N1 or influenza B strains, and removal of B/Yamagata did not affect responses to B/Victoria. These data support the continued clinical development of mRNA-based next-generation seasonal influenza vaccines with broadened influenza A/H3N2 strain coverage. Moderna.

BACKGROUNDTo understand the features of a replicating vaccine that might drive potent and durable immune responses to transgene-encoded antigens, we tested a replication-competent adenovirus type 4 encoding influenza virus H5 HA (Ad4-H5-Vtn) administered as an oral capsule or via tonsillar swab or nasal spray.METHODSViral shedding from the nose, mouth, and rectum was measured by PCR and culturing. H5-specific IgG and IgA antibodies were measured by bead array binding assays. Serum antibodies were measured by a pseudovirus entry inhibition, microneutralization, and HA inhibition assays.RESULTSAd4-H5-Vtn DNA was shed from most upper respiratory tract-immunized (URT-immunized) volunteers for 2 to 4 weeks, but cultured from only 60% of participants, with a median duration of 1 day. Ad4-H5-Vtn vaccination induced increases in H5-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood as well as increases in IgG and IgA in nasal, cervical, and rectal secretions. URT immunizations induced high levels of serum neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against H5 that remained stable out to week 26. The duration of viral shedding correlated with the magnitude of the NAb response at week 26. Adverse events (AEs) were mild, and peak NAb titers were associated with overall AE frequency and duration. Serum NAb titers could be boosted to very high levels 2 to 5 years after Ad4-H5-Vtn vaccination with recombinant H5 or inactivated split H5N1 vaccine.CONCLUSIONReplicating Ad4 delivered to the URT caused prolonged exposure to antigen, drove durable systemic and mucosal immunity, and proved to be a promising platform for the induction of immunity against viral surface glycoprotein targets.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT01443936 and NCT01806909.FUNDINGIntramural and Extramural Research Programs of the NIAID, NIH (U19 AI109946) and the Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS), NIAID, NIH (contract HHSN272201400008C).