Explore the vast range of titles available.

Sometimes by accident and sometimes on purpose, humans have transported plants and animals to new habitats around the world. Arriving in ever-increasing numbers to American soil, recent invaders have competed with, preyed on, hybridized with, and carried diseases to native species, transforming our ecosystems and creating anxiety among environmentalists and the general public. But is American anxiety over this crisis of ecological identity a recent phenomenon? Charting shifting attitudes to alien species since the 1850s, Peter Coates brings to light the rich cultural and historical aspects of this story by situating the history of immigrant flora and fauna within the wider context of human immigration. Through an illuminating series of particular invasions, including the English sparrow and the eucalyptus tree, what he finds is that we have always perceived plants and animals in relation to ourselves and the polities to which we belong. Setting the saga of human relations with the environment in the broad context of scientific, social, and cultural history, this thought-provoking book demonstrates how profoundly notions of nationality and debates over race and immigration have shaped American understandings of the natural world.

\"Sometimes by accident and sometimes on purpose, humans have transported plants and animals to new habitats around the world. Arriving in ever-increasing numbers to American soil, recent invaders have competed with, preyed on, hybridized with, and carried diseases to native species, transforming our ecosystems and creating anxiety among environmentalists and the general public. But is American anxiety over this crisis of ecological identity a recent phenomenon? Charting shifting attitudes to alien species since the 1850s, Peter Coates brings to light the rich cultural and historical aspects of this story by situating the history of immigrant flora and fauna within the wider context of human immigration. Through an illuminating series of particular invasions, including the English sparrow and the eucalyptus tree, what he finds is that we have always perceived plants and animals in relation to ourselves and the polities to which we belong. Setting the saga of human relations with the environment in the broad context of scientific, social, and cultural history, this thought-provoking book demonstrates how profoundly notions of nationality and debates over race and immigration have shaped American understandings of the natural world.\"--Jacket.

Strategies for managing biological invasions are often based on the premise that characteristics of invading species and the invaded environment are key predictors of the invader’s distribution. Yet, for either biological traits or environmental characteristics to explain distribution, adequate time must have elapsed for species to spread to all potential habitats. We compiled and analyzed a database of natural history and ecological traits of 138 coastal marine invertebrate species, the environmental conditions at sites to which they have been introduced and their date of first introduction. We found that time since introduction explained the largest fraction (20%) of the variability in non-native range size, while traits of the species and environmental variables had significant, but minimal, influence on non-native range size. The positive relationship between time since introduction and range size indicates that non-native marine invertebrate species are not at equilibrium and are still spreading, posing a major challenge for management of coastal ecosystems.

Aim We examine the regional dominance of California as a beachhead for marine biological invasions in western North America and assess the relative contribution of different transfer mechanisms to invasions over time. Location Western North America (California to Alaska, excluding Mexico). Methods We undertook extensive analysis of literature and collections records to characterize the invasion history of non-native species (invertebrates, microalgae and microorganisms) with established populations in coastal marine (tidal) waters of western North America through 2006. Using these data, we estimated (1) the proportion of first regional records of non-native species that occurred in California and (2) the relative contribution of transfer mechanisms to California invasions (or vector strength) over time. Results Excluding vascular plants and vertebrates, we identified 290 non-native marine species with established populations in western North America, and 79% had first regional records from California. Many (40-64%) of the non-native species in adjacent states and provinces were first reported in California, suggesting northward spread. California also drives the increasing regional rate of detected invasions. Of 257 non-native species established in California, 59% had first regional records in San Francisco Bay; 57% are known from multiple estuaries, suggesting secondary spread; and a majority were attributed to vessels (ballast water or hull fouling) or oysters, in some combination, but their relative contributions are not clear. For California, more than one vector was possible for 56% of species, and the potential contribution of ballast water, hull fouling and live trade increased over time, unlike other vectors. Main conclusions California, especially San Francisco Bay, plays a pivotal role for marine invasion dynamics for western North America, providing an entry point from which many species spread. This pattern is associated historically with high propagule supply and salinity. Any effective strategies to minimize new invasions throughout this region must (1) focus attention on California and (2) address current uncertainty and future shifts in vector strength.

Habitat heterogeneity is considered an important mechanism influencing diversity patterns in spatially structured habitats. However, spatial heterogeneity is not static and it can change along temporal scales. These changes, whether gradual or rapid, have the potential of forcing species extinctions or facilitating the introduction of nonnative species. Here, we present modeling results that show how changes in spatial heterogeneity over several generations can produce strong changes in benthic species composition residing in eastern Long Island Sound, USA. For many benthic species, hard substrate is a limiting resource which can vary in availability among different coastal areas. We modeled gradual changes from a heterogeneous landscape (mimicking patches of natural hard and soft substrate) to a homogenous one (analogous to a fully developed coast with hard, manmade substrate) and followed the abundance and distribution patterns of species possessing four different life histories. We also modeled changes from homogeneous to heterogeneous landscapes. We found that as regions become more homogeneous, species extinctions become more frequent and poor dispersers dominate locally. In contrast, as habitats become more heterogeneous, species distributing across localities leads to regional species coexistence and fewer extinctions. These results suggest that focusing on changing habitat heterogeneity can be a useful management strategy to prevent poor dispersing species, such as invasive ascidians, from driving communities to monocultures.

Ecological factors such as host density are important predictors of disease incidence. But another key determinant may be the evolutionary history and relatedness of the host community. See Letter p.542 Rare species' disease risk One advantage that rare species have in a community is that they may suffer less from disease — and pathogen pressure increases as a host species becomes more abundant. In a study of a Californian grassland habitat, Ingrid Parker et al . demonstrate that the structure of the whole community also influences exposure to disease. They show that plants suffer more disease when they have evolutionarily close species around them, reflecting the fact that many pathogens can attack several species, and as they move from host to host they tend to favour species that are closely related. The authors develop a model to predict the incidence of disease in different species of plants in natural communities, and successfully predict the degree of disease pressure on newly introduced plant species. They also show that this phylogenetically distant species advantage might contribute to the invasiveness of introduced species.

The introduction of nonnative biological control agents into a new region is one of the several approaches to managing the deleterious effects of nonnative invasive species. Predicting outcomes of such introductions has proven difficult. The US National Invasive Species Management Plan (2001) calls for better screening methods for intentional introductions, including nonnative biological control agents for animal pests. To address this challenge, I searched current and historical literature to develop a database of 13 life history traits and 8 descriptive variables for 87 nonnative insect biological control species in the continental United States. Models for predicting success in controlling a target species and likelihood of nontarget effects (documented cases of attacks on native hosts, prey, or natural enemies) were developed using logistic regression. The most important life history traits for predicting success included host specificity, whether the agent was a predator or parasitoid, and number of generations per year. There was no information about nontarget effects in 50 of 87 cases. Traits important for predicting nontarget effects included sex ratio of progeny and the documented presence of native natural enemies. This quantitative approach, derived from a meta-analysis of historical data, can be useful in developing guidelines for intentional introductions and predicting ecological outcomes of a broader range of nonnative species in new environments.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Lathyrus latifolius (everlasting pea) is a perennial vine native to Europe. Naturalized populations of L. latifolius occur in fields and on roadsides over large areas of the United States. Widely cultivated as a garden flower, L. latifolius produces abundant racemes of showy flowers that are bumblebee-pollinated. The seeds are heavy, large, and round, and exhibit no specialized means of dispersal. Allozyme diversity and population structure were determined for 32 populations of L. latifolius--30 from the southeastern United States and two from Oregon. Results from 21 allozyme loci indicate that genetic diversity is higher and population divergence is lower than expected based on the life history characteristics of the species. No association was found between genetic identity statistics and geographic distance between populations. Although the range in genetic diversity statistics among populations was unusually large, genetic drift did not appear to play a major role in structuring genetic variation. We conclude that the level of genetic diversity maintained within L. latifolius populations, and the level of population divergence found, is strongly influenced by its status as a cultivated garden flower and its human-associated mode of gene flow via seed dispersal