Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective To investigate whether surgery by open reduction and internal fixation provides benefit compared with non-operative treatment for displaced, intra-articular calcaneal fractures.Design Pragmatic, multicentre, two arm, parallel group, assessor blinded randomised controlled trial (UK Heel Fracture Trial).Setting 22 tertiary referral hospitals, United Kingdom.Participants 151 patients with acute displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures randomly allocated to operative (n=73) or non-operative (n=78) treatment.Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was patient reported Kerr-Atkins score for pain and function (scale 0-100, 100 being the best possible score) at two years after injury. Secondary outcomes were complications; hindfoot pain and function (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score); general health (SF-36); quality of life (EQ-5D); clinical examination; walking speed; and gait symmetry. Analysis was by intention to treat.Results 95% follow-up was achieved for the primary outcome (69 in operative group and 74 in non-operative group), and a complete set of secondary outcomes were available for 75% of participants. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome (mean Kerr-Atkins score 69.8 in operative group v 65.7 in non-operative group; adjusted 95% confidence interval of difference −7.1 to 7.0) or in any of the secondary outcomes between treatment groups. Complications and reoperations were more common in those who received operative care (estimated odds ratio 7.5, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 41.8).Conclusions Operative treatment compared with non-operative care showed no symptomatic or functional advantage after two years in patients with typical displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus, and the risk of complications was higher after surgery. Based on these findings, operative treatment by open reduction and internal fixation is not recommended for these fractures.Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN37188541.

The number of surgical procedures for distal radius fractures in the elderly has increased, even though most studies show little or no benefit over cast treatment. While medical costs of surgical treatment are higher than those of cast treatment, surgery may enable faster recovery and help patients maintain independence, potentially reducing their use of other healthcare resources and informal care. We evaluated whether cast treatment is cost-effective compared to surgery for patients aged 65 years or older with substantially displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. A multicentre randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with an economic evaluation in 19 hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants completed (cost) questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after trauma. A total of 138 patients were randomized between cast treatment and surgery. Health-related quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-3L; wrist function was measured with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Costs were assessed from a societal perspective, including intervention costs, healthcare use, informal care, unpaid productivity losses, and patients' own expenses. The estimated difference in total societal costs was -€81 (95%CI -€3936 to €3773) in favour of cast treatment compared with surgical treatment. Compared with cast treatment, surgery resulted in improved wrist function (PRWE: -5.5; 95% CI: -10 to -0.7) and slightly higher QALYs (+0.039; 95%CI 0.012 to 0.066), equivalent to 14 days in perfect health. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €15 per point improvement in PRWE and €2070 per QALY gained. Cast treatment's probability of cost-effectiveness was low for all values of willingness to pay. Although cast treatment had lower direct costs, these were offset by higher informal and secondary care costs. Surgical treatment offered clinically relevant short-term benefits. From a societal perspective, surgery appears to be the more favorable option for elderly patients with displaced distal radius fractures.

Background Calcaneal fractures are the most common tarsal fractures and often result in long-term disability. Although various treatment options exist, but the relationship between Essex-Lopresti subtypes, treatment methods, and dynamic functional recovery remains unclear. Methods This retrospective study included 66 patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures, treated between 2011 and 2021. Fractures were categorized according to the Essex-Lopresti classification (1 A–1 C, 2 A–2 C) and managed by conservative treatment, Steinmann pin fixation, or plate fixation. Functional outcomes were assessed, using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, radiographic parameters (Böhler and Gissane angles), and pedographic gait analysis with the Win-Track platform. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn–Bonferroni post-hoc analyses, Mann–Whitney U or independent-samples t-tests as appropriate, chi-square (or Fisher’s exact) tests for categorical variables, and Spearman’s rho for correlation. Results Functional outcomes varied across subtypes and treatment methods. Across subtypes, the distribution of AOFAS categories did not differ significantly (χ², p  = 0.587). Type 2 A fractures treated with Steinmann pin fixation demonstrated the highest AOFAS scores (80.4 ± 10.2; p  = 0.587). Böhler’s angle was numerically higher in the conservative group (17.0 ± 11.4°) but did not correlate with AOFAS scores (ρ = 0.01, p  = 0.94). Pedographic analysis showed that maximum plantar pressure was highest in the conservative group (1625 ± 142 kPa) and lowest in the plate fixation group (1437 ± 188 kPa; overall p  = 0.033). Gait asymmetries—particularly prolonged swing and stride duration tended to be greater in the Type 2B and 2 C subgroups, although statistical significance was limited (( p  = 0.195–0.795)). Conclusion Essex-Lopresti subtypes strongly influence clinical and gait outcomes following calcaneal fractures. Steinmann pin fixation is advantageous in Type 2 A fractures, while Type 2B fractures consistently show poor recovery. Radiographic angles alone are insufficient predictors of long-term outcomes, emphasizing the importance of integrating gait analysis with clinical scoring. Subtype-specific approaches may optimize treatment strategies and patient care. IRB number Ethics Committee of Fırat University (2022/04–04).

Background To evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes, as well as the treatment costs, of closed displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plates or nonoperative treatment with plaster cast immobilisation. Materials and methods A total of 60 patients (32 receiving ORIF, 28 receiving nonoperative treatment) with closed intra-articular distal radius fractures were included. The mean age was 52.1 and 57.4, respectively. Functional and radiographic assessments were carried out at 12 months post-injury. Patients’ treatment costs, median salaries and lengths of medical leave were obtained. Results DASH and MAYO wrist score in the ORIF group did not differ significantly from those in the nonoperative group. Apart from superior ulnar deviation in the ORIF group ( p  = 0.0096), differences in the range of motion of the injured wrists were not significant. Similarly, there were no significant differences in grip strength and visual analog scale for pain. Volar tilt ( p  = 0.0399), radial height ( p  = 0.0087), radial inclination ( p  = 0.0051) and articular step-off ( p  = 0.0002) were all significantly superior in the ORIF group. There was a 37-fold difference in mean treatment costs between ORIF (SGD 7951.23) and nonoperative treatment (SGD 230.52). Conclusion Our study shows no difference in overall functional outcomes at 12 months for closed displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either ORIF with volar locking plates or plaster cast immobilisation, and this is independent of radiographic outcome. A longer follow-up, nevertheless, is needed to determine whether the development of post-traumatic arthritis will have an effect on function. The vast difference in treatment costs should be taken into consideration when deciding on the treatment option. Level of evidence Level 3.

Stability is a key issue in treating supination-external rotation ankle fractures, but we do not know how it affects functional outcome and subsequent development of radiographic osteoarthritis. With a systematic literature review, we identified 11 clinical studies (Level IV evidence) published in peer-reviewed journals reporting on at least 10 ankles. Followup was at least 1 year. Two authors independently scored the quality of the studies using the modified Coleman Methodology Score; the mean score was 58 of 100, with substantial agreement between the two examiners. Four studies used a general health assessment questionnaire. Several literature limitations (debatable fracture stability criteria, few cohort studies with heterogeneous methodology, small patient numbers and limited followup in some studies) do not allow definitive conclusions. Of 213 stable fractures treated nonoperatively, 2.8% of ankles had radiographic osteoarthritis develop (18 years’ mean followup) and 84% were free of symptoms. The incidence of radiographic osteoarthritis in 420 unstable fractures treated operatively was 20.9% at 5.5 years versus 65.5% at 6.8 years in 137 ankles treated nonoperatively. The complication rate in 355 operatively treated fractures was 10.4%. A medial malleolus fracture, female gender, older age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, smoking, and lower educational level negatively influenced general health outcome, physical function, and pain. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BackgroundPost-traumatic stiffness after open reduction and internal fixation of fractures about the knee can have dramatic effects on function. Traditionally, open quadricepsplasty has been the treatment of choice, but is associated with significant morbidity.PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the immediate and sustainable range of motion (ROM) changes after surgical arthroscopic lysis of knee adhesions (SALKA) for post-traumatic knee stiffness after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients at a single institution who underwent SALKA for knee stiffness after intra-articular fractures about the knee treated with ORIF from 2009 to 2015. Pre-operative and immediate post-operative total ROM was assessed while patients were sedated during the SALKA procedure. Total ROM was assessed in the office pre-operatively and compared to the latest post-operative follow-up visit. Immediate post-operative ROM was also compared to the latest post-operative follow-up visit. Two-tailed paired Student’s t test was calculated for analysis.ResultsOf the 14 patients included in the study, 10 (71 %) had tibial plateau ORIF, 3 (21 %) had patella ORIF, and 1 (8 %) had intra-articular distal femur ORIF. The mean time between ORIF and SALKA was 244 days. The mean follow-up time after SALKA was 135 days. Under sedation during SALKA, the mean total ROM increased from 72° to 127° immediately post-operatively (p < 0.01). The mean pre-operative in-office total ROM was 73° and increased to 104° at the latest follow-up visit (p < 0.01). The mean immediate post-operative ROM was 127° and decreased to 104° at the latest follow-up visit (p = 0.01).ConclusionLysis of adhesions utilizing SALKA after ORIF about the knee improves knee ROM immediately post-operatively and in the short-term follow-up. However, there is a decrease in the gains in the range of motion over time. Patients should be counseled as such. Lysis of adhesions utilizing arthroscopic techniques may provide a favorable alternative to open quadricepsplasty.

The effects of bone graft materials on the inflammatory response and biochemical markers of bone remodeling were studied on a rabbit model of fracture augmentation with the following grafts: β-tricalcium phosphate, demineralized bone matrix, nanostructured carbon implant, and porous titanium implant made by additive 3D printing. The markers of bone remodeling and the blood system response in the postoperative period were studied. It was found that porous titanium implant and β-tricalcium phosphate induced osteogenesis and minimized osteoclastic resorption. Augmentation with nanostructured carbon implant and demineralized bone matrix stimulated the processes of osteoclastic resorption.

Background Treatment of distal radius fractures in patients of a younger than osteoporotic age is complex, because they often are the result of a high-energy trauma and have intra-articular fractures and associated injuries. As yet no fracture classification exists that predicts outcome. Our aim was to find the earliest possible prognostic factor by testing which radiological parameter on the trauma radiograph would have the greatest impact on clinical outcome in a younger than osteoporotic age group. Methods We assessed 66 patients (34 F) with unilateral fractures of the distal radius from a non-Osteoporotic age group. The median age was 42 years, (10 th -90 th percentile 20–54). Pre-reduction antero-posterior and lateral wrist radiographs were obtained and fracture pattern, radiocarpal joint surface tilt, radial length, radial inclination and ulnar variance were measured. Clinical outcome was assessed with the subjective part as well as the complete modified Gartland and Werley score. Multivariate analysis of those parameters was performed to assess which radiological parameter would best predict outcome. Results It was found that post-traumatic ulna + (>2 mm) was the single factor that significantly correlated with a bad outcome. An intra-articular fracture pattern may also be a strong marker; however this was not statistically significant (RR 95% conf interval 0.94 – 20.59). Conclusions The present study showed that post-traumatic ulna + is the most important factor in predicting bad outcome in non-osteoporotic patients, but that especially intra-articular fractures and to a lesser extent dorsal tilt may be of importance too.