Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a 13-week, randomized trial involving persons 6 to 79 years of age with type 1 diabetes, use of a bionic pancreas was associated with a greater reduction in the glycated hemoglobin level than standard care.

In a phase 3a trial involving adults with type 2 diabetes who had not previously received insulin, glycemic control was better with once-weekly insulin icodec than with once-daily insulin glargine U100.

Abstract Context Growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1 help regulate hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism, and reductions in these hormones may contribute to development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Objective To assess relationships between hepatic expression of IGF1 and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) and measures of glycemia and liver disease in adults with NAFLD. Secondarily to assess effects of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) on circulating IGFBPs. Design Analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial of GHRH. Setting Two US academic medical centers. Participants Participants were 61 men and women 18 to 70 years of age with HIV-infection, ≥5% hepatic fat fraction, including 39 with RNA-Seq data from liver biopsy. Main Outcome Measures Hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis by histopathology and measures of glucose homeostasis. Results Hepatic IGF1 mRNA was significantly lower in individuals with higher steatosis and NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) and was inversely related to glucose parameters, independent of circulating IGF-1. Among the IGFBPs, IGFBP2 and IGFBP4 were lower and IGFBP6 and IGFBP7 (also known as IGFBP-related protein 1) were higher with increasing steatosis. Hepatic IGFBP6 and IGFBP7 mRNA levels were positively associated with NAS. IGFBP7 mRNA increased with increasing fibrosis. Hepatic IGFBP1 mRNA was inversely associated with glycemia and insulin resistance, with opposite relationships present for IGFBP3 and IGFBP7. GHRH increased circulating IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3, but decreased IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-6. Conclusions These data demonstrate novel relationships of IGF-1 and IGFBPs with NAFLD severity and glucose control, with divergent roles seen for different IGFBPs. Moreover, the data provide new information on the complex effects of GHRH on IGFBPs.

Obesity is associated with alterations in circulating IGF1, IGF1-binding proteins (IGFBPs), insulin, inflammatory markers, and hormones implicated in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and aging. However, the effects of 4 and 6 h time-restricted eating (TRE) on circulating IGF1 and IGFBPs is uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of TRE on plasma IGF1, IGFBP1, IGFBP2, and IGFBP3, and whether these effects were mediated by weight loss or body composition changes. Insulin sensitivity, glucose control, adipokines, and inflammatory markers were also examined. Design: An exploratory analysis of an 8-week randomized controlled trial implementing a daily TRE intervention was carried out. Participants/Setting: This study was conducted at the University of Illinois at Chicago in 2019. Participants with obesity were randomized to 4 or 6 h TRE (n = 35) or a control (n = 14) group. Plasma biomarkers were measured by ELISA at baseline and week 8. In a sub-analysis, participants were stratified into higher- (>3.5%) and lower- (≤3.5%) weight-loss groups. Intervention: Participants fasted daily from 7 p.m. to 3 p.m. in the 4 h TRE group (20 h) and from 7 p.m. to 1 p.m. in the 6 h TRE group (18 h), followed by ad libitum eating for the remainder of the day. Controls received no dietary recommendations. Main outcome measures: IGF1, IGFBPs, hsCRP, and adipokines were the main outcome measures of this analysis. Statistical Analysis: Repeated measures ANOVA and mediation analysis were conducted. Results: Body weight significantly decreased with TRE (−3.6 ± 0.3%), contrasting with controls (+0.2 ± 0.5%, p < 0.001). Significant effects of TRE over time were observed on plasma IGFBP2, insulin, HOMA-IR, and 8-isoprostane levels, without affecting other biomarkers. In the sub-analysis, IGFBP2 increased while leptin and 8-isoprostane decreased significantly only in the “higher weight loss” subgroup. Changes in insulin and HOMA-IR were related to TRE adherence. Conclusions: Eight-week daily 4 to 6 h TRE did not affect IGF1, IGFBP1, or IGFBP3 levels but improved insulin, HOMA-IR, and 8-isoprostane. IGFBP2 increased and leptin decreased when weight loss exceeded 3.5% of baseline.

In this phase 2 trial, children and young adults with newly diagnosed overt type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive golimumab, a human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor α , or placebo. Golimumab resulted in better endogenous insulin production and less exogenous insulin use than placebo.

Abstract Context Childhood overnutrition is associated with increased growth and bone mineral density (BMD) vs the opposite for undernutrition. The role of insulin receptor (InsR) signaling in these phenotypes is unclear. Rare disease patients with hyperinsulinemia and impaired InsR function (homozygous [−/−] or heterozygous [+/−] INSR pathogenic variants, type B insulin resistance [TBIR]) model increased InsR signaling, while patients with intact InsR function (congenital generalized lipodystrophy, CGL) model decreased InsR signaling. Objective This work aimed to understand mechanisms whereby InsR signaling influences growth. Methods A cross-sectional comparison was conducted of CGL (N = 23), INSR−/− (N = 13), INSR+/− (N = 17), and TBIR (N = 8) at the National Institutes of Health. Main outcome measures included SD scores (SDS) for height, body mass index, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, and BMD, and IGF binding proteins (IGFBP)-1 and -3. Results INSR-/− vs CGL had higher insulin (median 266 [222-457] vs 33 [15-55] mcU/mL), higher IGFBP-1 (72 350 [55 571-103 107] vs 6453 [1634-26 674] pg/mL), lower BMI SDS (−0.7 ± 1.1 vs 0.5 ± 0.9), lower height SDS (−1.9[−4.3 to −1.3] vs 1.1 [0.5-2.5]), lower BMD SDS (−1.9 ± 1.4 vs 1.9 ± 0.7), and lower IGFBP-3 (0.37 [0.19-1.05] vs 2.00 [1.45-2.67] μg/mL) (P < .05 for all). INSR +/− were variable. Remission of TBIR lowered insulin and IGFBP-1, and increased IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 (P < .05). Conclusion Patients with hyperinsulinemia and impaired InsR function exhibit impaired growth and lower BMD, whereas elevated InsR signaling (CGL) causes accelerated growth and higher BMD. These patients demonstrate that insulin action through the InsR stimulates direct anabolic effects in bone and indirect actions through the growth hormone (GH)–IGF-1 axis. TBIR patients exhibit abnormalities in the GH axis that resolve when InsR signaling is restored, supporting a causal relationship between InsR and GH axis signaling.

Insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora) is a once-weekly basal insulin. This phase 3 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of efsitora compared with insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes. This randomised, 52-week, parallel-design, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority study conducted at 82 global health-care centres, randomly assigned (1:1) adults (ie, those aged ≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7·0–10·0% (53·0–85·8 mmol/mol) to efsitora (n=343) or, degludec (n=349), both in combination with insulin lispro. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week-26 (non-inferiority margin=0·4%). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05463744) and is completed. Between Aug 12, 2022, and May 7, 2024, of 893 participants enrolled, 692 (77%) participants were randomly assigned to once-weekly efsitora or once-daily degludec, and 623 (90%) participants completed the study. Mean HbA1c decreased from 7·88% (62·66 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7·41% (57·5 mmol/mol) at week 26 with efsitora and from 7·94% (63·3 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7·36% (56·9 mmol/mol) at week 26 with degludec. Mean HbA1c change from baseline to week 26 was –0·51% with efsitora and –0·56% with degludec (estimated treatment difference 0·052%, 95% CI –0·077 to 0·181; p=0·43), confirming a non-inferiority margin of 0·4% for efsitora compared with degludec. Rates of combined level 2 (<54 mg/dL [3·0 mmol/L]) or level 3 severe hypoglycaemia were higher with efsitora compared with degludec (14·03 vs 11·59 events per patient year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 1·21, 95% CI 1·04 to 1·41; p=0·016) during weeks 0–52, with the highest rates during weeks 0–12. Severe hypoglycaemia incidence was higher with efsitora (35 [10%] of 343) versus degludec (11 [3%] of 349) during weeks 0–52. Overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across treatment groups. One death not related to the study treatment occurred in the degludec group. In adults with type 1 diabetes, once-weekly efsitora showed non-inferior HbA1c reduction compared with daily insulin degludec. Higher rates of combined level 2 or level 3 hypoglycaemia and greater incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in participants treated with efsitora compared with participants treated with degludec might suggest the need for additional evaluation of efsitora dose initiation and optimisation in people with type 1 diabetes. Eli Lilly and Company.

ABSTRACT Objective: To review intermediate- and long-acting insulins with specific emphasis on the newer insulin analogs. Methods: A MEDLINE search, in English, was conducted with a cut-off of June 30, 2006, using the terms ‘NPH insulin’, ‘insulin analogs’, ‘insulin glargine’, ‘insulin detemir’ and ‘long-acting insulins’. All clinical trials from within the search period were included. Results: The insulin analogs, insulin glargine and insulin detemir, were introduced in an attempt to improve glycemic control among patients with diabetes, without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. This review indicates that both insulin analogs demonstrate better glycemic control than NPH insulin, based on measurements of HbA1c, fasting glucose and intra-subject variability in blood glucose. This was accomplished with similar or reduced risk of hypoglycemia. Also, insulin detemir appears to be associated with less body weight increase than NPH insulin or insulin glargine. Conclusion: The newer long-acting insulin analogs, insulin detemir and glargine, appear to provide better glycemic control than NPH insulin without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Obesity is heritable and predisposes to many diseases. To understand the genetic basis of obesity better, here we conduct a genome-wide association study and Metabochip meta-analysis of body mass index (BMI), a measure commonly used to define obesity and assess adiposity, in up to 339,224 individuals. This analysis identifies 97 BMI-associated loci ( P  < 5 × 10 −8 ), 56 of which are novel. Five loci demonstrate clear evidence of several independent association signals, and many loci have significant effects on other metabolic phenotypes. The 97 loci account for ∼2.7% of BMI variation, and genome-wide estimates suggest that common variation accounts for >20% of BMI variation. Pathway analyses provide strong support for a role of the central nervous system in obesity susceptibility and implicate new genes and pathways, including those related to synaptic function, glutamate signalling, insulin secretion/action, energy metabolism, lipid biology and adipogenesis. A genome-wide association study and Metabochip meta-analysis of body mass index (BMI) detects 97 BMI-associated loci, of which 56 were novel, and many loci have effects on other metabolic phenotypes; pathway analyses implicate the central nervous system in obesity susceptibility and new pathways such as those related to synaptic function, energy metabolism, lipid biology and adipogenesis. Genetic correlates of obesity In the second of two Articles in this issue from the GIANT Consortium, Elizabeth Speliotes and collegues conducted a genome-wide association study and Metabochip meta-analysis of body mass index (BMI), commonly used to define obesity and assess adiposity, to find 97 BMI-associated loci, of which 56 were novel. Many of these loci have significant effects on other metabolic phenotypes. The 97 loci account for about 2.7% of BMI variation, and genome-wide estimates suggest common variation accounts for more than 20% of BMI variation. Pathway analyses implicate the central nervous system in obesity susceptibility including synaptic function, glutamate signaling, insulin secretion/action, energy metabolism, lipid biology and adipogenesis.

OBJECTIVE: Traditional blood glucose-lowering agents do not sustain adequate glycemic control in most type 2 diabetic patients. Preclinical studies with exenatide have suggested sustained improvements in β-cell function. We investigated the effects of 52 weeks of treatment with exenatide or insulin glargine followed by an off-drug period on hyperglycemic clamp-derived measures of β-cell function, glycemic control, and body weight. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to exenatide (n = 36) or insulin glargine (n = 33). β-Cell function was measured during an arginine-stimulated hyperglycemic clamp at week 0, at week 52, and after a 4-week off-drug period. Additional end points included effects on glycemic control, body weight, and safety. RESULTS: Treatment-induced change in combined glucose- and arginine-stimulated C-peptide secretion was 2.46-fold (95% CI 2.09-2.90, P < 0.0001) greater after a 52-week exenatide treatment compared with insulin glargine treatment. Both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced A1C similarly: -0.8 ± 0.1 and -0.7 ± 0.2%, respectively (P = 0.55). Exenatide reduced body weight compared with insulin glargine (difference -4.6 kg, P < 0.0001). β-Cell function measures returned to pretreatment values in both groups after a 4-week off-drug period. A1C and body weight rose to pretreatment values 12 weeks after discontinuation of either exenatide or insulin glargine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide significantly improves β-cell function during 1 year of treatment compared with titrated insulin glargine. After cessation of both exenatide and insulin glargine therapy, β-cell function and glycemic control returned to pretreatment values, suggesting that ongoing treatment is necessary to maintain the beneficial effects of either therapy.