Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (L-ISR) and robotic intersphincteric resection (R-ISR) for low rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective clinical analysis between August 2018 and August 2021 at the Department Of General Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. Results: A total of 28 patients were recruited in this research. Among these patients, there were 12 patients who underwent L-ISR and assigned to L-ISR group, and the remaining 16 patients underwent R-ISR and assigned to R-ISR group. The time to start oral fluids, time to start soft diet and time to first motion in R-ISR group were earlier than those in L-ISR group (P < 0.05). The hospital stay in R-ISR group was shorter than that in L-ISR group (P < 0.05). However, the operation time of R-ISR was longer compared to L-ISR group (P < 0.05). Most important of all, the Kelly score in R-ISR group was 5.1 ± 0.9, which was higher than that in L-ISR group (P = 0.004). Conclusion: R-ISR is safe and feasible for patients with low rectal cancer. R-ISR is superior to L-ISR despite the operation time of R-ISR is longer. A randomised controlled trial will be performed to confirm the conclusion further.

BackgroundAnus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer has always been a serious difficulty for surgeons. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) are commonly used Anus-preserving surgeries for low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical use of two surgical methods.MethodsA total of 152 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with taTME in 75 cases and ISR in 77 cases. After propensity score matching, 46 patients in each group were included in the study. Perioperative outcomes, anal function scores (Wexner incontinence score) and quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ CR38) at least 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgical outcomes, pathological examination of surgical specimens, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications, except for patients in the taTME group who had their indwelling catheters removed later. Anal Wexner incontinence score was lower in taTME group than ISR group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, the physical function and role function scores in the ISR group were lower than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05), while the fatigue, pain symptoms, and constipation scores in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-CR38 scale, the scores of gastrointestinal symptoms and defecation problems in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05).ConclusionCompared with ISR surgery, taTME surgery is comparable in terms of surgical safety and short-term efficacy, and has better long-term anal function and quality of life. From the perspective of long-term anal function and quality of life, taTME surgery is a better surgical method for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

The surgical management of low-lying rectal cancer, within 5 cm from the anal verge (AV), is challenging due to the possibility, or not, to preserve the anus with its sphincter muscles maintaining oncological safety. The standardization of total mesorectal excision, the adoption of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the implementation of rectal magnetic resonance imaging, and the evolution of mechanical staplers have increased the rate of anus-preserving surgeries. Moreover, extensive anatomy and physiology studies have increased the understanding of the complexity of the deep pelvis. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) was introduced nearly three decades ago as the ultimate anus-preserving surgery. The definition and indication of ISR have changed over time. The adoption of the robotic platform provides excellent perioperative results with no differences in oncological outcomes. Pushing the boundaries of anus-preserving surgeries has risen doubts on oncological safety in order to preserve function. This review critically discusses the oncological safety of ISR by evaluating the anatomical characteristics of the deep pelvis, the clinical indications, the role of distal and circumferential resection margins, the role of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the outcomes between surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robotic), the comparison with abdominoperineal resection, the risk factors for oncological outcomes and local recurrence, the patterns of local recurrences after ISR, considerations on functional outcomes after ISR, and learning curve and surgical education on ISR.

Abstract Background Patients undergoing intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer often experience persistent bowel dysfunction, psychological distress, and compromised quality of life, especially in the context of preventive stoma creation. These challenges can negatively affect recovery, immune function, and long-term prognosis. Psychosocial interventions, such as narrative therapy and resilience training, may mitigate these effects, yet their integrated application in ISR populations remains unexplored. Methods In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 178 patients with stage I-III low rectal cancer who underwent ISR between October 2019 and October 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were randomized to receive either standard care or a structured 6-month intervention combining narrative therapy and resilience training. Primary outcomes included psychological resilience (CD-RISC), emotional well-being (HADS), sleep quality (PSQI), and nutritional recovery (serum albumin, prealbumin, BMI). Secondary endpoints encompassed postoperative complications, systemic inflammation (CRP, IL-6, TNF-α), and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Results The intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in psychological and nutritional parameters (all P < .01), fewer complications (12.4% vs. 23.6%, P = .035), and reduced inflammatory markers on postoperative day 7. At 24 months, both DFS (89.2% vs. 75.3%, P = .028) and OS (93.1% vs. 81.6%, P = .031) were significantly higher in the intervention group. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were assessed to support the interpretation of clinical relevance. Conclusion An integrated psychosocial intervention significantly enhanced functional recovery and long-term oncologic outcomes following ISR. These findings underscore the value of incorporating structured psychological support into postoperative care for low rectal cancer.

Total mesorectal excision (TME) with intersphincteric resection and handsewn coloanal anastomosis (ISR-CAA) has been shown to be oncologically safe in patients with distal rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation. The introduction of the watch-and-wait (WW) strategy for rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy is changing the profile of patients undergoing TME surgery immediately following neoadjuvant treatment. The outcomes of ISR-CAA for patients with locally advanced rectal cancers not qualifying for WW have not been investigated. We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing the outcomes of ISR-CAA and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in patients with distal rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy and not qualifying for WW, at a comprehensive cancer center with an established WW program. The primary outcome was local recurrence-free survival. Sixty-seven patients had ISR-CAA and 79 had APR. Median follow-up was 61.1 months. The two groups were similar in sex, tumor stage, grade, and distance from the anal verge, but patients in the APR group were older on average. An R0 resection was achieved in 94% of ISR-CAA patients and 91% of APR patients. Patients in the ISR-CAA group had a lower 5-year rate of local recurrence-free survival (79% vs. 93%; p = 0.038) compared with the APR group; however, 5-year disease-free survival did not differ significantly between groups (67% for ISR-CAA and 64% for APR; p = 0.19). The local recurrence rate after ISR-CAA may be higher than after APR for patients without a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy requiring TME surgery.

BackgroundFew investigations to date assessing the effectiveness of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) have included sufficient patients and follow-up period. This study assessed the utility and safety of robot-assisted ISR by comparing groups of patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) with or without ISR and ISR extent.MethodsThis study enrolled 897 patients who underwent curative LAR between 2010 and 2017. Patients were divided into those who did (ISR+) and did not (ISR−) undergo ISR, with the former group subdivided by ISR extent (partial, subtotal, and total). Tumor recurrence and survival were compared in the two groups by one-to-one nearest neighbor matching (218 patients each).ResultsRobot-assisted ISR was performed via an entirely transabdominal approach in 93% of patients who underwent LAR. The rate of circumferential margin positivity was ≤ 2% in all patients and did not differ in the ISR− and ISR+ groups or in the three ISR+ subgroups. Mean fecal incontinence score and manometric values deteriorated significantly during postoperative until 12–24 months (p < 0.05 to < 0.001), but recovered subsequently. The 5-year cumulative rates of local recurrence in the ISR+ and ISR− groups were 2.5% and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.731). The 5-year cumulative rates of overall (86.7% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.899) and disease-free (80.7% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.934) survival did not differ significantly in the ISR+ and ISR− groups.ConclusionsBecause ISR involves resection of low-lying tumors and complex pelvic dissection, robot-assisted ISR via a mostly transabdominal procedure may be technically more efficient, providing lasting anorectal function and good oncologic outcomes.

Background Da Vinci® Single Port (dvSP) was recently developed. Its application in colorectal surgery is under investigation. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of dvSP for intersphincteric (dvSP-ISR), right colectomy (dvSP-RC), and transverse colectomy (dvSP-TC). Surgical indication and short-term results were analyzed. Methods All consecutive patients from a prospective database of patients who underwent dvSP-ISR, dvSP-RC, and dvSP-TC at Korea University Anam Hospital from November 2020 to December 2021, were analyzed. Perioperative, pathological, and oncological short-term outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 7 dvSP-ISR, 5 dvSP-RC, and 1 dvSP-TC were performed. Median age was 56.0 (55.0–61.0) years for the dvSP-ISR and 54.0 (44.7–63.5) years for the dvSP-RC/TC. Median body mass index was 22.8 (17.1–24.8) kg/m 2 for the dvSP-ISR and 23.6 (20.8–26.9) kg/m 2 for the dvSP-RC/TC. All dvSP-ISR patients received neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy, including one patient with squamocellular carcinoma who was treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/mitomycin. All other patients, excluding one dvSP-RC patient with Crohn’s disease, had an adenocarcinoma. Median operation time was 280 (240–370) minutes for the dvSP-ISR and 220 (201–270) minutes for the dvSP-RC/TC. Estimated blood loss was insignificant. No intraoperative complications or conversions to multiport/open surgery was reported. Median post-operative stay was 7.0 (6.0–10.0) days for the dvSP-ISR and 5.0 (4.0–6.7) days for the dvSP-RC/TC. Quality of mesorectum was complete for six patients, and nearly complete for one. Median number of retrieved lymph nodes were 21 (17–25) for the dvSP-ISR and 28 (24–49) for the dvSP-RC/TC. Proximal and distal resection margins were tumor free. Four patients experienced post-operative complications not related to the platform which were: ileus, voiding dysfunction, infected pelvic hematoma, and wound infection. Median follow-up was 9 (6–11) months and 11 (7–17) months for the dvSP-ISR and dvSP-RC/TC, respectively. Two patients had systemic recurrence; all others were tumor free. Conclusions The dvSP platform is safe and feasible for intersphincteric resection with right lower quadrant access, and right/transverse colectomy with suprapubic access. Further studies are needed to evaluate benefit differences compared to multiport robotic platform.

Objectives This study aimed to compare the efficacy of local excision (LE) and intersphincteric resection (ISR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieved a significant or complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with stage ypT0-1ycN0 low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy who underwent LE or ISR between June 2016 and June 2021. Baseline characteristics, short-term outcomes, long-term oncological outcomes, and functional outcomes, were compared between the two groups. To reduce the selection bias, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. Results This study included 106 patients (LE group: n  = 51, ISR group: n  = 55). There were significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups ( P  < 0.05). After IPTW, there were almost no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. The LE group showed less postoperative complications and better function outcomes compared to the ISR group. The LE group had significantly lower rates of complications (13.7% vs. 36.4%, P  = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of long-term oncological outcomes. Conclusions For patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer achieving significant or complete pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy, both LE and ISR present comparable oncological outcomes. Yet, LE seems to show more advantages in terms of postoperative complications and functional outcomes. These findings offer important insights for surgical decision-making, emphasizing the necessity to consider both oncological and functional outcomes in selecting the optimal surgical approach.

BackgroundThe role of intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green in reducing anastomotic leakage (AL) has been demonstrated in colorectal surgery, however, its perfusion assessment mode, and efficacy in reducing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LsISR) need to be further elucidated.AimAim was to study near-infrared fluorescent angiography to help identify bowel ischemia to reduce AL after LsISR.Material and methodsA retrospective case-matched study was conducted in one referral center. A total of 556 consecutive patients with ultra-low rectal cancer including 140 patients with fluorescence angiography of epiploic appendages (FAEA)were enrolled. Perfusion assessment by FAEA in the monochrome fluorescence mode. Patients were divided into two groups based on perfusion assessment by FAEA. The primary endpoint was the AL rate within 6 months, and the secondary endpoint was the structural sequelae of anastomotic leakage (SSAL).ResultsAfter matching, the study group (n = 109) and control group (n = 190) were well-balanced. The AL rate in the FAEA group was lower before (3.6% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.026) and after matching (3.7% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.036). Propensity scores matching analysis (OR 0.275, 95% CI 0.035–0.937, P 0.039), inverse probability of treatment weighting (OR 0.814, 95% CI 0.765–0.921, P 0.002), and regression analysis (OR 0.298, 95% CI 0.112–0.790, P = 0.015), showed that FAEA was an independent protector factor for AL. This technique can significantly shorten postoperative hospital stay [9 (6–13) vs. 10 (8–13), P = 0.024] and reduce the risk of SSAL (1.4% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.029).ConclusionsPerfusion assessment by FAEA can achieve better visualization in LsISR and reduce the incidence of AL, subsequently avoiding SSAL after LsISR.

Purpose This study aimed to compare the oncological and functional outcomes following intersphincteric resection (ISR) with transverse coloplasty pouch (TCP) or straight coloanal anastomosis (SCAA) for low rectal cancer. Methods A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on patients with low rectal cancer who received ISR between January 2016 and June 2021. The primary endpoint was to compare the outcomes of bowel function within 1 year, 1 to 2 years, and 2 years after ileostomy closure in patients undergoing two different bowel reconstruction procedures (TCP or SCAA). The postoperative complications and oncological results were also compared between the two groups. Results A total of 235 patients were enrolled in this study (SCAA group: 166; TCP group: 69). There was no significant difference in complications, including grades A–C anastomotic leakage (9.6% vs 15.9%), 3-year local recurrence rates (6.1% vs 3.9%), disease-free survival (82.4%vs 83.8%), or overall survival (94.1% vs 94.7%) between the two groups. Two years after ileostomy closure, 52.7% of patients in the SCAA group were assessed as having major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which was significantly higher than the 25.9% of patients in the TCP group ( P = 0.014), but no difference was found prior to 2 years. Similar differences were seen in Wexner scores 2 years after surgery ( P = 0.032). Additionally, TCP was an independent protective factor for postoperative bowel function as measured by both the LARS (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10–0.82; p = 0.020) and Wexner scoring (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09–0.84; p = 0.023). Conclusion This study suggests that TCP is a safe technique that may decrease bowel dysfunction after ISR for low rectal cancer compared with SCAA 2 years after ileostomy closure.